Common Cause India Making Our Police Effective and People - Friendly Model Police Act, 2006 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 23
About This Presentation
Title:

Common Cause India Making Our Police Effective and People - Friendly Model Police Act, 2006

Description:

... not UPSC 2 year tenure for DGP, and other imp. functionaries (Zonal IGP, Range DIG, Dist. SP, and SHOs ) : Tenure of DGP and ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:195
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 24
Provided by: DrUN7
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Common Cause India Making Our Police Effective and People - Friendly Model Police Act, 2006


1
Common Cause IndiaMaking Our Police Effective
and People - FriendlyModel Police Act, 2006
  • Dr UNB RAO, Ph.D., IPS (Retd.)
  • Formerly Secretary,
  • Police Act Drafting Committee
  • 4th July 2009

2
Police Act , 1861
  • In the wake of First War of Independence
  • (Sepoy Mutiny)
  • Earlier Jamindari Police Systems
  • Degenerated and highly Ruler
    supportive
  • British introduced Irish Model
  • Oppressive and regimental

3
Preamble for 1861 Act
  • Whereas it is expedient to
  • reorganize the police and to
  • make it a more efficient for
  • the prevention and
  • detection of crime


  • Extremely limited role?

4
Provisions of 1861 Act
  • 47 Sections (6 Secs. were soon repealed)
  • Superintendence and Administration enmeshed and
    unclear
  • SP( who were generally from Armed Forces) to
    function under the general power and control of
    the DM
  • Mostly procedural police always on duty
  • Levying cost on inhabitants in disturbed areas!

5
Police Commission,1901-03
  • Observed that
  • there can be no doubt that the
    Police force through out the country was in a
    most unsatisfactory condition, that abuses were
    common everywhere, that this involved great
    injury to the people and discredit to the
    Government, and that radical reforms were
    urgently necessary

6
Comment on Indian Police
  • In India, a dual system of Criminal Justice has
    grown- the one of the Law and the other of
    Politics.
  • With respect at least to the
    police,
  • decisions made by the police officials
    about the application of law are frequently
    subject to partisan review or direction by the
    elected representatives
  • -
    Prof. David H. Bailey.

7
Status of Policing
  • Lack or bad policing led to newer forms of crime
  • 1960s..Naxalism..Naxalbari Srikakulam
  • 1980s .. Telangana and all over ..
  • 2000s.. 300 districts of India!
  • Veerappans..Ayodhya demolition..Gujarat riots,
    nithari killings..white collar crimes
  • Burking of crime ..serious manipu. of statistics
  • Police Subculture !!??

8
Commissions/Committees
  • 1959-71 Ten State Commissions
    (Kerala,WB,Bihar,Punjab,Maharastra,MP,Delhi,
    Assam and Tamilnadu)
  • 1984 Andhra Pradesh
  • Headed by 3..ICS 3..Retd Judges
  • 2..IP/IPS
    1..MPJudg
  • 1..Senior Advocate

9
Commissions/Committees (contd.)
  • National Level Commissions/ Committees
  • National Police Commission, 1977 - 81
  • Ribeiro Committee(as directed by the Supreme
    Court), 1998
  • Padmanabhaiah Committee(for structural changes
    in police), 2000
  • Malimath Committee on Reforms in Criminal
    Justice System, 2001
  • MHAs Review Committee(to cull out 49 vital recs.
    from ), earlier commissions), 2004
  • Sorabjee Committee (to draft a new Police
    Act),2005-06 (addressed to 38 out of 49 Recs.)
  • Menon Committee,2006 (Policy on CJS)

10
Police Act Drafting Committee
  • October 2005 to October 2006 (13 months)
  • Headed by Sh. Soli Sorabjee
  • 2 legal luminaries,4 IAS,3 IPS,One expert from
    Civil Society
  • 40 sittings, wide range of discussions and more
    than 1100 inputs from outside
  • A comprehensive Act with16 Chapters and 221
    Sections

11
Preamble for the MPA,2006
  • WHEREAS respect for and promotion of the human
    rights of the people, and protection of their
    civil, political, social, economic and cultural
    rights
  • ..
  • AND WHEREAS it is expedient to redefine the role
    of the police, its duties and responsibilities,
    . and respect for human rights
  • AND WHEREAS it is essential to appropriately
    empower the police to enable it to function as an
    efficient, effective, people-friendly and
    responsive agency

12
Salient Features of MPA,2006
  • Police is to be known as a Service, not as a
    Force
  • Ensuring functional autonomy for police.
  • Creation of a State Police Board( instead
    of State Security
  • Commission) A Recommendatory
    Body
  • - Merit based selection of DGP panel
    prepared by State Police Board, not
    UPSC
  • 2 year tenure for DGP, and other imp.
    functionaries (Zonal IGP,
  • Range DIG, Dist. SP, and SHOs
    ) Tenure of DGP and
  • others may be curtailed in
    specific circumstances, and exigencies
  • to be recorded

13
Ensuring functional autonomy for police (contd..)
  • Defining Superintendence vis-à-vis
    Administration.
  • Superintendence vests in the State Government
    policies and guidelines
  • Administration vests in Police Chief
  • Proviso for Government may intervene in Admn .
    Powers of Police Chief as per rules and in
    exceptional circumstances to be recorded
  • District Magistrate functions in accordance with
    provisions of Cr P C and plays coordination role
    ,especially in crucial situations like natural
    calamities, elections, atrocities against
    SC/ST/Women/Children, etc

14
Promoting Professionalism
  • Civil Police Officers vis-à-vis Armed Police
    Constabulary Civilian Police to be better
    qualified and trained better prospects
  • Dedicated staff for Crime Investigation
    periodical rotation between LO duties and IOs
  • Stepping up Training facilities and linking up to
    posting/promotion
  • Research and Development

15
Promoting Professionalism (contd..)
  • Providing Legal and Financial Advisers
  • Forensic and scientific support for Investigation
    and other policing tasks
  • Urban/Metropolitan Policing Commissioner of
    Police System (ten lakh plus) other areas as
    notified
  • Rural Policing- Village Guards, Village Defense
    Parties, Community Liaison Groups
  • Village Guard on salary and deemed a public
    servant

16
Accountability made Paramount
  • Norms set for Performance Evaluation (other than
    usual statistical)
  • Police Accountability (Public Complaint)
    Authorities at State and District levels
  • Distinguishing serious misconduct vis-à-vis
    misconduct
  • Non registration of an FIR is made an offence
    against police

17
Welfare and grievance redressal
  • State Welfare Bureau, incl. public participation
    also to take care of post retirement scenario
  • Insurance cover to all right from the day of
    joining service
  • Specifying working hours 8 hrs, maximum 12 hrs
    a day
  • Forum for redressing individual and collective
    grievances

18
Internal Security and Public Order
  • Special Security Zones for extremist areas, to
    provide with adequate infrastructure and command
    structures
  • Contiguous areas falling in more than one State
    Central support and notification with concurrence
    of relevant States
  • Responsibilities of public spelt out

19
Too detailed !?
  • Details and elaborations given to be made self
    explanatory and to indicate rationale behind
    those provisions
  • Parts are expected to be shifted to Rules and
    Manual , to be drafted
  • Supreme Court perused the Model Act at draft
    stage and just prior to their Judgment dtd 22nd
    Sep 2007

20
New Areas Covered in MPA
  • Setting up of a State Police Board
  • Selection procedure and minimum tenure of DGP
  • Security of tenure of key functionaries
  • Establishment committee
  • Separation of crime investigation from Law
    Order
  • Performance evaluation
  • Police accountability commission and District
    Accountability authorities
  • Improved service conditions
  • Special Security Zones

21
State-wise enactment of new Police Acts (as on
3rd July 2009)
  • Passed new Police Bills
  • - Haryana
    Mar. 21, 2007
  • - Bihar
    Mar. 21, 2007
  • - Tripura
    Mar. 21, 2007
  • - Chattishgarh
    July 20, 2007
  • - Gujarat
    July 20, 2007
  • Bombay Police Act
    (Gujarat amendment)
  • - Assam
    Aug. 08, 2007
  • - Himachal Pradesh
    Aug. 28, 2007
  • - Kerala (Amendment)
    Sep. 19, 2007
  • - Rajasthan
    Sep. 21, 2007
  • - Uttarakhand
    Jan. 04, 2008
  • -Tamil Nadu
    May 14, 2008
  • - Sikkim Aug. 04,
    2008

22
Contentious Issues
  • Reluctance of Political Executive to implement
    reforms due to an apprehension that reforms might
    weaken their control over the police.
  • Composition and Role of State Security
    Commission.
  • Control of District Magistrate over the District
    Police (Bihar Police Act was opposed by the State
    police, while draft police acts of AP and some
    other States are reportedly kept pending due to
    disagreement on this issue).
  • Commissionerate of Police system in notified
    cities.
  • Empowerment of Civil constabulary, by
    distinguishing them from Armed constabulary.

23
Epilogue
  • Reforms are evolutionary and continuing
    processes
  • One may not be able to bring in all reforms at a
    time
  • Process is to start as suited to individual
    States.. rather than arguing and resenting
  • States are to perform so that Federal Structure
    progresses..
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com