NUTRIENT CONCENTRATION, DISTRIBUTION AND TRANSPORT FROM THE EAST COAST CANALS TO BISCAYNE BAY AND WATER-QUALITY TRENDS AT SELECTED SITES IN SOUTH FLORIDA - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 56
About This Presentation
Title:

NUTRIENT CONCENTRATION, DISTRIBUTION AND TRANSPORT FROM THE EAST COAST CANALS TO BISCAYNE BAY AND WATER-QUALITY TRENDS AT SELECTED SITES IN SOUTH FLORIDA

Description:

nutrient concentration, distribution and transport from the east coast canals to biscayne bay and water-quality trends at selected sites in south florida – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:755
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 57
Provided by: ALI84
Learn more at: https://www.usgs.gov
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: NUTRIENT CONCENTRATION, DISTRIBUTION AND TRANSPORT FROM THE EAST COAST CANALS TO BISCAYNE BAY AND WATER-QUALITY TRENDS AT SELECTED SITES IN SOUTH FLORIDA


1
NUTRIENT CONCENTRATION, DISTRIBUTION AND
TRANSPORT FROM THE EAST COAST CANALS TO BISCAYNE
BAY AND WATER-QUALITY TRENDS AT SELECTED SITES IN
SOUTH FLORIDA
  • South Florida Ecosystem Program

2
INTRODUCTION
  • Biscayne Bay Is An Oligotrophic Subtropical
    Estuary Which Provides Habitat To A Variety Of
    Plant And Animal Life
  • Nutrient-laden Discharges From East Coast Canals
    Threaten Ecological Health Of Bay (Biscayne Bay
    SWIM Plan)
  • Ecosystem Restoration Plans Diversion Of
    Discharges To Biscayne Bay To Re-establish
    Natural Flow To Everglades National Park

3
INTRODUCTION(CONTINUED)
  • Anthropogenic Activities Are Major Source Of
    Nutrients And May Result From Urban And
    Agricultural Runoff
  • Adverse Effects Of Excessive Nutrients
  • Eutrophication
  • Algal Blooms
  • Phytoplankton Growth
  • Decreased Light Penetration Harmful To Submerged
    Aquatic Vegetation
  • Hypoxia/anoxia

4
PROJECT OBJECTIVES
  • Determine Method For Estimating Loads From Canals
    To Bay
  • Characterize Nutrient Concentration And
    Distribution In The East Coast Canals
  • Evaluate Sampling Methods In Order To Document
    Most Representative Manner Of Sample Collection
  • Determine Long-term Trends at Selected Sites in
    South Florida

5
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
  • Samples Collected Upstream Of Gated Control
    Structures At East Coast Canals During Periods Of
    Flow
  • Depth-integrated And Point Or Grab Samples
    Collected
  • Depth-integrated Samples Collected By
    Equal-Width-Increment (EWI) Using Weighted Bottle
    Since Velocities lt 2.0 Ft/sec
  • Instantaneous Discharge Determined for Each
    Sampling Event

6
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT (CONTINUED)
  • Samples Analyzed For
  • Total Organic Nitrogen
  • Total Ammonia
  • Total Nitrite And Nitrate
  • Total Phosphorus
  • Total Orthophosphate
  • Kjeldahl Nitrogen (Calculated)
  • Total Nitrogen (Calculated)

7
LOCATION OF SAMPLING SITES
8
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT(CONTINUED)
  • Depth-integrated Samples Collected By
    Equal-Width-Increment (EWI) Method
  • Stream Width Subdivided Into Equal Width
    Intervals With Sampling Vertical Associated With
    Each Interval
  • Vertical With Highest Velocity Is Selected And
    Sampler Is Raised And Lowered At Constant Rate So
    Bottle Is Not Overfilled When Returned To Surface

9
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT(CONTINUED)
  • Depth-integrated Samples (Continued)
  • Same Transit Rate Used In All Verticals But
    Sample Volume May Be Different
  • Samples Composited In Churn Splitter
  • Samples Collected In Amber Polyethylene Bottles
    And Chilled To 4 Degrees Centigrade And Sent To
    Lab

10
FIGURE SHOWING EWI SAMPLING
11
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT(CONTINUED)
  • Point Or Grab Samples
  • Collected At 0.5 Or 1.0 Meter Below Water Surface
    in Middle of Stream
  • Niskin Bottle Or Van Dorn Sampler

12
SNAPPER CREEK AT S-22 LOOKING UPSTREAM
13
SNAPPER CREEK AT S-22 DOWNSTREAM
14
SAMPLES COMPOSITED IN CHURN AT BRIDGE UPSTREAM OF
S-22
15
SAMPLES COLLECTED WITH VAN DORN SAMPLER AT
SNAPPER CREEK S-22
16
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT(CONTINUED)
  • Nutrient Concentrations In East Coast Canals
  • Total Organic Nitrogen Ranged From 0.20 To 1.7
    Mg/l And Median Was 0.75 Mg/l
  • Ammonia Ranged From 0.01 To 1.5 Mg/l And Median
    Was 0.10 Mg/l
  • Nitrate Ranged From .001 To 4.38 Mg/l And Median
    Was 0.18 Mg/l

17
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT(CONTINUED)
  • Nutrient Concentrations (Continued)
  • Total Nitrogen Ranged From 0.31 To 4.7 Mg/l And
    Median Was 1.47 Mg/l
  • Total Phosphorus Ranged From .004 To 0.31 Mg/l
    And Median Was 0.02 Mg/l
  • Orthophosphate Ranged From lt.001 To 0.26 Mg/l And
    Median Was .005 Mg/l

18
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT(CONTINUED)
  • Five Sites (G58, G93, S-26, S-27, And S-123) Had
    Ammonia Concentrations That Exceeded The
    Miami-Dade DERM Standard Of 0.5 Mg/l
  • Maximum Total Phosphorus Concentration Of 0.31
    Mg/l At G58 (Arch Creek) Was Above Recommended
    EPA Upper Limit Of 0.10 Mg/l To Control
    Eutrophication

19
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT(CONTINUED)
  • Nutrient Distribution In East Coast Canals Based
    On Land Use Categories
  • Agricultural (S-20f, S-20g, S021, S21a)
  • Urban (G-58, G-93, S-22, S-25, S-25b, S-26, S-27,
    S-28, S-29, S-123)
  • Wetland (S-20)

20
MEDIAN TOTAL ORGANIC NITROGEN CONCENTRATIONS WERE
HIGHEST IN WETLAND AND URBAN AREAS
21
MEDIAN CONCENTRATIONS OF TOTAL AMMONIAWERE
HIGHEST IN URBAN AREAS
22
MEDIAN NITRATE CONCENTRATIONS WERE HIGHEST IN
AGRICULTURAL AREAS
23
MEDIAN TOTAL PHOSPHORUS CONCENTRATIONS WERE
HIGHEST IN URBAN AREAS
24
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT(CONTINUED)
  • Comparison Of Grab With Depth-integrated Samples
    For Total Nitrogen And Total Phosphorus
  • Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test Exact Form Of The
    Test Statistic
  • Comparison Between Grab Samples At 0.5 Meter
    Depth And EWI Samples
  • Comparison Of Grab Samples At 1.0 Meter Depth And
    EWI Samples
  • Comparison Of Grabs At 0.5 Meter Depth And 1.0
    Meter Depth

25
DESCRIPTION OF THE PROJECT(CONTINUED)
  • Statistical Interpretation Of Differences Between
    Grab Samples And Depth-integrated Samples
  • Total Nitrogen
  • No Significant Differences Between Grabs And
    Depth-integrated Samples (Plt.025)

26
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT(CONTINUED)
  • Statistical Interpretation Of Differences
    (Continued)
  • Total Phosphorus
  • Three Sites (25) Showed Significant Differences
    Between Grabs At 1.0 Meter Depth And
    Depth-integrated Samples
  • One Site (33) Showed Differences Between Grabs
    At 0.5 Meter Depth And Depth-integrated Samples

27
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT(CONTINUED)
  • Water-Quality Cross-section Surveys
  • Document Water-Quality Homogeneity In The East
    Coast Canal System
  • At Several Sites Temperature, Dissolved Oxygen,
    pH, And Specific Conductance Measured Beneath
    Surface And At 2-foot Intervals To Streambed
  • Dissolved Oxygen Was Only Parameter Showing
    Variation In Cross-section

28
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT(CONTINUED)
  • Water-Quality Cross-section Survey At Snapper
    Creek At S-22
  • Temperature, Dissolved Oxygen, pH, Specific
    Conductance Measured From 1.0 Foot Below Surface
    Every 2 Feet To Streambed
  • Total Nitrogen And Total Phosphorus Samples
    Collected Every 2 Feet To Above Streambed

29
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT(CONTINUED)
  • Water-Quality Cross-section Survey (Continued)
  • Discharge Of 414 Cfs During Measurements
  • Suspended Sediment Sample Collected By EWI And By
    Grab

30
DISSOLVEDOXYGENDECREASEDWITHDEPTH
31
TOTALNITROGENAND TOTALPHOSPHORUSINCREASED
WITH DEPTH
32
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT(CONTINUED)
  • Suspended Sediment Sample Collected By EWI Method
    Was 3.0 Mg/l And By Grab Method Was 1.0 Mg/l
  • Depth-integrated Samples Collected By EWI
    Probably More Accurately Reflect Phosphorus
    Concentration Than Those Collected As Grabs

33
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT(CONTINUED)
  • Relation Between Grab And Depth-integrated
    Samples
  • Line Of Organic Correlation (LOC) Describes
    Relation Between Two Variables. No Reduction in
    Variance of Estimated Values

34
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT(CONTINUED)
  • Grab Samples Underestimate Phosphorus
    Concentration Compared To EWI Samples
  • S-21 (0.5) Grab 0.25EWI .00625
  • S-21 (1.0) Grab 0.2973EWI .0057
  • S-25b (1.0) Grab 0.8255EWI - .0018
  • S-28 (1.0) Grab 1.093EWI - .008

35
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT(CONTINUED)
  • Determination Of Constituent Loads

36
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT(CONTINUED)
  • Discharge Computed Corresponding to Each Sampling
    Event
  • Fundamental Equations

37
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT(CONTINUED)
  • Linear Regression Analysis To Develop Predictive
    Models
  • Load Was Dependent Variable
  • Discharge Was Explanatory Or Predictor Variable
  • Best Model Based On Highest R-squared And Lowest
    Predicted Error Sum Of Squares (PRESS)
  • R-squared Averaged 0.87 For Nitrogen Models And
    0.76 For Phosphorus Models

38
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT(CONTINUED)
  • Log-linear Model Called Estimator Used At Miami
    Canal S-26
  • Used For Load Estimation By NAWQA
  • Continuous Discharge Data
  • Minimum Of 50 Samples For Period Of At Least 2
    Years
  • Minimum Variance Unbiased Estimator (MVUE) For
    Elimination Of Bias From Log Space To Real Space
    And Adjusted Maximum Likelihood Estimator (AMLE)
    For Censored Data

39
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT(CONTINUED)ESTIMATOR
40
(No Transcript)
41
(No Transcript)
42
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT(CONTINUED)
  • Water-Quality Trends At Two Long-term Discharge
    Sites In South Florida
  • Miami Canal At S-26 (1966 To 1994). Represents
    Flow Through Agricultural, Conservation and Urban
    Areas.
  • Tamiami Canal 40-mile Bend To Monroe (1967 T0
    1993). Represents Overland Sheet flow From Big
    Cypress National Preserve.

43
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT(CONTINUED)
  • Constituents Analyzed For
  • Major Inorganics And Physical Characteristics
  • Field Parameters Specific Conductance, pH,
    Dissolved Oxygen
  • Suspended Sediment
  • Nitrogen And Phosphorus Species
  • Total Organic Carbon
  • Trace Metals
  • Fecal Coliform And Fecal Streptococcus
  • Phytoplankton

44
LOCATION OF SAMPLING SITES
45
TAMIAMI CANAL OUTLETS
46
OUTLET ON TAMIAMI CANAL IN BIG CYPRESS NATIONAL
PRESERVE
47
MIAMI CANAL AT S-26
48
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT(CONTINUED)
  • Extraneous Variation in Water-Quality Must Be
    Removed in Order to Ascertain Anthropogenic
    Changes on Water-Quality
  • Extraneous Variation in Water-Quality Caused by
  • Seasonality
  • Discharge

49
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT(CONTINUED)
  • ESTREND A Program For Determining Monotonic
    Trends In Water-Quality
  • Non-parametric Seasonal Kendall Trend (SKT) Test
    To Remove Extraneous Variation
  • SKT Applied To Time Series Of Flow-adjusted
    Concentrations (Residuals) From Regression Of
    Concentration With Discharge
  • Time Series Of Non-adjusted Concentrations

50
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT(CONTINUED)
  • Form Of Linear Models
  • Conservative Constituents (Dissolved Solids,
    Cations And Anions)

51
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT(CONTINUED)
  • Form Of Linear Models (Continued)
  • Non-conservative Constituents (Nitrogen And
    Phosphorus Species, Suspended Sediment, Organic
    Carbon, Bacteria And Phytoplankton)
  • Non-linear Method Fitting Concentration/discharg
    e Or Log Concentration/log Discharge Relation By
    LOWESS

52
(No Transcript)
53
(No Transcript)
54
SUMMARY
  • Nutrient Concentrations Vary In The East Coast
    Canals Based On Land Use Categories
  • No Statistical Differences Between EWI And Grab
    Samples For Total Nitrogen But 25 Of Sites
    Showed Differences For Total Phosphorus
  • Coefficients Of Determination (R2) For Nitrogen
    Models Averaged 0.87 And 0.76 For Phosphorus
    Models
  • Long-term Trends At Miami Canal At S-26 And
    Tamiami Canal Showed Both Improvement And
    Deterioration In Water-Quality With Time

55
WHERE DO WE GO FROM HERE?
  • Continued Water-quality Monitoring At Tamiami
    Canal And Miami Canal At S-26
  • Continued Water-quality Monitoring At East Coast
    Canal Sites

56
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
  • South Florida Water Management District Employees
  • George Hwa, Control Room
  • Ron Dempsey, Supervisor, Homestead Field Office
  • Dawn Browning, Supervisor, Miami Field Office
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com