Regenerative Development: - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 35
About This Presentation
Title:

Regenerative Development:

Description:

Regenerative Development: Examining Opportunities Beyond Sustainability Edward Quevedo Associate Professor of Sustainable Enterprise Research Fellow, Center for ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:125
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 36
Provided by: edw93
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Regenerative Development:


1
Edward QuevedoAssociate Professor of
Sustainable EnterpriseResearch Fellow, Center
for Sustainable BusinessLokey Graduate School of
BusinessMills College
  • Regenerative Development
  • Examining Opportunities Beyond Sustainability

2
Our conversation
  • time for a rethink?
  • strategy is dead.
  • strategic sustainability and CSR? not so much
  • terrain for new learning
  • ecosystems services model
  • complex adaptive systems
  • the players
  • a new framework regenerative development

3
The Earth Charter (UNEP/UNDP 1999)
  • Build democratic societies that are just,
    sustainable, participative, and peaceful
  • Secure the natural bounty and beauty for present
    and future generations
  • Protect and restore the integrity of ecosystems,
    especially the natural processes that sustain
    life
  • Use prevention as the best environmental
    protection device and when knowledge is limited,
    apply the precautionary principle
  • Adopt patterns of production, consumption, and
    reproduction that protect the ecosystems
    regenerative capacities, human rights, and
    community well-being
  • The Global Compact
  • (Ratified at Davos, 1999)

4
What is Sustainability and why are our
organizations pursuing it?
  • What are the motivating factors?
  • How did this become a priority?
  • How has this served the core purposes of our
    enterprises?

5
Confronting a rethink of Sustainability.
  • Current context
  • Overused, poorly defined, largely non-strategic
    (core) to the enterprises functioning
  • The macro-level systems we aim to sustain are
    continuing to weaken
  • Kyoto, Rio II, and other international accords
    continue to elude or disappoint us
  • And.

6
  • strategy is dead

7
  • We have found that strategic planning is no
    longer of value. It leaves us without the
    flexibility to act with acuity, does not link up
    with day to day activities, and wastes valuable
    time generating paperweight documents.
  • Hans Straberg
  • CEO, Electrolux AG
  • March 2013

8
  • Strategy is not now a core function for Sony.
    Our goal is instead to align our business
    trajectory with conditions in our ecosystem. To
    do this, we must first understand our ecosystem.
    Then we must think like expert biologists.
  • Bert Nordberg
  • CEO, Sony Ericsson
  • August, 2012

9
  • We are in search of a fundamentally new approach
    to modeling our future. Strategy offers nothing
    anymore as a viable tool for us. Too much effort
    for too little return..
  • Paul Todd
  • VP Strategy, eBay Marketplaces
  • October 2012

10
What Does Applied Sustainable Development Look
Like?
  • What does it create in the world?
  • What do its artifacts look like?
  • What is left behind, as evidence of our
    principles?

11
The Players
12
  • Design for social impact
  • Declaration of human potential
  • Value chain principles

13
  • Partnership with Nature
  • Tools for social innovation
  • Virtuous supply chain

14
  • Eco systems modeling of supply chain
  • Design innovation and being indigenous
  • Futuring and complex adaptive systems

15
a new framework emerges
16
Apparent rules of the new framework
  • There is no expertise for the categories of
    problems that we face
  • Rapid prototyping, based on Natures model, looks
    an apparently sound tool
  • Pursuit of effective understanding of the future
    requires re-consideration of the fundamentals of
    our approach to the stakeholder concept

17
Apparent rules of the new framework
  • Complex adaptive systems theory (CAST) seems to
    hold promise for our needs
  • Local interaction amongst diverse agents creates
    energy as they seek to understand each other and
    the world around them
  • The goal is to sustain and enhance relationships,
    and when this is pursued, energy is released into
    the system
  • This keeps the system alive and vibrant

18
Complex Adaptive Systems Theory
  • There is no control of the system, no
    understanding of the future, and no directed
    action for the participants
  • Flexible, experimental interaction is the best
    available tool
  • Over time, the borders between agents within the
    system (various stakeholders), melt, and these
    agents co-evolve in order to flourish and
    optimize themselves in the changing environment.

19
Under these conditions
  • Disruption of the system creates nutritive energy
  • Control or perfect understanding is an illusion
  • Planning is best done by virtue of potent
    inquiry, not description of alternate concrete
    futures
  • What is durable is not the external attributes of
    the system, but the broad conditions of the
    agents shared purpose, values, rituals, and
    relations

20
The goal then shifts
  • From predicting the future.
  • To continually co-creating the future in league
    with each other
  • Or, understanding how to nurture the
    effectiveness of those aspects of our
    organization that are valued by internal agents
    and produce value for external agents

21
Potent Inquiry
  • Replace strategic planning exercises with key
    potent questions to explore on a regular basis
  • Shift, pivot, elaborate, and creatively co-evolve
    on the basis of this inquiry

22
Potent Questions
  • How can we be clear about our purpose and values?
  • How can these shape modes of communication that
    support interconnectedness among stakeholders?
  • How can we optimize and design relationships in
    the system to foster resiliency, self-organizing,
    and construct a shared future?

23
Potent Questions
  • How can we encourage resiliency? Flexibility,
    durability, openness to learning
  • How can we find unique, alternative outcomes,
    expressive of our purpose and values, already
    contained in the current system and its history?

24
Potent Questions the core issue of trust
  • How do we create sufficient trust and
    relationship well-functioning to support honest
    feedback and discussion
  • How do we set the conditions for learning and
    creating together?
  • How can we build shared criteria for
    decision-making?

25
  • The Grammar of Regenerative Development
  • The enterprise and its leaders shall consider all
    undertakings and projects for approval by first
    determining
  • How the undertaking or project will measurably,
  • Over the medium and long term,
  • Measurably improve the social, economic, and
    ecological well being of affected stakeholders.

26
Reconsidering the Spectrum of Organizational
Performance
Regenerative Development
Performance
Sustainable Development
Time
27
regenerative development?
28
The Emergent Models
  • Enterprises that give back more to Nature and
    Community than they take
  • Communities that measurably build character, and
    measurably increase quality of life

29
In other words.
  • The shared pursuit of well-being
  • A natural systems, or eco-systems, notion
  • Each step in the chain contributes to greater
    well-being (vibrancy, resiliency, adaptability,
    thriving)

30
Proposed
  • The domain we formerly referred to as strategic
    planning
  • And the domain of sustainable development .
  • Are at bottom expressions of a common pursuit, a
    core human aspiration
  • To identify and seek conditions of thriving in
    the face of an uncertain future

31
Proposed The core gesture of Sustainability or
CSR is
  • Futuring
  • Examining the appropriateness, or fitness, of the
    enterprises purpose and positioning the
    enterprise to deal with potential future
    challenges
  • In the context of a long term perspective taking
    into account limits to resources

32
Legislating Regenerative Development
33
Imagine the Impact if ISSP were to advocate for,
and the Obama Administration were to support
enactment of, the following
  • The Congress, recognizing the profound impact of
    man's activity on the interrelations of all
    components of the natural environment,
    particularly the profound influences of
    population growth, high-density urbanization,
    industrial expansion, resource exploitation, and
    new and expanding technological advances
  • Declares that it is the continuing policy of the
    Federal Government, in cooperation with State and
    local governments, and other concerned public and
    private organizations,
  • To use all practicable means and measures,
    including financial and technical assistance,
  • To create and maintain conditions under which man
    and nature can exist in productive harmony, and
    fulfill the social, economic, ecological, and
    other requirements of present and future
    generations of Americans.
  • In order to carry out the policy set forth in
    this Act, it is the continuing responsibility of
    the Federal Government to use all practicable
    means, in order to.

34
  • Fulfill the responsibilities of each generation
    as trustee of the environment for succeeding
    generations
  • Attain the widest range of beneficial uses of the
    environment without degradation, risk to health
    or safety, or other undesirable and unintended
    consequences
  • Preserve important historic, cultural, and
    natural aspects of our national heritage, and
    maintain, wherever possible, an environment which
    supports diversity, and variety of individual
    choice
  • Achieve a balance between population and resource
    use which will permit high standards of living
    and a wide sharing of life's amenities and
  • Enhance the quality of renewable resources and
    approach the maximum attainable recycling of
    depletable resources.
  • The Congress recognizes that each person should
    enjoy a healthful environment and that each
    person has a responsibility to contribute to the
    preservation and enhancement of the environment.
  • The National Environmental Policy Act of 1969

35
Discussion
  • Lokey Graduate School of Business
  • Mills College
  • www.mills.edu
  • T 415.806.0355
  • equevedo_at_mills.edu
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com