Principals of Assessment and Intervention in Acquired Language Disorders - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Principals of Assessment and Intervention in Acquired Language Disorders

Description:

Principals of Assessment and Intervention in Acquired Language Disorders Goals of Assessment To assess potential for future recovery (prognosis) To monitor change ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:342
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 31
Provided by: Katr6
Learn more at: http://www.columbia.edu
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Principals of Assessment and Intervention in Acquired Language Disorders


1
Principals of Assessment and Intervention in
Acquired Language Disorders
2
Goals of Assessment
  • To determine the presence of communication
    impairment
  • Severity and type of impairment
  • Determine the individuals strengths and
    weaknesses
  • To identify exacerbating factors
  • Vision and hearing
  • Agnosias (recognition deficits) in various
    modalities
  • Deficits in proprioception or praxis
  • Affective (mood) disorders
  • Effects of medications
  • To identify intervention goals

3
Goals of Assessment
  • To assess potential for future recovery
    (prognosis)
  • To monitor change e.g. spontaneous recovery,
    treatment efficacy
  • To evaluate maintenance of treatment gains
  • To define factors that facilitate comprehension,
    production and use of language
  • To establish a working relationship with client
    and significant others

4
Goals of Assessment
  • To determine the presence of aphasia, and
    severity and type of aphasia, using the
    _____________, and profile the clients strengths
    and weaknesses
  • NOT
  • To administer the BDAE

5
Components of language function
Cognitive Recognition, understanding, memory,
attention, reasoning ability
Linguistic Auditory comprehension, language
production (form and content)
Communicative/ Pragmatic Turntaking, topic
initiation and maintenance, repairs, speech acts
produced, nonverbal aspects
6
Assessment Defined
  • Organised, goal directed evaluation of the
    components of communication
  • Evaluation of persons QOL
  • Evaluation of communicative interactions within
    family/social unit
  • Their role in larger unit of society
  • Carried out to determine how strengths fortified
    and weaknesses modified
  • Chapey 2008

7
Before you start
  • Gain information and form initial hypotheses
    from
  • Initial referral
  • Verbal information from MDT members
  • Medical notes
  • Remember introductions and endings
  • Why you are there, what you want to do, why it
    was useful, what happens next

8
Informal Language Assessments
  • What to assess
  • speech fluency
  • speech output
  • auditory comprehension
  • repetition
  • naming
  • written output
  • reading comprehension
  • drawing
  • gesture
  • facial expression
  • awareness of deficit
  • NOT all at once! Be sensitive to clients medical
    / cognitive / emotional state

9
Informal Assessment
  • For each aspect of communication
  • What the individual is able to do?
  • Where does the task break down?
  • language production Single words ? short phrases
    ? sentence ? 2-3 sentences ? paragraph ?
    monologue ? conversation
  • Auditory comprehension Single words ? yes/no
    questions ? sequential commands ? non-sequential
    commands
  • Have a hiearchy of tasks for each area to allow
    flexibility
  • Try to start at the appropriate level for that
    client

10
Informal assessment
  • Manipulate the structure you provide for the task
  • Unstructured (no control or interference)
  • Moderately structured (retell a story, describe a
    picture or a sequence of activities)
  • Highly structured (sentence completion, object
    naming)
  • Be systematic
  • Check hearing and visual perception first
  • Assess language comprehension before language
    production
  • Writing and calculation later

11
Informal assessment
Brookshire 2003
12
Informal assessment
  • Auditory comprehension
  • Answer closed ? open questions
  • Point to objects / pictures named by the examiner
  • Follow spoken directions
  • Answer questions about spoken discourse
  • Speech
  • Recitation
  • Object / picture naming
  • Phrase or sentence completion
  • Phrase / sentence repetition
  • Produce single sentences ? longer utterances
  • Reading
  • Match pictures, letters, geometric forms
  • Match printed words to pictures
  • Read aloud numbers, letters, words, phrases
  • Answer written questions
  • Silent reading / comprehension answer questions
    about a written test
  • Writing
  • Copy letters, numbers, shapes, words

Brookshire 2003
13
Formal Language Assessments
  • Acute
  • Boston Naming Test
  • Bedside Evaluation Screening Test (BEST)
  • Western Aphasia Battery
  • Chronic
  • BDAE (subtests)
  • PALPA
  • Pyramids and Palm Trees
  • Minnesota Test for Differential Diagnosis of
    Aphasia
  • Porch Index of Communicative Ability (PICA)
  • Comprehensive Aphasia Test (CAT)
  • Appropriacy for Sri Lanka?

14
Assessment of communicative functioning
  • Not language per se performance, pragmatics
  • Communication skills in everyday life
  • Example CADL-2 (Communicative Activities in
    Daily Living)
  • Provides a snapshot of functional communication
    skills using a variety of simulated communication
    activities
  • Involves people reading timetables, menus
    pretending to go to doctor, shopping making a
    phone call writing a shopping list
  • For people with aphasia, HI, dementia,
    intellectual impairment, hearing impairment

15
Aphasia Recovery
  • Spontaneous recovery decelerating curve
  • Maximum recovery 1-3m
  • Flattening out 6-7m
  • Little/no spontaneous recovery after 1yr
    plateau
  • Basso 1992 Benson and Ardila 1996 in Chapey 2008
  • Prognosis TBI better than stroke, haemorrhagic
    better than infarction
  • Lesser and Milroy 1993

16
Neural Mechanisms for Recovery
  • Reduction of cerebral oedema/improvement of local
    circulation Spontaneous recovery
  • Brain plasticity cortical reorganisation to
    engage pre-existing but functionally depressed
    pathways. Called upon when dominant system
    fails
  • Lesion size negative influence on recovery

17
Aphasia Treatment
  • Efficacy does aphasia treatment result in a
    significant improvement on one or more tests of
    language functioning?
  • Yes, provided that
  • Treatment is delivered by qualified professionals
  • Global aphasics are excluded
  • Content, intensity, duration and timing of
    treatment are appropriate
  • Sensitive and reliable measures are used to track
    changes
  • Effectiveness does aphasia treatment result in
    meaningful improvements in communicative
    functioning in daily life?

18
Therapy Approaches
  • Approaches that assume the brain can relearn what
    has been lost/skills can be re-accessed
  • Approaches that assume lost language functions
    not recoverable. Therapy aimed at getting
    around the problem

19
Models of Therapy
  • WHO International classification of Functioning,
    Disability and Health (2002)
  • Body functions and structures i.e. impairments of
    brain
  • Activity i.e. ability to make a phone call, read
    a menu
  • Participation i.e. pursuit and enjoyment of real
    life goals e.g. volunteering/getting a job

20
Treatment Considerations
  • Timing
  • During spontaneous recovery period or wait?
  • Vignolo (1964) treatment is only really
    effective if it begins when physiologic recovery
    is most rapid
  • Poeck et al (1989) time post-onset does not
    affect recovery of language, but it does affect
    response to treatment
  • Generally, delaying treatment has not been
    conclusively demonstrated to have any effects on
    eventual outcome but it likely does have effects
    on the patient and their family

21
Treatment Considerations
  • Candidacy
  • Some patients have very mild impairments and
    recover spontaneously
  • Some are so severely impaired that they cannot
    benefit
  • Some refuse, lack motivation, cant travel

22
Treatment planning
  • Use assessment results
  • Use discussion with client (where possible) and
    family
  • Set long and short term goals
  • Consider design of task, the psycholinguistic
    nature of stimuli selected, modality of material,
    type of facilitation given, duration and
    intensity of therapy (Byng and Black 1995)

23
Planning intervention
What person can do cannot do does do
What person needs to do wants to do
closing the gap
24
Example treatment planning
  • MJs assessments show
  • Strengths
  • Good lexical comprehension
  • Good sentence comprehension using non reversible
    active, passive comparative verbs
  • Can draw and gesture to convey some aspects of
    meaning
  • Semantic cueing facilitates naming
  • Written support facilitates comprehension
  • Weaknesses
  • Poor complex auditory sentence comprehension
  • Spoken confrontation naming difficulties
  • Difficulties in written confrontation naming when
    word frequency decreases
  • Drawings and gestures may not be recognisable
    outside context as tend not to be well defined
  • MJs wish to talk better with family and friends

25
Setting goals
  • Overall goal To maximise MJs current
    communication abilities
  • This will involve use of his existing strengths
    to compensate for his weaknesses (use drawing,
    gesture, writing of words etc - total
    communication)
  • Relate this to MJs goal, when setting goals for
    therapy, using phrases like in order to
  • For MJ to improve his communication skills (esp.
    drawing, gesture, keyword writing) in order for
    him to be able to engage in conversations with
    his family. This includes the following
  • to draw communicatively to convey meaning in
    conversation with his wife
  • To gesture to write etc
  • Then take one long term goal at a time, and break
    it down that is, what steps would be involved
    in getting the client from where he is now
  • His drawings are sometimes useful but are not
    well-defined
  • To the long term goal
  • Drawing communicatively in conversation with
    his wife

This is the overall goal
This is MJs goal
26
Task hierarchies
  • Arrange the steps in order of difficulty
  • To draw well defined single items
  • to command (draw an apple)
  • therapy tasks include drawing basic shape, then
    differentiating items from one another on visual
    features (e.g.. apple vs. orange)
  • based on function (draw something you wear)
    extending from objects to actions
  • based on gesture (may or may not incorporate the
    verb function from above) (e.g. gesture a banana
    gesture a shovel)
  • in whole and parts (involves semantic breakdown)
  • within a category/ generative drawing
  • from memory
  • To draw well defined single events
  • from stimulus pictures
  • from part of stimulus
  • from memory

27
Task hierarchies
  • to draw single items communicatively
  • to draw single events communicatively
  • therapy tasks will involve encouraging Pt to be
    aware of the conversation partners needs,
    focusing on issues such as listening to the other
    persons guesses, conveying one piece of
    information at a time
  • to draw communicatively in conversation with SLT
  • therapy tasks will include drawing answers to
    questions e.g. what did you do on the weekend?
  • to draw communicatively in conversation with wife
  • therapy tasks will include working with wife to
    assist her to develop interpretation strategies,
    such as homing-in questions asking for
    details adding to the drawings writing key
    words to check recapping what she knows about
    the drawing every few minutes

28
Drawing and total communication
  • Beeson Ramage, (2000). Drawing from experience
    The development of alternative communication
    strategies. Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation,
    7(2), 10-20.
  • Lawson Fawcus (1999). Increasing effective
    communication using a total communication
    approach. In Byng, S. Swinburn, K. (Eds) The
    aphasia therapy file. Pp 61-71. Hove, England
    Psychology Press.
  • Sacchett et al (1999). Drawing together
    evaluation of a therapy programme for severe
    aphasia. International Journal of Language
    Communication disorders, 34(3), 265-289).

29
Task Hierarchies
  • Simple ? more complex
  • Less demanding ? more demanding
  • More support ? less support
  • E.g. cuing hierarchy for anomia
  • Imitation
  • First sound / syllable
  • Sentence completion
  • Word spelled aloud
  • Rhyme
  • Synonym / antonym
  • Function / location
  • Superordinate
  • Make hierarchies personal

Brookshire 2003 p 313
30
Goals for treatment
  • The primary objective in treatment of aphasia is
    to increase communication. What the aphasic
    patient wants is to recover enough language to
    get on with his life. (Schuell et al 1964, 333.)
  • Usually will not be complete recovery of language
    and communicative function
  • Treatment may enhance recovery, but recovery will
    stop
  • Identify strengths and weaknesses use the
    strengths to compensate for the weaknesses help
    the aphasic person to be an effective
    communicator in spite of their language deficits
  • Generalization recovery must not be limited to
    the treatment room
  • Generalization does not just happen it must be
    planned for, worked towards, tested for
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com