UNANSWERED QUESTIONS IN UPFRONT THERAPY CHEMOTHERAPY ISSUES: WEEKLY DOSING - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 20
About This Presentation
Title:

UNANSWERED QUESTIONS IN UPFRONT THERAPY CHEMOTHERAPY ISSUES: WEEKLY DOSING

Description:

UNANSWERED QUESTIONS IN UPFRONT THERAPY CHEMOTHERAPY ISSUES: WEEKLY DOSING Andr s Poveda, MD Fundaci n Instituto Valenciano de Oncolog a apoveda_at_fivo.org – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:150
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 21
Provided by: Andres102
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: UNANSWERED QUESTIONS IN UPFRONT THERAPY CHEMOTHERAPY ISSUES: WEEKLY DOSING


1
UNANSWERED QUESTIONS IN UPFRONT
THERAPYCHEMOTHERAPY ISSUES WEEKLY DOSING
  • Andrés Poveda, MD
  • Fundación Instituto Valenciano de Oncología
  • apoveda_at_fivo.org
  • On behalf of GEICO and GCIG
  • Ovarian Cancer Clinical Trials Planning Meeting
  • Friday, May 29, 2009

2
3rd InternationalOvarian Cancer Consensus
Conference
3
  • 4-A4 Which regimen / kind of regimens can be
    regarded as standard
  • comparator for future first-line trials?
  • Within a given trial the chemotherapy regimen
    should be standardized and consistent
  • with respect to drugs, dose, and schedule.
  • The recommended standard comparator for trials on
    medical treatment in advanced
  • ovarian cancer (FIGO IIB-IV) is
    carboplatin-paclitaxel
  • The recommended regimen is carboplatin with a
    dose of AUC 5 - 7.5 and paclitaxel 175
  • mg/m²/ 3h given every three weeks for 6 courses
  • The recommended standard in early stage ovarian
    cancer (FIGO I-IIA) patients in whom
  • adjuvant chemotherapy is indicated should
    contain at least carboplatin AUC 5 -7.5
  • Level of Acceptance 13 / 13

4
UNANSWERED QUESTIONS IN UPFRONT THERAPYWEEKLY
DOSINGRATIONALE
  • Antiangiogenic property of Paclitaxel independent
    of its anti-proliferative action Lau DH et al.
    Proc ASCO 174141, 1998
  • Antiangiogenic scheduling chemotherapy improves
    efficacy against experimental drug-resistant
    cancer Browder T, Cancer Res 2000
  • Norton-Simon hypothesis a more frequent drug
    administration would be a more effective way of
    avoiding the regrowth of cell populations
    resistant to the agents used (Gomperzian model of
    tumor growth).
  • Proven activity in other tumours (Breast
    Cancer,..)
  • Better tolerance schedule

5
Mechanisms of Paclitaxel-induced cell death are
concentration dependent
  • Paclitaxel-mediated cell death may result from
    two different mechanisms
  • At low Paclitaxel concentrations (lt9 nM), cell
    death may occur after an aberrant mitosis by
    Raf-1 independent pathway
  • At higher Paclitaxel concentrations (gt9 nM) cell
    death may be the result of a terminal mitotic
    arrest occurring by a Raf-1 dependent pathway
  • Torres R and Horwitz B Cancer Res 1998, 583620

6
Potential Advantages of Weekly Paclitaxel
  • Greater dose intensity greater
    inhibition of mitotic cellular activity
  • Higher frequency of administration
    Higher cellular exposure in M phase
    Higher inhibition of mitotic cellular activity
  • Cause of cellular death mediated by other
    mechanisms (apoptosis)
  • Inhibition of neovascularization
  • Better pharmacodynamic profile

7
(No Transcript)
8
WEEKLY PACLITAXEL NO INCREASE IN
MYELOSUPPRESSION WITH DOSE ESCALATION
ANC (?1000/µL)
14
12
10
8
6
4
2
0
I
II
III
IV
V
Level
Fennelly et al. JCO 15 187-92 1997
9
UNANSWERED QUESTIONS IN UPFRONT THERAPYWEEKLY
DOSINGPHASE II STUDIES paclitaxel in
platinum-resistant ovarian cancer
Schedule (mg/m2) PP N RR PFS OS
1) 60-80 weekly 100 32 53 6.1 10.4
2) 80 weekly 100 48 21 3.6 -
3) 80 weekly x 3/ 4 10 14 28
4) 80 weekly 100 53 25 24 w 58 w
5) 80 weekly x 6/ 8 96 28 50 6 8
6) 80-100 weekly (1) 45 27 70 4.8 13.5
7) 80 weekly 68 57 56 5 13.7
1) Canada Le. Gyn Oncol 2005 2) GOG Markman. Gyn
Oncol 2006 3) Japan Kita Gyn Oncol 2004 4)
Markman at Cleveland. Markman. JCO 2002 5)
Roswell Park. Ghamande. Int J Gynecol Cancer
2003 in responders 6) Royal Mardsden Lynch.
Gyn Oncol 2008 including the platinum
sensitive patients (1) retrospective 7)
Norwegian Kaern Eur J Gynecol Oncol 2002
10
UNANSWERED QUESTIONS IN UPFRONT THERAPYWEEKLY
DOSINGPHASE II STUDIES paclitaxel in combination
in platinum-resistant ovarian cancer
TDose/m2/wk C AUC Author N RR DFS months OS months
T90 C AUC4 d1,8,q 21 Cadron Gynecol Oncol 2007 8 38 6.75 8
T80 C AUC2 d1,8,15, q 28 Havrilesky, Gynecol Oncol 2003 8 37.5 3.2 11.4
T90 C AUC4 d1,8,15, q 28 Van der Burg, Int J Gynecol Cancer, 2005 23 61 11 15
T80 C AUC3 d1,8,15 q28 Roxburgh P ESMO 08 A 668 54 50-63 4.7-7.5 7.5-9
T70 C AUC 3 d1,8,15, q28 Sharma R Br J Cancer 2009 20 60 7,9 13,3
11
UNANSWERED QUESTIONS IN UPFRONT THERAPYWEEKLY
DOSINGRANDOMIZED PHASE II STUDIES 3weekly vs
weekly paclitaxel in ovarian cancer
Author N Scenario T Doses/m2 Conclusion
Wu, 2001 29 Front-line T175 C AUC6 T60 C AUC 2 Equal RR Less toxicity
Rosenberg, 02 208 Second-line T 200 T 67 Equal RR,TTP, OS Less toxicity
Shen, 05 CGOG 125 Front-line TC Twkly C Equal RR,TTP, OS Less toxicity

12
UNANSWERED QUESTIONS IN UPFRONT THERAPYWEEKLY
DOSINGPHASE II STUDIES paclitaxel in combination
in front-line ovarian cancer
Author N Scenario T Doses/m2 Conclusion
Pignata, 2008 (MITO5) 26 Front-line elderly T60 C AUC2 d1,8,15 q28 RR 38,5 mPFS 13,6m mOS 32 m
Sehouli, 2008 (NOGGO) 129 Front-line IIb-IV radical resected T100 C AUC2 d1,8, q21 RR 74 mPFS 21m mOS 43m
Safra, 2009 (Tel Aviv) 64 Front-line Ic-IV T 80 C AUC2 d1,8,15 q28 RR 92,1 mPFS25,5m mOS 52m

13
What else?
14
UNANSWERED QUESTIONS IN UPFRONT THERAPYWEEKLY
DOSINGRandomized PHASE III TC vs DDTC in
first-line AOC patients a JGOG Study Isohishi S
et al . ASCO 2008,Abstract-5506
15
UNANSWERED QUESTIONS IN UPFRONT THERAPYWEEKLY
DOSINGRandomized PHASE III TC vs DDTC in
first-line AOC patients a JGOG Study
  • Endpoint PFS
  • n 637 pts
  • PFS (median follow up 29 m)
  • 17,1m vs 27,9m (p0.0014) log-rank test
  • OS (at 2 years)
  • 77,7 vs 83,6 (p0.05)
  • RR similar
  • Toxicity Anemia G3-4 in weekly arm more freq

Isohishi S et al . ASCO 2008,Abstract-5506 (Oral)
16
JGOG Conventional TC vs Dose-Dense TC in
ADOVCAProgression-free survival
Treatment n Event Median PFS P value HR 95CI
c-TC 319 200 17.2 mos.
dd-TC 312 160 28.0 mos. 0.0015 0.714 0.581-0.879
Isohishi et al, ASCO 2008 (abstract 5506, oral)
17
UNANSWERED QUESTIONS IN UPFRONT THERAPYWEEKLY
DOSINGONGOING STUDIES in front-line ovarian
cancer
Group Study Design Tmg/m2 n Primary Objetive Secondary Objetives Status
Intergroup MO22225 (OCTAVIA) GEICO, GINECO, NSGO, MITO Phase II T80 d1,8,15 q21 C AUC 6 q21 Beva 7.5q21 180 PFS ORR RR Duration OS Safety Open in June 09
MITO-7 Particip MANGO Phase III R C AUC6 T175 vs T60 d1,8,15, q21 C AUC 2 q 21 500 QoL ORR PFS, OS Safety Open

18
UNANSWERED QUESTIONS IN UPFRONT THERAPYWeekly
DosingConclusion
  • Results of trials with impact in FRONT-LINE
  • TC remains standard since 2003 and after many
    trials including more than 6000 patients!!!
  • CP vs TC GOG-111, OV10
  • Carbo T vs Cis T GOG, AGO, SWOG
  • Weekly T C (JGOG) improved PFS (phase III)
  • Ongoing Triplet TC Avastin
  • ICON-7 (recently closed)
  • GOG-218
  • GOG-213

19
UNANSWERED QUESTIONS IN UPFRONT THERAPYWeekly
DosingOpen Questions
  • Which is the optimal weekly dose?
  • Which drugs should be administered in a weekly
    schedule
  • Only Taxane?
  • Taxane carboplatin?
  • How to incorporate weekly dose to
  • i.p strategy?
  • biologic agents combination?
  • How to determine the appropriate duration of
    weekly dose therapy?

20
(No Transcript)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com