Title: Ethical Principles and Guidelines for Research Involving Human Subjects
1Ethical Principles and Guidelines for Research
Involving Human Subjects
- http//www.hhs.gov/ohrp/humansubjects/guidance/bel
mont.htm
2Basic Ethical Principles Applications
- 1. Respect for Persons
- 2. Beneficence
- 3. Justice
- 1. Informed Consent
- 2. Assessment of Risk and Benefits
- 3. Selection of Subjects
3CITI Program
- It is the policy of the University that all
personnel involved in the design or conduct of
human subjects research receive "certification"
in human subjects protections.
4Citi course
5Citiprogram
6How to get Students in research course
7- Once you have signed in and done the steps
outlined in Dr. Messingers powerpoint follow
these steps to get the appropriate course
8(No Transcript)
9(No Transcript)
10(No Transcript)
11(No Transcript)
12(No Transcript)
13(No Transcript)
14(No Transcript)
15(No Transcript)
16(No Transcript)
17(No Transcript)
18Due Tuesday March 12, 2013
- Complete The Students In Research Course for
Tuesday - The Basic Course and Informed Consent modules may
be completed for extra credit but must be
completed by Tuesday.
19(No Transcript)
20Click on View/Update Learner Group
21How to answer questions
- Question 1 Is this your first time taking a CITI
course at the University of Miami? - Yes, This is my first time using the CITI
Program. - Question 2 Do you serve the University as an IRB
member or IRB staff member? - NO I am NOT affiliated with the IRB.
- Question 3 Are you an investigator or staff
member involved at the U of Miami /Jackson
Hospital or an investigator at another
institution collaborating with an investigator at
the University of Miami? - YES, My focus is Social or Behavioral research. I
may have direct contact with subjects and /or
their personal information. - Question 4 Have you previously completed the
CITI Basic Course at the University of Miami? - I have NOT previously completed an approved CITI
Basic Course. If this is your first time using
the CITI Program, you must complete the Basic
Course first. Go to question 2. - Question 5 If you have taken a CITI Basic course
and would like to complete Good Clinical Practice
(GCP), Health Information Privacy and Security
(HIPS), and Students in Research, then please
make your selection below Make the above
unavailble
22Click on Go back to learners main menu
23Click on Grade book link
24Click on Introduction and begin
25Elements of Consent Form
- 28. Standard language for child abuse
- If information is revealed concerning child
abuse, it is required by law that this be
reported to the appropriate authorities. - 29. Standard language for other abuse
- The only exception is if information is revealed
concerning harm to yourself or others, child
abuse, neglect, or other forms of abuse that is
required by law to be reported to the appropriate
authorities.
26Indicate
- I will submit the results of my research to my
instructor, Daniel Messinger, Ph.D. and present
it to my class (PSY341 or PSY344). I will not
present any identifying details in my research.
27Standard signature line
- You may ask and will receive answers to any
questions during the course of the study. If you
have any questions about this study, please
contact your name and phone If you have
questions about your rights as a research
participant you may contact Daniel Messinger, my
Professor at 305-284-8443.
28Privacy
- Participants being rated rely on the discretion
of the student for their confidentiality in the
remote case they recognize a Participant. Raters
will be asked to communicate their recognition of
a Participant to the Investigators but to no one
else.
29No data may be removed from the lab under any
condition
30Counseling Center for UM students
- 305-284-5511
- Office Hours M-F 830-5pm
- Building 21-R
- Email counseling-center_at_miami.edu (for
information only)
31Research EthicsHeather Henderson
32Research Ethics Scientific Fraud
- Plagiarism
-
- Carelessness
- see
- Holden, C. (2003). Party drug paper pulled.
ScienceNow Daily News, 09/08/03.
33History of Unethical Research with Human
Populations
- World War II Nuremberg Code (1948)
- German physicians and administrators faced
criminal charges for participation in war crimes
and crimes against humanity - Medical experiments on concentration camp
prisoners without consent resulting in death or
permanent disability - Result Nuremberg Code was first international
document advocating voluntary participation and
informed consent
34History of Unethical Research with Human
Populations (cont)
- Late 1950s Thalidomide
- Approved as sedative in Europe but no FDA
approval in USA - Prescribed in US to control sleep and nausea
during pregnancybut later found that it caused
severe deformities in fetus - Many patients didnt know they were taking an
experimental drug nor did they give informed
consent - Result new regulations from FDA requiring drug
manufacturers to prove effectiveness prior to
marketing
35History of Unethical Research with Human
Populations (cont)
- Tuskegee Syphilis Study (1932-1972)
- US Public Health Service research study
- 600 low-income African-American males in Alabama
monitored for 40 years - 400 infected with syphilis
- Told they were being treated for bad blood
free medical examinations but not told about
syphilis diagnosis - In 1950s proven cure (penicillin) discovered but
study continued until 1972 with participants
being denied treatment
36Ethical Guidelines for Research with Humans
(APA 1973, 1982, 1992)
- Planning the Study
- Balance the need to discover the basic laws of
behavior with the need to protect participants - Defining degree of risk for participants
- Are the situations similar to those ordinarily
encountered in daily life or during the
performance of routine physical or psychological
examinations or tests ??? - Especially important consideration with special
populations - See
- Marshall, E. (2000). Enforcers halt NIH study
called less risky than outdoor play. Science,
290, 1281.
37Ethical Guidelines for Research with Humans
(APA 1973, 1982, 1992)
- Ensuring that participants are volunteers
- Getting informed consent
- must give enough meaningful information for
participants to volunteer - Consent must be documented
- Exceptions anonymous surveys, naturalistic
observations - see Fig 2.3 for sample consent form
- Read Box 2.2 Historical Problems with Informed
Consent - Withholding information about the true purpose of
a study at the beginning of the experiment - E.g., Milgrams obedience study
- Offering Inducements for Participants
- Targets the vulnerable?
38Ethical Guidelines for Research with Humans
(APA 1973, 1982, 1992)
- Treating participants well
- Full debriefing, dehoaxing, desensitizing
- Provide appropriate feedback after the study
- Summary of results, follow-up contact, contact
info for them to reach you - Maintaining confidentiality
- Identity of participants not to be revealed
- Exception when researcher compelled by law to
report certain disclosures e.g., child abuse
39Research Ethics Scientific Fraud
- Data Falsification
- not collecting any data at all but reporting
results - See Holden, C. (2001). Psychologist made up sex
bias results. Science, 294, 2457. - Altering or omitting collected data to make
overall results look better - Missing data are guessed at and created in order
to have a complete set of information - Suppressing results of a study because results
fail to come out as expected
40Research Ethics Scientific Fraud
- Other than being dishonest, why is scientific
fraud harmful? -
-
- Ways in which scientific fraud can be detected?
-
-
-
41Research Ethics Scientific Fraud
- Current thoughts on the issue of scientific fraud
- See article posted in Blackboard
- Kennedy, D. (2002). More questions about
research misconduct. Science, 297, 12. -