The effect of an alcohol ignition interlock programme (AIIP) upon the costs of health care utilization among DWI offenders - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 19
About This Presentation
Title:

The effect of an alcohol ignition interlock programme (AIIP) upon the costs of health care utilization among DWI offenders

Description:

... 6855 25959 Waiting 1139 21592 10868 8993 41452 995 29826 13071 13436 56322 Treatment 1029 14728 12066 4636 31431 995 24566 14666 9336 48569 Post-treatment ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:60
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 20
Provided by: Ker123
Learn more at: http://www.pire.org
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: The effect of an alcohol ignition interlock programme (AIIP) upon the costs of health care utilization among DWI offenders


1
The effect of an alcohol ignition interlock
programme (AIIP) upon the costs of health care
utilization among DWI offenders
  • Bo Bjerre
  • Traffic Medicine Advisory Board,
  • Swedish Road Administration, Borlänge, Sweden
  • Johan Kostela
  • Dalarna Research Institute (Dalarnas
    Forskningsråd), Falun, Sweden
  • Jan Selén
  • Statistics, Stockholm,Sweden

2
The design of the interlock program (AIIP)
  • Interlock device checked bimonthly
  • Every third month compulsory medical examination
    biological markers, toxicological urine analysis,
    AUDIT
  • From the 5th examination (12 months in the
    program) biological markers must verify sober
    living
  • Expensive (about 5 000 for 2 years) The full
    cost borne by the offender

3
The design..
  • If passing the 2-year program
  • regarded as rehabilitated from a traffic safety
    point of view
  • and thus reissued full driving licence

4
Previous results of the AIIP
5
Previous results of the AIIP
6
Previous results of the AIIP
7
Study design
  • A quasi-experimental intent-to-treat design
  • Intervention group with 1 156 participants in the
    AIIP and including those 48 being dismissed
  • Control group with 815 individuals with revoked
    licences but without opportunity to participate
    in an AIIP
  • Only individuals between the ages of 24 and 60
    were included

8
Cost analysis
  • Three different costs were calculated
  • The cost for sickness benefit and disability
    pension and the cost for hospital care of
    in-patients
  • Each reported cost has been recalculated to the
    price index of the year 2003.

9
Average number of care days in hospital per
person and year. Care under all diagnosis in the
AIIP and the control group. Each category is one
year of data except the adm. period which is 3
months
10
The average number of days of sick leave per
person and year. Participants in AIIP and
controls. Each category is one year of data
except the adm. period which is 3 months.
11
The average cost caused by sick leave and
disability pension per person and year.
Participants in AIIP and controls.
12
The combined average costs caused by sick leave
and disability pension per person and year.
Participants in AIIP and controls.
13
The average cost caused by sick leave and
disability pension per person and year. The
difference between the AIIP and control group,
controls as reference
14
The average costs caused by sick leave and
disability pension per person and year. A
comparison between completed and dismissed in the
AIIP.
15
The total costs (prior to regression analysis)
caused by sick leave, disability pension and
hospital in-patient care. Average costs in SEK
per person and year.
16
Total health care costs. Expected cost
differences (after regression analysis) between
AIIP participants and controls. Average costs in
SEK per person/year.
17
ConclusionsDifferences among the AIIP
participants
  • Significantly higher health care costs for
    persons reporting harmful alcohol habits
    according to AUDIT (gt8 and 6 scores)
  • Significantly higher health care costs for
    persons having an alcohol dependence diagnosis
  • Significantly higher sick leave/disability
    pension costs for females
  • A gradually increasing cost difference between
    those who complete the AIIP and those who are
    dismissed

18
ConclusionsIn comparison to controls
  • The total costs for sick leave, disability
    pension and in-patient health care costs were 9
    000 SEK (about 1000 ) lower per person and year
    during participation in an AIIP
  • This corresponds to 25 lower costs than for the
    controls
  • After the 2-year AIIP the costs were still found
    about 2000 SEK lower

19
Final conclusions
  • The positive health care effects in the AIIP are
    most probably linked to reduced alcohol
    consumption
  • but also to social benefit of being allowed to
    drive while in the AIIP
  • The DWI offender pays about 2 500 per year for
    the participation in the AIIP
  • which apparently results in about 1 000 lower
    public health care costs per year
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com