BRIEF INTRODUCTION TO - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 28
About This Presentation
Title:

BRIEF INTRODUCTION TO

Description:

Title: PowerPoint Presentation Author: James T. Peterson Last modified by: Peterson, James Created Date: 2/19/2001 7:26:41 PM Document presentation format – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:22
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 29
Provided by: Jam115
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: BRIEF INTRODUCTION TO


1
BRIEF INTRODUCTION TO CLOSED CAPTURE-RECAPTURE
METHODS
2
Workshop objectives
  • Basic understanding of capture-recapture
  • Estimators
  • Sample designs
  • Uses and assumptions

3
Detectabilityand abundance estimation
N true abundance C catch p probability of
capture E(C) pN
4
Incomplete capture Inference
Inferences about N require inferences about p
5
Estimating abundance with capture probability
known 0.5 (or 50)
  • If you ignore p then C 2 is biased
  • Usually we have to collect other data to estimate
    p!

6
Closed Population Estimation
  • Parameters
  • Abundance
  • Capture probability
  • Population closed
  • No gains or losses in the study area
  • Replicate samples used to estimate N, p

7
Commonly Used EstimatorsLincoln-Petersen/Schnabe
l/etc.
  • Design
  • Animals caught
  • Unmarked animals in sample given (or have)
    unique marks
  • Marks on any marked animals recorded
  • Release marked animals into population
  • Resample at subsequent occasions
  • Minimum two sampling periods (capture and
    recapture)
  • (Ideally) a relatively short interval between
    periods
  • Not during migration, harvest period, other
    period with
  • significant gains, losses, movement
  • Must be long enough to generate recaptures

8
Closed Population Estimators
  • Key Assumptions
  • Population is closed
  • (no birth/death/immigration/emigration)
  • Animal captures are independent
  • All animals are available for capture
  • Marks are not lost or overlooked
  • L-P and Schnabel
  • assume equal p (never ever possible)
  • Probability of recapture not affected by previous
    capture

9
Violations of Assumptions
  • Closure violation
  • Mortality or emigration during sampling
  • Unbiased estimate of N at first sample time
  • Immigration or birth
  • Unbiased estimate of N at last sample
    time
  • Both
  • Valid inferences not possible

10
Violations of Assumptions
All animals are not available for capture -
underestimate N - overestimate p
11
Violations of Assumptions
  • Equal capture probability (when assumed)
  • Differences (heterogeneity) among individuals
  • Underestimate abundance
  • Trap response trap-shy
  • Overestimate N
  • Underestimate p
  • Trap happy
  • Underestimate N
  • Overestimate p

12
Potential Violations of Assumptions
  • Tag loss
  • Lost between sampling periods
  • Underestimate p
  • Overestimate N
  • Overlooked or incorrectly recorded
  • Underestimate p
  • Overestimate N
  • Effect can be eliminated or minimized by
    double-tagging

13
Variance of abundance estimate
Depends on Variance in true N Capture
probability Variance in estimated p Affected by
sample size Sample size Number of marked
animals Number of capture occasions
14
Rule of thumb
  • Number of animals captured each occasion (C)
    determines precision of estimates of N
  • If capture probabilities low or true abundance
    low
  • More effort in fewer occasions
  • Increases occasion specific p
  • Increases C

15
Closed population estimators
  • Definitions
  • pt probability of first capture sampling
    occasion t
  • ct probability of recapture sampling occasion
    t1 (dont confuse with big C)
  • N population size
  • Note there are t-1 estimates possible for c

16
Closed population estimators
  • Definitions
  • If there is no effect of first capture on
    recapture probability
  • - no trap happy
  • - no trap shy, etc.
  • pt1 ct

17
Capture (encounter) histories
  • H1 101
  • Verbal description individual was captured on
    first and third sample occasion, not captured on
    second occasion
  • Mathematical depiction
  • P(H1 101) p1(1-c1)c2

18
Capture (encounter) histories
  • H1 111
  • Verbal description individual was captured on
    all three occasions
  • Mathematical depiction
  • P(H1 111) p1c1c2

19
Capture (encounter) histories
  • H1 001
  • Verbal description individual was captured on
    first and third sample occasion, not captured on
    second occasion
  • Mathematical depiction
  • P(H1 001) (1-p1)(1-p2)p3

20
Capture (encounter) histories
100 p1(1-c1)(1-c2)
010 (1-p1)p2(1-c2)
001 (1-p1)(1-p2)p3
110 p1c1(1-c2)
101 p1(1-c1)c2
011 (1-p1)p2c2
111 p1c1c2
21
Capture (encounter) histories
H Capture and recapture equal differ in time Capture and recapture equal across time
100 p1(1-c1)(1-c2) p1(1-p2)(1-p3) p(1-p)2
010 (1-p1)p2(1-c2) (1-p1)p2(1-p3) (1-p)p(1-p) or p(1-p)2
001 (1-p1)(1-p2)p3 (1-p1)(1-p2)p3 (1-p)2 p
110 p1c1(1-c2) p1p2(1-p3) p2(1-p)
101 p1(1-c1)c2 p1(1-p2)p3 p(1-p)p or p2(1-p)
011 (1-p1)p2c2 (1-p1)p2p3 (1-p)p2
111 p1c1c2 p1p2p3 p3
22
Huggins version of CR estimator
  •  

23
Why Covariates?
Capture probability known to be related
to species, body size, habitat
characteristics More efficient means of
accounting for heterogeneity e.g., assume p
varies through time (5 time periods) due to
differences in stream discharge Number of
parameters time varying model 5 Number
parameters p in f(discharge) 2 Effects model
selection AIC -2LogL 2K Danger of over
parameterization (more parameters than data)
24
Frequently encountered problem
  • I dont have enough marked and/or recaptured
    individuals
  • Make sure closure assumption not violated
  • Include data from other years/locations to
  • estimate p for poor recapture year (Huggins)
  • Bayesian hierarchical approaches

p?
p1
p2
25
Frequently encountered problem
Lake Sturgeon in Muskegon River, MI
Year Year
Catch Statistic 1 2 3 4

Total Gill Net Hours 3030 2250 1247 1852
Total marked adults 13 10 8 15
Recaptured adults 8 5 1 2
Schnabel Estimate (95 CL) each year seperate 24 (12-74) 15 (9-45) --- ---
Estimate (95 CL) modeled together f(soak time, size) 22 (16-45) 16 (12-37) 45 (14-247) 18 (16-39)
26
Double Sampling
Disadvantages of capture recapture approaches
Can be labor/time intensive!!
But.double sampling can reduce effort
Capture recapture
Normal sampling
Estimate p and adjust data
27
Mark-resight(will not cover in this course)
  • Estimate population size
  • Resighting marked and unmarked individuals
  • Requires known number of marks
  • But version available if marks unknown (not
    recommended)
  • Used terrestrial applications but potential fish
    uses
  • snorkeling if marks detectable
  • weir or trap where unmarked fish returned
    unmarked
  • Marks
  • Batch marked
  • Individually identifiable
  • Open and closed versions

28
BREAK! then ON TO MARK
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com