Transfer Pricing - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 24
About This Presentation
Title:

Transfer Pricing

Description:

Seminar on Income Tax Northern India Regional Council Institute of Chartered Accountants of India Transfer Pricing A Perspective By Aseem Chawla Partner, Amarchand ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:623
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 25
Provided by: Ern158
Category:
Tags: pricing | transfer

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Transfer Pricing


1
Seminar on Income Tax Northern India Regional
Council Institute of Chartered Accountants of
India
Transfer Pricing A Perspective
By Aseem Chawla Partner, Amarchand
Mangaldas aseem.chawla_at_amarchand.com
May 21, 2011
2
Contents
Key Concept
Legislative Overview
Documentation
Form 3CEB Accountants Report
Dispute Resolution Mechanism
Indian Judicial Update
OECD Update, 2010
Direct Taxes Code, 2010
Points for Consideration
3
Key Concept

Transfer Pricing Keeping it at Arms Length
4
Key Concept (Contd)
Circular No. 14/2001 dated 27-11-2001 55. New
legislation to curb tax avoidance by abuse of
transfer pricing- 55.1 The increasing
participation of multi-national groups in
economic activities in the country has given rise
to new and complex issues emerging from
transactions entered into between two or more
enterprises belonging to the same multi-national
group. The profits derived by such enterprises
carrying on business in India can be controlled
by the multi-national group, by manipulating the
prices charged and paid in such intra-group
transactions, thereby, leading to erosion of tax
revenues.
Objectives of Transfer Pricing

5
Scope of Transfer Pricing Regulations
Key Concept (Contd)


6
Legislative Overview
  • Legislation introduced effective from April 1,
    2001
  • Provisions applicable only if
  • There is an international transaction(s) Section
    92B between
  • Two or more associated enterprises Section 92A
  • Deeming provisions Section 92B(2)
  • Transaction between an enterprise and a person
    (other than an associated enterprise) shall be
    deemed to be a transaction between two associated
    enterprises, if there exists a prior agreement or
    the terms of such a international transaction are
    in substance determined between one of these
    entities and the associated enterprise of the
    other contracting entity

7
Legislative Overview (Contd)
  • Computation of Arms Length Price by applying the
    most appropriate method out of
  • Comparable Uncontrolled Price (CUP)
  • Resale Price Method (RPM)
  • Cost Plus Method (CPM)
  • Transaction Net Margin Method (TNMM)
  • Profit Split Method (PSM) Section
    92C
  • Mandatory contemporaneous documentation
    requirements Section 92D
  • Stringent Penal Consequences on Non-compliance /
    TP adjustments

8
Legislative Overview (Contd)
  • Recent Amendments Finance Act, 2011
  • Change in computation of arms length range
    Notification of an allowable variation for
    different business activities and types of
    transactions
  • Expanded powers of transfer pricing officer
    (TPO) - TPO would now have powers to conduct a
    survey for enquiry and verification as provided
    under 133A of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (Act)
  • Further, where any other international
    transaction other than that referred comes to the
    notice of the TPO during the course of the
    proceedings before him, he may include those in
    his transfer pricing audit
  • Transactions with notified tax havens - An entity
    located in a notified tax haven will be now
    deemed to be an associated enterprise

9
Documentation Rule 10D
  • Documentation requirements Rule 10D of Income
    Tax Rules, 1962
  • The statute requires information/ documents in
    relation to an international transaction to be
  • kept and maintained in by every person
  • List of documents prescribed in Rule 10D
  • kept and maintained for a prescribed time 9
    years
  • furnished within 30 / 60 days of Revenues
    requisitioning

10
Documentation Rule 10D (Contd)
11
Form 3CEB - Accountants Report
  • Section 92E requires every person who has entered
    into an international transaction to obtain a
    report from an accountant
  • Rule 10E prescribes the requisite repot to be in
    Form 3CEB
  • Accountant shall give in his report declaration
    about
  • Examination of accounts records
  • Maintenance of prescribed information documents
  • Factual accuracy of contents mentioned in
    annexure to form 3CEB
  • Scope of examination Guidance Note of Institute
    of Chartered Accountants of India
  • Restricted examination of books related to
    international transaction only
  • Not an audit for expression of opinion
  • Reconciliation between figure mentioned in 3CEB
    general purpose financial statements

12
Form 3CEB - Accountants Report (Contd)
  • While certifying in the Report, Accountant should
    consider the following
  • Rely upon judicial pronouncement about inclusion
    exclusion of any information
  • If conflict of judicial opinion- mentioned the
    view followed
  • Follow Accounting standard, Guidance notes
    standard on Auditing issued by ICAI
  • Obtain details of Associated Enterprise (AE) of
    taxpayer and all the transaction between them
  • Obtain written representation from taxpayer in
    relation to Business of AE and from taxpayer to
    the effect that all international transactions
    have been properly disclosed
  • Verify computation of Arm length price

13
Dispute Resolution Mechanism
  • In the recent past, the use of alternative
    dispute resolution practices has been growing in
    importance and popularity world wide, having
    resolved both international conflicts and
    domestic arrangements
  • In the international tax scenario, an impetus was
    provided with the introduction of the Mutual
    Agreement Procedures in the bilateral tax
    treaties
  • With this expansion of new methods of dispute
    resolution worldwide, a need arose for such a
    mechanism in India to facilitate speedy
    resolution of numerous pending tax disputes
  • Section 144C of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (Act)
    was introduced vide Finance Act, 2009 to set up
    the mechanism of reference to DRP with effect
    from October 1, 2009

14
Dispute Resolution Mechanism (Contd)
  • On receipt of the draft order, eligible assessee
    has an option to
  • File acceptance to the proposed variations
  • Take no action
  • File objections to the proposed variations
  • Collegium of 3 Commissioners to constitute DRP
    subordinate to CBDT
  • Manner of filing objections
  • Objection to the proposed variation to be
    furnished in Form 35A in quadruplicate, within 30
    days of receipt of draft order, alongwith a copy
    to the AO

15
Dispute Resolution Mechanism (Contd)
  • Manner of filing objections (Contd.)
  • Objections to state factual / legal arguments
    against the proposed variation
  • Objections to be filed against entire order
    both corporate tax issues and transfer pricing
    issues
  • Additional evidence to be filed through a
    separate application
  • DRP has the power to confirm, reduce or enhance
    the variations or issue directions to the AO to
    cause further enquiry
  • Power of further enquiry by AO restricted -
    Requirement to be reported to DRP and directions
    of DRP are binding
  • Directions shall be issued within nine months
    from the end of month in which draft order is
    forwarded

16
Indian Judicial Update
  • Serdia Pharmaceuticals v. ACIT (2011) 44 SOT 391
  • The arms length price for importing active
    pharmaceutical ingredients from related
    enterprises should be determined on the basis of
    price at which locally manufactured generic API
    are sold in the domestic market
  • Provides guidance on several important aspects of
    transfer pricing jurisprudence preference of CUP
    over TNMM, irrelevance of customs valuation,
    persuasive value of foreign rulings, economic
    importance of an intangible like patent and the
    requirement to select the most appropriate method
    under the relevant rules
  • Cheil India (P) Ltd. vs ACIT
  • ITA No. 767/Del/2010
  • Pass-through costs that are incurred for non
    value-added purposes should not form a apart of
    the cost base while determining mark up
  • Tax administration should not depart from its
    previous position on the same set of facts

17
Indian Judicial Update (Contd)
  • DHL Express India (P) Ltd. vs ACIT
  • I.T.A. No. 7360/Mum./2010
  • Where enough comparables are available, companies
    with segmented results should not be accepted
  • Only those items that have something to do with
    the business shall be included in the operational
    income for the purpose of transfer pricing
    analysis, thereby clarifying and specifying the
    parameters required for a valid and acceptable
    transfer pricing study

18
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and
Development (OECD) Update, 2010
  • Significantly expanded guidance on application of
    the TNMM and the Transactional Profit Split
    Method.
  • Completely new chapter on Comparability including
    a typical process that can be followed when
    performing a comparability analysis.
  • A nine-step process is outlined in the
    Guidelines.
  • Recognition that the TNMM may be applied if
    non-unique intangibles exist for which
    comparables can be found.
  • Detailed guidance on the use of commercial
    databases, foreign comparables, limitations in
    available comparables, selecting or rejecting
    potential comparables, etc.
  • Detailed Guidelines of Business Restructuring
    Attribution of Profits

19
Direct Taxes Code, 2010
  • Concept of Advance Pricing Arrangements (APA)
    introduced in order to eliminate uncertainty over
    determination of arms length price
  • APA provides for determination of arms length
    price of an international transaction entered
    into by a person through an advance pricing
    agreement by the Central Board of Direct Taxes
  • APA shall be valid for specified period as
    mentioned in the agreement (not exceeding 5
    consecutive financial years)
  • APA shall be binding only on the taxpayer, the
    Commissioner the IT authorities subordinate to
    him only in respect of the transaction in
    relation to which APA has been entered into

20
Direct Taxes Code, 2010 (Contd)
  • Code proposes safe harbor rules in determination
    of arm length price
  • It intends to specify tolerable mark up to the
    cost of the goods or service for the taxation
    authority to accept the transfer price computed
    by the assessee as such
  • Adoption of Safe Harbour rules, absolves the
    taxpayers from the burden of a detailed
    benchmarking analysis  for transfer pricing while
    retaining the onus to maintain documentation for
    intra-group transactions
  • The TPO may determine the ALP in relation to the
    best of his judgment, if the assessee does not
    co-operate or comply with his directions
  • The Assessing Officer shall make the assessment
    of the tax base of the assessee after taking into
    account the order of the TPO

21
Points for Consideration
  • Application of deeming provisions under Section
    92B(2)
  • Cherry picking of comparables exclusion of
    loss making low turnover comparables
  • Disregarded transaction wise analysis in case of
    low profit/loss at net margin on a company wide
    level
  • Dispute on allocation of common costs in case
    of segmental date in TP analysis
  • Application of CUP method using comparative
    prices of localised vis-à-vis Import price

22
Points for Consideration
  • Inherent conflict between customs and income tax
    laws
  • Objectives different

Higher Price for higher customs duty
Customs Department
Assessee
Lower Price for higher taxable income
Income Tax Department
23
Precept
There is no art which one government sooner
learns from another than that of draining money
from the pockets of the people Adam
Smith (Father of Modern Economics)
24
  • NOTE This presentation is for discussion and
    general guidance purposes, prepared on the basis
    of information available. It may not be used for
    any other purpose, or distributed to any other
    party, without seeking our prior written consent.
    No party should rely on this presentation without
    taking necessary prior professional advice

25
Comparable Uncontrolled Price Method
  • CUP method compares the price transferred in a
    controlled transaction to the price charged in a
    comparable un-controlled transaction
  • CUP method is the most direct and reliable way to
    apply the arms length principle

26
Resale Price Method
  • The resale price method begins with the price at
    which a product is resold to an independent
    enterprise (IE)by an associate enterprise
  • X sold to AE at Rs. 1000 (profit 300)
  • AE sold to an IE at Rs. 2000
  • (profit of Rs. 500 for relevant IE)
  • Arms length price 2000 - 500 1500

27
Profit Split Method
  • PSM is used when transactions are inter-related
    and is not possible to evaluate separately
  • PSM first identifies the profit to be split for
    the AE. The profit so determined is split between
    the AE on the basis of the functions
    performed/assets/CE

28
Cost Plus Method
  • In CP method, first the cost incurred is
    determined. An appropriate cost plus mark-up is
    then added to the cost to arrive at an
    appropriate profit. The resultant figure is the
    arms length price

29
Associate Enterprise Section 92A
  • Direct Control/Control through intermediary
  • Holding 26 of voting power
  • Advance of not less than 51 of the total assets
    of borrowing company
  • Guarantees not less than 10 on behalf of
    borrower
  • Appointment of more than 50 of the BoD
  • Dependence for 90 or more of the total raw
    material or other consumables

30
International Transactions Section 92B
  • Transaction between two or more AE of which
    either both or anyone is a non-resident
  • Transactions
  • Purchase/Sale/Lease
  • Provision of service
  • Lending or borrowing

31
Arms Length Price
  • Price which two independent firms would agree on
  • Price which is generally charged in a transaction
    between persons other than associated enterprises

32
Transactional Net Margin Method (TNMM)
  • TNMM is adopted in cases of transfer of
    semi-finished goods, distribution of finished
    products (where resale price method (RPM) cannot
    be adequately applied) and transactions involving
    the provision of services
  • TNMM compares the net profit margin relative to
    an appropriate base (sales, assets or costs
    incurred) of the tested party with net profit
    margin of the independent enterprises in similar
    transactions after making adjustments regarding
    functional differences and risk involved

33
Deemed International Transactions
Arrangement (non-related parties)
XYZ Bank US
ABC Finance Corporation
Debt
Interest
XYZ Branch India
Benchmarked at Arms Length as Deemed
International Transaction
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com