Choices for Studying Choice Dev Davis Macke Raymond - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 8
About This Presentation
Title:

Choices for Studying Choice Dev Davis Macke Raymond

Description:

Choices for Studying Choice Dev Davis Macke Raymond * Study Approach One large multi-location dataset 14 states plus two large districts Student-level results 2004 ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:133
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 9
Provided by: DevD9
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Choices for Studying Choice Dev Davis Macke Raymond


1
Choices for Studying ChoiceDev DavisMacke
Raymond
2
Study Approach
  • One large multi-location dataset
  • 14 states plus two large districts
  • Student-level results
  • 2004-2005 through 2007-2008
  • Two methods
  • Student fixed effects
  • Virtual control records
  • Two comparisons
  • Head-to-head comparison of the methods
  • Policy analysis

3
Virtual Control Record Process
Match rate is 86
4
Head-to-Head Comparison
  Math Math Math Math Read Read Read Read
  FE N389,961 FE N389,961 VCR N351,616 VCR N351,616 FE N428,018 FE N428,018 VCR N381,096 VCR N381,096
All students -0.07 -0.06 -0.03 -0.02
Black -0.03 -0.04 -0.03 -0.03
Hispanic -0.07 -0.06 -0.03 -0.03
White -0.17 -0.16 -0.09 -0.07
Low income 0.02 0.05 0.02 0.03
English learner 0.11 0.05 0.07 0.04
Special ed 0.06 0.02 0.01 0.02

Significant at p 0.05 Significant at
p 0.01
5
Policy AnalysisNational Charter Performance
  Math Math Math Math Read Read Read Read
  FE N19,905,212 FE N19,905,212 VCR N1,692,236 VCR N1,692,236 FE N19,780,459 FE N19,780,459 VCR N1,765,464 VCR N1,765,464
All students -0.07 -0.02 -0.05 0.01
Black -0.03 0.01 -0.04 0.01
Hispanic -0.06 -0.02 -0.04 0.00
White -0.13 -0.06 -0.09 -0.01
Low income 0.02 0.03 0.02 0.02
English learner 0.05 0.03 0.04 0.03
Special ed 0.01 0.02 0.01 0.01

Significant at p 0.05 Significant at
p 0.01
6
Summary of Findings
  • Charter school results vary by student subgroup.
  • Positive for low income, English learners
  • Other groups mixed or negative
  • Charter school results vary by location.
  • Positive for 6 locations in math reading
  • Negative for 4 locations in math reading
  • Charter school results vary by school.
  • Positive for 19 of schools in math 19 in
    reading
  • Negative for 33 of schools in math 21 in
    reading

7
Policy Implications
  • Closure rate comparison
  • Small businesses 50 percent
  • Charter schools 15 percent
  • Accountability side of flexibility-for-accountabil
    ity equation is important for quality.
  • Authorizing renewal
  • Publicly available information comparisons
  • Other possibilities
  • School age
  • Affiliation with charter networks
  • State charter school policies

8
Thank You
8
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com