(Scopus???/EES????) - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 36
About This Presentation
Title:

(Scopus???/EES????)

Description:

... provide language and copy editing services globally to authors will not ... Sciences Veterinary Dentistry Health Professions http://www.scopus ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:27
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 37
Provided by: knuu7
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: (Scopus???/EES????)


1
????? ??????????? ????
???????
  • (Scopus???/EES????)

2
??????
  • Scopus???????
  • ??????Scopus?????????
  • ??????????
  • ????????????
  • ???????????????
  • ??Scopus????????
  • ???????????
  • ??Scopus?????
  • ??????,???Scopus???

3
?????Scopus?
  • ??????
  • ???????????????????
  • ??????????
  • ???????????????????
  • ??????????
  • ????????
  • ??????
  • ?????????????????
  • Google???????????????
  • ????????
  • ???????????????

4
??Scopus
  • ??????????,
  • 33,000,000 ???
  • 245,000,000 ?????
  • ???20????????????
  • ????4,000?????15,000? STM ??
  • ????????
  • ?? 386,000,000 ??????22,000,000?????
  • ??80?????????????????????,??????
  • ???????
  • ?????????????????
  • ??????

5
??
  • 15,000? ?? / ????
  • 12,850? ????,??
  • 1,100? ??? MEDLINE ??
  • 1,200????? (Open Access)??
  • 500? ?????
  • ??600? ?????(trade publications) (??????)
  • 200? Book series
  • 33,000,000 ???
  • 16,000,000??????????(?1996??)
  • 17,000,000???(?1841??)
  • 245,000,000 ????? (?1996??)
  • ????

6
???? (1)
  • ??????
  • gt5,500 ?????
  • ????
  • gt5,900 ????? (100 ??MEDLINE???)
  • ????????????
  • gt2,800 ?????
  • ????
  • gt3,400 ?????
  • ???????????????????
  • ?????????,????? 15,000?

7
???? (2)
  • Energy
  • Engineering
  • Environmental Science
  • Immunology and Microbiology
  • Materials Science
  • Mathematics Medicine
  • Neuroscience
  • Nursing
  • Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics
  • Physics and Astronomy
  • Psychology
  • Social Sciences
  • Veterinary
  • Dentistry
  • Health Professions
  • General
  • Agricultural and Biological Sciences
  • Arts and Humanities
  • Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
  • Business, Management and Accounting
  • Chemical Engineering
  • Chemistry
  • Computer Science
  • Decision Sciences
  • Earth and Planetary Sciences
  • Economics, Econometrics and Finance

8
????(??)
9
?????????????
  • ???????????????
  • ???????
  • ??????,Scopus????
  • ?????????
  • ??????
  • ??????
  • ?????
  • ??Scirus???????

10
??
??????????? ?????? ?????? ???? ?????? ????? ???Sco
pus info site ?Scopus Labs
http//www.scopus.com
11
????
  • ?????????
  • ????(??????????????)??????
  • ?????????????
  • ??????????????????
  • ???????
  • ????????????
  • ?????????
  • ????????
  • ????????
  • ????????
  • ????
  • ???????????
  • ???????????????
  • ????????
  • ??Elsevier Editorial System (EES) ???? ????
  • ??(??/??)??
  • EES?? ??????

12
????????? - ????(?????????
?????)??????
Basic search
13
????????? ????????????
Cited By
  • Refine Result

Refine Result
14
??????? - ?????????
Refine Result
15
????????? ??????????????
?????
Citation Tracker
16
??????? - ????????????
Citation Tracker
???????? ??
????????
17
??????? - ????????
Related Article Author Reference Citing Citied
18
??????? - ????????
Search Alert Citation Alert Author Citation
Alert
19
????????
???????
PDF????
20
???? - ???????????
Author Search
??????? ??editor????reviewer ????????
21
???? - ???????????????
Affiliation Search
?????? ??????
22
????????
Journal Analyzer
??????? ???????? ???????????????
23
??(EES) ???? ??(??)??
24
??(EES) ???? ??(??)??
Michael Derntl. Basics of Research Paper Writing
and Publishing. http//www.pri.univie.ac.at/dernt
l/papers/meth-se.pdf
25
????? Role of Editor
  • Decides on what gets published
  • type and standard of paper
  • Sets editorial policies
  • with editorial board publishers editor
  • Runs the peer review process
  • Editor assigns article to (at least) 2 reviewers
    and takes a decision based on recommendations of
    reviewers comments.

26
?????? Role of Peer Reviewer
  • A methodological check
  • soundness of argument
  • supporting data and cited references
  • Done by two anonymous academics
  • (the reviewers)
  • Reviewers peer review without payment
  • costs of administering the selection of
    reviewers, postage and document costs are borne
    by the journal
  • On average 30 more papers are reviewed than
    published

27
?????? Peer review Process
  • Varies from journal to journal
  • Peer review is the standard
  • other scientists comment on quality, accuracy and
    suitability of manuscript for publication in the
    journal
  • Today, most journals reject some paper prior to
    peer review (on basis of Editors own
    evaluation)
  • Usually 2-3 reviews sought (per manuscript)
  • Aim for first decision within 2-10 weeks
  • Submission and review for most journals online
    (via EES)
  • Authors can track the progress of their
    manuscript online

28
??(EES) ???? ?? Authors Home
http//www.elsevier.com/authors
??????
?????????
29
?? (EES) ???? ???????? ????
?????????
??????
????????
30
??(EES) ???? EES????
31
??????
32
?????? Criteria for Article Evaluation
  • Does the article fit the aims and scope of the
    Journal?
  • Is the research novel and does it add to the
    existing body of knowledge?
  • Are the right conclusions drawn from the data
    presented?
  • Is it of international relevance?
  • Is it well-presented in proper English?

33
???? ??/ ?? Review process - decisions
  • Decision by Editor usually fall into four
    categories
  • Reject
  • varies by journal, 30 - 90 is typical range
  • Major revision required
  • will require further refereeing (may still get
    rejected)
  • Minor revision required
  • likely to be accepted once changes made (often
    not sent for further review)
  • Accept immediately
  • very rare

33
34
???????? Why Papers get Early Rejection ?
  • Aims and scope
  • Paper is of limited interest or covers local
    issues only (sample type, geography, specific
    product, etc.).
  • Paper is a routine application of well-known
    methods
  • Paper presents an incremental advance or is
    limited in scope
  • Novelty and significance are not immediately
    evident or sufficiently well-justified
  • Preparation
  • Failure to meet submission requirements
  • Incomplete coverage of literature
  • Unacceptably poor English

35
???? ?? ! ?????????? ?????Never treat
publication as a lottery by resubmitting a
rejected manuscript directly to another journal
without any significant revision!!! It wont save
any of your time and energy
  • The original reviewers (even editors) may
    eventually find it, which can lead to animosity
    towards the author.
  • ?? ?? A suggested strategy
  • In your cover letter, declare that the paper
    was rejected and name the journal.
  • Include the referees reports and a detailed
    letter of response, showing how each comment has
    been addressed.
  • Explain why you are resubmitting the paper to
    this journal, e.g., this journal is a more
    appropriate journal the manuscript has been
    improved as a result of its previous review etc.

36
?????? Language Editing Services
  • Elsevier negotiated competitive rates with the
    following service providers for our authors
  • American Journal Experts (www.journalexperts.com)
  • Asia Science Editing (www.asiascienceediting.com)
  • Diacritech Language Editing Services
    (www.languageedit.com)
  • Edanz Editing (www.edanzediting.nl)
  • International Science Editing (www.internationalsc
    ienceediting.com)
  • ScienceDocs Editing Services (www.sciencedocs.com)
  • SPI Publisher Services (www.prof-editing.com)
  • provide language and copy editing services
    globally to authors
  • will not guarantee acceptance or preference for
    publication in an Elsevier journal.
  • Please note Elsevier neither endorses nor takes
    responsibility for any products, goods or
    services offered by these vendors
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com