Title: Adult Serious Case Reviews
1Adult Serious Case Reviews
2What are Adult SCRs?
- Definitions vary
- Internal external (even high profile)
- Called many names
- Public private
- Single or group/institution
- Crossover with complaints/ reviews/management
inquiries.
3Thresholds for SCRs
- Death serious harm/concerns of vulnerable adult
- Institutional practices
- Problems with agency communications or
relationships - Safeguarding Board concerns
- Pressure - championing
- Fit with policy procedures
- Panorama media something must be done!
4Current policy says (most LAs adopted)
- Permissive (No Secrets)
- ADASS (2006) purpose is not to reinvestigate nor
to apportion blame - To establish whether there are lessons to be
learnt from the circumstances of the case about
the way in which local professionals agencies
work together to safeguard vulnerable adults - review the effectiveness of procedures (both
multi-agency and those of individual
organisations) - inform and improve local inter-agency practice
- improve practice by acting on learning
(developing best practice) - prepare or commission an overview report which
brings together and analyses the findings of the
various reports from agencies in order to make
recommendations for future action
5Chairs told us
- Get admin support (and support for them)
- Know how to unlock doors
- Build up experience
- Keep process going
- Not always in control
- Limited call back to review
- Independent chair not always necessary
- Independence has its uses ( costs)
- Little knowledge of learning under-developed
ways of monitoring recommendations - Delays frustrating but explicable
6Looking at 22
- Communication problems 17
- No lead agency 5
- Training needed 13
- Whistle-blowing problems 3
7discretion
- No set process so decide !
- Identify resources
- Agree purpose terms of reference
- Present chronology facts, missed opportunities,
think system - Ascertain co-operation
- Establish ways to monitor learn
8Thinking systems (Munro)
- Recognise staff are neither autonomous or puppet
- Why did poor practice happen?
- Improve learning
- Think sailing boat not train..
9Example 1 content
- The report has four main elements after the
introductory sections good practice that was
noted, lessons that have been learnt, changes in
policy and practice that have been made since the
events, and recommendations for action to improve
adult safeguarding further. (Action Plan 37pp)
- Somerset Safeguarding Adults Board
- Serious Case Review
- concerning
- Parkfields Care Home
- Overview report by Margaret Sheather, Independent
chair of the Review - May 2011
10Example 2
Executive Summary of the Serious Case Review in
respect of Adult A DOB 03/07/1945 DOD
10/03/2010 Author Margaret Williams Apx 3
Key people/organisations involved with Adult A
page61/65 (excluded neighbours)
11Example 3 terms of reference
- Terms of reference for the SCR as established by
the Board. - To establish the circumstances and events
surrounding the death - to examine the management of his care by
individual agencies - to review the effectiveness of both multi agency
individual policies and procedures and
operational methods examine the probability of
whether any changes would have changed the
outcome - to inform and improve local inter-agency
practice - to make recommendations for future practice and
to provide explanation and insight for Bills
relatives
Serious Case Review Executive Summary Bill
The Cumbria Safeguarding Adults Board wish to
express sincere condolences to Bills family.
2009 Logos of County Council, NHS Police
12Example 4
- What next
- London Borough of Merton illustrates keeping on
the books approach
- Recommendations
- The SGAB will ensure that all recommendations are
actioned and will request updates from agencies - The action plan will remain on the SGAB Agenda
until such time that all recommendations have
been implemented
13Fear of SCR
- Following the Serious Case Review, ensure a
more systematic approach to reviews in the
learning disability service, particularly
emphasising quality and outcomes. - Extract from CSCI report to a Local Authority
2007 - feeling that they were hung out to dry
by making SCR public.
14(No Transcript)
15Legal arenas
- In contrast to child care law, adult social
carehas developed piecemealit remains a
confusing patchwork of conflicting statutesit is
characterised by the sheer volume of legislation
with much overlap duplication. It is noted for
its baffling and tortuous complexity .. - Re A per Munby J
16Legal/Practice Terms
- No Secrets DH 2000 (England Wales)
- In the absence of explicit, comprehensive
legislation on adult protection, DH guidance
instead defines vulnerable adults, characterises
different forms of abuse and sets out a
framework.. (Mandelstam, Safeguarding Adults
and the law see SCIE 2011) - Defining a vulnerable adult
- A person who is or may be in need of community
care services by reason of mental or other
disability, age or illness and who is or maybe
unable to take care of him-or herself, or unable
to protect him-or herself against significant
harm or exploitation (DH 2000) but
contentious, also described as adult in
vulnerable situations or adult at risk
17Case Law
- Emphasis on mental capacity at the centre of
decisions Justice Hedley Re Z (Local Authority
Duty (2004) EWHC 2817 (Fam). - Social care and health services are there to
support not to control seek authority from the
court. Justice Munby -A C 2010 EWHC 978 (Fam) - Persons rights to live with risk What good is
making someone safer if it merely makes them
miserable? Justice Munby MM (An Adult) (2007)
EWHC 2003 (Fam), (2009) - Recognise undue influence and coercion affecting
capacity role is to intervene to reduce the
levels of coercion Re SA (2005) EWHC 2942
(Fam)(Case related to forced marriage) Justice
Munby - (JE 2009 unreported)
18Existing Legislation
- Human Rights Act 1998
- Mental Capacity Act 2005 amended 2007 (DoLS)
- NHS Community Care Act 1990
- Health and Social Care Act 2008 regulation
direct payments - Equalities Act 2010
- Domestic Violence Crimes and Victims Act 2004
- SVG Act (vetting barring)
- and the rest!
- Law Commission Review April 2011
19future
- Thinking about
- Statutory Safeguarding Boards (decided)
- Enhanced duty of cooperation
- Duty to investigate/ make enquiries
- And more..
20Thank you
- P.S. Please send us any SCRs you think we have
missed ! - Contact details
- e-mail jill.manthorpe_at_kcl.ac.uk