The Logical Structure of Argument - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

The Logical Structure of Argument

Description:

The Logical Structure of Argument Forming sound arguments Terms to know Claim: statement to be justified/proven/upheld Thesis: positive statement or declaration to ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:296
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 17
Provided by: Michael2112
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: The Logical Structure of Argument


1
The Logical Structure of Argument
  • Forming sound arguments

2
Terms to know
  • Claim statement to be justified/proven/upheld
  • Thesis positive statement or declaration to be
    supported with reasons and evidence
  • Premise a statement or assumption that is
    established before an argument is begun
  • Grounds the reasons, support, and evidence to
    support your claim
  • Warrant a stated or unstated belief, rule, or
    principle that underlies an argument

3
Remember
  • Claims are supported with reasons. You can
    usually state a reason as a because clause
    attached to a claim statement.
  • A because clause attached to a claim is an
    incomplete logical structure called an enthymeme.
    To complete the logical structure, the unstated
    assumptions must be articulated.
  • To serve as an effective starting point for the
    argument, this unstated assumption should be a
    belief, value, or principle that the audience
    grants or allows.

4
Creating Logical Structure
  • A B
  • B C
  • Therefore,
  • A C

5
ENTHYMEME
  • After-school jobs are bad for teenagers because
    they take away study time.
  • Includes a claim with a reason expressed as a
    because clause. To render this enthymeme
    logically complete, you must supply an unstated
    assumption or a warrant.

6
  • CLAIM After-school jobs are bad
  • for teenagers.
  • REASON Because they take away
  • study time
  • WARRANT Loss of study time is bad.

7
Now break down your enthymeme into its A, B, and
C terms
  • A After-school jobs (subject of claim)
  • B Activity that takes away study time
  • (reason)
  • C Activity that is bad (claim)

8
After-school jobs are good for teenagers because
they teach responsibility and time management.
  • CLAIM After-school jobs are
  • good for teenagers
  • REASON Because they teach time
  • responsibility and time
  • management
  • WARRANT Learning responsibility
  • and time management is
  • good.

9
REMEMBER
  • You must categorize your subject
  • The first word of B and C must be the same or you
    have an undistributed middle term
  • Warrants must be acceptable to the audience

10
YOUR TURN!
  • ENTHYMEME
  • Cocaine and heroine should be legalized because
    legalization would eliminate the black market for
    drugs.

11
State the claim, reason, and warrant
  • CLAIM Cocaine and heroine should be
    legalized
  • REASON Because legalization would
  • eliminate the black market
  • for drugs
  • WARRANT An action that eliminates the
  • black market for drugs is good

12
State the A, B, and C
  • A Legalization of cocaine and heroine
  • B Action that would eliminate the black
  • market for drugs
  • C Action that should be taken

13
Grounds
  • GROUNDS are the supporting evidencedata, facts,
    statistics, testimony, or examplesthat cause you
    to make your claim. They are collectively all
    the evidence you use to support a reason.
  • Grounds answers the question How do you know?

14
Backing
  • BACKING is the argument that supports the
    warrant, or underlying assumption.
  • In some cases, successful arguments require just
    three components a claim, a reason, and
    grounds. However, if the audience questions or
    doubts the warrant, the writer needs to provide
    support for that argument.

15
After-school jobs are bad for teenagers because
they take away study time.
  • Grounds (jobs take away study time)
    data/evidence showing that after-school jobs take
    away study time (exs. of teenagers who work late
    and dont study, statistics showing that
    teenagers with jobs study less that those without
    jobs, testimony from teachers that working
    students study less that those with jobs)

16
Backing for the warrant
  • Argument showing why loss of study time is bad
    (it leads to lower grades, to inadequate
    preparation for college, to less enjoyment of
    school, to lower self-image as a student, etc.)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com