Nitrogen fixing trees influence concentrations of ammonium and amino sugar-nitrogen in soils - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 35
About This Presentation
Title:

Nitrogen fixing trees influence concentrations of ammonium and amino sugar-nitrogen in soils

Description:

Nitrogen fixing trees influence concentrations of ammonium and amino sugar-nitrogen in soils Jing-Shu Wang, Saeed A. Khan, and Jeffrey O. Dawson – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:117
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 36
Provided by: JingSh4
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Nitrogen fixing trees influence concentrations of ammonium and amino sugar-nitrogen in soils


1
Nitrogen fixing trees influence concentrations of
ammonium and amino sugar-nitrogen in soils
  • Jing-Shu Wang, Saeed A. Khan, and Jeffrey O.
    Dawson
  • Department of Natural Resources and Environmental
    Sciences, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL
    61801, USA

2
Introduction
  • The recently-developed Illinois Soil Nitrogen
    Test (ISNT) measures the combined concentration
    of ammonium- and amino sugar-N in soils,
    providing a novel, alternative approach to N
    fertility assessment. The nonresponse level to N
    fertilization for corn is 235 (mg kg-1 or 635
    lbs per acre) amino sugar plus ammonium N.

3
Introduction
  • A positive correlation between soil amino sugar-N
    plus NH4-N values and check-plot yield was
    described by Mulvaney et al. at the U. of
    Illinois. This method to determine soil N
    availability is sensitive and provides a simple
    estimation of soil capacity to supply
    plant-available N.

4
Introduction
  • Amino sugar-N in soils originates from microbial
    activity rather than from higher plants.
    Therefore, the concentration of amino sugar-N in
    soils reflects the level of mineralizable N and
    soil capacity to supply N to promote plant growth.

5
Rationale
  • Amino sugar-N is a key soil organic fraction
    associated with soil N fertility. It is different
    from leachable NO3- in that it is more stable. It
    should provide a straightforward and more
    accurate estimate of soil N fertility than other
    methods currently available (total N, lab
    incubations for mineralization, buried bag, resin
    exchange).

6
Hypothesis
  • Amino sugar-N will increase in concentration in
    soils under nitrogen-fixing trees.

7
(No Transcript)
8
(No Transcript)
9
(No Transcript)
10
(No Transcript)
11
(No Transcript)
12
(No Transcript)
13
Objectives
  • 1) to determine how different densities, sizes
    and species of nitrogen-fixing trees in different
    soil types affect soil concentrations of amino
    sugar-N (plus ammonium).
  • 2) to describe amino sugar-N distribution with
    respect to soil depths in plots with and without
    N2-fixing trees.

14
Study Sites in East-Central Illinois
  • The University of Illinois Arboretum (N. Lat.
    40o).
  • The Douglas-Hart Nature Center (DHNC), a
    50-year-old interplanting of either 2 native
    trees per 1 N2-fixing A. glutinosa or Robinia
    pseudoacacia L. tree or no N2-fixing nurse trees
    at all (spacing 10 10 feet).
  • Kickapoo State Park in Vermilion County, IL on
    45-year-old mine spoils.

15
Illinois Soil Nitrogen Test
  • The samples were analyzed using the ISNT
    technique described by Khan et al. (Soil Sci.
    Soc. Am. J. 651751-1760. 2001).
  • H3BO3-indicator solution was suspended from the
    lid of a Mason jar. Sealed jars were heated for 5
    hours in 10 ml of 2 M NaOH at precisely 48 oC.
    After 5 hours of ammonia diffusion, the
    H3BO3-indicator solution was titrated with 0.01 M
    H2SO4 to determine quantity of ammonium from
    amino sugar and ammonium N in the soil samples.

16
(No Transcript)
17
(No Transcript)
18
(No Transcript)
19
Individual mean differences in amino sugar
nitrogen concentration (mg kg-1) of soil from
different depths associated with actinorhizal A.
glutinosa trees and a T. americana tree at the
University Arboretum.
1 Means with the same letter for a tree species
are not significantly different (LSD, a 0.05).
20
Individual mean differences in amino sugar
nitrogen concentration (mg kg-1) in the top 30
cm of soil associated with actinorhizal A.
glutinosa trees and a T. americana tree at the
University Arboretum.
1 Means with the same letter for a tree species
are not significantly different (LSD, a 0.05).
21
Chemical analysis of the surficial 30 cm of soil
at the Arboretum. CEC cation exchange capacity.
Values are means with standard deviation within
parenthesis.
1 Illinois Soil Nitrogen Test
(Khan et al., 2001). 2 Total
nitrogen (Kirsten and Hesselius, 1983).
3 Cation exchange capacity.
4 Base saturation percentage of cation exchange
sites. 5 Means with the same
letter within a column for a given location are
not significantly different (LSD, a
0.05).
22
(No Transcript)
23
Ammonium and amino sugar-N concentration
  • For DHNC, significant differences occurred for
    depths, but not for past alder or black locust
    influence (nitrogen fixing nurse trees mostly
    dead after 50 years).
  • There is more biomass in the interplanted stands
    at DHNC, which could constitute a major N pool
    for the site and explain the lack of significant
    differences in soil amino sugar-N.

24
(No Transcript)
25
Individual mean differences in amino sugar
nitrogen concentration (mg kg-1) of different
soil depths at Kickapoo State Park.
1 Means with the same letter are not
significantly different (LSD, a 0.05).
26
Individual mean differences in amino sugar
nitrogen concentration (mg kg-1) in the top 30
cm of soil for different vegetation at Kickapoo
State Park.
1 Means with the same letter are not
significantly different (LSD, a 0.05).
27
Chemical analysis of the surficial 30 cm of soil
on mine spoils. CEC cation exchange capacity.
Values are means with standard deviation within
parenthesis.
1 Illinois Soil Nitrogen Test
(Khan et al., 2001). 2 Total
nitrogen (Kirsten and Hesselius, 1983).
3 Cation exchange capacity.
4 Base saturation percentage of cation exchange
sites. 5 Means with the same
letter within a column for a given location are
not significantly different (LSD, a
0.05).
28
Soil Depth Strata
  • Amino sugar-N concentrations were always highest
    in the top 10 cm of soil consistent with the
    input of organic N from annual litter fall and
    surficial root dieback, but the mount of increase
    over control amount with respect to lower strata
    varied minespoil w N fixersgtmollisols w N-fixersgt

29
Arboretum Findings
  • The significant 13 increase in soil amino sugar
    N under the A. glutinosa canopy occurred, even
    though soil amino sugar levels indicate high N
    fertility. High N fertility levels can inhibit
    symbiotic nitrogen fixation by plants through
    energy conserving feedback mechanisms.

30
Additional Arboretum Findings
  • At the University Arboretum under A. glutinosa
    leaf canopies, there were significantly higher
    amino sugar-N concentrations, lower pH values and
    greater proton saturation of CEC exchange sites
    than beyond A. glutinosa canopies in the 0-30 cm
    soil layer. Increased ammonium nitrogen from
    mineralization of litter and sloughed roots of A.
    glutinosa tissue enriched with fixed N is
    oxidized to nitrate via microbial nitrification,
    which can decrease soil pH and thereby increase
    cation leaching. Total N and amino sugar-N in
    soils were not correlated at this site.

31
Mine Spoil Findings
  • On mine spoils, both E. umbellata and A.
    glutinosa had significantly higher amino sugar-N
    concentrations than the control plot. The E.
    umbellata plot had the highest amino sugar-N,
    followed by the A. glutinosa plot and, lastly,
    the control plot.

32
Mine Spoil Findings
  • At Kickapoo State Park, the only significant
    correlation was negative (r -0.681) for the
    relationship between amino sugar-N concentration
    and total N. Higher amino sugar-N concentration
    may reflect abundant and easily mineralizable N
    of the actinorhizal plant litter and sloughed
    roots.

33
Mine Spoil Findings
  • There was higher phosphorus concentration beneath
    A. glutinosa at Kickapoo State Park similar to
    findings of Giardina et al. (1995)

34
Conclusions
  • ISNT is sensitive to soil nitrogen fertility
    contributions by nitrogen-fixing trees, The test
    itself is simple, precise and employs
    commonly-available materials. The test results,
    when calibrated with corresponding levels of
    productivity, should be able to predict soil N
    fertility and the potential benefits of planting
    N-fixing trees on a particular soil type.

35
THANK YOU
  • Any questions?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com