Professional Development Course on Catering for Diversity in English Language Teaching ENG5316 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 33
About This Presentation
Title:

Professional Development Course on Catering for Diversity in English Language Teaching ENG5316

Description:

Professional Development Course on Catering for Diversity in English Language Teaching ENG5316 Assessing Diversity in English Language Learning – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:339
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 34
Provided by: ruby4
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Professional Development Course on Catering for Diversity in English Language Teaching ENG5316


1
Professional Development Course on Catering for
Diversity in English Language TeachingENG5316 As
sessing Diversity in English Language Learning
Session 6 Assessing progress, learning plans and
statements
2
Assessment
  • Assessment is more than merely testing students.
    Rather, it involves collecting data to form a
    holistic picture of a student so that the teacher
    can plan instruction and promote student
    progress (Meese, 2001, p. 130).
  • In combination, the various forms of assessment
    give teachers the needed documentation by which
    to make informed educational decisions to promote
    student achievement.

3
Steps in the Assessment Process
Identification and Referral
Program Planning
Program Implementation and Evaluation
3
4
Identification and Referral
  • Identification of students with possible
    disabilities
  • Involve the largest number of students
  • Not necessarily result in referral
  • When a disability is suspected, the assessment
    process involves a multidimentional evaluation.

5
Screening and Teacher Identification
  • Complete checklists or rating forms to identify
    students with potential problems
  • Conferences with students and parents
  • Review of school records
  • Changes in instruction

6
Checklists and Rating Scales
  • Checklists are sequential lists of skills that
    the teacher completes for a particular student.
  • Rating scales are instruments by which the
    teacher judges a students performance or
    behavior.
  • The rating is often completed using a Likert
    scale measure.

6
7
Program Planning
  • Design of the Individualized Education Program
    (IEP)

8
Design of the IEP
  • Developed before the student begins to receive
    special services
  • A meeting must be held to examine the
    appropriateness of the IEP and revise it, if
    necessary

9
Program Implementation and Evaluation
  • To determine whether the educational program is
    effective or not
  • Modify the program, if necessary

10
What should be included in the IEP?
  • Students present levels of educational
    performance
  • A statement of measurable annual goals
    short-term objectives
  • Needed special education, supplementary aids,
    program modifications and supports
  • The projected date for the beginning of the
    services and modifications, and the anticipated
    frequency, location, and duration of those
    services and modifications
  • A statement of how the students progress toward
    the annual goals will be measured

11
Ongoing Monitoring of Progress
  • Analysis of work samples
  • Criterion-referenced test
  • Observation

12
Informal Assessment in the Classroom
  • Informal assessment procedures make use of any
    data the teacher collects to monitor the progress
    of students and make instructional decisions.
  • Informal assessment methods often employ the
    specific curricular materials used when teaching
    students.

12
13
Curriculum-Based Assessment
  • When assessment involves the actual curricular
    materials that students are using, the procedure
    is called curriculum-based assessment.
  • Frequent and direct assessment, when used to
    evaluate student objectives, helps teachers
    determine the effectiveness of instruction.

13
14
Curriculum-Based Assessment
  • APPLY as a framework
  • A ____________ the curriculum
  • Determine the foundational skills, important
    competencies and ultimate outcomes for students.
  • P __________ items to meet curriculum
    objectives
  • P __________ frequently
  • Give the CBA several times across the days in
    order to make decisions about student learning.
  • L __________ data on a graph
  • Use a graph to plot daily performance data.
  • Y __________ to results
  • Make decisions regarding student progress and
    revise instruction accordingly.

14
15
Authentic Assessment Performance-Based
Assessment
  • Authentic assessment and performance assessment
    are two terms often used interchangeably to refer
    to testing a students ability to produce an
    answer or product that demonstrates his or her
    knowledge or skills.
  • Results on students class assignments, anecdotal
    records, writing samples, and observational data
    on behavior are all examples of authentic
    assessments (Bryant, et al., 2008).

15
16
Portfolios
  • Portfolios are a form of performance assessment.
  • With teacher guidance, students select various
    items to place in their portfolio to document
    their learning and progress across curricular
    areas.
  • A portfolio can serve as a vehicle for measuring
    a childs current level of functioning and his or
    her progress toward annual goals and objectives
    on the IEP.
  • It is an excellent tool to facilitate
    communication between parents and teachers about
    student progress.

16
17
Criterion-Referenced Assessment
  • How will the teacher determine that a student has
    mastered an objective?
  • A criterion-referenced test compares a students
    performance to a preset criterion.
  • The criterion is often an objective that states
    that a student can perform a particular task to a
    specified level.

17
18
Observation
  • Another common method used for informal
    assessment of both academic and behavioral
    performance is direct observation.
  • Procedures anecdotal recording, event recording,
    duration recording, or time-sampling

18
19
Review of the IEP
  • Evaluate the students progress toward the IEP
    goals
  • Evaluate the effectiveness of services or
    supports

20
Task 1
  • Form in groups of 3-4.
  • Identify a student who is suspected to have
    learning difficulties.
  • Try to design an individualized education program
    (IEP) for that student.

21
Assessment of SEN in Hong Kong
Special Educational Needs Professional Assessment
Specific Learning Difficulties (dyslexia) To be confirmed by educational psychologists (EP) or clinical psychologists (CP)
Intellectual Disability To be confirmed by EPs, CPs, or Child Assessment Service of the Department of Health/Hospital Authority
Autism Spectrum Disorders To be confirmed by psychiatrists or Child Assessment Service of the Department of Health/Hospital Authority
Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorders To be confirmed by psychiatrists
Physical Disability To be confirmed by medical doctors as having significant disability
Visual Impairment To be confirmed by ophthalmologists, or General Eye and Low Vision Centre of the Hong Kong Society for the Blind
Hearing Impairment To be confirmed by audiologists
Speech and Language Impairment To be confirmed by speech therapist as having moderate to severe speech and language difficulty or having fluency disorder of any severity
21
22
Principles and Strategies for Assessment
  • Flexible assessment arrangements can be made
    according to students special learning needs
    (Education and Manpower Bureau, 2004).
  • special design for the format of examination
    papers and answer sheets,
  • arrangement for appropriate examination venues,
  • adaptation of examination time, etc.

23
Principles and Strategies for Assessment
  • Taking into account students learning
    difficulties, they should be assessed according
    to their situations (Education and Manpower
    Bureau, 2004). For instance,
  • Students with serious and profound hearing
    impairment can be exempted from listening
    examinations
  • Dictation marks of the students with dyslexia are
    not counted in the calculation of the total
    scores in language subject examinations

24
Some Special Arrangements for SEN Students
  • Large print examination papers
  • Extra 5-15 minutes can be given to mildly
    visually impaired students for each hour of
    examination time
  • A 5-10 minutes break can be arranged halfway
    during the examination when necessary
  • Assessment instructions must be simple, direct
    and clear with concrete examples
  • Leave enough space for answers
  • Avoid the use of separate answer sheets

25
Some Special Arrangements for SEN Students
  • Flexibly reduce the use of copying for answering
    questions, e.g., circle or underline the correct
    answers in the passage for reading comprehension
  • An additional time allowance of up to 25 for
    finishing test or examination papers
  • Allow using computers as a tool for writing for
    students who demonstrate extreme writing
    difficulties
  • Reduce the amount required for dictation
  • Teachers may consider using fill in the blanks
    instead of dictating the whole paragraph
  • Schools may adopt the system of giving marks for
    the right answers instead of deducting marks for
    errors

26
Case Study Support for SEN Students in XXX
Secondary School
  • Whole-school Approach to Catering for Student
    Diversity
  • Write up an Individual Education Profile (IEPro)
    for each student with special educational needs
    (SEN).
  • Conduct diagnostic tests of Chinese, English and
    Mathematics.
  • Conduct Chinese and English handwriting tests to
    assess students writing speed.
  • Set up Chinese, English and Mathematics resource
    classes for SEN students and have an Individual
    Education Plan (IEP) written for each student in
    the classes by the subject teachers.
  • Implement Differentiated Instruction.
  • Implement the One Student One Mentor Scheme.

26
27
Differentiated Instruction
  • Graded teaching materials and exam papers
  • Low level / SEN students
  • Copying sentences
  • Answering factual questions
  • Main points are highlighted
  • Keywords are bolded / represented with pictures
  • Greater line spacing
  • Simpler and clearer layout
  • Middle level
  • Copying and constructing sentences
  • Answering factual and inferential questions
  • High level
  • Constructing sentences
  • Answering inferential and reflective questions

27
28
Task 2
  • Based on the short story provided, see if you can
    set some factual, inferential, and reflective
    questions for students of low, middle, and high
    levels.

29
Support for SEN Students
  • Is there any special support for SEN students at
    your teaching school? If yes, share with other
    participants.

29
30
Evaluation
  • To conduct self-evaluation on SEN support.
  • To develop an annual plan for the following
    school year.

30
31
Self-Evaluation Process
  • Planning
  • SWOT analysis
  • Implementation
  • Evaluation
  • Year-end Evaluation Form for Individual Student
  • Year-end Evaluation Form at School Level

31
32
Whole School Approach
  • Think about the strengths, weaknesses,
    opportunities, and threats at your teaching
    school that may affect its implementation of the
    Whole School Approach to Integrated Education.

32
33
References
  • Bryant, D. P., Smith, D. D., Bryant, B. R.
    (2009). Teaching students with special needs in
    inclusive classrooms. Boston, Mass. Allyn
    Bacon.
  • Education and Manpower Bureau. (2004). Whole
    school approach Principles and strategies for
    assessment. Retrieved May 14, 2009, from
    Education Bureau Website http//www.edb.gov.hk/Fi
    leManager/EN/Content_3296/assessment_e1.pdf
  • Meese, R. L. (2001). Teaching learners with mild
    disabilities Integrating research and practice
    (2nd ed.). Belmont, CA Wadsworth/Thomson
    Learning.
  • Spinelli, C. G. (2006). Classroom assessment for
    students in special and general education (2nd
    ed.). Upper Saddle River, N.J.
    Pearson/Merrill/Prentice Hall.

33
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com