GUIDED BY - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 24
About This Presentation
Title:

GUIDED BY

Description:

Mary M. Rodgers, Dynamic biomechanics of the normal foot and ankle during walking ... 4 Slide 5 STRIDE ANALYSIS KINEMATIC ANALYSIS MARKER TECHNIQUE ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:149
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 25
Provided by: win1401
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: GUIDED BY


1
2-D Comparative Gait Kinematics Using a Single
Video Camera and EMG Signal Analysis
  • GUIDED BY
  • Mr. Chaitanya Srinivas L.V. Sujeet Blessing
  • Assistant Professor 08MBE026
  • SBST VIT University
  • VIT University Vellore
  • Vellore

2
SUMMARY OF WORK
  • Acquisition and Processing of EMG for six
    subjects from nine muscles
  • Stride analysis for six subjects
  • Kinematics analysis for six subjects
  • Marker based automated video-graphic analysis
  • Marker-less automated video-graphic analysis

3
EMG ANALYSIS
  • EMG acquisition
  • EMG processing
  • Linear envelope
  • Normalization using Maximum Voluntary Contraction
  • Wave rectification
  • Butterworth low pass filter
  • Integrated EMG
  • Output from Low pass filter is passed through an
    integrator
  • Root mean square

4
µ volts
µ volts
µ volts



Biceps Femoris
Vastus Medialis
Vastus Lateralis



µ volts
µ volts
µ volts

Semi Tendinosus
Rectus Femoris
Medial Gastrocnemius
µ volts
µ volts
µ volts
Lateral Gastrocnemius
Soleus
Tibialis Anterior
Linear envelope of EMG during one gait cycle
Normal
5
µ volts
µ volts
Muscles Medial gastrocnemius Lateral gastrocnemius Rectus femoris Vastus lateralis Vastus medialis Biceps Femoris Semi membranosus Soleus Tibialis Anterior
Average 102.7534 102.4169 69.4962 90.5123 100.0003 76.9286 147.1159 108.0622 163.433
6
STRIDE ANALYSIS
  • Stride analysis Paper-Ink Method
  • Step length, Stride length, Cadence, Stride
    width, Velocity, Foot progression angle

7
KINEMATIC ANALYSIS
  • The motion of objects without consideration of
    the causes leading to the motion
  • Determinants of position
  • Active EMG
  • Passive Force

8
MARKER TECHNIQUE
  • Helen Hayes marker set
  • Distance from Camera 9 feet
  • Camera captures 25 frames/second
  • Image processing
  • Colour image to binary image
  • Blob detection
  • Drawing line, connecting respective markers
  • Line and angle detection using Houghs transform

Pics
Results
9
MARKER-LESS TECHNIQUE
  • Converting into silhouette video
  • Extraction of the silhouette
  • Segmenting leg into thigh, shin and foot using
    manual measurements
  • Finding mid points of these segments, which
    serves as markers
  • Correlating these markers with the un-segmented
    body
  • Drawing lines connecting these markers
  • Detecting lines and angles using Houghs
    transform

Pics
Results
10
Video
MARKER TECHNIQUE
Frame n
Colour image
Binary image
Blob detection
Draw lines
Draw lines
Houghs Transform
Houghs Transform
Hip angle
Knee angle
Video
11
Video (in RGB)
MARKER-LESS TECHNIQUE
Silhouette extraction
Frame n
Swing Phase Algorithm
Stance Phase Algorithm
Segmentation and Detection of Markers
Adjusting Leg Shortening using extraction
Drawing Lines
Segmentation and Detection of Markers
Angle Detection
Drawing Lines
Angle Detection
Video
12
COMPARISON
  • Marker-less technique has a wide range of hip
    angle
  • Knee flexion angle during heel strike is not
    clearly seen in marker-less technique, however,
    during swing phase, it has a good range

Normal
13
CONCLUSION
  • Stride analysis was carried out using paper-ink
    method
  • Emg was acquired from nine muscles from six
    subjects, processed and averaged
  • Kinematic analysis was done on the same six
    subjects
  • Marker and Marker-less automated video-graphic
    techniques were developed and the results were
    compared

14
REFERENCE
  • Richard Baker, Gait analysis methods in
    rehabilitation, Journal of NeuroEngineering and
    Rehabilitation, 2006, 34.
  • Mary M. Rodgers, Dynamic biomechanics of the
    normal foot and ankle during walking and
    running, Physical Therapy, 1988, 1822-30.
  • Michela Goffredo, Imed Bouchrika, John N. Carter
    and Mark S. Nixon, Performance analysis for gait
    in camera networks, Association of Computing
    Machinery, 2008, 73-80.
  • Y.P. Ivanenko, R.E. Poppele and F. Lacquaniti,
    Five basic muscle activation patterns account
    for muscle activity during human locomotion,
    American Journal of Physiology, 2004, 267-282.
  • M.B.I. Reaz, M.S. Hussain and F. Mohd-Yasin,
    Techniques of EMG signal analysis Detection,
    processing, classification and applications,
    Biological Procedures, 2006, 8(1) 11-35.
  • Noraxon EMG and Sensor System, Clinical SEMG
    Electrode Sites. www.noraxon.com.
  • Helen Hayes Marker System, www.helenhayeshospital.
    org.

15
Queries???
16
THANK YOU.
17
Back
18
Back
19
MARKER BASED VIDEO-GRAPHIC TECHNIQUE
Back
HIP ANGLE
KNEE ANGLE
MARKER-LESS VIDEO-GRAPHIC TECHNIQUE
Back
HIP ANGLE
KNEE ANGLE
20
MUSCLES
  • Lateral gastrocnemius, Medial gastrocnemius,
    Vastus lateralis, Vastus medialis, Rectus
    femoris, Biceps femoris, Semi tendinosus, Soleus,
    Tibialis anterior

Back
21
SOLEUS
LG
MG
TA
VL
RF
Back
VM
µ volts
BF
Stride
ST
Data Taken From Winter (1991)
Normal Hip Angle
Normal Knee Angle
Back
22
From Helen Hayes official website
Back
23
  • a one frame of an original video b grey
    image c, d binary image e blob detection
    f for hip angle
  • estimation g for knee angle estimation h
    detected lines by Houghs transform for hip
    angle
  • i detected lines by Houghs transform for knee
    angle

Back
24
h
i
a Silhouette of a original frame b image
extracted from d negative image e
correlating the manual the hip c extracting
only the subject from the background
measurements with the pixel values f shin g
upper leg h drawing lines connecting the
markers i detected lines using Houghs
transform
BACK
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com