Settlement of motor claims electronic assessment systems ensure profitability of motor insurance (best practise examples from Germany, Belgium and Poland) - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Settlement of motor claims electronic assessment systems ensure profitability of motor insurance (best practise examples from Germany, Belgium and Poland)

Description:

Settlement of motor claims electronic assessment systems ensure profitability of motor insurance (best practise examples from Germany, Belgium and Poland) – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:255
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 36
Provided by: cop95
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Settlement of motor claims electronic assessment systems ensure profitability of motor insurance (best practise examples from Germany, Belgium and Poland)


1
Settlement of motor claims electronic
assessment systems ensure profitability of motor
insurance (best practise examples from Germany,
Belgium and Poland)
  • Dr. Richard J. Nathschlaeger
  • Tashkent, April 2010

Global Innovation - Local Focus
2
Agenda
  • Audatex a global company with a strong focus on
    Central Eastern Europe (CEE) and Asia
  • Effective management of claims processes
  • Best practise examples Germany, Belgium, Poland
  • Conclusions

3
  • 01 A Global Company with a strong focus on
  • Central Eastern Europe (CEE) and Asia

4
The World of Audatex
Solera
San Ramon
,
CA
Argentina, Austria, Australia, Belarus, Belgium,
Bosnia, Brazil, Bulgaria, Canada, Chile, China,
Colombia, Costa Rica, Croatia, Czech Republic,
Denmark, Dominican Republic, Ecuador, El
Salvador, Estonia, France, Germany, Greece,
Guatemala, Honduras, Hungary, India, Israel,
Japan, Latvia, Lebanon, Lithuania, Mexico,
Netherlands, Nicaragua, Panama, Portugal,
Romania, Russia, Serbia-Montenegro, Slovakia,
Slovenia, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland,
Turkey, Ukraine, United Kingdom, United States,
Venezuela
5
Central and Eastern Europe (CEE) in the Audatex
World
Audatex BEFIG
Audatex-APAC
AX Ibero-America
Audatex CEE
Audatex North-America
AX Ibero - America
Audatex GAS
Audatex UISA
ABZ
BRUSSELS, BELGIUM
VIENNA, AUSTRIA
TOKYO, JAPAN
MINDEN, GERMANY
READING, UK
ZEIST, NETHERLANDS
SAN DIEGO, CA
SAO PAOLO, BR
Solera
SAN DIEGO, CA
5
6
Audatex is the only global provider of claims
management solutions
  • Revenue 600 Mio.
  • Global Network of over 100.000 users
  • 2.100 employees in 54 countries
  • Brand Audatex now also used in North America
  • Over 60 million annually in product development
    more than twice our leading competitor
  • Nearly 30 million annually in database
    development four times our leading competitor

7
Countries in CEE
8
Audatex CEE in 2010
CZ-1994
Sl
LT-2009
AT- 1969
HU-1994
HR
PL-1997
LV
RU-2003
RS
UA-2004
BA
SK-2004
BY
EE
RO-2005
TR-2008
MD
9
Local Focus Central and Eastern Europe Region
Opportunity
Action
Market Development
New Audatex CEE Region
  • High economic growth region
  • Demand for electronic workflow partner
  • New Customer quality expectations
  • Meet and exceed customers high expectations
  • Respond and capture dynamic market developments
  • Underline global knowledge, local focus
  • AX-CEE Facts Figures
  • HQ in Vienna,
  • 100 employees in the region
  • Product development center in Poland

Voice of our customer
  • Big 5 insurers go CEE
  • Allianz, AXA, Generali, Uniqa, VIG
  • Manufacturers go CEE
  • VW, Dacia-Renault, Kia, Hyundai, Peugeot

10
Audatex-CEE Region Introduction
  • Audatex in CEE consists of
  • 10 local country organizations
  • AT, Baltics, PL, CZ, SK, HU, RO, RU, TR and UA
  • 9 countries are supported out of the established
    country organisations
  • 5 Balkan countries (Slovenia, Serbia, Croatia,
    Bosnia, Bulgaria) from CEE-Headquarter - Austria
  • Belarus and Moldavia from Ukraine
  • Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan from Russia

11
Audatex-CEE Strategy
  • Audatex CEE will continuously reinforce its
    position as world class estimatics services
    provider,
  • Audatex CEE will continue to build up its
    standing as a premier claims services provider
    along the entire claims value chain, delivering
    on precise value propositions and improving
    inefficient, mostly paper based workflows,
  • Audatex CEE will strive to become the trusted
    partner of all our regional customers for
    identifying business improvement opportunities
    and realizing them jointly with flexible
    online-offline solutions.

12
Future Countries in CEE
  • CEE offers still a lot of
  • opportunities for expansion
  • Audatex-CEE will follow its
  • customers
  • Database can easily be
  • localized

13
  • 02 Effective management of claims processes

14
Largest part of premiums written goes to claims
handling activities
Product development Risk management
Repair
Network development
Sales
Claims handling
Health indemnification
0-30

5
5-10
30-70
10-15
10-15




15
Repair value control - example Ukraine in 2009
  • 30 use professional tools
  • 15 use less professional tools
  • 55 use best guess principle

16
Repair value control improvement
  • Completely exclude best guess principle
  • Use professional tools
  • Sign only professional body shops for partnership
  • They have knowledge know-how
  • Exclude fraud
  • Control everything, even the smallest claims!!!!

17
Three steps to reduce claims costs effectively
  • Encourage market to use one calculator for
    estimation of damage amount
  • 40 years of history
  • 85 manufacturers
  • Customized for 52 countries
  • Connect all users with offline/online solution
    which is currently
  • Central database and case management
  • ?ommunication between partners
  • Additional documents handling (pictures, invoices
    etc.)
  • Connect all users with online solution which
    will provide with
  • Profound and logical system of case and partners
    management
  • Claims history based on global market data
    possibility to prevent fraud
  • Advantageous statistics possibilities may be
    used in underwriting

18
  • 03 Best practise examples
  • Comparative Market Overview Germany, Belgium,
    Poland
  • Market dynamics
  • Basic motor claims data
  • Challenges and opportunities
  • Based on the market evolution insurers face
    different challenges
  • How to make the claims process faster, better,
    cheaper
  • Conclusions

19
  1. Motor Claims Handling in Germany
  2. Motor Claims Handling in Belgium
  3. Motor Claims Handling in Poland
  4. Conclusions

20
Germany - strong manufacturers position,
independent assessors and market consolidation
Key Forces _at_ work
Manufacturers acting as bodyshop operator and
dealers
Insurance carriers trying to reduce claims costs
Manufacturers are a channel for insurance policy
distribution
Manufactures trying to prevent margin erosion for
after sales
German Market
Strong position of independent assessor
organisations
Market consolidation reducing number of bodyshops
and assessors
21
German Market
Source Audatex
22
Insurers face constant pressure to improve
service at a lower cost
  • Several steps have been taken by the market
    participants to increase efficiency
  • Reduce severity
  • Standardized electronic estimate is required for
    every claim
  • Implement the research results of AZT for
    painting and repair
  • Increase the accuracy of the estimate through VIN
    vehicle identification
  • Automate and rationalize the communication
  • Between assessors and insurers
  • Between repairers and insurers
  • Involving all other parties towing and rental
    companies
  • Waste and fraud reduction
  • Automatic SLA management
  • Automatic dispatching and review via Claims
    Filters
  • Electronic handling of paperwork, photos, etc.

23
  1. Motor Claims Handling in Germany
  2. Motor Claims Handling in Belgium
  3. Motor Claims Handling in Poland
  4. Conclusions

24
Belgian Market
  • Insurers
  • 34 Insurance companies
  • Assessors
  • 265 Assessors
  • 199 independent
  • 66 affiliated with insurance companies
  • Repair Shops
  • 2909 Repairers
  • 1791 brand tied repair only specific brands
  • 1118 no brand
  • Wreck Buyers
  • 497 Wreck buyers
  • Importers
  • 30 Importers
  • Car Parc
  • 4,929,284 cars
  • 523,161 vans
  • 152,505 trucks
  • 355,933 motor bikes
  • Claims
  • 650,000 Claims per year
  • 56,575 total losses
  • 1.12 million Audatex calculations
  • Some of the lower repair averages in Western
    Europe
  • All claims are estimated and handled through the
    Audatex platform

Source Audatex
25
The Audatex platform enables fully electronic and
flexible process for everyone
Insurers
Experts
Repair Shops
Audatex Platform
Total loss buyers
Importers
WAN
26
Prerequisites for the Belgian model
  • Full cooperation among the insurers
  • All have implemented the World Audatex Number
    WAN
  • WAN allows the process to start with any of the
    partners
  • WAN facilitates the settlement on TPL claims
  • All vehicles are identified through VIN
  • Single independent provider of claim services
  • Audatex does not take sides
  • Constant innovation together with all partners
  • All big partners sit on the Technology Advisory
    Board
  • Independent monitoring of partner performance
  • Non-compliant partners are excluded from the hub
  • Rules based automation of the workflow
  • Automatic approval based on claim size and
    complexity
  • Intelligent routing of jobs (to assessors and
    shops)

27
  1. Motor Claims Handling in Germany
  2. Motor Claims Handling in Belgium
  3. Motor Claims Handling in Poland
  4. Conclusions

28
Poland a market in transition
  • PZU today controls 40 of the motor insurance
    market
  • Direct insurers are opening up and growing fast
  • Heavy competition has translated into a price war
  • Insurers are focusing on closer cooperation with
    their partners to create competitive advantages
    and ensure higher satisfaction for the policy
    holders
  • Reduce the number of non standard manual
    estimates
  • Move toward automated workflow with the
    repairers, assessors
  • Optimization of the internal workflow through
    removing redundant processes
  • Developing incentives for selected partners

29
Poland - Market Statistics
- Rapidly growing car parc - Decline in
severity in 2005/6 due to large influx of
old cars from EU
Average Claim Amount (USD) 2,144
Source Audatex
30
Poland - typical old mistakes
  • Internal mobile assessors were sent to inspect
    every claim
  • Only 30 or less of repairable claims go to
    Preferred Repair Networks (PRN)
  • No control over the non PRN repairs
  • 70 of non PRN claims took up to 10 times more
    time to settle
  • Shops were forced to lower labor rates
  • High attrition among PRN shops
  • Authorized shops avoid PRN contracts
  • No way to verify the compliance of the rates used
    to the contractual ones
  • Questionable quality of repair gt negative impact
    on customer
  • 50 of claims were paid out without proof of
    repair
  • High levels of fraud same damage claimed at
    several insurers
  • Large number of manual estimates

31
Poland - Recent Improvements
  • Reduced work for the insurer
  • Estimates are required in standardized and mostly
    electronic form
  • Reduced number of process steps
  • Internal assessors focus on real challenges
  • Opportunity to automate process steps through
    software tools
  • Ability to sell the PRN from the beginning
  • Learn about the claim as soon as possible
  • Drive more work to the shops
  • Involve shops (PRN) from the early stage to
    reduce rework
  • Control labor costs in the estimate
  • Increase the of controlled repair to control
    fraud
  • Apply policy to control non PRN repairs

32
  1. Motor Claims Handling in Germany
  2. Motor Claims Handling in Belgium
  3. Motor Claims Handling in Poland
  4. Conclusions

33
Best practices summary faster, better, cheaper
claims management
  • Standardize the process deviations create waste
  • Use standardized electronic estimating tools
    (Audatex is customized and operating in 18
    countries in CEE)
  • Analysis shows savings potential of a minimum of
    8 to 10 of the total repair cost
  • Involve all relevant parties in a structured
    electronic way
  • Create PRNs if market dynamics allow
  • Steer the claim to the PRN to get best service at
    lowest cost
  • Drive more work to trusted shops
  • Involve shops (PRN) from the early stage to
    reduce rework

34
Best practices summary faster, better, cheaper
claims management
  • Employ tools to reduce severity
  • Manage fraud by reviewing every estimate in an
    automated way
  • Electronically control all SLAs
  • Increase accuracy of planning
  • - Reserve assignment, reinsurance, statistics
  • Improve customer satisfaction at lower cost !

35
Thank you !
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com