Post-Disaster Safety Assessment Program (SAP) Training for Evaluators - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 80
About This Presentation
Title:

Post-Disaster Safety Assessment Program (SAP) Training for Evaluators

Description:

Post-Disaster Safety Assessment Program (SAP) Training for Evaluators Unit 5 Lifeline Systems and Facilities DAMAGE OBSERVED (D.O.) 0 ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:282
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 81
Provided by: State68
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Post-Disaster Safety Assessment Program (SAP) Training for Evaluators


1
Post-Disaster Safety AssessmentProgram (SAP)
Training for Evaluators
  • Unit 5 Lifeline Systems
  • and Facilities

2
Lifeline systems and Facilities
  • Geotechnical Evaluation
  • Transportation Systems
  • Airports
  • Bridges
  • Roads
  • Water/Wastewater Systems
  • Pipeline
  • Pump Station
  • Reservoir
  • Wastewater Treatment Plant
  • Water Treatment Plant                 

3
General Procedures
  • All lifeline evaluations are Detailed Evaluations
  • Instead of tagging, the responsible authority is
    informed of results
  • If a facility is found to be unsafe, the
    authority is contacted immediately, so proper
    steps can be taken.

4
Assessment Form Heading
  • See pages 134 136 in student manual.
  • All the lifeline forms use the same heading.
  • Facility name, address
  • Date time, type of disaster
  • SAP ID numbers
  • Estimated damage
  • Facility status (red, yellow, green)
  • Section A Condition existing posting,
    recommended posting

5
Geotechnical Evaluation
  • Only non-lifeline specific assessment
  • Applies to all evaluations
  • Can be requested for any evaluation
  • Begin evaluation at point in question then spread
    out.

6
Geotechnical Evaluations
  • Liquefaction
  • Lateral Spreading
  • Expansive Soils
  • Landslides
  • Differential Settlement

7
Geotechnical Evaluations
8
(No Transcript)
9
(No Transcript)
10
(No Transcript)
11
(No Transcript)
12
(No Transcript)
13
(No Transcript)
14
DAMAGE OBSERVED (D.O.)
Assessment
Report _____________
0 1 2-3-4
5 6 NA
NO Damage Scale None Slight Moderate
Severe Total Not
Not (0) (1-10)
(11 - 40) (41 - 60) (over 60) Applicable
Observed
D. OBSERVED GEOTECHNICAL CONDITIONS WITH EFFECT
ON FACILITY
Extent of
Effect of
Extent of Effect of Condition
Observed Condition Condition
Observed Condition Condition
Condition
D.O. D.O.
D.O.
D.O.
E. CONTINUING HAZARDS TO LIFE/PROPERTY (Please
describe) ________________________
__________________________________________________
_____________________________
__________________________________________________
_____________________________
__________________________________________________
_____________________________
15
Geotechnical Evaluation
  • If the facility has been posted, make sure you
    update the existing placard.
  • If your recommendation changes a posting, change
    the placard and add the appropriate information.

16
(No Transcript)
17
(No Transcript)
18
Airport Evaluations
  • Small, general aviation airports.
  • Potentially used as staging areas for people and
    equipment working within the community.

19
Airport Evaluations
  • Types of Damage
  • Control towers have been damaged because of the
    amplification between the ground and the top, and
  • Damage to airport runways.
  • Damage to buildings and utilities

20
DAMAGE OBSERVED (D.O.)
Assessment
Report _____________
0 1 2-3-4
5 6 NA
NO Damage Scale None Slight Moderate
Severe Total Not
Not (0) (1-10)
(11 - 40) (41 - 60) (over 60) Applicable
Observed
D. SURFACE DISPLACEMENT
Amount in inches
D.O.
Horiz. Vert. Runway pavement _____
______ ______ Taxiway pavement _____
______ ______ Aircraft aprons
_____ ______ ______ Car parking areas
_____ ______ ______ Access roadways
_____ ______ ______ Bridges
_____ ______ ______
Liquefaction _____  
(Bridge Report Attached ? Geotechnical
Report Attached ?)
G. REMARKS _______________________ _____________
__________________________________________________
__________________________________________________
__________________________________________________
__________________________________________________
__________________________________________________
__________________________________________________
__________________________________________________
_________________________________ ________________
__________________________________________________
__________________________________________________
__________________________________________________
__________________________________________________
__________________________________________________
__________________________________________________
__________________________________________________
__________________________________________________
________________
E. UNDERGROUND UTILITIES D.O.

Water mains
________ Water services
________ Gas mains
________ Sewer
________ Collapsed
? Displaced ? Large storm drains
________ Aircraft fueling
systems ________ Airfield
lighting ________
Underground electrical ________
21
F. BUILDINGS
D.O. Control tower structure
_______ Passenger terminal buildings
Structural
_______
Mechanical _______
Electrical
_______ Utility plant buildings
Equipment _______
Piping
_______ Emergency generator building
Equipment
_______ Fuel supply
_______
 
22
Airport Evaluations
  • Posting
  • Report to the general manager of the airport.
  • You do not have the authority to post the
    airport all you can do is make a recommendation.
  • If your recommendation is UNSAFE, immediately
    contact the jurisdiction.

23
(No Transcript)
24
(No Transcript)
25
Bridge Evaluations
  • Major bridges on the highways and freeways will
    be evaluated by CA Dept. of Transportation
    (Caltrans).
  • Used to evaluate bridges not a part of the
    national highway system and located within the
    jurisdiction.

26
Bridge Evaluations
  • Types of Damage
  • Support columns fail in shear.
  • Spans fall off abutments and piers.
  • approaches settle, resulting in an offset at the
    abutment.

27
STATE OF CALIFORNIA SAFETY ASSESSMENT PROGRAM

BRIDGE
Assessment Report No. _________
B. RECOMMENDATIONS Monitor _____________________
___ ? Use for emergency vehicles
____________ ? Use for public transportation
_______ ? Close to truck traffic
__________________ ? Use for pedestrians
______________ ? Use for private passenger
vehicles only___ ? Use for two-way traffic
____________ ? Use for one-way traffic
________________ ? Use off-site detour
_______________ ? Use for on-site detour
_________________ ? Use underpass only
______________ ? Use overpass only
___________________ ? Barricade
______________________ ? Shore and brace
_____________________ ?
C. COMMENTS _____________________________________
____________________ _____________________________
__________________________________________________
__________________________________________________
__________________________________________________
__________________________________________________
__________________________________________________
_____
28
D. BRIDGE DESCRIPTION

Assessment Report _________ 1. Type
MATERIAL
3. Internal support
Concrete Steel Composite
Timber Number of spans Height
Prestr. Reinf.

One Two No. (ft)
Arch ? ? ? ? ? Bents (frames)
? ? _____ _____ Box ? ? ? ?
? Columns ? ? _____ _____ Cantilever
? ? ? ? ? Piers ? ? _____
_____ Girder ? ? ? ? ? Slab
? ? ? ? ? 4. Abutments
High _______ ft. Suspension ? ? ? ? ?
Low _______ ft. Truss
? ? ? ? ? Other ? ? ? ?
? 5. Road Dimensions Length _______
ft. Curb to curb
_______ ft 2. Foundation Caisson ? Pile ?
Spread footings ? Walks
_______ft
29
DAMAGE OBSERVED (D.O.)
Assessment
Report _____________
0 1 2-3-4
5 6 NA
NO Damage Scale None Slight Moderate
Severe Total Not
Not (0) (1-10)
(11 - 40) (41 - 60) (over 60) Applicable
Observed
E. FOUNDATION H. APPROACHES K.
SUPERSTRUCTURE D.O. D.O.
D.O. ____ Earth movements/gaps ____
Damage ____ Girder Piles
at ? Operational ? Shear
cracks ____ a) abutments ? Roadway
settled (___in) ? Moment cracks ____ b)
Piers ? Off bridge seat ____ Deck
Spread footings at ? Long.
joints enlarged ____ a) Abutments I. BE
ARINGS ? Expansion joints ____ b)
Piers ____ Integral ____
Truss ____ Contact ?
Upper chord F. ABUTMENTS ____
Rocker ? Lower chord _____ Disturbance
or erosion ____ Elastomeric Pad ?
Diagonals _____ Wall movement (____in)
____ Suspenders _____ Backfill settlement
(____in) J. INTERMEDIATE SUPPORTS
____ Settlement L.
GEOTECHNICAL G. WINGWALLS ____
Damage ____ Liquefaction _____
Damage ? Near top ____
Landslide ? Movement ? Near
bottom ____ Faulting ? Separation
? Near middle ____ Other ?
Moment failure ? Shear
failure ? Compression
failure ? Support lost
30
Bridge Evaluations
  • Posting
  • If determined the bridge is UNSAFE, notify the
    jurisdiction immediately.

31
(No Transcript)
32
(No Transcript)
33
(No Transcript)
34
(No Transcript)
35
Road and Highway Evaluations
  • Freeways and highways that are a part of the
    national highway system are rapidly evaluated by
    the CA Dept. of Transportation (Caltrans).
  • Local law enforcement and fire service are on the
    streets immediately following the event and will
    determine what streets are useable.
  • Will most likely be used to re-evaluate as
    streets are needed.

36
Road and Highway Evaluations
  • Types of damage
  • Collapse debris from bridges and overpasses
  • Debris from buildings and landslides
  • Slip-outs and settlements
  • Washouts

37
STATE OF CALIFORNIA SAFETY ASSESSMENT PROGRAM

ROAD/HIGHWAY Assessment Report
No. ________
B. RECOMMENDATIONS Monitor_____________________
___________ ? Ok for emergency
vehicles______________ ? Ok for public
transportation________________ ? Ok for private
vehicles__________________ ? Ok for
pedestrians______________________ ? Ok for
one-way traffic___________________ ? Ok for
two-way traffic____________________ ? Install
barricades______________________ ? Use
detour(s)__________________________ ? Aftershocks
potentially dangerous to traffic__ ? Traffic in
danger due to adjacent unstable/unsound
structure__________?
C. COMMENTS _____________________________________
__________________________________________________
__________________________________________________
__________________________________________________
__________________________________________________
__________________________________________________
__________________________________________________
__________________________________________________
__________________________________________________
_________________________________________________
38
DAMAGE OBSERVED (D.O.)
Assessment
Report _____________
0 1 2-3-4
5 6 NA
NO Damage Scale None Slight Moderate
Severe Total Not
Not (0) (1-10)
(11 - 40) (41 - 60) (over 60) Applicable
Observed
D. ROADBED G. UTILITIES
D.O. Location Extent
D.O. _____ Fills ______________ ___________
__ _____ Drainage _____ Cuts _____________
_ _____________ _____ Gas lines _____
Subgrade ______________ _____________ _____
Petroleum lines _____ Slip-outs ______________
_____________ _____ Underground power
lines _____ Slides ______________ ____________
_ _____ Aboveground power lines _____
Washouts _____
Sewers E. PAVEMENTS _____
Water lines D.O. _____
Other ____________ _____ Longitudinal
cracks _____ Transverse cracks H. O
BSTRUCTION/HAZARDS _____ Vertical
displacement D.O. Amount
_________________ _____ Bridges
Side up ( N, S, E, W) _______ _____
Buildings/structures Pavement type ? AC ?
PCC ? Other _____ Debris Describe
________________________________ _____
Joint poles _____
Mud F. TRAFFIC CONTROL FACILITIES _____
Power lines D.O. _____
Rocks _____ Condition _____
Trees ? Operating _____
Water ? Critical regulatory signs
standing _____ Other ______________ Excep
tions and conditions ______________________ ____
_________________________________________ ________
_____________________________________
39
Road and Highway Evaluations
  • Posting
  • If determined the road is UNSAFE, notify the
    jurisdiction immediately.

40
(No Transcript)
41
(No Transcript)
42
Pipeline Evaluations
  • Used to evaluate water and sewage lines.
  • How pipelines are evaluated will be up to the
    jurisdiction.
  • Usually assigned a segment of the system be
    prepared to evaluate other facilities that are a
    part of the system such as pump stations and
    reservoirs

43
Pipeline Evaluations
  • Types of damage
  • Joint damage or separation.
  • Bursting.
  • For water systems entire areas of the system may
    lose pressure and can result in water boiling out
    of the ground.

44
Pipeline Evaluations
  • Types of damage (Continued)
  • Sewer pipelines may collapses, causing backup and
    possible overflow.
  • In liquefiable soils, sewers and manholes will
    float, making them hydraulically inoperable.
  • Identification of these types of failures will
    only be possible using specialized equipment.

45
(No Transcript)
46
STATE OF CALIFORNIA SAFETY ASSESSMENT PROGRAM

PIPELINE
Assessment Report No. ________
  B. RECOMMENDATIONS Monitor___________________
_______ ? Continue in service ______________ ?
Remove from service_______________ ? Install
temp. above-ground line____ ? Provide
temporary alternate service___ ? Check water
quality/safety ________ ? Unblock entrance
________________ ? Divert flow________________
_____ ?   _________________________________ ____
___________________________ ____________________
_____________ _______________________________ _
________________________________ ________________
_______________
C. COMMENTS ____________________________________
________________________ _________________________
__________________________________________________
__________________________________________________
__________________________________________________
__________________________________________________
__________________________________________________
__________________________________________________
_____________________________________________
47
D. PIPELINE DESCRIPTION

Assessment Report ____________   1. Type of
pipeline Pressure ? Gravity ? Storm
Drain ? Water ? San.
Sewer ? Other ? ______________   2. Pipe
nominal diameter ______ 3. Proximity to
water/sewer/gas line _______________
AC CI CMP DI PVC RC STEEL VC WI Other Unknown
Bell Spigot
Butt
Caulked
Comp. Ring
Riveted
Welded
Unknown
4 Describe the failure mode ? Circumferential
crack ? Pulled joint ? Burst pipe
barrel ? Broken joint ? Sheared pipe
barrel ? Other ______________________________
___ ? Sheared service connection ? Liquefaction
Describe ______________________________ ________
__________________________________________________
_____________________
48
DAMAGE OBSERVED (D.O.)
Assessment
Report _____________
0 1 2-3-4
5 6 NA
NO Damage Scale None Slight Moderate
Severe Total Not
Not (0) (1-10)
(11 - 40) (41 - 60) (over 60) Applicable
Observed
SURFACE OBSERVATIONS D.O. D.O.
E. ____ Ground surface disturbed K. ____
Soffit damaged F. ____ Visible
leakage L. ____ Invert displacement G.
____ Service connection broken M. ____
Horizontal displacement H. ____ Headwall
damaged N. ____ Trash-rack
blocked/damaged I. ____ Endwall
damaged O. ____ Leakage at valves J. ____
Manhole damaged P. ____ Leakage
continuing Q. ____ Leakage
rates _____ _____ R. Nearest valve/MH (if
less than 1/4 mile) ______________________________
___________
S. Remarks _____________________________________
________________________________ _________________
__________________________________________________
__________________________________________________
__________________________________________________
__________________________________________________
_______________________
49
Pipeline Evaluations
  • Posting
  • If determined the pipeline should be removed from
    service, notify the jurisdiction immediately.

50
(No Transcript)
51
Pump Station Evaluations
  • Pump stations are found with water, wastewater,
    natural gas (compressor stations), and liquid
    fuel pipelines.
  • All but wastewater pump stations are usually at
    grade, and may have components as deep as 10 feet
    below grade.

52
Pump Station Evaluations
  • Types of damage
  • Loss of power.
  • Damage to the emergency power system.
  • Fallen electrical and control cabinets.
  • Damage to piping.
  • Wastewater pump stations are often founded in
    liquefiable soils such that they become buoyant,
    breaking connecting piping.

53
STATE OF CALIFORNIA SAFETY ASSESSMENT PROGRAM
PUMP
STATION Assessment Report
No. ________
  B. RECOMMENDATIONS Monitor___________________
______ ? Continue in service_____________ ? Rem
ove from service______________ ? Check
pump-motor alignment_____ ? Brace structure
before using________ ? Recheck after power
restored_____ ? Check filter basket_____________
___ ? _________________________________ ______
_________________________ ______________________
___________ _______________________________ ___
______________________________ __________________
_____________
C. COMMENTS ____________________________________
________________________ ________________________
__________________________________________________
__________________________________________________
__________________________________________________
__________________________________________________
__________________________________________________
__________________________________________________
_______________________________
54
D. PUMP STATION DESCRIPTION
Assessment Report _______________   ?
Water ? Wastewater ? Sewage ? Other
_________________ ? Wet
Well ? Dry Well
No. Motors No. Motors No. Motors No. Motors No. Operable No. Operable No. Operable No. Operable
Elect Gas Gasoline Diesel Elect Gas Gasoline Diesel Str. Type Buried Above Grade
Centrifugal Concrete
Reciprocal Masonry
Horizontal Frame
Vertical Other
? Building (Building Evaluation Attached ?)
55
DAMAGE OBSERVED (D.O.)
Assessment
Report _____________
0 1 2-3-4
5 6 NA
NO Damage Scale None Slight Moderate
Severe Total Not
Not (0) (1-10)
(11 - 40) (41 - 60) (over 60) Applicable
Observed
E. STRUCTURE G. MOTORS/ENGINES I.
EXTERNAL POWER D.O. D.O. D.O
. _____ Access _____ Anchors
_____ Electrical continuity _____ Crane
runway _____ Connected piping _____ Fuel
lines _____ Fixed hoist _____ Couplings to
pumps _____ Fuel storage _____ Floor ____
_ Power supply _____ Fore bay _____ Trans
former(s) J. AUXILIARY EQUIPMENT _____ Foundati
on _____ Charts _____ Roof H
. CONTROLS _____ Lighting,
exterior _____ Walls _____ Internal
power _____ Lighting, interior _____ Hatche
s _____ Supports _____ Meters
gauges _____ Wiring _____ Overhe
ad crane _____ Valving _____
Small diameter piping F. PUMPS
_____ Electrical Cabinets _____ Anchors __
___ Casing _____ Connected piping K.
EXTERNAL PIPING _____ Supports Inlet
Outlet _____ Valving Piping ____ ___
Leaked ? ? Leaking
? ? Leakage rate, gpm _________
__________________________________________________
__________________________________________________
__________________________________________________
__________________________________________________
_____________________________________
56
Pump Station Evaluations
  • Posting
  • If determined the pipeline should be removed from
    service, notify the jurisdiction immediately.

57
(No Transcript)
58
Reservoir (Tank) Evaluations
  • Water tanks are highly susceptible to damage from
    earthquakes.
  • The potential is there for evaluations following
    other types of events or situations, but it will
    be earthquakes where they are most often used.
  • Important components of a jurisdictions
    infrastructure, especially when their main water
    supply has been disrupted.

59
Reservoir (Tank) Evaluations
  • Types of damage (Steel Tanks)
  • Uplift, breaking connecting piping.
  • Tank wall wrinkling, commonly referred to as
    elephants foot buckling.
  • Wall-floor seam can burst.
  • Sloshing water can damage the roof, although this
    is not likely to result in loss of service.

60
Reservoir (Tanks) Evaluations
  • Types of damage (Cable Wrapped Concrete Tanks)
  • Failure of the wrapping as a result of corrosion
    of inadequate design.
  • Older tanks can slide off their floor slab
    foundations
  • Roofs are also vulnerable.

61
STATE OF CALIFORNIA SAFETY ASSESSMENT PROGRAM

RESERVOIR
Assessment Report No. ________
  B. RECOMMENDATIONS Monitor___________________
______ ? Continue in service, repair
ASAP_____ ? Remove from service______________ ?
Drain and repair___________________ ? Continue
in service________________ ? Lower water level
and continue service_ ? . _______
__ ft _________________________________ _____
__________________________ _____________________
____________ _______________________________ __
_______________________________ _________________
______________
C. COMMENTS ____________________________________
______________________ __________________________
__________________________________________________
__________________________________________________
__________________________________________________
__________________________________
62

STEEL RESERVOIR
Assessment Report __________   D. RESERVOIR
DESCRIPTION Capacity ______ MG Wall Height
______ ft O/S Diameter ______ ft   Roof Type ?
Wood ? Steel ? Flat ? Conical ?
Knuckled Edge Shell ? Welded ?
Bolted ? Riveted Floor support ? Footing
ring ? Oiled sand ? A.C. ? Other
___________________ Footing ? Concrete
ring ? Other _____________ ? None Pipe
connection ? Rigid ? Flexible Anchorage to
foundation _____ Dia. __________ Spacing

DAMAGE OBSERVED (D.O.)
0 1 2-3-4
5 6 NA
NO Damage Scale None Slight Moderate
Severe Total Not
Not (0) (1-10)
(11 - 40) (41 - 60) (over 60) Applicable
Observed
63
E. SHELL F. VALVE PIT
D.O. D.O. _____
Elephant's foot _____ Access a.
Height ______ ft _____ Control
Piping b. Circumferential extent
______ft _____ Gauges _____ Other
buckling _____ Hatches _____ Hor
izontal joints broken _____ Inlet-outl
et piping _____ Vertical joints
broken _____ Pit flooded _____ Plat
e split _____ Roof _____ Seism
ic anchors _____ Walls _____ Rock
ing of reservoir evidenced _____ Charts
_____ Sliding of reservoir evidenced ____
_ Valving _____ Leaks evident. Rate ________
gpm G. _____ Roof _____ Unexplained wet
spots on adjacent ground H. _____ Footing __
___ Shell penetrations damaged I.
_____ Floor _____ Other attachments to
shell damaged J. _____ Aboveground Piping
_____ Pipe Connections to Tank K.
_____ Underground Piping
L. REMARKS ______________________________________
_________________________ _____________________
__________________________________________________
__ _______________________________________________
__________________________ _______________________
__________________________________________________
_________________________________________________
________________________
64
M. RESERVOIR DESCRIPTION Wire or Strand
Wrapped Buttress Type using individual
Bar Tendons on Tendons usually
inside wall Tank Surface TENDONS
? 220 ksi - 0.142" or 0.172" dia ?
Strands ? Wires ? Bars ? Bars with
prop. couplers ? 270 ksi - 3/8"
dia WALL CONSTRUCTION ?
Cast-in-place ? Cast-in-place
? Cast-in-place ? Shotcrete ?
Precast ? Shotcrete ? Shotcrete w/
steel diaphragm ? Precast ? Precast w/ steel
diaphragm TENDON PROTECTION SYSTEMS ?
Shotcrete ? Corrosion inhibiting grease ?
Galvanizing protected by plastic sheath ?
Grout Tank Restraints ? Seismic
cables ? Curb (restraining sliding) Ca
pacity _______ MG Wall height ______ ft O/S
diameter ______ ft Roof Type ? Flat ?
Dome Exposed ? Fill depth _____ Surface usage
___________ ? Yes ? No

65
DAMAGE OBSERVED (D.O.)
0 1 2-3-4
5 6 NA
NO Damage Scale None Slight Moderate
Severe Total Not
Not (0) (1-10)
(11 - 40) (41 - 60) (over 60) Applicable
Observed
N. SHELL O. HORIZONTAL
PRESTRESSING D.O.
D.O. _____ Shell or shotcrete
cracked 1. Wrapping _____ Vertical
cracks more than 2 feet long _____ Corrosion
_____ Unexplained excessive loss of
contents _____ Corrosion at horizontal
cracks _____ Bulging observable 2.
Individual tendons _____ Visible construction
joints _____ Corrosion
products _____ Wall leaking _____
Leaks _at_ tendon locations _____ Wet
spots _____ Leaks _at_ tendon
anchorages _____ Spouts _____
Tendon anchorage distressed _____ Horizontal
cracks more than 25 of perimeter _____
Tendon anchorage disrupted/loose _____ Corrosion
at horizontal cracks _____ Cracking in
vicinity of tendon anchorage _____ Shotcrete
delaminated at cracks _____ Tendon
location visually observable _____ Attachments
to shell loose _____ Discoloration of
concrete in line
w/tendons _____ Leaks _at_ rust
stains 3. Bar tendons on
surface _____ Major leaks at shell/foundation
joint _____ Tendons failed _____ Unexplain
ed wet spots on adjacent ground _____
Tendons sound loose _____ Corrosion at
manholes/other penetrations _____ Evidence
of rust Leakage rate ______ gpm
66
DAMAGE OBSERVED (D.O.)
0 1 2-3-4
5 6 NA
NO Damage Scale None Slight Moderate
Severe Total Not
Not (0) (1-10)
(11 - 40) (41 - 60) (over 60) Applicable
Observed
 P. ROOF D.O.
D.O. Flat or conical R.
_____ FOOTING _____ Displaced with respect to
wall _____ Sagging S.
_____ FLOOR _____ Cracked at edges _____ Crack
ed at interior supports T.
_____ ABOVEGROUND PIPING _____ Supporting
column spalled Dome Shell U.
VALVE PIT ? Shotcrete ? CIP
concrete _____ Access ? Precast
concrete _____ Control
piping _____ Construction joints ____
_ Gauges _____ Cracks _____
Hatches (equipment) ? Show
reinforcement/corrosion _____ Inlet-outlet
piping ? Increasing with time ___
__ Pit flooded (depth ______ ft) _____
Delaminating _____ Roof _____
Misalignment of surface _____ Walls ___
__ Rust lines _at_ top of soffit over
rebars _____ Charts _____ Dome
Ring _____ Valving _____
Corrosion _____ Distress _at_ shell/ring
juncture _____ Shotcrete loose/hollow-sounding
_____ Vertical cracks _____ Wire (strand)
exposed/corroded
67
Reservoir (Tanks) Evaluations
  • Posting
  • If determined the reservoir should be removed
    from service, notify the jurisdiction
    immediately.

68
(No Transcript)
69
Wastewater Treatment Plant
  • Complex systems made up of many components and
    systems
  • Buried and above grade pipe,
  • Cast-in-placed concrete basins and galleries,
  • Buildings, and
  • Chemical, gas, piping, and electrical systems.

70
Wastewater Treatment Plant
  • Types of damage
  • Expansion joints have failed, allowing sewage to
    drain into galleries and
  • Baffles in large basins have broken as a result
    of sloshing sewage.

71
Wastewater Treatment Plant
  • The goal is to keep as much of the plant in
    operation as possible.
  • It is desirable as a minimum to maintain
    operation of the headworks, primary sedimentation
    basins, and chlorine disinfection system, even if
    the secondary or tertiary systems were heavily
    damaged and not operational.

72
STATE OF CALIFORNIA SAFETY ASSESSMENT PROGRAM
TREATMENT PLANT
Assessment
(WASTEWATER) Report
No. _________
B. RECOMMENDATIONS Monitor____________________
______ ? Continue in service_____________ ? Re
move from service_______________ ? Check
effluent quality/safety______ ? Chlorinate and
by-pass_____________ ? ________________________
___________ ___________________________________
___________________________________ ___________
________________________
C. COMMENTS ___________________________________
______________________________ __________________
__________________________________________________
__________________________________________________
__________________________________________________
__________________________________________________
__________________________________________________
________________________________________
73
DAMAGE OBSERVED (D.O.)
Assessment
Report _____________
0 1 2-3-4
5 6 NA
NO Damage Scale None Slight Moderate
Severe Total Not
Not (0) (1-10)
(11 - 40) (41 - 60) (over 60) Applicable
Observed
D. PROCESS COMPONENT (D.O.)   Structural
Mechanical Electrical Screening/grinding
________ __________ ________ Influent
pumping ________ __________ ________ Gri
t removal ________ __________ ________
Primary treatment ________ __________ ____
____ Secondary treatment ________ __________
________ Tertiary treatment ________ ____
______ ________ Quaternary treatment ________
__________ ________ Effluent
disinfection ___-____ __________ ________
Solids digestion ________ __________ ___
_____ Solids dewatering ________ __________
________ Solids disposal ________ ______
____ ________   E. TRIBUTARY PUMPING
PLANTS/FORCE MAINS Pumping Plant
Name ____________________ ________ __________
________ ____________________ ________ __
________ ________ ____________________ ______
__ __________ ________   F. TRIBUTARY
GRAVITY SEWER SYSTEM Briefly summarize your
assessment of the condition of the gravity sewer
system (recognizing the limitations of time and
resources during this initial inspection period)
74
Assessment Report ____________   Check El
ectrical power (control panel, emergency
generator) Telemetry Disinfectio
n process (chemical containers, feeder,
piping) Broken pipes, flooding,
leaking Chemical feed (spills) U
nit Processes   OBSERVATIONS   RAW
SEWAGE _____________________________________
_________________ SCREENING/GRINDING ___________
___________________________________________ INFLUE
NT PUMPING ____________________________________
__________________ GRIT REMOVAL _____________
_________________________________________ PRIMARY
TREATMENT ______________________________________
________________ SECONDARY TREATMENT ____________
__________________________________________ TERTIAR
Y TREATMENT ____________________________________
__________________ QUATERNARY TREATMENT __________
____________________________________________ EFFLU
ENT DISINFECTION ________________________________
______________________ SOLIDS DIGESTION _______
_______________________________________________ SO
LIDS DEWATERING ________________________________
______________________ SOLIDS DISPOSAL _______
_______________________________________________
75
Wastewater Treatment Plant
  • Posting
  • If determined the wastewater treatment plant
    should be removed from service, notify the
    jurisdiction immediately.
  • They will notify Public Works who will notify the
    plant operators.
  • If you have performed building evaluations, make
    sure to post the buildings.

76
Water Treatment Plant
  • Types of damage
  • Similar to wastewater treatment plants
  • Damage to baffles due to sloshing water inside
    basins is common.
  • Unanchored equipment will slide and/or topple.

77
STATE OF CALIFORNIA SAFETY ASSESSMENT PRGOGRAM
TREATMENT
PLANT Assessment
(WATER)
Report No. _________
B. RECOMMENDATIONS Monitor______________________
___ ? Continue in service________________ ? Re
move from service______________ ? Check
effluent quality/safety_________ ? Chlorinate
and by-pass_____________ ? ____________________
_______________ ________________________________
___ ___________________________________ _______
____________________________
C. COMMENTS ___________________________________
______________________________ __________________
__________________________________________________
__________________________________________________
__________________________________________________
__________________________________________________
__________________________________________________
________________________________________
78
D. PRETREATMENT G. CONTROL SYSTEMS
I. CLEARWALL D.O. D.O.
D.O. _____ Raw water
channels _____ Mechanical _____
Tank-type (use Reservoir _____
Aerators _____ Electrical
Assessment Form) _____ Rapid
mix _____ Pneumatic ______
Influent piping _____ Flocculation
_____ Hydraulic _____ Effluent
piping _____ basins _____ Manual
J. WASHWATER RECLAMATION _____ baffles
_____ Automatic _____
Settling basin _____ paddles H. HEAD
HOUSE _____ Mechanical
equipment _____ scrapers _____
Bearing walls _____ Electrical
equipment _____ Sedimentation _____
Nonbearing walls _____ Piping _____ basin
_____ Containment structure
_____ Detention basin _____ troughs
_____ Frame (general condition) _____
Sludge discharge _____ scrapers _____
Structural members E. FILTRATION
_____ Structural connections _____
Structure _____ Roof _____
Troughs _____ Floors _____
Beds _____ Stairs _____
Backwash system _____ Elevators
_____ Surface wash system _____ Glass
F. CHEMICAL TREATMENT _____ Mechanical
equipment _____ Chlorine piping _____
Electrical equipment _____ Chlorine
cylinders _____ Filter gallery _____
Chlorine feeders _____ Piping _____ Other
chemical piping _____ Pipe gallery _____
Other chemical feeders _____ Other
chemical storage
79
Assessment Report ____________   Check El
ectrical power (control panel, emergency
generator) Telemetry Disinfect
ion process (chemical containers, feeder,
piping) Broken pipes, flooding,
leaking Chemical feed
(spills) Unit Processes   O
BSERVATIONS   RAW WATER ____________________
__________________________________ PRECHLORINATION
______________________________________________
________ AERATION _________________________
_____________________________ RAPID
MIX _______________________________________
_______________ FLOCCULATION _________________
_____________________________________ SEDIMENTATIO
N ____________________________________________
__________ FILTRATION ______________________
________________________________ DISINFECTION
_________________________________________________
_____ FLUORIDATION __________________________
____________________________ CLEARWELL _____
_________________________________________________
DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM _____________________________
_________________________
80
Water Treatment Plant
  • Posting
  • If determined the water treatment plant should be
    removed from service, notify the jurisdiction
    immediately.
  • They will notify Public Works who will notify the
    plant operators.
  • If you have performed building evaluations, make
    sure to post the buildings.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com