A Social Cognition Perspective of Stigma - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

A Social Cognition Perspective of Stigma

Description:

A Social Cognition Perspective of Stigma A presentation at Lawrence University on May 18, 2006 by JOHN B. PRYOR, Ph.D. Illinois State University – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:107
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 45
Provided by: PsychologyD177
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: A Social Cognition Perspective of Stigma


1
A Social Cognition Perspective of Stigma
  • A presentation at Lawrence University
  • on May 18, 2006
  • by JOHN B. PRYOR, Ph.D.
  • Illinois State University

2
  • Outline of Todays Talk
  • 1) What is a stigma? Some basic concepts.
  • 2) Some theories about stigma Evolutionary
    Psychology Socio-Cultural Approaches
  • 3) A dual process model of reactions to stigma
  • 4) Study 1 A time course in reactions to a
    variety of different stigmas - the roles of
    disgust sensitivity, motivational to control
    prejudice, and attributions about onset control
  • 4) Study 2 Evidence for two factors in reactions
    to children with HIV/AIDS
  • 5) Study 3 The unfolding impact of reflexive and
    rule-based processes in reactions to PWAs over
    time
  • 6) Conclusions

3
According to Crocker, Major, and Steele (1998) "a
person who is stigmatized is a person whose
social identity, or membership in some social
category calls into question his or her full
humanity--the person is devalued, spoiled or
flawed in the eyes of others (p. 504)."
4
Erving Goffman (1963) identified several types of
stigma.
5
an abomination of the body
mastectomy
6
an abomination of the body
7
blemishes of individual moral character
Drug addict
8
blemishes of individual moral character
Homeless man
9
tribal stigma of race, nation, religion, family,
or other social group
Muslim cleric
10
courtesy stigma - acquired through chosen
affiliation
Girlfriend of Klansman
11
Theories of Stigma
12
The Evolutionary Psychology Perspective on Stigma
Kurzban Leary (2001)
  • The social exclusion of the stigmatized is found
    across all cultures and even in many non-human
    animals. Stigma avoidance may have helped our
    ancestors survive.
  • Evolutionary psychologists suggest that human
    beings evolved to avoid
  • Poor social exchange partners
  • Members of lower status or conflicting groups
  • People likely to carry communicable pathogens.

13
Socio-Cultural Perspectives on Stigma
Crandall Eshleman, 2003
  • People learn to associate negative evaluations
    with group labels. Negative reactions to persons
    with stigma essentially represent a form of
    prejudice.
  • People also learn that it is socially acceptable
    to express negative reactions to some groups and
    not others (a form of political correctness).
  • The perceived onset controllability of a stigma
    is crucially related to whether prejudice is
    socially acceptable or not.

14
The Case of Obesity
  • According to BMI analyses, 31 of Americans are
    obese. Only 19 describe themselves as such.
  • Obesity has been shown to relate to negative
    employment decisions in hiring, promotion,
    firing.
  • Obesity is a more powerful stigma for white
    women. Mildly obese white women make 5.9 lower
    wages than their standard weight counterparts
    morbidly obese white women make 24.1 lower.
  • Parents are less likely to financially support
    their heavyweight daughters college educations.
  • In a study of adolescent overweight girls, 96
    percent reported perceived negative experiences
    because of their weight, including hurtful
    comments, weight-related teasing, jokes and
    derogatory names.

15
Source Pew Research Center (2006)
16
The blame game
  • People have less negative reactions to obese
    people when they are told that the person has
    genetic disorder
  • Cross-cultural studies show that the tendency to
    blame obese persons for their conditions varies
    across cultures. More negative reactions are
    found in cultures where there is an ideology of
    blame.

17
The Dual Process Model
  • People have both
  • REFLEXIVE
  • RULE-BASED
  • psychological reactions to stigmas.

18
A dual-process model of reactions to perceived
stigma
  • Reflexive Processes
  • Immediate reactions
  • Often emotional, often negative, often involve
    avoidance
  • May reflect instinctual processes
  • May reflect associative processes
  • Rule-based Processes
  • Thoughtful, deliberative reactions
  • Take time to unfold
  • Control processes
  • May involve approach or avoidance
  • Bring into play attributional considerations
    why questions

19
The Psychological Impact of Rule-based and
Reflexive Processes Over Time
Rule-based processes
Reflexive processes
Psychological Impact
Time
20
Study 1 Reflexive and rule-based factors
predict reactions to a variety of different
stigmas
21
Study 1 Hypotheses
  • Social norms about blame will be related to how
    people react to stigmas. The relationship between
    blame and negative reactions to stigmas will be
    more pronounced after people have had time to
    think about their reactions.
  • Sensitivity to certain emotions will enhance
    initial avoidance toward stigmas.
  • As people have time to think about their
    reactions to stigmas, they will be more likely to
    adjust them according to their motives to be
    politically correct.

22
Mean Ratings of Personal Responsibility for the
Onset of Stigmas
Personal Responsibility for Onset
23
Instructions to Participants
  • Imagine that you have a summer job working at
    a hospital. The title of your job is
    "TRANSPORTATION SPECIALIST." The hospital is very
    large and has many different units. Units include
    an emergency room, critical care, drug/alcohol
    rehabilitation, oncology (cancer unit), cardiac
    unit, psychiatric unit, and counseling services.
    Your primary task is to transport patients from
    each unit to the discharge area. This task
    includes physically moving patients--helping them
    to get in and out of a wheelchair. Every patient
    is required to leave the hospital in a wheelchair
    irregardless of whether the person is capable of
    walking. You are also expected to initiate
    conversation with the patients. In this
    experiment you will be introduced to a variety of
    different people. Imagine that these individuals
    are the patients you have to transport to the
    discharge area.

24
AIDS
25
Approach/Avoidance Reactions to Persons with
Stigmas Perceived to have Controllable, Neutral,
or Uncontrollable Onsets
26
Sensitivity to Disgust ScaleHaidt, McCauley,
Rozin (1994)
8 domains of disgust (Coefficient Alpha .82)
  • Food - I might be willing to eat monkey meat
    under some circumstances.
  • Animals - It would bother me to see a rat run
    across my path in a park.
  • Body Products - It bothers me to hear someone
    clear a throat full of mucous.
  • Sex - I think homosexual activities are immoral.
  • Envelope Violations - You see a man with his
    intestines exposed after an accident.
  • Death - It would bother me tremendously to touch
    a dead body.
  • Hygiene - You discover that a friend of your
    changes underwear only once a week.
  • Magic - A friend offers you a piece of chocolate
    shaped like dog doo.

27
Motivation to Control Prejudice Against Persons
with Stigma QuestionnairePryor, Reeder, Yeadon,
Hesson-McInnis (2004)
  • Coefficient Alpha .88
  • 1) I attempt to act in non-prejudiced ways
    towards people with AIDS (people who have cancer,
    people who are obese) because it is personally
    important to me.
  • 2) I am personally motivated by my beliefs to
    be non-prejudiced towards people with AIDS
    (people who have cancer, people who are obese) .
  • 3) Being non-prejudiced towards people with AIDS
    (people who have cancer, people who are obese) is
    important to my self concept.
  • 4) My personal beliefs and values determine how
    I respond to people with AIDS (people who have
    cancer, people who are obese) more than my
    concern with others reactions.
  • 5) My personal beliefs and standards are more
    important in my decision for how to act towards
    people with AIDS (people who have cancer, people
    who are obese) than is my concern for how others
    will react.

28
Percent of Variance in Relationships between
Distance and Disgust Sensitivity vs. Motivation
to Control Prejudice regarding Stigma over Time
29
Study 2 Can arbitrary associations produce
reflexive reactions to a stigma?
30
A Stigma Evokes a Collection of Associations
death
homosexuality
affect
affect
H I V
affect
misfortune
illness
drug use
affect
affect
31
Can reflexive reactions to a stigma be activated
by an arbitrary associative chain?
HOMOSEXUALS
affect
x
x
x
x
x
32
Attitudes toward lesbians and gay men
  • EXAMPLE ITEMS
  • Female homosexuality is bad for society because
    it breaks down the natural divisions between the
    sexes.
  • State laws against private sexual behavior
    between consenting adult women should be
    abolished.
  • Female homosexuality is a sin.
  • I think male homosexuals are disgusting.
  • If a man has homosexual feelings, he should do
    everything he can to overcome them.
  • Male homosexuality is merely a different kind of
    lifestyle that should not be condemned.

33
Motivation to Control Prejudice Against PWAs
Questionnaire
  • (Coefficient Alpha .76)
  • 1) I attempt to act in non-prejudiced ways
    towards people with AIDS because it is personally
    important to me.
  • 2) I am personally motivated by my beliefs to
    be non-prejudiced towards people with AIDS.
  • 3) Being non-prejudiced towards people with AIDS
    is important to my self concept.
  • 4) My personal beliefs and values determine how
    I respond to people with AIDS more than my
    concern with others reactions.
  • 5) My personal beliefs and standards are more
    important in my decision for how to act towards
    people with AIDS than is my concern for how
    others will react.

34
Step 1
Hierarchical Multiple Regression for 98
Undergraduates
Attitudes toward Lesbians Gay Men
R .37
F (1,97)14.93, p lt.01
Attitudes toward having lunch with Child with HIV
Step 2
Motivation To Control Prejudice
R .46
F (1,96)9.89, p lt.01 (for change)
35
Step 1
Hierarchical Multiple Regression for 98
Undergraduates
Motivation To Control Prejudice
R .32
F (1,97)10.79, p lt.01
Attitudes toward having lunch with Child with HIV
Step 2
Attitudes toward Lesbians Gay Men
R .46
F (1,96)13.96, p lt.01 (for change)
36
Study 3 A time course in the impact of reflexive
and reflective factors on reactions to someone
with HIV/AIDS
37
The Psychological Impact of Rule-based and
Reflexive Processes Over Time
Rule-based processes
Reflexive processes
Psychological Impact
Time
38
Participants were told they would be going on a
trust walk with the other participant they
rated most positively
39
Online Questionnaire Completed by Participants
40
Screen used by participants to react to
information concerning the other participants.
41
Questions Answers
  • Where are you from and how long have you been at
    ISU?
  • Do you belong to any organizations on campus or
    do you work?
  • List your three favorite hobbies?
  • What do you feel makes you unique?
  • Where do you see yourself in 5 years?
  • I am from Peoria and I am a freshman
  • I pledged a fraternity this year
  • sports, going to frat stuff, computer games (like
    Tomb Raider)
  • After a car accident, I had a blood transfusion.
    From that transfusion I got HIV/AIDS.
  • I want to get a Masters work for a large
    software company. I want to develop software and
    some day have my own company and be filthy rich

42
Distance from all 3 Persons Over Time on the
Fourth Trial
450
400
Distance from Person
350
Burglar
Honors Student
300
PWA
250
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
4.5
5
5.5
6
6.5
7
7.5
8
8.5
9
9.5
Time (secs.)
43
Relationships of Avoidance of a PWA to Internal
Motivation to Control Prejudice and
Heterosexuals' Attitudes toward Homosexuality on
the 4th Trial
Time (500 ms. intervals)
44
  • Conclusions of Todays Talk
  • Psychological reactions to perceived
  • stigma involve two processes an immediate,
    reflexive
  • process and a more thoughtful, rule-based
    process.
  • These two processes do not seem to function in
    some discrete stage-like fashion, rather they
    interact dynamically to influence
    approach/avoidance reactions over time.
  • Anti-stigma interventions could attempt to alter
    either or both processes. Interventions that have
    incorporated contact with stigmatized persons
    have been shown to be effective in reducing
    negative reactions to persons with HIV, persons
    with mental illnesses, and other stigmatized
    groups. Contact interventions may reduce
    reflexive negative reactions.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com