Tactics in Christian Apologetics (Part III): - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Tactics in Christian Apologetics (Part III):

Description:

Tactics in Christian Apologetics (Part III): The following four tactics are adapted from Gregory Koukl, Stand to Reason Ministries, 1-800-2-Reason; www.str.org – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:242
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 24
Provided by: Paul242
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Tactics in Christian Apologetics (Part III):


1
Tactics in Christian Apologetics (Part III)
  • The following four tactics are adapted from
    Gregory Koukl, Stand to Reason Ministries,
    1-800-2-Reason www.str.org

2
Tactics in Christian Apologetics
  • The Columbo Tactic
  • The Suicide Tactic
  • The Take the Roof Off Tactic
  • The Steamroller Tactic

3
The Columbo Tactic
  • If you hit a roadblock, ask a good question
  • Offensive tactic used in a disarming way with
    carefully selected questions to productively
    advance the conversation.

4
The Columbo Tactic Ask a Good Question!
  • Three basic ways to use the Columbo tactic to
  • both gain information stay out of the hot seat,
  • reverse the burden of proof, and indirectly
    exploit
  • a weakness or flaw in someones view
  • Ask the following 3 questions

5
The Columbo Tactic Ask a Good Question!
  • What do you mean by that?
  • - This is a clarification question.
  • - It tells you what he or she thinks, so you
    dont misunderstand or misrepresent him or
    her.
  • - Keeps you out of the hot seat.
  • - Gives you more thinking time.

6
The Columbo Tactic Reverse the Burden of Proof!
  • Now, how did you come to that conclusion or
    what are your reasons for saying that?
  • - This question assumes the person has come to a
    conclusion.
  • - While the first question helps you to learn
    what he or she thinks, this second question helps
    you to learn how he or she thinks, giving you
    valuable information on how to question further.

7
The Columbo Tactic Indirectly Exploit a
Weakness or Flaw!
  • Have you ever considered
  • - This is an offensive question, yet not in an
    offensive way.
  • - It offers an alternative view that gently
    challenges his beliefs, exploiting a point of
    weakness you uncovered in his answers to your
    first two questions.
  • - It requires you have an option you can explain
    clearly that gives him reason to abandon his view
    for a better answer.

8
The Columbo Tactic Indirectly Exploit a
Weakness or Flaw!
  • Have you ever considered
  • - You can use a number of phrases to introduce
    your question to soften your approach
  • I am just curious
  • Help me out because Im trying to
    understand you on this
  • Im a little confused on something
  • Maybe you can clear something up for me
  • Something about this thing bothers me
  • Maybe Im still missing something

9
The Columbo Tactic REVIEW OF COLUMBO QUESTIONS
  • 1. What did you mean by that?
  • 2. Now, how did you come to that
    conclusion or what are your reasons for
    saying that?
  • 3. Have you ever considered

10
The SUICIDE Tactic
  • The suicide tactic makes capital of the tendency
    of many arguments to self destruct when given the
    opportunity
  • - They express contradictory concepts.
  • - Self-refuting arguments.

11
The SUICIDE Tactic
  • There are no absolutes! Are you sure about
    that?
  • There is no truth. Is that statement true?
  • Dont take anyones advice on that issue.
  • Is that your advice to me?
  • Who are you to say? Who are you to ask the
    question?

12
The SUICIDE Tactic
  • Its wrong to try to change other peoples
    religious beliefs! If you think this is wrong,
    why are trying to change my religious beliefs
    about evangelism missions?
  • All religions are true. If all religions are
    true, then Christianity is true. But part of the
    truth of Christianity is that all other
    religions, taken as a whole, are false. Either
    Christianity is true and others are false, or
    others are true and Christianity is false.
    Either way, all religions cant be true.
  • I dont believe anything unless it can be proven
    scientifically.
  • Oh? What scientific experiment or proof taught
    you that only science can teach you truth?

13
The SUICIDE Tactic
  • You can only know truth through experience. Oh?
    What experience taught you that you could only
    know truth through experience?
  • Ill give you three good reasons you cant use
    logic to find truth. So you want to use logic
    to disprove logic.

14
Taking the Roof Off Tactic
  • This is a simple technique used with great skill
    by Dr. Francis A. Schaeffer
  • (1) Adopt the other persons viewpoint for the
    sake of argument.
  • (2) Press the person to the logical conclusion
    of his or her view. This is way of seeing
    whether he or she can really live in the kind of
    world he or she is affirming.

15
Taking the Roof Off Tactic
  • In essence, you are taking his or her moral or
    intellectual rules and applying them consistently
    to show that are inadequate or absurd. Can he or
    she live with the moral consequences of his or
    her beliefs?

16
Taking the Roof Off Tactic
  • This tactic is also known as reductio ad absurdum
    (or simply reductio), or reducing the argument to
    its absurd conclusion or consequence.
  • All you do is take his or her view seriously,
    reflect it back to him unambiguously-taking the
    spin off, as it were-showing him where it really
    leads.

17
Taking the Roof Off Tactic
  • Warning when you use this approach
  • 1. Sometimes we remove a persons false sense
    of security and convince him of the nihilism
    inherent in his beliefsif we do not have the
    time to replace his beliefs with the God of the
    Bible, we may end up leaving him or her in a
    worse state than when we found him
  • This is what we mean by taking the roof off.
    But we cannot ever think this to be easy. The
    hardest thing of all is that when we have exposed
    modern man to his tension, he still may not be
    willing for the true solution. Consequently, we
    may seem to leave him in a worse state than he
    was in before. But this is the same as the
    evangelism of the past. Whenever the evangelist
    preached the reality of hell, men who did not
    believe were more miserable after hearing his
    preaching than if they never heard him. We are
    in the same position. We confront men with
    reality we remove their protection and their
    escapes we allow the avalanches to fall. If
    they do not become Christians, they are indeed in
    a worse state than before we spoke to them.
  • Francis A. Schaeffer, The God Who Is There, in
    The Complete Works of Francis A. Schaeffer
    (Wheaton, Ill. Crossway, 1982), 1 140.

18
Steamroller Tactic
  • The steamroller is not a technique you use it is
    one you defend against. It is insincere people
    who bombard you with questions and possibly
    insults.
  • Three ways to deal with a steamroller in process

19
Steamroller Tactic
  • Defense 1 Stop him or her graciously but
    firmly, then referee the argument
  • 1. Stop the intrusionuse a little body
    language. For example
  • a. Hold up your hand briefly say, I am not
    quite finished yet.
  • b. Wait a minute, let me finish.
  • c. You have asked a good question and
    you deserve a good answer. Are you interested
    in what I have to say?

20
Steamroller Tactic
  • Defense 1 Stop him or her graciously but
    firmly, then referee the argument
  • 2. Negotiate an agreement. For example
  • a. Say, Is it okay with you if I take a few
    moments to answer your concerns before you ask
    another question?
  • b. I know its easier to ask the hard
    questions than to listen to the hard answers.
    But I need a moment to explain myself. Is
    that okay?
  • c. Dont let him or her ask you more
    than ONE question before you stop him or her
    and get a chance to give adequate
    answers.Say, let me respond to your first
    challenge. When Im done you can jump in
    again. Is that okay?

21
Steamroller Tactic
  • Defense 2 Shame Him
  • 1. If he or she has broken the agreement you
    made in how to discuss the argument, then you
    will need to be more aggressive. For example, if
    he or she continues to interrupt ask
  • a. Oh, did you want me to stop talking now so
    you could talk? Or did you want to take turns
    and have a conversation?
  • b. Are you genuinely interested in an
    answer to my question or do you just want to
    make a point by asking questions without
    listening to my response? Ill stop and listen
    if all you want is an audience.
  • c. The point here You and I had an
    agreement and now youre breaking that.
    Whats it going to be?

22
Steamroller Tactic
  • Defense 3 Leave the Person
  • 1. If he or she wont let you answer, listen
    politely until he or she is finished, then drop
    it. Let him or her have the satisfaction of
    having the last word, then walk away.
  • Jesus said,Do not give what is holy to dogs,
    and do not throw your pearls before swine.
  • Matthew 76

23
Conclusion Practice Makes Perfect
  1. Know your Bible so that you can give an accurate
    answer.
  2. Actively share with othersexperimentation with
    tactics is often the proving ground.
  3. Push yourself beyond your comfort zone.
  4. Examine your intimacy/fellowship with the Lord
    before and during the exchange.
  5. Be prayerful.
  6. Evaluate or replay the exchange in order sharpen
    your skills of argumentationkeep notes.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com