Joint Modeling of the Multipath Radio Channel and User-Access Method - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Joint Modeling of the Multipath Radio Channel and User-Access Method

Description:

Laroia, Flash-OFDMTM Mobile Wireless ... to the multipath propagation and small scale fading ... future mobile communication systems ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:69
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 28
Provided by: tdl4
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Joint Modeling of the Multipath Radio Channel and User-Access Method


1
Joint Modeling of the Multipath Radio Channel and
User-Access Method
Zs. A. Polgar1), V. Bota1), M. Varga1), A.
Gameiro2)
1) Communications Department Technical University
of Cluj-Napoca, Romania 2)Electronics
Telecommunications Department University of
Aveiro, Portugal
2
Outline
  • Mathematical modeling of the multipath Rayleigh
    faded radio channel.
  • OFDMA type multiple access techniques short
    presentation.
  • Theoretical computation of the received SINR
    p.d.f. for a specific OFDMA multiple access
    technique.
  • Evaluation of the received SINR p.d.f. in the
    considered OFDMA multiple access based on
    measured/simulated data.
  • Markov chain modeling of the channel SINR states
    in the considered OFDMA multiple access scheme.
  • Further studies and developments.

3
Mathematical modeling of the multipath Rayleigh
faded radio channel.
  • evaluation of the data transmission performances
    on a radio channel affected by frequency and time
    selectivity, requires the derivation of the
    channel state p.d.f., i.e. the p.d.f. of the
    instantaneous total SINR (total SINR background
    SNR SIR).
  • the stated problem is a difficult one and pure
    analytical solutions are possible only for some
    special cases, e.g. the case of a radio channel
    characterized by multipath propagation with
    uniform power delay profile and Rayleigh fading
    Alouini - 3
  • in this particular case the global SINR of the
    channel will be characterized by a ?
    distribution, while the SINR on each propagation
    path is characterized by an exponential
    distribution.
  • another possible mathematical characterization of
    the entire transmission chain, very useful
    especially for packet based transmissions, can be
    made with Markov chains
  • beside the probability distribution of the
    average received SINR, it allows the computation
    of instantaneous SINR for small time intervals.

4
Mathematical modeling of the multipath Rayleigh
faded radio channel.
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
Fig. 1 Multipath Rayleigh faded radio channel
model
(7)
5
Mathematical modeling of the multipath Rayleigh
faded radio channel.
  • Possible solutions proposed in literature
  • An infinite series for the computation of the
    c.d.f. and p.d.f. of sums of random variables
    (particular case of Rayleigh variables) Beaulieu
    - 14
  • A number of several thousands of terms are
    required to obtain a good approximation of the
    p.d.f. of sums of random variables.
  • It considers only the sum of real random
    variables the phase variations induced by
    multipath propagation and random phase variations
    induced by the small scale fading are not
    considered.
  • Computation of the p.d.f of sums of random
    vectors, with identically and arbitrarily
    distributed lengths and uniformly distributed
    phases Abdi - 13
  • Integration of the multipath propagation
    situation is required (phase distributed
    uniformly but with imposed mean value) .
  • The p.d.f. obtained can be expressed as a
    definite integral including Bessel functions
    the obtained p.d.f. of the vector length can be
    expressed by Hankel transform H0a, where J0 is
    the zero order Bessel fct and Exy is the
    expectation of the combined vector
  • The previous p.d.f. can be decomposed as a a
    series of Laguere polynomial, easier to compute
    than the definite integral.

(8)
6
Mathematical modeling of the multipath Rayleigh
faded radio channel.
  • Closed-form upper-bound for the distribution of
    the weighted sum of Rayleigh variates
    Karagiannidis - 16
  • An upper-bound is defined for the sum of Rayleigh
    distributed variables.
  • The phase variations due to the multipath
    propagation and small scale fading are not
    considered.
  • The proposed upper-bound relies on G Meijers
    functions very difficult to compute in the
    general case.
  • Computing the distribution of sums of random sine
    waves and of Rayleigh-distributed random
    variables by saddle-point integration Helstrom -
    13
  • The c.d.f. of a sum of independent random
    variables can be computed according to the
    following integral on a curve, where h(z) is the
    moment generating function of the v variable
  • Saddle point integration is proposed to compute
    the previous integral the saddle point which has
    to be found as well the moment generating
    function.
  • Random phases and Rayleigh distributed amplitudes
    are considered separately.
  • Conclusion no simple closed form solutions are
    available for the
  • stated problem.

(9)
7
Mathematical modeling of the multipath Rayleigh
faded radio channel.
  • The proposed solution
  • It considers a multipath channel with N
    propagation paths characterized by gains ai and
    delays ?i (i - index of the path). The level on
    each path is xiA?ai, where A is the amplitude of
    a test sine with frequency fl the level
    distribution on the propagation paths is given by
    distributions pi(x).
  • The probability to obtain a level r at the output
    of the channel, if the phase distributions are
    not considered, is given by
  • (10)
  • (11)
  • (12)
  • The function Ql(r,x1,x2,xN-1, ?1,?2,, ?N-1),
    expresses the occurrence probability of a level
    xN on the last path, N, that would make the value
    of the entire
  • received signal equal r, when the signals on the
    other N-1 paths have levels x1 xN-1

8
Mathematical modeling of the multipath Rayleigh
faded radio channel.
  • The channel instantaneous SINR on frequency fl
    can be obtained by dividing the received signal
    power level on the considered frequency to the
    noise interferences power at receivers input.
  • Since the noise power is constant for a short
    time interval and over a small frequency
    bandwidth, we may assume that the SINR p.d.f. is
    also expressed by (10), (11), (12).
  • The channel instantaneous SINR on frequency fl
    can be obtained by dividing the received signal
    power level on the considered frequency to the
    noise interferences power at receivers input.
  • If the phase distributions, p?i(?) on different
    propagation paths are considered, the probability
    of the level r at the output of the channel is
    expressed by
  • (13)
  • The presented relations are related to one
    discreet frequency (subcarrier)
  • If the small scale fading is Rayleigh distributed
    then pi(x) are Rayleigh distributions and p?i(?)
    are uniform distributions.
  • The integrals related to the amplitude
    distributions can be computed on a
  • smaller, finite interval, according to the
    dynamic of the pi(x) distributions

9
OFDMA type multiple access techniques. Short
presentation.
  • the OFDMA type multi-user access is based on a
    frequency-time signal pattern that can be
    adjusted to different propagation scenarios and
    which is able to cope with the frequency
    selectivity generated by the multipath
    propagation and the time variability generated by
    the user motion.
  • the mentioned signal pattern, called bin, chunk
    or burst, is proposed by several existing and
    future high bit rate transmission systems -
    candidate systems for the future 4G mobile
    communication networks.
  • Examples of existing or future mobile
    communication systems based on OFDMA multiple
    access
  • the WINNER project - tends to propose radio
    interface technologies and system concepts for
    the future 4G mobile communication systems.
  • the IEEE 802.16.x (xa,,e) standards (WiMAX)
    specify an OFDMA type multi-user access technique
    (called SOFDMA Scalable OFDMA)
  • the FLASH-OFDM high speed mobile transmission
    technology proposed by Flarion Technologies.
  • within these chunks, non-coded or coded QAM
    modulations are used adaptively, based on channel
    estimation or prediction, performed by the mobile
    station, using a number of scattered pilot
    sub-carriers.

10
OFDMA type multiple access techniques. Short
presentation.
  • the chunk-allocation to different users in the
    downlink is performed based on the Best Frequency
    Position (BFP) method - each chunk is allocated
    to the user that predicts the best channel
    parameters (SINR) in the frequency band of that
    chunk or on a fast frequency hopping (FH)
    method.

Bchunk?channel coherence bandwidth
Tchunk?channel coherence time
Fig. 3 Chunk allocation according to BFP algorithm
  • chunks are allocated by a scheduler using
    channel measure- ments performed by the mobile
    and channel prediction performed by the base
    station in the whole frequency band
  • chunks are allocated in such a manner to
    increase the data amount transmitted by the BS
  • one or several chunks are allocated to one user
    according to the channel and service
    characteristics

11
Theoretical computation of the received SINR
p.d.f. for the considered OFDMA multiple access
technique.
  • Computation of the joint mobile channel-multiple
    access SINR p.d.f.
  • Frequency Hopping user-chunk allocation
  • The probability of the rated level to lie between
    a pair of thresholds Tk(dB) and Tk1(dB), wkFH,
    (Jk and Jk1 - corresponding the linear values)
    where modulation configuration k should be used
  • The selection of a modulation configuration in a
    chunk m is made according to the average of the
    rated levels received on the Cu sub-carriers of
    that chunk, Pam.
  • For FH bin-allocation method, the probability of
    a bin m to be assigned to one user is Pm1/Bu,Bu
    being the number of available chunks Nu is the
    no. of payload subcarriers

(14)
12
Theoretical computation of the received SINR
p.d.f. for the considered OFDMA multiple access
technique.
  • Computation of the joint mobile channel-multiple
    access SINR p.d.f.
  • Best Frequency Position user-chunk allocation
  • The probability, wkBFP, that the maximum rated
    level lies between thresholds Jk, Jk1, where
    modulation configuration k should be used,
    requires the computation of the probability of
    the average rated level of chunk m to lie in this
    domain, Pkm, multiplied with the probability that
    the average rated levels of all other chunks, Qm
    to be smaller than the average rated level of bin
    m, it is expressed by

(15)
13
Theoretical computation of the received SINR
p.d.f. for the considered OFDMA multiple access
technique FH-allocation.
non-coded non-coded
nb SINR thr. (dB)
1 -?
2 8.3
3 13.2
4 16.2
5 20.2
6 23.6
7 26.6
8 29.8
Simulated
Computed
Fig 4 Measured and computed probabilities to
employ the specified non-coded configurations
(SINR of reference path16 dB) FH chunk
allocation method
Table 1 Non-coded configurations and
corresponding SINR thresholds
Const. No 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
PFH -computed 0.0745 0.1228 0.1341 0.2362 0.2066 0.1488 0.0663 0.0107
NFH /10000 - simulated 0.0734 0.1215 0.1338 0.2381 0.2062 0.1515 0.0581 0.0174
Table 2 Measured and computed probabilities to
employ the specified non-coded configurations
(SINR 16 dB, FH method)
14
Theoretical computation of the received SINR
p.d.f. for the considered OFDMA multiple access
technique BFP allocation.
Test parameters Test parameters
Carrier freq. fc 1.9GHz
OFDM symb. freq. fs 10kHz
OFDM guard Interv. G 11?s
Chunk size (no. subc.? no. OFDM symb.) 20?6120 108 payload symb.
Power delay profile 4 paths User speed a13dB?1200ns a23dB?2400ns a33dB?3600ns 120km/h
Simulated
Computed
Table 3 Test conditions related to fig. 4 and
fig. 5
Fig 5 Measured and computed probabilities to
employ the specified non-coded configurations
(SINR of reference path16 dB) BFP chunk
allocation method
Const. No 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
POA computed 0.0012 0.0013 0.0076 0.0756 0.2910 0.3936 0.2158 0.0139
NOA /10000 - simulated 0.0050 0.0025 0.0065 0.0675 0.2785 0.4165 0.2105 0.0130
Table 4 Measured and computed probabilities to
employ the specified non-coded configurations
(SINR 16 dB, BFP method)
15
Evaluation of the received SINR p.d.f. based on
measured/simulated data.
  • the approach presented before requires a large
    amount of computation and should be performed for
    every SINR value for the BFP allocation, it
    should also be performed for every cell-carrier
    loading (Lc).
  • an approximate method to compute the p.d.f. of
    the received signal level (and the SINR at the
    receiver), for any desired average SINR0 of the
    first arrived path consists of three steps
  • compute, simulate or measure the probabilities
    of the receivers SINR to lay between an imposed
    set of thresholds Tk, for a given SINR0 of the
    first arrived path. Computation can be done using
    the method described above
  • find an interpolation function f(x) that
    approximates the distribution of the SINR on the
    channel, fulfilling the conditions imposed by
    step a.
  • translate and scale f(x) around the desired SINR
    of the first arrived wave, SINR0.
  • this method requires a smaller amount of
    computation and ensures a good accuracy of the
    obtained p.d.f.
  • as an example, the WP5 Macro channel model (18
    propagation paths) for a given average SINR0 16
    dB of the first path and Lc (cell load) 2,
    50, 75, 100 was considered both the BFP and
    FH chunk allocation methods were considered.

16
Evaluation of the received SINR p.d.f. based on
measured/simulated data.
  • if f(x) is the function which interpolates the
    SINR p.d.f. and wk is the probability of the
    current SINR to lay within the k-th domain, the
    interpolation function should fulfill the
    conditions
  • (Jk - linear values corresponding to logarithmic
    values Tk J1 min., JS max.)
  • The interpolation function f(x) should also be
    positive and it should have only one maximum
    across the whole range of x variable considered
  • To simplify the computation of f(x), the number
    of SINR domains is reduced by suppressing those
    who exhibit a wk probability below an imposed
    value, e.g. wk lt 110-3, and adjusting the
    lowest and highest thresholds, to Tkm and TkM.

(16)
  • The f(x) was chosen to be a polynomial function
    of order SkM-km1, (17.a) Using the
    probabilities wk of the SINR to lay within the
    k-th interval, the coefficients of f(x) are
    computed using (17.b ) - (17.c).

(17)
17
Evaluation of the received SINR p.d.f. based on
measured/simulated data.
Tk dB T1-2 T28.3 T313.2 T416.2 T520.2 T623.6
Lc2 0 0 0 210-5 1.410-3 3.910-2
Lc50 0 0 0 510-5 3.210-3 5.510-2
Lc75 0 0 0 810-5 8.5 10-3 7.310-2
Lc100 0 0 3.110-4 6.810-3 2.610-2 8.810-2
Lcx 510-4 1.110-2 3.710-2 1.4710-1 2.3810-1 2.6710-1
Tk dB T726.6 T829.8 T933 T1036.2 T1139.4  
Lc2 3.410-1 5.310-1 8.710-2 7.810-4 0  
Lc50 3.510-1 5.010-1 8.810-2 7.910-4 0  
Lc75 3.410-1 4.810-1 8.710-2 8.210-4 0  
Lc100 3.110-1 4.810-1 8.910-2 1.010-3 0  
Lcx 2.2110-1 710-2 4.510-3 210-5 0  
  • the SINR domains and the associated probabilities
    corresponding to BFP and FH chunk allocation are
    presented in in table 5

Tab. 5 SINR domains and associated probabilities
for BFP and FH chunk allocation SINR016dB Lcx
corresponds to the FH chunk allocation
  • Scaling the f(x) function for other desired SINR0
    (SINR0-a) of the reference path, (fa(x))

(18)
18
Evaluation of the received SINR p.d.f. based on
measured/simulated data.
  • both the analytical and the approximate method,
    ensure good accuracies of the wk SINR state
    probabilities.
  • the wk SINR state probabilities delivered by the
    approximate method differ with less than 0.3
    from the ones obtained by computer simulations.
  • the approximate method provides the probabilities
    wk, with a slightly greater error, but requires
    significantly less computation than the
    analytical approach.

19
Evaluation of the received SINR p.d.f. based on
measured/simulated data.
  • the BFP allocation method ensures high state
    probabilities only for a limited number of
    channel states, 2 maximum 3, the rest of the
    states being employed quite seldom.
  • the SINR average value of these states is 10-14
    dB higher than the SINR level of the firstly
    arrived path - this is because the BFP method
    ensures (with high probability) the chunk with
    the highest SINR for each user, taking advantage
    of the frequency diversity of the multipath
    Rayleigh channel in a very efficient way.
  • with the FH method the cell-carrier load does no
    longer affect the p.d.f., because the user chunks
    are allocated independently according to a
    pseudorandom sequence.
  • the FH allocation method employs with significant
    probabilities wk, more channel states, 5 or 6,
    because it does not place the user on the
    particular chunk that ensures the best SINR.
  • the average SINRs of these states are smaller,
    with even 8 dB, or greater, with up to 14 dB,
    than the SINR of the firstly arrived wave, SINR0.
  • the most employed states ensure an average SINR
    higher with 0-10 dB than SINR0.
  • the FH chunk allocation method takes advantage of
    the channel frequency diversity in a less
    efficient manner - it performs an averaging over
    the
  • whole available frequency bandwidth.

20
Markov chain modeling of the channel SINR states
in the considered OFDMA multiple access scheme.
  • The p.d.f. of the total SINR is independent of
    the mobile speed.
  • the total SINR p.d.f. shows only the average
    probabilities of the channels SINR to lie
    between each pair of thresholds.
  • employment of the p.d.f. only allows the
    computation of average performances of a
    transmission scheme, over a relatively long time
    interval.
  • If the transmission analysis requires the
    probability distributions of the studied
    parameters, distributions depending on the mobile
    speed, a Markov-chain modeling of the channel and
    multiuser-access method should be developed.
  • Different chains should be derived for various
    cell-carrier loadings and mobile speeds.
  • Some Markov-chains obtained by computer
    simulations, for some significant situations
    related to the considered OFDMA access scheme,
    are presented.
  • The computer simulations required to derive these
    models with acceptable accuracy are far less time
    consuming than the complete evaluation by
    simulations of the desired performances of a
    transmission system.
  • Out of the set of possible non-coded QAM
    modulations only the first 8 are used adaptively
    in each chunk.
  • the complete Markov-chain assigned to the channel
    SINR states has 8 possible states, one assigned
    to each SINR domain.
  • the Markov chains can be simplified by dropping
    some states with low or very low associated
    probabilities, i.e. smaller than 0.01, to allow a
    simpler and still accurate performance
    evaluation.

21
Markov chain modeling of the channel SINR states
in the considered OFDMA multiple access scheme.
Initial state
Initial state Final state speed Initial state Final state speed Tab.a BFP allocation, Lc2 Tab.a BFP allocation, Lc2 Tab.a BFP allocation, Lc2 State probab.
Initial state Final state speed Initial state Final state speed 6 7 8 State probab.
6 120 km/h 0.0839 0.0554 0.0269 0.03775
6 4 km/k 0.9713 0.0018 0.00077 0.03775
7 120 km/h 0.464 0.3972 0.1128 0.33888
7 4 km/k 0.0158 0.9807 0.0095 0.33888
8 120 km/h 0.4484 0.545 0.3563 0.62305
8 4 km/k 0.0127 0.0174 0.9897 0.62305
Tab.6 SINR state transition probabilities. BFP
chunk allocation, Lc2, speed 4km/h and 120km/h,
SINR016dB
22
Markov chain modeling of the channel SINR states
in the considered OFDMA multiple access scheme.
  • The presented Markov chains can be used to
    compute two important parameters of a mobile
    transmission system, namely the packet error rate
    and the packet average length in bits, a packet
    of data being composed of an imposed number of
    chunks.
  • each branch is labeled with a variable X used to
    count the number of chunks in the packet, and
    with a product of the state transition
    probability and the correct chunk probability of
    the branch originating from that state
  • the correct chunk probability is computed based
    on the average SINR, QAM modulation corresponding
    to the considered state and chunk parameters
  • the average SINR of a given state is computed
    based on the previously established SINRs
    p.d.f.
  • for each possible combination of initial and
    final states i.e. the states corresponding to
    the first and last chunk in the packet - the
    transfer function of the graph (between the two
    considered states) is computed using the Masson
    formula 17.
  • finally only the terms with an imposed power L
    (Lpacket length) are considered.
  • To compute the average length of a packet, each
    branch in the graph will be labeled, beside the
    previously mentioned X variable, the state
    transition probability and with a term having the
    expression Yi, i being the number of bits/symbol
    of the QAM modulation used in the branch
    originating state.
  • the obtained graph transfer functions are
    composed of terms having the following
    expression p?Yt?Xz. From each transfer function,
    the terms XL are extracted , and finally the
    average packet length is computed.

23
Markov chain modeling of the channel SINR states
in the considered OFDMA multiple access scheme.
Fig. 9 p.d.f. of the no. of bits/symbol in the
case of BFP allocation of the user chunk for
different loads of the cell carrier and different
speed values of the mobile
24
Further studies and developments.
  • Study of methods which allow the accurate and
    fast computation of the p.d.f. of a sum of
    independent Rayleigh random variables e.g. an
    infinite-series approach for the computation of
    c.d.f. and p.d.f. or saddle-point integration
    approach.
  • Alternative approach study of methods that give
    closed forms of upper/lower bounds of a sum of
    independent Rayleigh random variables.
  • Study/computation of the c.d.f./p.d.f. of
    Rayleigh distributed vectors.
  • Computation of the joint multipath-Rayleigh
    channel multiple access p.d.f.
  • Theoretical Markov modeling of the
    multipath-Rayleigh channel
  • Possible solution - mathematical modeling of the
    level transition rate and (based on this)
    computation of the SINR-state transition rate
  • - time dimension is required - leading to
    a time domain modeling
  • of the multipath-Rayleigh process should
    be performed
  • - decomposition of the multipath-Rayleigh
    process as sum of weighted sine signals
    with p.d.f. restrictions, might be a possible
    solution
  • Joint Markov modeling of the multipath-Rayleigh
    channel and multiple access technique.

25
References
  • 1 Th. S. Rappaport, Wireless Communications,
    New JerseyPrentice Hall PTR, 2001.
  • 2 B. Sklar,Rayleigh fading channels in mobile
    digital communication systems. Part I
    Characterization, IEEE Comm. Mag., July 1997.
  • 3 M-S. Alouini, Analytical Tools for the
    Performance Evaluation of Wireless Communication
    Systems, lecture notes CommunicationCoding
    Theory for Wireless Channels, http//www.iet.ntnu.
    no/projects/beats/Documents/parts1and2.pdf ,
    NTNU, Trondheim, Norway, Oct. 2002.
  • 4 M. Hassan, M. M. Krunz, I. Matta
    Markov-Based Channel Characterization for
    Tractable Performance Analysis in Wireless Packet
    Networks, IEEE Trans. on Wireless Comm., Vol. 3,
    No. 3, May 2004.
  • 5 R. Laroia, Flash-OFDMTM Mobile Wireless
    Internet Technology, Proc. of IMA Workshop on
    Wireless Networks, August 8-10, 2001
  • 6 M. Sternad, T. Ottosson, A. Ahlen, A.
    Svensson, Attaining both Coverage and High
    Spectral Efficiency with Adaptive OFDM
    Downlinks, Proc. of VTC 2003, Oct. 2003,
    Orlando, Florida.
  • 7 IST-2003-507581 WINNER, Final report on
    identified RI key technologies, system concept,
    and their assessment, Report D2.10 v1.0.
  • 8 V. Bota, Transmisiuni de date, Risoprint,
    Cluj Napoca, 2004.
  • 9 V.Bota, M. Varga, Zs. Polgar Performancesof
    the LDPC-Coded Adaptive Modulation Schemes in
    Multi-Carrier Transmissions Proc. of COST 289
    Seminar, July 7-9, 2004, Budapest, Hungary.
  • 10 H. Yaghoobi, Scalable OFDMA Physical Layer
    in IEEE 802.16 Wireless MAN, Intel Technology
    Journal, Vol. 8, Issue 3, 2004.
  • 11 M. Varga, V. Bota, Zs. Polgar, User-Bin
    Allocation Methods for Adaptive-OFDM Downlinks of
    Mobile Transmissions, Proc. of ECUMICT 2006,
    2006, Gent, Belgium, pp. 371-382.
  • 12 V.Bota, M. Varga, Zs. Polgar Simulation
    Programs for the Evaluation of the LDPC-Coded
    Multicarrier Transmissions, Proc. of COST 289
    Seminar, July 7-9, 2004, Budapest, Hungary.
  • 13 A. Abdi, H. Hashemi, S. Nader-Esfahani, On
    the PDF of the Sum of Random Vectors,
    http//web.njit.edu/abdi/srv.pdf
  • 14 N. C. Beaulieu, An Infinite Series for the
    Computation of the Complementary Probability
    Distribution Function of a Sum of Independent
    Random Variables and Its Application to the Sum
    of Rayleigh Random Variables, IEEE Trans. On
    Communications, Vol. 38, No. 9, September 1990.
  • 15 C. W. Helstrom, Cpomputing the Distribution
    of Sums of Random Sine Waves and of
    Rayleigh-Distributed Random Variables by
    Saddle-Point Integration, IEEE Trans. On
    Communications, Vol. 45, No. 11, November 1997.
  • 16 G. K. Karagiannidis, T. A. Tsiftsis, N. C.
    Sagias, A Closed-Form Upper-Bound for the
    Distribution of the Weighted Sum of Rayleigh
    Variates, IEEE Trans. Letters, Vol. 9, No. 7,
    July 2005.
  • 17 S. Lin, D. Costello, Error Control Coding.
    Fundamentals and Applications, Prentice Hall,
    1983.

26
Annex demonstration of relations (10) (12)
  • the transmitted and received signal, s(t) and
    r(t)

(17)
  • alternative expression of received vector length

(18)
27
Annex demonstration of relations (10) (12)
  • the probability of signal level on the N-th
    path, conditioned by the received signal and the
    signals on other levels

(19)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com