Title: An Introduction to: InterProfessional Common Assessment Tools in Stroke Care Within the Central East Stroke Network
1An Introduction toInterProfessional Common
Assessment Tools in Stroke CareWithin the
Central East Stroke Network
- Donelda Moscrip, MSc, S-LP(c), Reg CASLPO
- Regional Stroke Rehabilitation Coordinator
- Central East Stroke Network
- moscripd_at_rvh.on.ca
- 705-728-9090 ext 46312
2Objectives for Today
- Share project purpose approach
- Highlight stroke best practices in use of common
assessment tools - Share next steps in moving forward
3Central East Stroke Network
4Project Purpose
- Collaboratively identify and implement common
assessment tools across the continuum of care for
stroke survivors in Central East Stroke Network.
5Collaborative Change Approach
- Emergent change ? adaptation
- Appreciative inquiry
- Best possible end state
- Focus on the possibilities
- Hearing the voices in the system
6Gathering What Is
7Gathering What Is Best Practice
- Varied use of measures
- Measures frequently used only at admission and
not at discharge - Not necessarily using measures tested for
responsiveness - Using measures with weak psychometric properties
- (Korner-Bitensky et al, 2006)
8Canadian Best Practices in Stroke Rehabilitation
Outcomes Report of the Expert Panel
- Prioritized a set of outcome measures that could
be used to evaluate the outcomes of stroke
rehabilitation in Canada. - Used the International Classification of
Functioning to identify measures for the domains
of body structure and function, activity and
participation. - Recommended measures for clinical use based on
reliability, validity, responsiveness, proven
application with stroke and ease of use.
9Gathering What Is Best Practice
- A Best Practice for Stroke Care
- Consensus Panel on the Stroke Rehabilitation
System Report (2007)Standard 5 Stroke related
impairments and functional status will be
evaluated by rehabilitation professionals trained
in stroke rehabilitation using standardized,
valid assessments. - Canadian Best Practice Recommendations for Stroke
Care (2008, p E53, Table 8)5.1(iii)
Clinicians should use standardized, valid
assessment tools to evaluate the patients
stroke-related impairments and functional status.
10Recommended Outcome Tools for Stroke
Rehabilitation
- Criteria for inclusion
- Cross-continuum
- Interprofessional administration
- Can be administered in a reasonable amount of
time at beginning and end of rehabilitation - Minimize cost of training
- Ideally available in English and French
11Gathering What is Current Practice
- Which of the recommended outcome measures are
being used in CESN?
http//www.surveymonkey.com/s/CAT-OM
12Discovering What Could Be
13Results from Pilot Project Based on your
reality what is the best possible state in your
setting (that this project could impact upon)?
- More consistent identification of need for
follow-up in the community. - More seamless transitions.
- Better allocation of resources.
- Trust of assessment results in transfer of
information. - Reduce duplication and increase treatment time.
- Use of a dynamic process to adopt emerging best
evidence. - Opportunity for tailoring approaches (goals,
referral, re-entry, ) based on needs of client.
14Identifying What Is Needed
15Results from Pilot ProjectWhat do you think
will help people to consistently use the core set
of tools?
- Physician support
- Leadership support
- Education about when each tool is beneficial
- Practical education about how to use the tools
- Endorsement from others (other hospitals, PPL)
- Access to tools, including copies of tools
funding - Taking part in a pilot project so they can try
out the tools and experience the pros and cons - Education about the benefits and problems
associated with inconsistency - Show the evidence that demonstrates that
consistent use of outcome measures increases
efficiency, communication between care providers
and patient outcomes.
16Results of Pilot ProjectWhat other enablers are
you aware of?
- Forced-use required use (on transition
documentation, forms, etc) - Standards of care on EMR (times and pop-up)
- Literature support
- Clinician comfort with tools
- Free or no cost assessment tools
- Tools that can be used with other populations
17Moving Forward
18A Collaborative Forum
- Learn more about best practice use of common
assessment tools for rehabilitation of stroke
survivors - Review results of survey
- Collaborate to decide upon a list of 4-5 core
tools for implementation across the district.
19A Collaborative Forum
- Collaborate to generate a list of needs.
- Establish willingness to take the key messages to
teams / organizations. - Establish readiness to adopt a core set of tools
across the care continuum. - Identify next steps
20Next Steps for Project
21Next Steps for Project
- Complete the survey with your team (We are hoping
for 1 collaborative response from each
organization or from each area of the continuum
from an organization.)http//www.surveymonkey.co
m/s/CAT-OM - Currently planning the forums
- Watch for registration information coming soon.
- Are you interested in helping out with the forum?
(contact Donelda) - Support implementation across CESN
22A Collaborative Forum
Durham HKPR DistrictsSept 22, 2010
York DistrictSept 14, 2010
23References
- Canadian Stroke Network, Heart Stroke
Foundation of Canada (2008). Canadian Best
Practice Recommendations for Stroke Care. CMAJ,
179(12) - Ontario Stroke System, Heart Stroke Foundation
of Ontario (2007). Consensus Panel on Stroke
Rehabilitation System Time is Function. - Bayley, Mark (January 7, 2009) Presentation
entitled Measuring the Outcomes of Stroke
Rehabilitation Results of a Canadian Stroke
Strategy / Heart and Stroke Foundation National
Consensus Panel Archived on OTN - Korner-Bitensky, Nicol (2006) Presentation
entitled The Canadian National Survey on
Rehabilitation Practices for Stroke - www.cesnstroke.ca
24Thank You for Listening!
moscripd_at_rvh.on.ca