Title: Market rationality Behavioral Finance vs. Classical Finance
1Market rationalityBehavioral Finance vs.
Classical Finance
2Main questions
- Is classical financial theory old and incapable
of explaining most of the market riddles? Or just
several modifications will be enough to make it
work? - What new can you find in behavioral finance? Can
you use the results of research in this field to
get excess returns?
3Presentation Outline
- A question of rationality
- Known major deviations from rational behavior
- Royal Dutch / Shell Classical example
- Classical theory strategic defense
- Even more market anomalies
4Are people rational?
- Rationality Definition
- Sometimes its really hard to be rational
- Have you calculated NPV deciding to study at ABS?
- Example of a Singing Professor
- Subjective probability
- Overestimation of small probabilities when
dealing with big potential profits and losses
1. Rationality
5Rationality in finance
- The Prime Directive
- Asset prices have to be explained by rational
models! - Behavioral Finance
- Investors are just people with a great number of
deviations from rational behaviour - Thats why there is a variety of effects, which
explain market anomalies
1. Rationality
61. Excessive Confidence
- Excessive confidence about the precision of
private information - Biased self estimation
- Willingness to keep losers and sell winners
- Illusion of control unjustified belief in an
opportunity to influence events
2. Deviations from rational behavior
72. Statistical Errors
- Gamblers fallacy a wish to see patterns where
they can not be - Giving too small or too big probabilities to rare
events - Giving excessive weight to personal experience
- Excessive reaction giving excessive weight to
recent events
2. Deviations from rational behavior
83. Mistakes in statements
- Axioms violation (e.g. transitivity)
- Influence of sunk costs on financial decisions
- Dynamic inconsistency negative discount rates,
etc. - Willingness to take excessive risks
- Herding
- Overestimation of the model results and theory
implications
2. Deviations from rational behavior
9Limits to arbitrage
Royal Dutch / Shell Deviation
John Maynard Keynes The market can remain
irrational longer than you can remain solvent
- LTCM tried to make money on arbitrage
- They failed ?
- Closing positions made markets even less
efficient
3. Limitations to arbitrage
10Line of defense 1Market efficiency and
rationality
- Absolute rationality
- all investors are rational
- Rationality
- as if rational
- Weak rationality
- not rational, but no profit opportunities
4. Classical Theory Defense
11Line of defense 2Models are not perfect yet,
but
- Rationality really takes into account several
behavioral moments - Greed
- Risk aversion
- Impatiens discounting future values
- Habit formation need go away from
additive-separable function of utility
4. Classical Theory Defense
12Major market anomalies
- Bubbles on financial markets
- Excessive volatility
- Risk premium riddle
- Significance of Market-to-Book and Firm size vs.
CAPM - Calendar effects
5. More anomalies
13Conclusion
- Markets are far from being rational and efficient
- A variety of anomalies exist where they should
not - Behavioral finance comes to the rescue
- Takes into account decision making process
- Do not ignore costs of thinking
- Classical theory defense line
- Point to a weak form of rationality
- Search the data errors
14Thank you for attention!