How Do I Get Into Phase 1 Trials With My Compound? - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

How Do I Get Into Phase 1 Trials With My Compound?

Description:

How Many Approaches To An IND Drug Combinations Nonclinical development programs should be conducted on the individual entities. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:183
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 45
Provided by: anel8
Learn more at: https://biocomcro.org
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: How Do I Get Into Phase 1 Trials With My Compound?


1
How Do I Get Into Phase 1 Trials With My Compound?
Greg Ruppert Director, North American Sales May
9, 2013
2
Preface and Disclaimer
  • This presentation is in regard to nonclinical
    animal studies provided to support an
    investigational new drug (IND) application (21
    CFR 312) for various scenarios and approaches.
    There are a number of other aspects to the drug
    development process that are not covered.
  • There isnt a one size fits all approach to
    designing a nonclinical IND package. Rather,
    nonclinical studies in support of an IND must be
    tailored to the specific investigational agent
    and the proposed clinical trials.

3
Preface and Disclaimer
  • FDA's guidance documents, including this
    guidance, do not establish legally enforceable
    responsibilities. Instead, guidances describe the
    Agency's current thinking on a topic and should
    be viewed only as recommendations, unless
    specific regulatory or statutory requirements are
    cited. The use of the word should in Agency
    guidances means that something is suggested or
    recommended, but not required.
  • Before submitting the application, the applicant
    should submit a plan to the appropriate new drug
    evaluation division identifying the types of
    bridging studies that should be conducted. The
    applicant should also identify those components
    of its application for which it expects to rely
    on FDAs finding of safety and effectiveness of a
    previously approved drug product. The division
    will critique the plan and provide guidance.

4
What You Need To Do Before You Start Animal
Studies
  • Species selection
  • Metabolic profiles
  • Pharmacology
  • Vehicle
  • Solution vs. suspension
  • Concentration
  • Methods
  • Formulation
  • Bioanalytical
  • Immunological for biopharmaceuticals
  • Clinical plan

5
How Many Approaches To An IND Standard
Approach
  • NCE Small Molecule or Traditional Approach
  • DRF and repeat toxicology in rodents nonrodent
    with TK
  • Dosing regimen
  • Recovery?
  • Genotoxicity battery
  • Ames
  • Mammalian Cell Mutation (Chromosomal Aberration)
  • in vivo Micronucleus (optional)
  • Safety Pharmacology battery
  • CV nonrodent
  • in vitro hERG
  • CNS rodent
  • Respiratory rodent
  • In general, the differences from this standard
    approach is presented for the following IND
    approaches.

6
How Many Approaches To An IND Biopharmaceuticals
  • What is a biopharmaceutical?
  • Product derived from characterized cells
    (bacteria, yeast, insect, plant, mammalian).
  • Includes growth factors, recombinant proteins,
    antibodies, endogenous proteins, enzymes etc.
  • Does not include antibiotics, heparin, vitamins,
    vaccines, cellular and gene therapy etc.
  • Oligonucleotides

7
How Many Approaches To An IND Biopharmaceuticals
  • Species selection Needs to be the most relevant
  • Sequence homology
  • Cell based assays for binding affinities
  • Functional activity - in vivo or in vitro
  • If no orthologous target consider homologous
    molecules, transgenic animals or animal models of
    disease.
  • Monoclonal antibodies directed against foreign
    targets

8
How Many Approaches To An IND Biopharmaceuticals
  • How many species?
  • If pharmacologically active in two species, then
    2 are needed for initial studies.
  • Single species based on well understood
    pharmacology.
  • For novel antibody-drug conjugates (ADC) two
    species are recommended
  • Dose selection
  • High dose should be the highest of
  • Maximum pharmacological effect.
  • Up to 10-fold exposure over expected clinical
    levels.
  • .

9
How Many Approaches To An IND Biopharmaceuticals
  • Immunogenicity
  • Assessment of anti-drug antibodies (ADAs) not
    needed if evidence of sustained pharmacology, no
    unexpected changes is PK/TK, no evidence of
    immune-mediated reactions.
  • Take blood samples for analysis of ADAs, analyze
    if needed.
  • If ADAs detected characterize impact on
    exposure, pharmacology, toxicity.
  • Neutralizing antibody assays generally not
    needed if there is adequate understanding of
    PK/PD relationship.

10
How Many Approaches To An IND Biopharmaceuticals
  • Differences in nonclinical approach for IND
  • Species selection
  • Pharmacology not metabolism
  • Number of species
  • One or two
  • Safety pharmacology
  • Separate or incorporated
  • Genetic toxicology
  • Not needed except for special situations
  • Toxicology
  • Dose selection

11
How Many Approaches To An IND Vaccines
  • Single species - generally rabbit
  • Single dose toxicity
  • Adjuvant toxicity study if novel adjuvant is
    used
  • Repeat dose toxicity
  • Include local tolerance and evaluation of
    immunogenicity in repeat-dose study
  • Biodistribution and Integration study may be
    required
  • Safety Pharmacology and genotoxicity battery
    generally not required

12
How Many Approaches To An IND Oncology
  • Cancer advanced vs. palliative care
  • The investigation does not significantly
    increases the risks (or decreases the
    acceptability of the risks) associated with the
    use of the drug product.
  • Pharmacology (mechanism of action, resistance,
    schedule dependencies, and anti-tumor activity).
  • Safety Pharmacology battery generally included in
    general toxicology studies.
  • Reversibility (in at least one of the repeat-dose
    studies).
  • Genotoxicity battery generally not required.

13
How Many Approaches To An IND Animal
Rule
  • Compounds where conducting a clinical trial in
    humans is not feasible radiation sickness,
    neurotoxic gas exposure
  • For an IND a standard approach is used along with
    a Phase 1 in humans, but the clinical trials for
    efficacy are carried out in animals not humans.

14
How Many Approaches To An IND Excipients
  • Excipients- anything other than GRAS requires
    additional work
  • Studies required will vary from no additional
    work required (GRAS) to conducting all studies in
    the Traditional Approach (Novel).
  • Use in previously approved products or GRAS
    status?
  • Indication - lifesaving therapies vs. low
    morbidity indications.
  • Novel - adequate prior human exposure has not
    been documented.
  • The sponsor is encouraged to contact the
    appropriate review division to receive specific
    guidance when necessary.

15
How Many Approaches To An IND
Reformulated/Repurposed Drugs
  • 505(b)(2)
  • Bridging studies may substitute Safety
    Pharmacology battery and General Toxicology
    studies if they are found to provide an adequate
    basis for reliance upon FDAs finding of safety
    and effectiveness.
  • Particular toxicities associated with the new
    route of administration should be
    considered/evaluated.
  • May require additional nonclinical work based on
    the composition of the formulation and known
    toxicities.
  • May be required in two species (ocular,
    intrathecal, or epidural) or one species (all
    other routes).
  • Additional nonclinical work may be required
    depending on the alternate route being utilized
    (i.e. hypersensitivity and phototox for dermal,
    blood compatibility for IV, etc.).

16
How Many Approaches To An IND Biosimilar
  • Generic form of a biopharmaceutical.
  • Not as straightforward as for small molecules
    where you synthesize the exact same structure.
  • For biopharmaceuticals, the process by which they
    are created does not lend itself to duplication
    many processes are proprietary.
  • Need to establish the biosimilar is equivalent to
    the innovator compound.

17
How Many Approaches To An IND Biosimilar
  • Proving equivalency.
  • First step is characterizing the product for
    structure and activity, typically done in vitro.
  • Guidance documents
  • Nothing much from the FDA yet.
  • Guidance form Canada, WHO, as well as multiple
    documents from EMEA.
  • Could involve animal studies prior to IND.
  • Typically single species.
  • Goal is comparison of biosimilar to innovator
    are there any differences in the tox profile?

18
How Many Approaches To An IND Exploratory IND
  • Obtain human data on exposure and distribution,
    no efficacy or safety.
  • Should only be considered when planning limited,
    early exploratory IND studies in man.
  • Early Phase I studies, limited human exposure, no
    therapeutic or diagnostic intent.
  • Conducted prior to the traditional dose
    escalation, safety, and tolerance studies
    generally conducted in Phase I trials.
  • Generally are used to determine if MOA can be
    achieved in man, provide PK information in man,
    select most promising lead, and/or explore
    biodistribution characteristics.

19
How Many Approaches To An IND Exploratory IND
  • Reduced scope of the Exploratory IND results in
    reduced nonclinical need
  • Expanded acute toxicology studies may suffice if
    supporting a microdose study (less than 1/100th
    of the dose that produces pharmacologic effect).
  • Single species may be used if supported by in
    vitro metabolism and in vivo PD effects.
  • Safety Pharmacology and genotoxicity battery
    generally not required.

20
How Many Approaches To An IND Exploratory IND
  • 14-Day Repeat-Dose toxicology studies may suffice
    if supporting a study designed to evaluate
    pharmacologic effect of up to 14 days.
  • Two species with standard designs.
  • Dose selection based on anticipated clinical
    exposures.
  • Safety Pharmacology evaluations can be evaluated
    in the toxicology studies.
  • Genotoxocity limited to Ames assay in specific
    scenarios

21
How Many Approaches To An IND Imaging Agents
  • FDA encourages meeting due to uniqueness of each
    agent
  • Biological products should be evaluated similar
    to biopharmaceuticals described previously
  • Generally single lifetime exposure, or only a few
    exposures used to diagnose or monitor diseases or
    conditions, therefore results in reduced
    nonclinical need.
  • Need to consider dose (e.g. mass dose), route,
    frequency of exposure, and kinetics.
  • Studies should be conducted to evaluate effects
    of a large mass dose (or maximum feasible dose).
  • NOAEL in acute toxicology and safety pharmacology
    studies should be at least 100X and NOAEL in
    repeat-dose toxicology be at least 25X the
    maximal mass dose in man.

22
How Many Approaches To An IND Botanical Products
  • Definition - products that contain vegetable
    matter as ingredients, may be a food (including
    dietary supplement), drug (including
    biopharmaceuticals), device, or cosmetic.
  • For the guidance, botanical includes plant
    materials, algae, macroscopic fungi and
    combinations thereof does not include materials
    from genetically engineered species, fermentation
    products (even if already approved for other uses
    in US), or highly purified/chemically modified
    substances derived from botanical substances.
  • Unique situation in that many of the products in
    development have been taken/sold for many years
    with no nonclinical support.

23
How Many Approaches To An IND Botanical Products
  • Nonclinical approach
  • If legally available already and there are no
    known safety issues (serious or life
    threatening), additional toxicology may not be
    needed.
  • If contains multiple components from different
    plant, algae, or fungal species it would be
    subject to the requirements of a combination drug
    product, although this may be changing.
  • For compounds marketed outside the US, dependent
    on route of administration
  • For compounds that have never been marketed such
    as traditional herbal medicines dependent on
    preparation and dosing

24
How Many Approaches To An IND Drug
Combinations
  • Combinations 3 scenarios
  • New new- Nonclinical combination studies
    recommended.
  • Marketed new
  • If no cause of concern, additional nonclinical
    studies generally not required to support POC
    studies up to 1 month.
  • Marketed marketed
  • If clinical experience with co-administration
    available, additional nonclinical studies
    generally not required unless there is a
    significant toxicological concern.
  • If no clinical experience with co-administration
    available, but no cause of concern based on
    available data, nonclinical studies generally not
    required to support short duration clinical
    trials (up to 3 months), however are recommended
    for longer durations.

25
How Many Approaches To An IND Drug
Combinations
  • Nonclinical development programs should be
    conducted on the individual entities.
  • Duration of combination studies should be
    equivalent to duration of clinical trial (not to
    exceed 90 days) and take into account the
    characteristics of the combination.
  • Should be limited to single relevant species,
    unless unexpected toxicity is identified.
  • If complete nonclinical development programs are
    not available for the individual entities, a
    complete program with the combination will
    suffice as long as the individual agents are only
    planned to be used in combination.
  • Combination Safety Pharmacology and genotoxicity
    battery generally not recommended.

26
How Many Approaches To An IND Juvenile
Indications
  • If starting in humans and expanding into
    juveniles
  • Review of the data from standard toxicology
    studies to determine if additional studies are
    needed
  • If Juvenile is the target population
  • Design of juvenile animal toxicology studies
  • Consider intended use in children, timing of
    dosing relative to growth and development phases
    in intended population, differences in
    pharmacological and toxicological profiles
    between mature and immature systems.
  • Should be designed to evaluate effects on organ
    systems that develop postnatally ( nervous,
    reproductive, pulmonary, renal, skeletal, and
    immune) and measurements of growth.

27
How Many Approaches To An IND Cellular and
Gene Therapies
  • Design of nonclinical study package should take
    into consideration the population of cells to be
    administered or the class of vector the animal
    species and physiologic state most relevant for
    clinical indication and product class and the
    intended doses, route of administration, and
    treatment regimens.
  • Follow same rules as for biopharmaceuticals.
  • Species specificity, permissiveness for infection
    by viral vectors, comparative physiology, etc.
    should be considered in study design.
  • Single species (most appropriate,
    pharmacologically relevant) should be employed.
  • Other non-standard endpoints may be required
    such as cell fate, functional, product-dependent,
    or disease-dependent endpoints.
  • Generally difference lies in stricter
    manufacturing regulations and controls.

28
Which Path Do I Take
  • Depends on test article type, indication, route,
    clinical plan
  • Review the guidelines (FDA/EMEA/ICH)
  • Pre-IND Meeting
  • Propose what makes scientific sense, along with
    the data to support your approach
  • Ask if the Agency agrees with this approach

29
Where Do I Go To Get The Work Done
  • What to look for in a CRO
  • Inspections how often, any 483s, if so what
    were they for (not all 483s indicate issues)
  • Experience SD and technical
  • Capacity are they overbooked
  • Historical data needed to discern background
    from test article-related
  • Communication if they are hard to contact
    during proposal process, will that carry through
    to the study
  • Reporting history can they follow through on
    commitments
  • What the CRO needs from you
  • Test article
  • Understanding of project scope
  • Communication

30
Where Do I Go To Get The Work Done (Continued)
  • Common issues that arise
  • No material available, insufficient material
    available
  • Protocol approval
  • Veterinary intervention
  • Communication
  • Background information on compound and possible
    toxicities

31
Summary
  • How do I get an IND for my compound depends on
  • Indication
  • Compound class
  • Clinical plan
  • Numerous guidance documents to help
  • Hire a consultant as needed
  • Work with your CRO as appropriate
  • Take advantage of a pre-IND meeting with the
    Agency

32
Horizontal Bar Chart
Study Traditional Biopharmaceuticals Vaccines Cancer
Single dose/DRF Yes Yes (1 or 2 species) Yes (1 species) Yes
Repeat dose Yes Yes (1 or 2 species) Yes (1 species) Yes
Genotoxicity Yes No No No
Safety Pharmacology Yes Yes in Tox studies No Yes in Tox studies
Study Animal Rule Excipients Reformulated or Repurposed Biosimilar
Single dose/DRF Yes Yes or No Yes or No Yes (1 species)
Repeat dose Yes Yes or No Yes or No Yes (1 species)
Genotoxicity Yesa Yes or No Yes or No No
Safety Pharmacology Yesa Yes or No Yes or No No
a - dependent on type of test article
33
Horizontal Bar Chart
Study Exploratory Imaging Agents Botanicals Combinations b
Single dose/DRF Yes Yes Yes or No Yes or No
Repeat dose Yes or No Yes Yes or No Yes or No
Genotoxicity No Yes Yes or No No
Safety Pharmacology Yes in Tox studies Yes Yes or No No
b May or may not be needed on the combination.
Traditional studies should be completed on
individual entities.
Study Juvenile c Orphan Cellular and Gene Therapeutics
Single dose/DRF Yes or No Yes Yes (1 or 2 species)
Repeat dose Yes or No Yes Yes (1 or 2 species)
Genotoxicity Yes or No Yes No
Safety Pharmacology Yes or No Yes Yes in Tox studies
c May or may not be needed in the juvenile
animal. Traditional studies should be
completed in the adult animals.
34
The FDA And Their Divisions
  • Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER)
  • Conventional synthetic chemicals
  • Antibiotics, natural and recombinant hormones
  • Novel drugs such as antisense oligonucleotides
    and synthetic peptides (lt 40 AA)

35
The FDA And Their Divisions
  • Center for Biologic Evaluation and Research
    (CBER)
  • Blood and blood products
  • Vaccines and allergenics
  • Conventional biotechnology-derived products
  • Recombinant proteins, monoclonal antibodies,
    antigenic peptides
  • Novel biotechnology-derived products
  • Center for Devices and Radiological Health (CDRH)
  • Center for Veterinary Medicine (CVM)

36
Guidelines
  • ICH
  • Q3A (R2) Impurities in New Drug Substances
  • Q3B (R2) Impurities in New Drug Products
  • Q3C (R4) Impurities Guidelines for Residual
    Solvents
  • S1A Need for Carcinogenicity Studies for
    Pharmaceuticals
  • S1B Testing for Carcinogenicity of
    Pharmaceuticals
  • S1C (R2) Dose Selection for Carcinogenicity
    Studies of Pharmaceuticals
  • S2 (R1) Guidance on Genotoxicity Testing and Data
    Interpretation for Pharmaceuticals Intended for
    Human Use
  • S3A Note for Guidance on Toxicokinetics The
    Assessment of Systemic Exposure in Toxicity
    Studies
  • S3B Pharmacokinetics Guidance for Repeat Dose
    Tissue Distribution Studies

37
Guidelines
  • ICH (Continued)
  • S4 Duration of Chronic Toxicity Testing in
    Animals (Rodent and Nonrodent Toxicity
    Testing)
  • S5 (R2) Detection of Toxicity to Reproduction for
    medicinal Products Toxicity to Male Fertility
  • S6 (R1) Preclinical Safety Evaluation of
    Biotechnology-Derived Pharmaceuticals
  • S7A Safety Pharmacology Studies for Human
    Pharmaceuticals
  • S7B The Non-Clinical Evaluation of the Potential
    for Delayed Ventricular Depolarization (QT
    interval prolongation) by Human
    Pharmaceuticals
  • S8 Immunotoxicology Studies for Human
    Pharmaceuticals
  • S9 Nonclinical Evaluation of Anticancer
    Pharmaceuticals
  • S10 Photosafety Evaluation
  • M3 (R2) Guidance on Nonclinical Safety Studies
    for the Conduct of Human Clinical Trials and
    Marketing Authorization for Pharmaceuticals

38
Guidelines
  • EMEA
  • 3BS11A Pharmacokinetics and metabolic studies
    in the safety evaluation of new medicinal
    products in animals
  • CHMP/SWP/302413/08 Need for revision of the
    guideline single dose toxicity (3BS1A)
  • CHMP/SWP/488313/07 Repeated dose toxicity
  • CPMP/SWP/1042/99 Repeated dose toxicity
  • CPMP/SWP/5199/02 Limits of genotoxic impurities
  • CHMP/QWP/251344/2006
  • CHMP/SWP/199726/04 Reflection Paper on the
    assessment of the Genotoxic Potential of
    Antisense Oligodeoxynucleotides
  • EMEA/194898/2006 Carcinogenicity Evaluation of
    Medicinal Products for the Treatment of HIV
    Infection
  • CPMP/SWP/2592/02 Rev 1 CHMP SWP Conclusions and
    recommendations on the use of genetically
    modified animal models for carcinogenicity
    assessment

39
Guidelines
  • EMEA (Continued)
  • CPMP/SWP/2877 /00 Carcinogenic potential
  • CPMP/SWP/372/01 Points to consider on the
    Non-clinical assessment of the carcinogenic
    potential of human insulin analogues
  • EMEA/CHMP/203927/05 Risk Assessment of Medicinal
    Products on Human Reproduction and Lactation
    From Data to Labeling
  • CHMP/SWP/169215/05 Need for Non-Clinical Testing
    in Juvenile Animals on Human Pharmaceuticals
    for Pediatric Indications
  • CPMP/SWP/2600/01 Points to consider on the Need
    for assessment of reproduction toxicity of
    human insulin analogues
  • CPMP/SWP/2145/00 Non-clinical local tolerance
    testing of medicinal products
  • CHMP/SWP/150115/06 Non-clinical guideline on
    drug-induced hepatotoxicity

40
Guidelines
  • EMEA (Continued)
  • CHMP/SWP/94227/04 Non-Clinical Investigation of
    the Dependence Potential of Medicinal
    Products
  • CPMP/SWP/398/01 Need for revision of the Note
    for Guidance on photosafety testing
  • CPMP/SWP/728/95 Replacement of animal studies by
    in vitro models
  • CHMP/SWP/28367/07 Strategies to identify and
    mitigate risks for first- in-human clinical
    trials with investigational medicinal
    products
  • CHMP/GTWP/125459/2006 Non-clinical studies
    required before first clinical use of gene
    therapy medicinal products
  • EMEA/CHMP/SWP/91850/06 Development of a CHMP
    Guideline on the Non- Clinical Requirements to
    Support Early Phase I Clinical Trials with
    Pharmaceutical Compounds
  • EMEA/CHMP/94526/05 Annex Guideline on Similar
    Biological Medicinal Products containing
    Biotechnology-Derived Proteins as Active
    Substance Non-Clinical and Clinical Issues -
    Guidance on Similar Medicinal Products
    containing Recombinant Erythropoietins

41
Guidelines
  • EMEA (Continued)
  • EMEA/273974/05 Quality, Preclinical and Clinical
    aspects of Gene Transfer Medicinal Products -
    Annex on Non- Clinical testing for Inadvertent
    Germline transmission of Gene Transfer
    Vectors
  • CPMP/SWP/799/95 Non-Clinical Documentation for
    Mixed Marketing Authorization Applications
  • CHMP/SWP/258498/05 Non-Clinical Development of
    Fixed Combinations of Medicinal Products
  • CPMP/SWP/1094/04 Evaluation of Control Samples
    for Non - clinical Safety Studies Checking
    for Contamination with the Test Substance
  • CPMP/SWP/2599/02 Position Paper on the
    non-clinical safety studies to support
    clinical trials with a single micro dose
  • CPMP /3097/02 Comparability of medicinal
    products containing biotechnology-derived
    proteins as active substance -annex on
    non-clinical and clinical issues

42
Guidelines
  • EMEA (Continued)
  • CPMP/SWP/997/96 Pre-clinical evaluation of anti-
    cancer medicinal products
  • CPMP/SWP/465/95 Pre-clinical pharmacological and
    toxicological testing of vaccines
  • EMEA/HMPC/107079/07 Assessment of genotoxicity of
    herbal substances/preparations
  • EMEA/HMPC/32116/05 Non-Clinical Documentation
    for Herbal Medicinal Products in Applications
    for Marketing Authorization (Bibliographical
    and Mixed Applications) and in Applications
    for Simplified Registration

43
Guidelines
  • CDER
  • Animal Models - Essential elements to Address
    Efficacy under the Animal Rule
  • Developing Medical Imaging Drugs and Biological
    Products - Part 1 Conducting Safety Assessments
  • Estimating the Maximum Safe Starting Dose in
    Initial Clinical Trials for Therapeutics in Adult
    Healthy Volunteers
  • Genotoxic and Carcinogenic Impurities in Drug
    Substances and Products Recommended Approaches
  • Immunotoxicology Evaluation of Investigational
    New Drugs
  • Nonclinical Evaluation of Late Radiation Toxicity
    of Therapeutic Radiopharmaceuticals  
  • Nonclinical Safety Evaluation of Drug or Biologic
    Combinations  
  • Nonclinical Safety Evaluation of Reformulated
    Drug Products and Products Intended for
    Administration by an Alternate Route
  • Nonclinical Safety Evaluation of Pediatric Drug
    Products

44
Guidelines
  • CDER (Continued)
  • Nonclinical Studies for the Safety Evaluation of
    Pharmaceutical Excipients
  • Photosafety Testing
  • Recommended Approaches to Integration of Genetic
    Toxicology Study Results  
  • Reference Guide for the Nonclinical Toxicity
    Studies of Antiviral Drugs Indicated for the
    Treatment of N/A Non-Life Threatening Disease
    Evaluation of Drug Toxicity Prior to Phase I
    Clinical Studies
  • Safety Testing of Drug Metabolites
  • Single Dose Acute Toxicity Testing for
    Pharmaceuticals 
  • Statistical Aspects of the Design, Analysis, and
    Interpretation of Chronic Rodent Carcinogenicity
    Studies of Pharmaceuticals  
  • Content and Format of Investigational New Drug
    Applications (INDs) for Phase 1 Studies of Drugs 
  • Exploratory IND Studies
  • Codevelopment of Two or More Unmarketed
    Investigational Drugs for Use in Combination
  • Applications covered by Section 505(b)(2)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com