Secondary Amines for Aliphatic Polyurea Polymers - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Secondary Amines for Aliphatic Polyurea Polymers

Description:

Secondary Amines for Aliphatic Polyurea Polymers Mark Posey and Kenneth Hillman Huntsman - Austin Research Labs Thermoset Resin Formulators Association 2003 Inaugural ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:144
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 29
Provided by: MarkP125
Learn more at: https://www.trfa.org
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Secondary Amines for Aliphatic Polyurea Polymers


1
Secondary Amines for Aliphatic Polyurea Polymers
  • Mark Posey and Kenneth Hillman
  • Huntsman - Austin Research Labs

Thermoset Resin Formulators Association 2003
Inaugural Conference November 10-11, The Sofitel
Philadelphia Hotel, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
2
Objectives of This Presentation
  • Introduce JEFFLINK 754, Huntsmans
    cycloaliphatic chain extender and provide
    comparisons to CLEARLINK 1000.
  • Provide brief overview of aliphatic polyurea.
  • Provide formulation assistance to get the most
    out of the molecule.
  • Demonstrate both sprayed and static-mix coating
    physical properties and UV resistance.
  • Demonstrate the conditions at which each product
    will have superior properties.

3
Aliphatic Polyurea Overview
  • Aliphatic coatings do not yellow, however the raw
    materials are generally more expensive.
  • There are several aliphatic isocyanates from
    which to choose, however due to its lower cost
    and commercial prevalence, IPDI was used in this
    study.(see next slide)
  • Prepolymers with PPG-2000 or JEFFAMINE D-2000 in
    the 14-16 NCO range are ideal for spray
    coatings.
  • In the early 90s only primary polyetheramines
    were available which reacted too fast to be
    practical.
  • Introduction of secondary cycloaliphatic amines
    made aliphatic polyurea viable, but more costly
    option.

4
Aliphatic Isocyanate Structures
5
Molecular Structures
JEFFLINK 754
CLEARLINK 1000
6
Chain Extender Properties Comparisons
JEFFLINK 754 CLEARLINK 1000 Molecular
Weight 254 322 Equivalent wt,
meq/g 7.87 6.21 Grams/equivalent 127 161 Pvap
_at_ 25ºC, mmHg 0.02 lt 0.02 Viscosity _at_ 25ºC,
cP 13 110 _at_ 16C Density _at_ 25ºC,
g/mL 0.855 0.89
7
Summary of Chemical Sources
  • Chemical Manufacturer
  • JEFFAMINE D-2000 HUNTSMAN LLC
  • JEFFAMINE T-5000 HUNTSMAN LLC
  • TIOXIDE TiO2 HUNTSMAN TIOXIDE
  • JEFFLINK 754 HUNTSMAN LLC
  • CLEARLINK 1000 UOP (now Dorf Ketal)
  • VESTANAT IPDI CREANOVA

8
Summary of ASTM Methods Used
  • Tensile Strength, psi ASTM D638 - Type IV
  • Modulus, psi ASTM D638 - Type IV
  • Percent Elongation, ASTM D638 - Type IV
  • Tear Strength, pli ASTM D624 - Die C
  • Hardness, Shore A/D ASTM D2240-81
  • Taber Abrasion - H18 wheel ASTM D4060
  • 1000 grams, 1000 rev.
  • Gloss ASTM D523

9
Pneumatic Static Mix Equipment
Dual-Cartridge 200 mL Each Side
Speed Adjustment
10
Comparison of Equal Wt Formulations
11
Equal Wt Results (Static-Mix)
12
45/55 Static Mixed Formulations
13
45/55 Static Mix Results
14
50/50 Static Mixed Formulations
15
50/50 Static Mixed Results
16
Typical Spray Conditions
  • Gusmer GX-7 400 Gun, with 212 Pattern Control
    Disk and 453 Mixing Module.
  • Feed preheat and hose heat set at 160F.
  • Due to high isocyanate viscosity, the pressure
    differential could be up to 500 psig. Typical
    pressures 2300 psig Iso. / 2000 psig Resin.
  • Coatings sprayed onto metal/plastic sheets with
    mold release to obtain free films. Also sprayed
    directly onto QUV panels.

17
Comparison of Equal Wt Formulations
18
Equal Wt Results (Spray)
19
45/55 Sprayed Formulations
20
45/55 Spray Results
21
50/50 Sprayed Formulations
22
50/50 Spray Results
23
QUV Testing of Samples
  • Coating samples were placed in a QUV cabinet with
    QUVB-313 bulbs for 2012 hours of continuous
    exposure at 35C Panel Temp.
  • No UV stabilizers were used and surface cracks
    formed in all samples within 200 hours exposure.
  • Surface cracks made gloss measurement difficult.
  • Retested sprayed samples after 2012 hours QUV
    exposure for physical properties.

24
Yellowness Index (YI) Results
  • Hours
  • Sample 0 1458 2012
  • 8276-63-1 4.51 4.23 4.10 (45/55 JL754)
  • 8276-64-1 4.19 2.21 2.19 (45/55 CL1000)
  • 8276-66-1 3.88 2.37 2.42 (50/50 JL754)
  • Aromatic Comparison
  • 0 1 24
  • 8276-72 8.11 23.7 49.4

25
Properties After QUV Exposure
26
QUV Testing Conclusions
  • Due to lack of UV Stabilizer, all samples showed
    surface cracking by 200 hrs. It is recommended
    that all IPDI formulations utilize a UV
    stabilizer.
  • All samples showed essentially no increase in
    color, and some slightly decreased their
    Yellowness Index at 2012 hours.
  • Samples lost some elongation, but gained strength
    in the 100 and 300 stress values.
  • Based upon QUV results, we conclude that
    JEFFLINK 754 and CLEARLINK 1000 have similar
    color behavior in aliphatic coating systems.

27
Conclusions
  • JEFFLINK 754 is faster reacting than
    CLEARLINK1000, but not always significantly so.
  • Neither chain extender can claim to be better at
    all sets of conditions. Both have good UV
    stability.
  • JEFFLINK 754 can replace CLEARLINK 1000, but
    reformulation and testing is necessary.
  • Clearlink1000 produces coatings that are harder
    and less flexible than JEFFLINK 754 at
    equivalent conditions.
  • When high NCO requires high chain extender
    content, 754 can provide a more flexible, cost
    effective coating.

28
Wrap-up / More Information
  • Huntsman is working hard to bring to market new
    molecules that will further enhance the
    formulators toolbox. Please stay tuned to our
    website and your local salesman for more details.
  • A paper based upon this data can be obtained from
    our website.
  • For more information on our products, please
    visit
  • www.huntsman.com, JEFFAMINE.COM,
    huntsmanpolyurea.com, huntsmanepoxy.com,
    huntsmanchainextenders.com
  • A portion of this presentation was delivered at
    the August 2003 Polyurea Development Association
    conference in Reno, Nevada.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com