Peter Askolin, M. Sc. (Chemistry) Lead assessor at Division of Chemistry - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 29
About This Presentation
Title:

Peter Askolin, M. Sc. (Chemistry) Lead assessor at Division of Chemistry

Description:

Peter Askolin, M. Sc. (Chemistry) Lead assessor at Division of Chemistry Swedish Board of Accreditation and Conformity Assessment SWEDAC Issues Short introduction of ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:815
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 30
Provided by: Peter1379
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Peter Askolin, M. Sc. (Chemistry) Lead assessor at Division of Chemistry


1
Peter Askolin, M. Sc. (Chemistry)Lead assessor
at Division of Chemistry
  • Swedish Board of Accreditation and Conformity
    Assessment
  • SWEDAC

2
Issues
  • Short introduction of SWEDAC
  • Accreditation procedure
  • Accreditation requirements according to EN
    ISO/IEC 17025
  • (Flexible scope (or not))
  • Statistics about medical laboratories accredited
    by SWEDAC and DANAK

3
SWEDACBoard of Accreditation and Conformity
Assessment
  • Placed under the Foreign Department
  • Handles all Technical Control in Sweden
  • Divided in 3 divisions that are handling
    accreditation of laboratories.
  • General technology
  • Chemistry
  • Medical Technology and Electrotechnics

4
EN ISO/IEC 17025First edition 1999-12-15
  • General requirements for the competence of
    testing and calibration laboratories

5
EN ISO/IEC 17025
  • Replaces EN 45001
  • International ISO standard
  • A general standard not only for accreditation use
  • Divided into 2 parts
  • Management requirements (4)
  • Technical requirements (5)

6
4 Management requirements
  • Incorporates ISO 9001 and 2 requirements
  • Big efforts is made to guarantee the independency
    of the laboratory.
  • Potential conflicts in interests shall be
    identified (e.g. the laboratory is placed
    directly under production)
  • Personnel and management shall be free from
    financial, commercial and other pressures
    (external)

7
4 Management requirements
  • Technical management
  • Quality system
  • Contracting reviews
  • Subcontracting tests to other laboratories
  • Internal audit and Management review
  • Corrective actions and preventive actions
  • Control of records

8
Technical management
  • Technical leader shall be pointed out and
    deputie(s) for him.
  • Has the overall responsibility of laboratory
    operations.
  • Leads the laboratory work so that the required
    quality is reached.
  • Technical competence

9
Contract reviews
  • Confirmation that both the laboratory and its
    customer have understood the commissioned work in
    the same manner
  • Confirmation that the laboratory has necessary
    competence and resources for the commissioned
    work
  • Shall include work that is subcontracted to other
    laboratories.

10
Subcontracting
  • Accreditation can only be granted for work that
    the laboratory usually performs itself.
  • Shall be reported and approved by the customer
  • Shall clearly be marked out.
  • The laboratory shall make sure that the
    subcontractor works according to the std.
  • The laboratory have overall responsibility

11
Internal audits
  • Shall be performed regularly
  • Shall include all activities and elements
  • Shall be carried out by trained and qualified
    personnel
  • Independent from the activity being audited

12
Management review
  • Shall be done periodically by the laboratory
    management
  • To ensure quality improvements, suitability and
    introduce necessary changes.
  • Shall be documented

13
Corrective actions
  • Shall include cause analysis
  • Selection and implementation of corrective action
  • Shall be monitored
  • Additional audits

14
Preventive actions
  • Routines to identify needs to improvement
  • Identify potential sources of non-conformances

15
Technical requirements
  • Personnel
  • Choosing methods
  • Standard
  • Modified standards, sector approved methods
  • Own methods
  • Example of an accreditation scope
  • Validation of non standard methods
  • Sampling
  • Opinions and interpretations
  • Measurement uncertainty
  • Traceability
  • Reference materials
  • Control of data

16
Choosing methods
  • Standard methods
  • Only verification needed
  • Modified standard methods
  • Verification
  • Validation of modification needed
  • Methods developed by the laboratory
  • Full validation needed for all matrices
  • Documentation

17
Validation of methods
  • Required
  • Does not need to be preformed by the laboratory
    that uses the method
  • All documentation shall be found at the
    laboratory
  • The laboratory has to verify the competence and
    recourses that developed the method.
  • SWEDAC has a document (informative) that helps
    chemical laboratories in validation.

18
Uncertainty
  • Laboratory has to
  • Identify potential components in uncertainty
  • Make an estimation of the uncertainty
  • Ensure that the result doesnt give wrong
    impression
  • Based on knowledge, validation, experience

19
Personnel
  • Can be employed or contracted
  • Supervision in introduction
  • Basic competency for accredited activities
  • Job descriptions shall be maintained for all
    personnel (e.g responsibly for validation)

20
Opinions and interpretations
  • Shall be based on the results
  • It must be clearly identified
  • Procedures
  • Technical competence
  • The big responsibility for opinions and
    interpretations
  • Not to be mixed with specifications

21
Sampling
  • Can be accredited separately
  • The laboratory cant automatically exclude
    sampling
  • Will be assessed if the laboratory performs such
    activities even if not accredited

22
Control of data
  • Control of datasets (e.g. Excel datasheets)
  • Regularly controlled and when changed
  • Documented (traceability)
  • Validation of software developed by the
    laboratory.
  • Electronic signatures (traceablility)
  • Assessed by computer experts if necessary

23
Accreditation Procedure
  • Application from the laboratory
  • The lead assessor from AB chooses the assessment
    team according to the scope
  • Documentation will be assessed
  • Visit to confirm compliance
  • Laboratory fixes non-compliances
  • Decision made by the AB

24
Flexible scope
  • What is a flexible scope?
  • Requirements on the laboratory
  • Restrictions
  • Example of a flexible scope accredited by SWEDAC

25
What's this?
  • The laboratory can change the scope without
    asking permission from AB
  • The changes will be audited on the yearly audit
    visit at the laboratory
  • Freedom with great responsibility
  • Certain limitations

26
Requirements
  • Experience
  • Great technical competence
  • Personnel pointed out to do validations and
    development of methods

27
Restrictions
  • Restricted to methods that are already used in
    the laboratory.
  • Laboratory has to have experience in the method
    used and its limitations
  • New methods cant be added to the scope
  • New methodology cant be introduced

28
Accredited laboratories
  • SWEDAC
  • 70 Clinical laboratories
  • 32 Transfusion medicine
  • 34 Clinical microbiology
  • 8 Clinical pharmacology
  • 5 Clinical physiology
  • 5 Clinical pathology
  • 1 Hospital physics
  • DANAK
  • Total of 17 accreditation's in laboratory
    medicine
  • 8 of them at Statens Serum institute
  • 2 Clinical biochemistry
  • 1 Private in Clinical biochemistry and
    physiology
  • 3 Veterinary laboratories
  • 1 Forensic genetics

29
Thank you
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com