Research Methods in Science - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Research Methods in Science

Description:

... to explain a phenomena Educated guess A hypothesis must be falsifiable A hypothesis must be falsifiable The Loch Ness Monster is alive and well The Loch ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:1270
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 79
Provided by: GregorioB
Learn more at: http://www.csun.edu
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Research Methods in Science


1
Research Methods in Science
  • UC LEADSSummer 2003Lecture 1

2
Research Methods in Science Outline of talk
  • Overview of general principles of the scientific
    method
  • Philosophy of science
  • examine objections
  • Bayesian and frequentist approach
  • Humanistic side of science
  • Ethics in science (case studies)
  • Scientific writing

3
(No Transcript)
4
What do you think the scientific method is?
5
Elementary Scientific Method
  • Hypothesis formation
  • Hypothesis testing
  • Deductive and inductive logic
  • Controlled experiments, replication, and
    repeatability
  • Interaction between data and theory
  • Limits to sciences domain

6
The Scientific Method (mission statement)
  • The scientific method is the process by which
    scientists, collectively and over time, endeavor
    to construct an accurate (that is, reliable,
    consistent and non-arbitrary) representation of
    the world

7
General principles that pervade all of the
sciences
  • Hypothesis generation and testing
  • Deductive and inductive logic
  • Parsimony
  • Sciences presuppositions, domains, and limits

8
Hypothesis generation and testing
  • Formulation of a hypothesis to explain a
    phenomena
  • Educated guess
  • A hypothesis must be falsifiable

9
A hypothesis must be falsifiable
  • The Loch Ness Monster is alive and well
  • The Loch Ness Monster does not exist
  • There is life on Mars
  • There is no life on Mars
  • DNA is the genetic material of all life
  • DNA is not the genetic material

10
Hypothesis Generation and Testing
  • Based on my (or someone elses) observations, I
    predict that
  • H0 no differences
  • HA significant difference

11
Lets do an Experimental Test!!
12
Experimental Tests What are the main features?
  • Clear hypothesis
  • Identify independent and dependent variables
  • Assign controls
  • Repeatable, hence verifiable results
  • Used to support or refute claims

13
General principles that pervade all of the
sciences
  • Hypothesis generation and testing
  • Deductive and inductive logic

14
Deductive and Inductive Logic (distinction 1)
  • The conclusion of a deductive argument is already
    contained implicitly in its premises
  • The conclusion of an inductive argument goes
    beyond the information in its premises

15
Deductive and Inductive Logic (distinction 2)
  • Given the truth of all of its premises, the truth
    of an inductive arguments conclusion follows
    with at most high probability
  • Deduction argues from a given models general
    principles to specific cases of expected data

16
Deductive and Inductive Logic (distinction 3)
  • Deduction argues from a given models general
    principles to specific cases of expected data
  • Induction argues in the opposite direction, from
    actual data to an inferred model

17
Deductive and Inductive Logic
  • One is based on statistics (inductive)
  • The other is based on probability

18
Deductive and Inductive Logic(telling the
difference)
  • Given A fair coin is one that gives tails with
    probability 0.5 and head 0.5 .
  • Problem 1 Given that a coin is a fair coin. What
    is the probability that the coin will produce 45
    heads and 55 tails?
  • Problem 2 Given that 100 tosses of a coin
    produce 45 heads and 55 tails. What is the
    probability that the coin is a fair coin?

19
Why is induction so pervasive and critical in
science?
  • Science is almost entirely about unobservables --
    about things and times outside the database of
    actual observations.
  • Iron melts at 1,535C (but everywhere?)
  • Water boils at 100C (but everywhere?)

20
The basis of induction Aristotle
  • Aristotle (384-322 BC) offered 3 methods of
    induction
  • Unifying concept in deductive arguments, which
    are composed of premises, inductive arguments are
    the scaffolds that raise the status of the
    deductive argument to a law-like status

21
The basis of induction Aristotle
  • Dialectical induction (Topics). Not entirely
    relevant to scientific research, but useful
  • mentor to pupil discourse
  • If a skilled pilot is the best pilot and the
    skilled charioteer is the best charioteer, then,
    in general, the skilled person is the best
    person in any particular sphere (Perez-Ramos
    1988)

22
The basis of induction Aristotle
  • Enumerative induction (Prior Analytics).
    Statements about individual objects provide the
    basis or premises for a general conclusion
  • from observing numerous adult humans, an
    inductive argument could conclude that all humans
    have 32 teeth

23
The basis of induction Aristotle
  • Intuitive induction (Posterior Analytics).
    Direct intuition of the general principles
    exemplified in the data
  • bright side of the mood always faces the sun, so
    the moon shines because of reflected sunlight

24
(No Transcript)
25
General principles that pervade all of the
sciences
  • Hypothesis generation and testing
  • Deductive and inductive logic
  • Parsimony

26
Parsimony
  • Shortest path or the less complex explanation
    to the true state of nature

A
B
27
Parsimony
  • Keynes (1962) expressed parsimony as the law of
    the limited variety in nature
  • Iron melts at 1,535C
  • unlimited natureunique atomsunique
    propertiesno iron, oxygen, no humans (sum of the
    parts)
  • 100 chemical elements
  • related presuppositions of induction

28
Parsimony
  • The principle of parsimony recommends that from
    among theories fitting the data equally well,
    scientists choose the simplest theory.
  • Thus, the fit of the data is not the only
    criterion bearing on the theory choice

29
Parsimony
  • Additional criteria includes
  • predictive accuracy
  • explanatory power
  • testability
  • fruitfulness in generating new insights and
    knowledge coherent with other scientific and
    philosophical beliefs
  • repeatability of results

30
Parsimony
  • Q Why is parsimony an important principle in
    science?
    .
  • A1 The entire scientific enterprise has never
    produced, and never will produce, a single
    conclusion without invoking parsimony
  • A2 Economyfacilitate insight, improve accuracy,
    and increase efficiency

31
General principles that pervade all of the
sciences
  • Hypothesis generation and testing
  • Deductive and inductive logic
  • Parsimony
  • Sciences presuppositions, domains, and limits

32
Sciences presuppositions, domains, and limits
  • Set of beliefs that allow a person to validate
    her observations, results, conclusions
    (objectivity of science)
  • constancy of the universe
  • parsimony
  • Acceptance and acknowledgement of the knowable
    and the unknowable

33
General principles that pervade all of the
sciences
  • Hypothesis generation and testing
  • Deductive and inductive logic
  • Parsimony
  • Sciences presuppositions, domains, and limits

34
(No Transcript)
35
General principles that pervade all of the
sciences
  • Hypothesis generation and testing
  • Deductive and inductive logic
  • Parsimony
  • Sciences presuppositions, domains, and limits

36
(No Transcript)
37
General principles that pervade all of the
sciences
  • Hypothesis generation and testing
  • Deductive and inductive logic
  • Parsimony
  • Sciences presuppositions, domains, and limits

38
General principles that pervade all of the
sciences
  • There are detractors of the idea that a
    scientific method, upon which we are able to make
    claims about the true state of nature, does not
    exist

39
General principles that pervade all of the
sciences
  • There are detractors of the idea that a
    scientific method, upon which we are able to make
    claims about the true state of nature, does not
    exist

PhilosophicalScientific
40
General principles that pervade all of the
sciences
cannot
  • Paul Feyerabend insisted that there are no
    objective standards of rationality, so naturally
    there is no logic or method to scienceanything
    goes in scienceit is no more productive of
    truth than ancient myth-tellers, troubadours and
    court jesters

Philosophical
41
(No Transcript)
42
General principles that pervade all of the
sciences
cannot
  • Thomas Kuhn is critical of what he sees as
    modernist misrepresentation of the nature of
    science
  • Modernist definitions of science claim that
    science is objective because it is empirical
    (based only on the data of our senses), rational
    (reasonable, or logically defensible) and that
    its presuppositions are obviously true...

Scientific
43
General principles that pervade all of the
sciences
cannot
  • Kuhn claims science is a social enterprise and as
    such is also quite subjective. He argues that,
    "every individual choice between competing
    theories depends on a mixture of objective and
    subjective factors."

Scientific
44
General principles that pervade all of the
sciences
cannot
  • Instead, science occurs in revolutions where old
    ideas are thrown out and new ones accepted.
    Science is therefore capricious, and each
    discipline of science cannot share a set of
    pervading principles

Scientific
45
General principles that pervade all of the
sciences
cannot
  • These revolutions are called
  • PARADIGM SHIFTS

Scientific
46
astronomy
chemistry
geology
physics
biology
47
astronomy
chemistry
geology
physics
biology
General principles and technologies are distinct
to each scientific discipline
48
Thought experiment
  • You have been awarded a 500,000 grant and can
    spend it on any type of equipment that is
    relevant to your research.
  • Make a list of what you will buy and justify it
    (dont worry about EXACT price values as you
    essentially can afford almost anything!)
  • (dont forget about Gregorios research!)

49
Thought experiment
  • Can you safely say that you will not rely on or
    utilize any of the following principles by using
    your new equipment?
  • hypothesis generation and testing
  • Deductive and inductive logic
  • Parsimony
  • Sciences presuppositions, domains, and limits

50
you
them
51
Pervasive inall sciences
Based on Greekphilosophers many others
Non-negotiablepresuppositionsof
perceptionyou see what Iseeyou feelas I
feel
52
(No Transcript)
53
The Scientific Method (mission statement)
  • The scientific method is the process by which
    scientists, collectively and over time, endeavor
    to construct an accurate (that is, reliable,
    consistent and non-arbitrary) representation of
    the world

54
(No Transcript)
55
Bayesian and Frequentist Approach to Scientific
Research
  • Bayesian Statistics have been developed for a
    variety of purposes, such as designing
    experiments, estimating the values of quantities
    of interest, and testing hypothesis
  • Useful because this family of statistics takes
    into account prior results as opposed to
    assigning independence to each result, thereby
    introducing efficiency

56
Bayesian and Frequentist Approach to Scientific
Research
  • For a loaded dice (biased for 6)
  • The frequentist views dice throws as independent
    events, each number or face having an equal
    probability each value has a 1/6 probability of
    appearing.
  • The Bayesian, the probability of getting a 6
    will be more than just 1/6 (as will the
    probability of being thrown out on your ear!)

57
Bayesian Approach to Scientific Research
  • The search for patterns in data will be more
    realistic as you do not discard prior
    knowledge -- it helps you get to the answer
    much faster
  • Calculations are not very difficult for small
    sample sizes, but can get complicated for large
    oneslets see an example

58
Bayesian Example
  • Coin toss determines the configuration of the
    marbles that go into an opaque urn
  • heads place 1 white 3 blue marbles(WBBB)
  • tails place 3 white 1 marbles blue (WWWB)
  • Only coin-tosser knows

59
(No Transcript)
60
Bayesian Example
Ratio of the likelihood of heads to the
likelihood of tails
61
Posterior probability
Number of draws
62
Bayesian Approach to Scientific Research
  • Your confidence in the results (and hence your
    hypothesis) increases tremendously with each draw
    of a marble
  • If trials are expensive then using likelihood
    values are important
  • Can be computationally complex (trade off)

63
The Humanistic side of Science
  • Your perceptions of the humanistic side of
    science
  • It can lie between ones research and ones
    beliefs
  • It may not be realized at the outset
  • It may change during your career
  • You may not want them to intermingle

64
Science as a Liberal Art
  • The search for and the advancement of knowledge
    and truth is a common goal among scientists
  • The truth will (hopefully) be used to improve
    the world in which we live in
  • The truth will be used for just and moral
    purposes

65
Science as a Liberal Art
  • As scientist, we may be in dilemmas that will
    challenge out personal beliefs
  • A strong conviction in what one believes should
    reflect the kind of work one undertakes
  • May or may not reflect current social climate

66
Science as a Liberal Art
  • Examples of controversial research
  • stem cell research
  • genetic engineering / GM food
  • nuclear sciences
  • control systems (used by the defense)
  • biological control
  • alternative fuel research

67
Science as a Liberal Art
  • Do you have ethical boundaries that you have
    considered in your work?

68
Ethics Case Studies
  • Isa and Senait will lead discussion
  • Introduce the paper
  • Break into groups
  • Read and discuss paper
  • Develop topics for big discussion
  • Introduce second ethics issue (no break-out
    groups)

69
Ethics in Research
  • Reporting of data accurately is seen not only as
    a high professional quality, but also a moral
    one.
  • Why?

70
Ethics in Research
  • Ethical researchers do not plagiarize or claim
    credit for the results of others
  • They do not misrepresent sources or invent
    results
  • They do not submit data whose accuracy they have
    reason to question, unless they raise the
    question
  • They do not conceal objections that they cannot
    rebut
  • They do not caricature or distort opposing views
  • They do not destroy or conceal sources and data
    important for those to follow

71
Research Ethics and Science Writing Example
72
Research Ethics and Science Writing Example
73
Research Ethics and Science Writing Example
74
Research Ethics and Science Writing Example
75
Research Ethics and Science Writing Example
76
Research Ethics and Science Writing Example
77
Research Ethics and Science Writing Example
78
Concept MapWater Example
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com