Issues and challenges around integrating qualitative and quantitative research in systematic reviews - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Issues and challenges around integrating qualitative and quantitative research in systematic reviews

Description:

Title. Funder. Main collaborating institutions. The effects of schools and school-environment interventions on health. NIHR. LSHTM, UEL, IOE. Can specific approaches ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:326
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 39
Provided by: esquireshe
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Issues and challenges around integrating qualitative and quantitative research in systematic reviews


1
Issues and challenges around integrating
qualitative and quantitative research in
systematic reviews
  • Angela Harden, Professor of Community and Family
    Health
  • InCQuiRES, 4th September, 2013

2
INSTITUTE FOR HEALTH AND HUMAN DEVELOPMENT
  • A centre for research, innovation and community
    engagement to promote health and wellbeing.
  • Staff from a range of health and social science
    disciplines.
  • Includes collaborative programme of research with
    Barts Health NHS Trust focused on women, children
    and young people


3
Overview of recent SR projects
Title Funder Main collaborating institutions
The effects of schools and school-environment interventions on health NIHR LSHTM, UEL, IOE
Can specific approaches to community engagement help to reduce inequalities in health? NIHR IOE, UEL, LSE
A meta-narrative review of conceptualisations and meanings of community within and across research traditions AHRC UEL
Facilitating access to antenatal care for women in India, Pakistan and Bangladesh EUFP7 UEL, QMUL other partners
4
Acknowledgements
  • Colleagues at the EPPI-Centre, Social Science
    Research Unit, Institute of Education
  • Co-convenors of the Cochrane Qualitative Research
    Methods Group

5
Outline
  • Drivers and challenges of integration
  • Review of approaches and methods
  • Recent developments
  • Future challenges and issues

6
Drivers for integration
  • Greater recognition of the value of qualitative
    research in evidence-based policy
  • Empty reviews
  • Public perspectives and experiences
  • Systematic reviews of complex interventions
  • Issues of process and implementation
  • Extension of evidence-based health care to other
    areas of public policy
  • Growing tradition for integration in primary
    research (mixed methods research)
  • Dedicated research funding for methodological
    research
  • Establishment of dedicated methods groups (e.g.
    Cochrane Qualitative Methods Research Group)

7
(No Transcript)
8
Differences in Male Life Expectancy within a
small area in London
Travelling east from Westminster, every two tube
stops represent over one year of life
expectancy lost Data revised to 2004-08
Male Life Expectancy 73.6 (CI 71.9-75.2)
Canning Town
Male Life Expectancy 78.5 (CI 75.5-81.6)
Westminster
Canary Wharf
London Bridge
River Thames
Canada Water
North Greenwich
Bermondsey
Waterloo
Southwark
Electoral wards just a few miles apart
geographically have life expectancy spans varying
by years. For instance, there are eight stops
between Westminster and Canning Town on the
Jubilee Line so as one travels east, every two
stops, on average, mark over a year of shortened
lifespan. 1
London Underground
Jubilee Line
1 Source Analysis by London Health Observatory
of ONS and GLA data for 2004-08. Diagram produced
by Department of Health
9
Mega-events and urban regeneration
  • Examples of complex interventions with multiple
    anticipated outcomes
  • Regeneration - a set of activities to reverse
    economic, social and physical decline
  • Housing stock, service improvements, physical
    environment, creation of socially mixed
    population

10
McCartney et al. BMJ 2010 340c2369
11
McCarthy et al. (2010) conclude.
  • There is little evidence that major multi-sport
    events held between 1978 and 2008 delivered
    health or socio-economic benefits for the
    population of the host country..
  • Future events such as the 2012 Olympic Games and
    Paralympic Games, or the 2014 Commonwealth Games,
    cannot be expected to automatically provide
    benefits. Until decision makers include robust,
    long term evaluations as part of their design and
    implementation of events, it is unclear how the
    costs of major multi-sport events can be
    justified in terms of benefits to the host
    population.

12
Unanswered questions
  • What happens during implementation?
  • How do the various actors involved experience
    mega-sporting events and the associated
    regeneration?
  • What are the pathways to impact?
  • Do variations in the above relate to outcomes?

13
Challenges of integration
  • New and evolving field
  • Scale of task
  • Paradigm wars
  • Lack of training and expertise
  • Few worked examples
  • Infrastructure in development

14
Approaches and methods in 2004
  • Narrative summary
  • Thematic analysis
  • Grounded theory
  • Meta-ethnography
  • Meta-study
  • Miles and Huberman's data analysis techniques
  • Content analysis
  • Case survey
  • Qualitative comparative analysis
  • Bayesian meta-analysis

Qualitising
2004
Quantitising
15
Approaches and methods 2013
16
Origins of approaches and methods
Method Developed by/Exemplars Context and purpose
Narrative synthesis Popay et al. (2005) Cochrane remit to examine issues of process, implementation and experience
Mixed methods synthesis Thomas, Harden et al. (2004) Harden and Thomas (2005) Informing policy to promote childrens health
Bayesian synthesis Roberts et al. (2002) Factors that affect the uptake of childhood immunisation
Critical interpretive synthesis Dixon-Woods et al. (2006) Access to healthcare for vulnerable groups
Meta-narrative Greenhalgh et al. (2005) To review research on diffusion of innovation to inform healthcare policy
Realist synthesis Pawson (2006) To develop and test theories of change underpinning complex policy interventions
17
In focus Mixed methods synthesis
  • Recent examples
  • Teenage pregnancy and social disadvantage (Harden
    et al., 2009)
  • Knowledge and information needs of young people
    with epilepsy (Lewis et al., 2010)
  • Behavioural interventions for weight management
    in pregnancy (Campbell et al., 2011)
  • The effects of schools and school environment
    interventions (Bonell et al., 2013)
  • Aim is to generate and test theory from diverse
    body of literature
  • Exhaustive search, review questions, inclusion
    criteria and quality assessment largely specified
    a priori
  • Each review typically has three syntheses
  • Statistical meta-analysis
  • Thematic synthesis
  • Cross-study synthesis

18
Mixed methods systematic reviews
  • Working definition
  • Combining the findings of qualitative and
    quantitative studies within a single systematic
    review, in order to address the same, overlapping
    or complementary review questions
  • (Harden and Thomas, 2010)

19
Three ways in which reviews are mixed.
  • The types of studies included and hence the type
    of findings to be synthesised (i.e. qualitative/
    textual and quantitative/numerical)
  • The types of synthesis method used (e.g.
    statistical meta-analysis and qualitative
    synthesis)
  • The mode of analysis theory testing AND theory
    building

20
(No Transcript)
21
Review questions
  • What is known about the barriers to, and
    facilitators of, healthy eating amongst children?
  • Do interventions promote healthy eating amongst
    children?
  • What are childrens perspectives on healthy
    eating?
  • What are the implications of the above for
    intervention development?

22
REVIEW PROCESS
Searching, screening and mapping
Focus narrowed to fruit veg
Synthesis 2 Qualitative studies (n8) 1. Quality
assessment 2. Data extraction 3. Thematic
synthesis
Synthesis 1 Trials (n33) 1. Quality
assessment 2. Data extraction 3. Statistical
meta-analysis
Synthesis 3 Trials and qualitative studies
23
Synthesis 3 Across studies
Childrens views Trials Trials
Recommendation for interventions Good quality Other
Do not promote fruit and vegetables in the same way 0 0
Brand fruit and vegetables as an exciting or child-relevant product, as well as a tasty one 5 5
Reduce health emphasis in messages to promote fruit and vegetables particularly those which concern future health 5 6
24
Synthesis 3 Across studies
Increase (standardised portions per day) in
vegetable intake across trials
Little or no emphasis on health messages
25
Recent development
  • Candy et al. (2013) Using qualitative evidence on
    patients views to help understand variation in
    effectiveness of complex interventions
  • Used qualitative comparative analysis to identify
    pathways to effectiveness
  • Worked example - improving adherence to drug
    therapy

26
Recent developments
27
In focus Bayesian synthesis
  • Recent examples
  • Factors affecting the uptake of childhood
    immunisation (Roberts et al., 2002)
  • Factors that influence adherence to HIV
    medication regimes
  • (Vollis et al., 2009)
  • (Crandell et al., 2011)
  • Aim is to test theory
  • Findings from qualitative and quantitative
    research are fused
  • Only three worked examples to date
  • Variation in weight given to the qualitative
    evidence
  • Synthesis product is a set of weighted factors
    associated with/predicting the phenomenon under
    review

28
Factors that influence adherence to HIV
medication (Crandell et al., 2011)
29
In focus Critical Interpretive Synthesis
  • Examples
  • Access to health care for vulnerable groups
    (Dixon-Woods et al. 2006)
  • Use of morphine to treat cancer related pain
    (Flemming, 2009)
  • Nurses response to suicide and suicidal patients
    (Talseth and Gilje, 2011)
  • Aim is to generate theory from large and diverse
    body of literature
  • Literature itself is an object of scrutiny
    (critical)
  • Comprehensive search to identify sampling frame
  • Purposive and theoretical sampling
  • Analysis leads to generation of synthetic
    constructs and a synthesising argument

30
Access to health care for vulnerable groups
(Dixon-Woods et al. 2006)
  • Based on 119 papers
  • Interpretive qualitative analysis of diverse
    types of studies
  • Conceptual and methodological problems with
    measures of health service utilisation
  • Synthesising argument organised around a set of
    central concepts (e.g. navigation, adjudications)
    with the synthetic construct of candidacy at
    the core

31
Access to health care for vulnerable groups
(Dixon-Woods et al. 2006)
  • Core construct candidacy
  • Candidacy describes the ways in which people's
    eligibility for medical attention and
    intervention is jointly negotiated between
    individuals and health services.candidacy is a
    dynamic and contingent process, constantly being
    defined and redefined through interactions
    between individuals and professionals, including
    how "cases" are constructed.
  • Central concepts
  • Identification of candidacy
  • Navigation
  • Permeability of services
  • Appearances at health services
  • Adjudications
  • Offers and resistance
  • Operating conditions and local production of
    candidacy

32
In focus Meta-narrative review
  • Recent examples
  • Spread and sustainability of innovations in
    health service delivery and organisation
    (Greenhalgh et al., 2005)
  • Understanding the use of electronic patient
    records in health care organisations (Greenhalgh
    et al., 2009)
  • See also the
  • Realist and meta-narrative evidence synthesis
    evolving standards project (RAMASES) (Greenhalgh
    et al., 2011 Wong et al., 2013)
  • Aim is to make sense of and understand diverse
    bodies of literature and their findings
  • Literature itself is an object of scrutiny
    (critical)
  • Searching is iterative, snowballing a key
    technique
  • Analysis leads to production of a set of
    meta-narratives (storylines of research)

33
A meta-narrative approach
  • The influence of Kuhns paradigms (1962) and
    the makings of the first meta-narrative
  • The essential technique is interpretive synthesis
    exploring distinct research traditions, each with
    its own meta-narrative
  • Methods of unpacking the meta-narrative
    exploratory methods expert consultations
    snowballing database searching

34
Stages of a meta-narrative review (from
Greenhalgh et al., 2009)
35
Meta-narratives identified in the electronic
patient records review (from Greenhalgh et al.,
2009)
36
Comparing approaches and methods
Method Idealist realist continuum Deconstruct body of literature? Mixed methods lens Other characteristics
Mixed methods synthesis Realist No Complementary strengths stance and Dialectical stance Little iteration in methods Synthetic product aims to directly address policy
Bayesian synthesis Realist No Alternative or single paradigm stance Little iteration in methods Synthetic product aims to directly address policy
Critical interpretive synthesis Idealist Yes Alternative or single paradigm stance Iterative approach key Synthetic product requires interpretation
Meta-narrative Idealist Yes Dialectical stance Iterative approach key Synthetic product requires interpretation
37
Future challenges
  • More worked examples are key
  • Focus on methods and tools for the actual
    integration
  • Enhancing transparency
  • Establishing rigour
  • Further conceptual work to illuminate points of
    difference, strengths and weaknesses, fit for
    purpose (e.g. aggregation and configuration
    Sandelowski et al., 2011 Gough et al., 2012)
  • Learning from, and contributing to, the mixed
    methods literature for primary research.
  • Critical appraisal and reporting standards

38
  • Thank you!
  • a.harden_at_uel.ac.uk
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com