Horses for Courses: a comparative - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Horses for Courses: a comparative

Description:

Horses for Courses: a comparative approach to developing staff use of technology. Three Models Sally Bradley, Jane Carne, Fran Beaton, Pam Parker – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:80
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 18
Provided by: BradL87
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Horses for Courses: a comparative


1
  • Horses for Courses a comparative
  • approach to developing staff use of
  • technology.
  • Three Models
  • Sally Bradley, Jane Carne,
  • Fran Beaton, Pam Parker
  • SEDA Annual conference 2011

2
Associate Lecturers and Work Based Educators in
Physiotherapy
  • M Level CPD course Teaching Skills in Higher
    Education
  • Traditional technology enhanced learning
  • Blackboard site
  • Online groupwork with formative assessment
    through group teaching with peer feedback
  • Using Flip cameras and iPhones!
  • Capturing images of student support

3
And non-traditional technology enhanced learning!
4
University of Kent Model
  • 2 aspects work together to provide development
    for staff
  • E-learning strategy links in technology resources

PGCHE Technology Module Provides academic study
and critique   Includes a focus on developing
own professional practice.
Learning Technology Team Provides practical
support and advice on all aspects of e-learning
5
 A way of viewing your use of technology and
where to develop next.
Core technologies (centrally supported) to deliver current courses at Kent.    VLE Turnitin e-resources / reading lists /CLA audio /video resources MyFolio Peripheral technologies ( available to trial)   Clickers Flip cameras Mp3 players Lecture Capture Etc......
Developing new courses and curriculum (consultancy available for design technology advice )   Distance/ Blended /flexible learning P/T or WBL students Innovative / cutting edge /high risk (help with set up and research)     e.g. Teaching philosophy with Second Life
6
Technology on a PG Cert
  • Technology module
  • gentle exposure to VLE
  • opportunities to experiment eg clickers
  • Technology enhanced projects in other modules
  • feeds forward into University Teaching Prizes

7
Blended Learning on the MA Academic Practice
Programme
  • All modules leaders use the VLE to provide
    information, submit assessments and provide
    feedback but also to engage students where
    appropriate.
  • This might be through discussion boards, wikis,
    resources such as videos
  • Specific module on Technology enhanced learning
  • The LDC has an integrated team and so modules
    have learning development consultants attached to
    them and this is being strengthened

8
Other activities to support staff using
Technology
  • Showcase and Practice
  • All our events have a mix of
  • both face to face projects
  • /activities and technology
  • Our awards schemes
  • recognises projects that
  • enhance learning and
  • encourages the blended
  • approach
  • The MILL
  • School Liaison Teams
  • Each school has both an
  • academic and a learning
  • development consultant to
  • work as a team helping
  • schools with their learning
  • and teaching activity

9
  • Over to you
  • In groups identify the models used in
  • your own institutions

10
Challenges and Benefits
11
Challenges
  • Reluctance to engage due to prior experience of
    eLearning
  • read, answer and click fire awareness
    training and diversity style training modules
  • Raising unrealistic expectations
  • Access to resources in the workplace
  • Development time required to incorporate emerging
    technologies without access to support

12
  • Challenges
  •  
  • False sense of security by some
  • Still feeling that technology is not somehow
    proper (view reinforced in some school
    cultures).
  • Time

Benefits Technology resource targeted to
real goals of academics, schools , students and
the University. P People learn what they
actually need to, so they learn it quickly and
well. Engaged academics who enthuse others.
Competitive edge and desire to narrow the gaps. 
13
Challenges
  • We need to keep up!
  • Participants can be reluctant to engage risk of
    a few super-enthusiasts
  • Offsite access can go wrong/be erratic (partner
    colleges especially)

14
Benefits
  • High quality independent project work
  • Goes to next level
  • Generates confidence
  • Increases spread of champions across university
  • Privileges educational purposes over the tool

15
  • Challenges
  • Benefits
  • Academics changing their practice and in some
    cases feeling a loss of control
  • Persuading following bad experiences
  • Time for learning yourself and then developing
    blended learning with thought
  • Using technology appropriately
  • An opportunity to re think how to use face to
    face time and what could be done another way
  • Realising the possibilities for active engagement
  • Developing different relationships with students
  • Meeting student expectations

16
  • Back in your groups
  • What are your challenges, benefits and tips for
    educational developers?

17
Thank you!
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com