Environmental Economics - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Environmental Economics

Description:

Environmental Economics Of Cows and Cars Peter Berck Cows Calif is tops! Production Dairy Inputs that are paid for Feed Water Labor Land Inputs not paid for Removal ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:65
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 15
Provided by: PeterB167
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Environmental Economics


1
Environmental Economics
  • Of Cows and Cars
  • Peter Berck

2
Cows
3
Calif is tops!
4
Production
  • Dairy
  • Inputs that are paid for
  • Feed
  • Water
  • Labor
  • Land
  • Inputs not paid for
  • Removal of ammonia compounds by air
  • Removal of nitrogen and phosphorus to water

5
Suppose they paid for pollution
6
Response to a pollution charge
  • Could trap manure in a pond, digest it, and burn
    the methane in an engine.
  • Buys capital goods (engine, pond)
  • Sells electricity (but it wont pay for engine,
    pond)
  • Doesnt pollute as much
  • Suppose that farmer had to pay for release of
    methane, etc. Would that tip the balance to
    cleaner production?
  • As price paid for right to pollute goes up,
    amount of pollution per unit output goes down.
    Amount of other inputs goes up.

7
Two effects of pollution charge
  • Pollution per unit of output goes down (she buys
    the generator and pond)
  • Quantity of polluting output goes down (her
    supply curve shifts in and less polluting output
    is produced in equilibrium)

8
Question
  • (Hypothetical) A tax of 100/ton of organic
    gasses emitted would induce the farmer to use the
    generator and decrease his emissions by 75.
  • Would the farmer rather be ordered to use the
    generator or would she rather face the tax?

9
Question
  • If farmers have to clean up (this is real see the
    draft scoping plan for GHG!)
  • It will cost them more to make milk
  • Will the price of milk go up?
  • Can consumers avoid paying for cleanup?
  • Who does the general public think pays?

10
Sacred Cars Efficient Cleanup
MCA is marginal cost of abatementcost to clean
up the next unit of pollution
11
The Case for Tradable Permits
  • It costs powerplants much more than it costs cars
    to clean up 1 ton of Nox. At original allocation
  • We need to remove 21 mt from the air.
  • Which is better
  • Cars and powerplantsmust abate as in original
  • Powerplants pays cars money and cars clean up
    another 4mt.

12
What could be Wrong
  • power pays cars and cars lie about cleaning up.
  • power is in an unpopulated place and cars are in
    the center of a city
  • Pollution is just wrong and power shouldnt be
    allowed to pollute (but it isnt wrong for my car
    to pollute, just yours)

13
Politics
  • California may not clean its air by prohibiting
    2-stroke lawn mower engines.
  • California must add alcohol to its gasoline, even
    though we dont believe that is the best way to
    clean the air.
  • California won the right to regulate heavy trucks
    in its State Implementation Plan.

14
Model
  • Politicians need votes
  • Can have popular position
  • Can get and use them to advertise
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com