Title: Biological Evolution of the Saussurean Sign as a Component of the Language Acquisition Device
1Biological Evolution of the Saussurean Sign as a
Component of the Language Acquisition Device
- James R. Hurford
- University of Edinburgh, Scotland
- Presented by Laurel Preston
- May 17, 2006
- Linguistics 580, Professor Lewis
2Overview
- Purpose
- Assumptions
- Machinery
- Simulations
- Results
- Discussion
3Purpose
- To propose an explanatory model of early stage
language. - Nativist component innate strategy for
acquiring a communication system - Functional component evolutionary mechanism
whereby communicative success confers a selective
advantage
Summary of model Communicative success confers
a selective advantage Innate Saussurean strategy
is the most advantageous for communicative
success Saussurean individuals invade population,
displacing rivals
4Simulation Summary
- Initial populations with defined communicative
behavior - Individuals with different strategies for
language acquisition - Assume communicative success confers selective
advantage - Discover which individuals come to dominate the
population?
5Assumptions
Saussurean bi-directional sign the fundamental
formal structure underlying human language
6Assumptions, continued
- Language evolved for the purpose of communication
- Early stage language existed no syntax
- Acquisition strategy can be transmitted
genetically - Darwinian natural selection
- Mendelian genetics
- Transmission and reception are logically distinct
7(No Transcript)
8Machinery definitions
- Successful communication
- any encounter between individuals where one (the
transmitter), while mentally attending to a
particular concept, carries out some observable
act (which may be a gesture, a vocalization, or
whatever), and another individual (the receiver),
as a result of observing this act comes to attend
to the same concept. p.191
9Machinery definitions (2)
- Communicative potential, interpretive potential
For individuals s, h and objects o
10Machinery definitions (3)
- Matrix of transmission probabilities
- Matrix of reception probabilities
objects
signals
signals
objects
11Machinery definitions (3a)
- Matrix of transmission probabilities
objects
signals
12Machinery definitions (3b)
- Matrix of reception probabilities
signals
objects
13Machinery definitions (4)
- Strategy
- Component of the Language Acquisition Device
- Individuals with different strategies will
observe the same data but construct different
internal representations - strategy does not imply conscious intention or
control
14Strategies Imitator
Transmission Reception
Transmission Reception
- transmission and interpretation are not
necessarily coordinated - happy to imitate correct or incorrect behavior
15Strategies Calculator
Reception Transmission
Transmission Reception
- optimal response to the observed sampling
- transmission and interpretation are not
necessarily coordinated
16Strategies Saussurean
Transmission
Reception Transmission
- acquisition of transmission is the same as for
Imitator - transmission and interpretation are necessarily
coordinated - never observes/samples transmission
17Simulations
- Given starting populations with different CPs
- Random, Emergent, Perfect
- 30 individuals, 5 objects, 7 signals
- 20 simulations of each scenario 100 generations
- 3-way competitive simulations 10 individuals
from each strategy population - 2-way competitive simulations 15 individuals
from two of the strategy populations at a time I
vs C, C vs S, I vs S - 1-way non-competitive simluations
18Results competitive
19Results Calculators only
20Results Imitators only
21Results Saussureans only
22Discussion
- How is ambiguity modeled?
- Homonomy, synonomy
- Calculators cant say I dont know they have
to guess - I do not believe that I have loaded the dice by
idealizing any of these strategies in such a way
as to render it less (or more) successful
(p.221) - Do we agree?
23Calculator deriving reception behavior from
observed transmission behavior
signals
objects
signals
objects