Biological Evolution of the Saussurean Sign as a Component of the Language Acquisition Device - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 23
About This Presentation
Title:

Biological Evolution of the Saussurean Sign as a Component of the Language Acquisition Device

Description:

Biological Evolution of the Saussurean Sign as a Component of the Language Acquisition Device James R. Hurford University of Edinburgh, Scotland – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:110
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 24
Provided by: facultyWa6
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Biological Evolution of the Saussurean Sign as a Component of the Language Acquisition Device


1
Biological Evolution of the Saussurean Sign as a
Component of the Language Acquisition Device
  • James R. Hurford
  • University of Edinburgh, Scotland
  • Presented by Laurel Preston
  • May 17, 2006
  • Linguistics 580, Professor Lewis

2
Overview
  • Purpose
  • Assumptions
  • Machinery
  • Simulations
  • Results
  • Discussion

3
Purpose
  • To propose an explanatory model of early stage
    language.
  • Nativist component innate strategy for
    acquiring a communication system
  • Functional component evolutionary mechanism
    whereby communicative success confers a selective
    advantage

Summary of model Communicative success confers
a selective advantage Innate Saussurean strategy
is the most advantageous for communicative
success Saussurean individuals invade population,
displacing rivals
4
Simulation Summary
  • Initial populations with defined communicative
    behavior
  • Individuals with different strategies for
    language acquisition
  • Assume communicative success confers selective
    advantage
  • Discover which individuals come to dominate the
    population?

5
Assumptions
Saussurean bi-directional sign the fundamental
formal structure underlying human language
6
Assumptions, continued
  • Language evolved for the purpose of communication
  • Early stage language existed no syntax
  • Acquisition strategy can be transmitted
    genetically
  • Darwinian natural selection
  • Mendelian genetics
  • Transmission and reception are logically distinct

7
(No Transcript)
8
Machinery definitions
  • Successful communication
  • any encounter between individuals where one (the
    transmitter), while mentally attending to a
    particular concept, carries out some observable
    act (which may be a gesture, a vocalization, or
    whatever), and another individual (the receiver),
    as a result of observing this act comes to attend
    to the same concept. p.191

9
Machinery definitions (2)
  • Communicative potential, interpretive potential

For individuals s, h and objects o
10
Machinery definitions (3)
  • Matrix of transmission probabilities
  • Matrix of reception probabilities

objects
signals
signals
objects
11
Machinery definitions (3a)
  • Matrix of transmission probabilities

objects
signals
12
Machinery definitions (3b)
  • Matrix of reception probabilities

signals
objects
13
Machinery definitions (4)
  • Strategy
  • Component of the Language Acquisition Device
  • Individuals with different strategies will
    observe the same data but construct different
    internal representations
  • strategy does not imply conscious intention or
    control

14
Strategies Imitator
Transmission Reception
Transmission Reception
  • transmission and interpretation are not
    necessarily coordinated
  • happy to imitate correct or incorrect behavior

15
Strategies Calculator
Reception Transmission
Transmission Reception
  • optimal response to the observed sampling
  • transmission and interpretation are not
    necessarily coordinated

16
Strategies Saussurean
Transmission
Reception Transmission
  • acquisition of transmission is the same as for
    Imitator
  • transmission and interpretation are necessarily
    coordinated
  • never observes/samples transmission

17
Simulations
  • Given starting populations with different CPs
  • Random, Emergent, Perfect
  • 30 individuals, 5 objects, 7 signals
  • 20 simulations of each scenario 100 generations
  • 3-way competitive simulations 10 individuals
    from each strategy population
  • 2-way competitive simulations 15 individuals
    from two of the strategy populations at a time I
    vs C, C vs S, I vs S
  • 1-way non-competitive simluations

18
Results competitive
19
Results Calculators only
20
Results Imitators only
21
Results Saussureans only
22
Discussion
  • How is ambiguity modeled?
  • Homonomy, synonomy
  • Calculators cant say I dont know they have
    to guess
  • I do not believe that I have loaded the dice by
    idealizing any of these strategies in such a way
    as to render it less (or more) successful
    (p.221)
  • Do we agree?

23
Calculator deriving reception behavior from
observed transmission behavior
signals
objects
signals
objects
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com