Title: The effect of an alcohol ignition interlock programme (AIIP) upon the costs of health care utilization among DWI offenders
1The effect of an alcohol ignition interlock
programme (AIIP) upon the costs of health care
utilization among DWI offenders
- Bo Bjerre
- Traffic Medicine Advisory Board,
- Swedish Road Administration, Borlänge, Sweden
- Johan Kostela
- Dalarna Research Institute (Dalarnas
Forskningsråd), Falun, Sweden - Jan Selén
- Statistics, Stockholm,Sweden
2The design of the interlock program (AIIP)
- Interlock device checked bimonthly
- Every third month compulsory medical examination
biological markers, toxicological urine analysis,
AUDIT - From the 5th examination (12 months in the
program) biological markers must verify sober
living - Expensive (about 5 000 for 2 years) The full
cost borne by the offender
3The design..
- If passing the 2-year program
- regarded as rehabilitated from a traffic safety
point of view - and thus reissued full driving licence
4Previous results of the AIIP
5Previous results of the AIIP
6Previous results of the AIIP
7Study design
- A quasi-experimental intent-to-treat design
- Intervention group with 1 156 participants in the
AIIP and including those 48 being dismissed - Control group with 815 individuals with revoked
licences but without opportunity to participate
in an AIIP - Only individuals between the ages of 24 and 60
were included
8Cost analysis
- Three different costs were calculated
- The cost for sickness benefit and disability
pension and the cost for hospital care of
in-patients - Each reported cost has been recalculated to the
price index of the year 2003.
9Average number of care days in hospital per
person and year. Care under all diagnosis in the
AIIP and the control group. Each category is one
year of data except the adm. period which is 3
months
10The average number of days of sick leave per
person and year. Participants in AIIP and
controls. Each category is one year of data
except the adm. period which is 3 months.
11 The average cost caused by sick leave and
disability pension per person and year.
Participants in AIIP and controls.
12The combined average costs caused by sick leave
and disability pension per person and year.
Participants in AIIP and controls.
13The average cost caused by sick leave and
disability pension per person and year. The
difference between the AIIP and control group,
controls as reference
14The average costs caused by sick leave and
disability pension per person and year. A
comparison between completed and dismissed in the
AIIP.
15The total costs (prior to regression analysis)
caused by sick leave, disability pension and
hospital in-patient care. Average costs in SEK
per person and year.
16Total health care costs. Expected cost
differences (after regression analysis) between
AIIP participants and controls. Average costs in
SEK per person/year.
17ConclusionsDifferences among the AIIP
participants
- Significantly higher health care costs for
persons reporting harmful alcohol habits
according to AUDIT (gt8 and 6 scores) - Significantly higher health care costs for
persons having an alcohol dependence diagnosis - Significantly higher sick leave/disability
pension costs for females - A gradually increasing cost difference between
those who complete the AIIP and those who are
dismissed
18ConclusionsIn comparison to controls
- The total costs for sick leave, disability
pension and in-patient health care costs were 9
000 SEK (about 1000 ) lower per person and year
during participation in an AIIP - This corresponds to 25 lower costs than for the
controls - After the 2-year AIIP the costs were still found
about 2000 SEK lower
19Final conclusions
- The positive health care effects in the AIIP are
most probably linked to reduced alcohol
consumption - but also to social benefit of being allowed to
drive while in the AIIP - The DWI offender pays about 2 500 per year for
the participation in the AIIP - which apparently results in about 1 000 lower
public health care costs per year