IFR Criteria and Your Airport Goals: - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 18
About This Presentation
Title:

IFR Criteria and Your Airport Goals:

Description:

Airport Manager s role in gaining the best IFR minimums. Survey and data requirements. ... Resulted in the FAA changing instrument procedure criteria (TERPS). – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:35
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 19
Provided by: faa85
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: IFR Criteria and Your Airport Goals:


1
IFR Criteria and Your AirportGoals
  1. Quick review of criteria changes.
  2. Airport Managers role in gaining the best IFR
    minimums.
  3. Survey and data requirements.

2
FAA Contacts
  • IFR procedures Boston Flight Procedures
    Office/Sue Crumb (781) 238-7220
  • Airport Design Criteria Airport Division/ (781)
    238-7600
  • Operational Safety/Criteria Flight
    Standards/Gerry Holtorf (781) 238-7215

3
Why All the Change?
  • International concern over Controlled Flight Into
    Terrain (CFIT).
  • Vertical guidance key to fewer accidents.
  • Resulted in the FAA changing instrument procedure
    criteria (TERPS).
  • TERPS Change 17 (1998) and 18 (1999).
  • TERPS and airport Advisory Circular 150/5300-13
    now better aligned.
  • A visual area assessment is required.

4
Visual Area Assessment for IFR Procedures
  • Flight Standards 10/07/03 policy letter.
  • Apply paragraph 251
  • For all new approach procedures
  • For existing, when amended or reviewed

5
What if VAAR is penetrated?
  • Flight Procedures will notify airport manager.
  • From date of notification, 3 years to address
  • Reduce height/ clear obstructions, or
  • Mark/light obstruction(s).

6
If clearing or lighting cant be done?
  • 201 penetrations may be mitigated by
  • A vertical glide slope indicator (VGSI).
  • Sited at or above 3.0 degrees.
  • VGSI obstacle surface must be clear.
  • Note on approach plate requiring VGSI for night.

7
What will these changes mean to my airport?
  • NEW APPROACH airport design standards are
    integral to gaining a new approach. Advisory
    Circular 150/5300-13 is now better aligned with
    TERPS.
  • EXISTING IFR APPROACH Obstruction penetrations
    of these visual assessment surfaces may cause a
    change to straight-in or night circling minimums.

8
If this three years catches up to you
  • FAA will take steps to not authorize night
    minimums to the affected runways.
  • UNLESS
  • Acceptable corrective action is in progress, and
  • Airport submits a request for extension.

9
Airport Managers Role
  • Initiate an Aeronautical Study
  • 1. Airport sponsor initiates the request.
  • 2. Master Plan or Airport Layout Plan (ALP)
    considerations.
  • 3. Requirements identified for data, survey,
    environmental, etc.
  • 4. Determine funding and plan of action.
  • FAA completes the Aeronautical Study.

10
Remember
  • Survey Level of obstruction survey depends upon
    level of approach minimums desired.
  • Data accurate runway ends, navigation/ visual
    aid site info up to date ALP and 5010.
  • Communication with the Flight Procedures Office
    and Airports Division.
  • NOTE Lead times for procedures can exceed
  • ONE YEAR!

11
SurveysIn accordance with FAA Specification
405 Requirements provided in Appendix 16 of
AC 5300-13No survey day/visibility equal to
or gt1smPart 77 Level C or D Non-precision
12
Helpful Web SitesFlight Standards-http//www.faa.
gov/avr/afs/afs400(TERPS under AFS-420)Flight
Procedures-http//www.avn.faa.gov/index.asp?xmlin
dexSurvey info- http//www.noaa.gov(Spec 405
and more)
13
How do I know what applies?
  • Check AC 150/5300-13 Appendix 16.
  • Provides a matrix of minimums vs. airport
    requirements.
  • Generally in concert with TERPS.
  • Are the runway OFZ and safety area correct for
    largest design group aircraft?
  • TERPS minimums now effected by OFZ, hold lines,
    etc.

14
Circling Approaches
  • Require visual assessment for night approach
    minimums.
  • Smaller area than for straight-in nonprecision
    approaches.

15
Straight-in Approaches
  • Require visual assessment for day and night
    approach minimums.
  • Generally larger than circling area.
  • Slope varies depending upon visibility.

16
SUMMARY
  • New Procedures
  • Process generally starts with the Airports
    Division
  • ALP revision
  • Contact your ANE-600 planning person
  • Request the procedure through the FPO/Sue Crumb
  • -Sue Crumb (781) 238-7220
  • Plan to work with FAA team through an iterative
    aeronautical study process.

17
Summary Cont.
  • Existing Procedure Assessments
  • Dont wait for FAA to come knocking
  • Plan ahead.
  • Get the evaluation process started.
  • Request an Aeronautical study if required.
  • We want to protect the maximum utility of your
    instrument approaches.

18
OK! Whats the bottom line?
  • FAA will work together with you and your staff
    and/or consultants during the Aeronautical Study.
  • Evaluate Part 77 penetrations.
  • Study of applicable Airport Design AC TERPS
    surfaces.
  • Good Part 77 survey supports most of the approach
    analysis (some exceptions).
  • Examine lowest minimums possible.
  • FAA determination includes Part 77 obstruction
    lighting if clearing not practical.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com