The Irish Structured PhD: history, development, rationale and objectives G.Honor Fagan Chair: IUA Deans of Graduate Studies - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 24
About This Presentation
Title:

The Irish Structured PhD: history, development, rationale and objectives G.Honor Fagan Chair: IUA Deans of Graduate Studies

Description:

The Irish Structured PhD: history, development, rationale and objectives G.Honor Fagan Chair: IUA Deans of Graduate Studies Enhancing researchers education, skills ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:171
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 25
Provided by: hfa89
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: The Irish Structured PhD: history, development, rationale and objectives G.Honor Fagan Chair: IUA Deans of Graduate Studies


1
The Irish Structured PhDhistory, development,
rationale and objectivesG.Honor FaganChair IUA
Deans of Graduate Studies
  • Enhancing researchers education, skills and
    career development

2
Irish developments since 2003
  • What was in place?
  • What are the key developments?
  • How do they reflect the international and
    European context?
  • What are the current debates?

3
Doctoral training
  • Master-slave or apprenticeship model
  • Unstructured - haphazard
  • Pedagogy of mystical osmosis
  • Patriarchal disciple model
  • Completion rates were problematic
  • Shorter PhD duration required
  • Needed more doctoral graduates to compete
    effectively in the knowledge economy (The number
    of PhD graduates per 1,000 graduates of tertiary
    and advanced research programmes was 18, far
    behind Finland (48) and Sweden (75).

4
The Policy Context - Improving Quality and
Quantity
  • OECD Review doubling of PhDs 2003/04-13
    (quantity and quality, major change required in
    both)
  • 2005- EUA Bologna Seminar on Doctoral Programmes
    for the European Knowledge Society (Salzburg,
    3-5 February 2005) (10 principles)
  • 2005 - IUA, Reform of 3rd level and creation of
    4th Level Ireland (securing competitive
    advantage in the 21st century (2005))
  • 2005- IUQB Good Practice in the Organisation of
    PhD programmes- Guidelines 2005
  • 2006-Graduate Education Forum Key Guiding
    Principles (HEA/Research Councils)
  • 2006 Strategy for Science, Technology and
    Innovation 2006-13 (Dept of Enterprise, Trade
    and Employment)
  • 2008- IUA Irish Universities PhD Graduate Skills
  • 2009 IUA Statement on Structured PhDs.

5
The Funding Context - Improving Quality and
Quantity
  • HRB PhD Scholars
  • IRCSET and IRCHSS Graduate Research Education
    Programmes (GREPs)
  • HEAs PRTLI1 to 5 - International Panels
    assessing competitive research bidding towards
    producing quality research and a critical mass of
    top quality researchers around strategic research
    themes who could engage in research training.
  • PRTLI 4 and 5 supporting themed research training
    programmes and student cohorts. (Research
    specialisation development)
  • HEAs - SIF 1 and SIF 2 supporting development
    of graduate infrastructure. (Mainstreaming
    development)

6
Some Key Players
  • Irish Universities Association (IUA)
  • IUA 4th Level Group (Deans of Graduate Studies)
  • Higher Education Authority (HEA)
  • Irish Universities Quality Board (IUQB)
  • Research Councils - (IRCHSS) and (IRCSET)
  • Health Research Board (HRB)

7
REFORM of 3rd and the creation of 4th level.
  • Graduate Education Forum Key Guiding
    Principles 2006
  • The development of a quality graduate education
    system will be
  • reflected by the following features
  • The best possible graduate education experience
    for students
  • The development of a rounded individual in
    order to meet the challenges of the workplace.
  • A graduate education environment that is
    internationally attractive
  • A four year programme with apprenticeship and
    taught courses and structured entry and exit
    points
  • The professionalisation of supervision.
  • PhDs of a calibre that makes them sought after
    internationally
  • Increased number of PhDs
  • Infrastructure and capability to achieve ground
    breaking research
  • Collaboration, where appropriate, to deliver
    complementarity
  • Uniquely differentiated collaboration between
    academia and enterprise in its widest sense.

8
The Structured PhD in 2008
  • In 2008 the HEA review of the progress of the
    structured PhD concluded that progress had been
    made particularly on numbers, but there was some
    concern that data collection was poor there was
    no agreed national definition of structured PhDs
    or the aims of graduate schools insufficient
    evidence of student involvement relative
    emphasis on generic versus disciplinary training,
    and heterogeneous level of progress.

9
What is the Irish Structured Doctorate?
  • Answer to quality benchmark?
  • During 2008, the seven Irish universities came
    together to agree on the context, components and
    definition of the Irish structured doctorate.
  • In 2009 the IUA issued a statement on the context
    and the definition of the developing Irish
    structured doctorate.

10
Contextual Statement (Extracts)
  • From the perspective of the student, the
    structured PhD is marked by
  • A high quality research experience and training
  • Enhanced arrangements for supervision and
    mentorship
  • Structured arrangements for the development of
    generic and transferable skills
  • Advanced taught courses in their discipline
  • Regular monitoring of progress.
  • The traditional research thesis remains the most
    common way in which the research is described and
    examined.

11
Balancing disciplinary integrity with national
objectives? (IUA Definition)-
  • The core component of a structured PhD programme
    is the advancement of knowledge through original
    research at the same time the structured PhD is
    designed to meet the needs of an employment
    market that is wider than academia
  • A high quality research experience, training and
    output consistent with international norms and
    best practice
  • To support the original research activity, the
    following elements are included
  • a formalised integrated programme of education,
    training and personal and professional
    development activities,
  • the development of discipline-specific knowledge,
    research skills and generic / transferable
    skills,
  • declared outcomes and graduate attributes in line
    with national and international best practice

12
Definition (continued)
  • Supervision by a principal supervisor(s),
    normally with a supporting panel approved by the
    institution
  • Progress to completion is formally monitored
    against published criteria and supported by
    formal institutional arrangements in line with
    national and international best practice
  • Successful completion and examination of the
    research thesis is the basis for the award of the
    PhD degree
  • Registration is normally for four years for a
    full-time student. (IUA Statement, 2009)

13
HEA Additions for Strategic Funding (PRTLI 5)
Purposes
  • Any structured PhD programme to be supported in
    full or in part by the PRTLI Cycle 5 will contain
    subject specific education and generic and
    transferable skills training
  • Appropriate placements, rotations and assignments
    across wide sectors of the economy are eligible
    for inclusion as part of the structured PhD
    programme
  • Supervision will be provided through a principal
    supervisor with a supporting panel
  • Funding will be provided for a maximum of four
    years full time equivalent
  • Professional doctorates are not excluded from the
    consideration of structured PhD definition
    alternative forms of theses are also acceptable.
    (HEA, 2009)

14
What is the nature of the change?
  • Shift from traditional to structured doctorates.
  • Emphasis on incorporating professional/career
    skills and advanced specialist taught modules
    across university sector.
  • Improving quality and increasing numbers of
    doctoral students
  • New monitoring of the research student life-cycle
  • Enhanced supervisory arrangements. Developing
    graduate governance at national and institutional
    level.
  • Investment in research education
  • Monitoring of research education and information
    reporting
  • Linking research education with key stakeholders
    in social and economic development
  • Improvement in Research Student Experience
  • Inter-institutional co-operation towards quality
    programmes and student mobility
    (Inter-Institutional Collaborative Agreement).

15
Skills
  • A. Ethics and Social Understanding
  • B. Communication Skills
  • C. Personal Effectiveness / Development
  • D. Team Working and Leadership
  • E. Career Management
  • F. Entrepreneurship and Innovation

16
Guidelines for improving quality
17
Internationally Benchmarked?
  • IUA 2004 Conference - was effectively a
    benchmarking exercise to help guide the
    development of and innovation in Irish graduate
    education.
  • This conference led to the 2005 IUA submission to
    government,, Reform of 3rd level and creation of
    4th Level Ireland (securing competitive
    advantage in the 21st century (2005))
  • The conference proceedings explicitly present and
    discuss the UKGRAD programme and NSFs IGERT.
  • 2008 - IUQB/IUA Conference International
    doctorate education
  • 2009 IUA Conference- The Irish PhD
  • EUA-CDE and Salzburg II The Irish PhD is
    making a contribution to outcomes

18
Related to other national models?
  • More than one national model, and different
    aspects of any one model, are incorporated in its
    development. For example completion rates are
    benchmarked against the UK model, where
    completion is a strong focus, monitored closely
    and where timely completion is essential.
    However, we have a 4 year completion expectation
    to ensure that the quality of the graduate
    education does not deteriorate.
  • It could be argued that Irish Graduate Schools
    tend to fall somewhere between the programme
    offerings of the United States institutionalized
    Graduate Schools and the Finnish network model
    which is particularly well embedded in the
    international research system and offers a number
    of good examples of excellent inter-institutional
    and international cooperation.
  • The highly specialized networked graduate
    programmes developed for GREPs, PRTL4 and 5
    exemplify the Finnish thematic approach, while
    the overall governance structure in schools in
    our 7 universities follow the US model (with
    fewer taught modules taken throughout the
    programme which is specifically tailored to
    support the research project).

19
Quantitative Progress
  • From 2004/5 to 2008/9 there was a 47 increase in
    PhD numbers 4,448 to 6,795
  • 850 of this total is part-time
  • 1,024 doctoral graduates in 2008 and the SSTI
    target is to have 1,312 graduations per annum.
  • A recent study indicated that at least a third
    of enrolled doctoral students are overseas,
    evenly split between EU and non-EU.  

20
Qualitative Progress
  • An array of themed funded structured PhD
    programmes in the Irish universities
  • Benchmarked
  • Inter-university cooperation
  • Cohort funding
  • Placements, rotations, innovation focus.
  • Professional skills and advanced specialist
    skills
  • Strongly themed.
  • International Panel selection and approval
  • Critical mass
  • An array of new supports for all research
    students including
  • professional skills,
  • monitoring through annual progress reports,
  • advanced skills modules
  • enhanced supervisory support
  • and enhanced governance beyond individual or team
    supervisor, and beyond the department .

21
Key debates and matters pending.
  • Is there provision of 4 years funding from
    funding agencies
  • Answer Not all have moved to 4 years and in
    current climate argue they cannot.
  • Would the inclusion of taught modules undermine
    the PhDs core activity of original research?
  • Answer The core activity of research has been
    maintained in that there is no critical shift
    from this in the Irish Structured PhD design.

22
(continued)
  • All of the themed programmes funded must target
    national objectives and were subject to
    competitive funding processes that ensured this -
    Do social development programmes have parity with
    economic development programmes?
  • How do structured programmes balance disciplinary
    integrity with the PhDs role in reaching
    national objectives?
  • 2009 budget levels dictate that the number of PhD
    places that can be funded will have peaked in
    2008 at 1055 graduates, and may well fall back to
    960 by 2013. Is this a problem?

23
Key Debates (in skills development)
  • How will the development of researchers
    employability be integrated into programmes?
  • - Through professional skills training and a
    number of other links where possible, transcripts
    that record training and skills training modules,
    placements where appropriate, stakeholders
    incorporated in advisory capacity.
  • Which instruments of skills development are
    successful? (Under review)
  • - Advanced Specialist Skills proving more
    enhancing than the Professional/Generic Skills?
    Entrepreneur and Commercialisation skills seem to
    be working best.

24
Key Debates creation of a two- tier system?
  • Cohort PhDs are funded, but these are very
    expensive doctorates.
  • Mainstreaming of Structured PhDs? - what further
    supports are there for mainstreaming if the
    structured PhD model is to move beyond funded
    themed PhD programmes
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com