Human interests, intrinsic value and radical questioning: - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Human interests, intrinsic value and radical questioning:

Description:

Human interests, intrinsic value and radical questioning: Three necessary aspects of environmental ethics as international action? Johan Hattingh – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:128
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 36
Provided by: Information1273
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Human interests, intrinsic value and radical questioning:


1
Human interests, intrinsic value and radical
questioning
  • Three necessary aspects of environmental ethics
    as international action?
  • Johan Hattingh

2
Overview
  • Environmental ethics
  • Practical enterprise
  • Theoretical enterprise
  • Three snapshots of environmental ethics as
    international action
  • Interpretation of these snapshots
  • Human interests
  • Intrinsic value
  • Radical questioning

3
Snapshot 1 Kyoto Protocol
  • 16 February 2005 activated
  • Binds industrialized countries
  • Cut 6 key greenhouse gasses
  • 5 below 1990 levels
  • Commitment period 2008 2012
  • 128 signatories
  • Mechanisms to assist other countries

4
Main aim of Kyoto Protocol
  • To stem global warming by reducing greenhouse-gas
    emissions in the most cost effective manner,
    while addressing issues of environmental
    integrity and equity.

5
Main instruments
  • Emissions trading
  • Free market in Carbon Reduction Credits.
  • Credits earned by meeting reduction targets.
  • Surplus credits can be sold
  • The Clean Development Mechanism (CDM)
  • Joint Implementation (JI)

6
Snapshot 2 World Summit on Sustainable
Development
  • Johannesburg, 2002 WSSD
  • Assessment of implementation of Agenda 21
  • Ten years after Rio de Janeiro (1992) the
    diagnosis is still pessimistic

7
Global state of the environment
  • The global environment continues to suffer. Loss
    of biodiversity continues, fish stocks continue
    to be depleted, desertification claims more and
    more fertile land, the adverse effects of climate
    change are already evident, natural disasters are
    more frequent and more devastating and developing
    countries more vulnerable, and air, water and
    marine pollution continue to rob millions of a
    decent life

8
Other concerns of Johannesburg
  • Growing gap between rich and poor
  • Distribution and equity issues
  • Justice and equity environmental issues
  • Causes
  • Unsustainable production and consumption
  • A new commitment to sustainable development was
    adopted

9
Sustainable development
  • is development that meets the needs of present
    generations without compromizing future
    generations to meet their needs
  • Two important provisos
  • The needs of the poor are central
  • Only constraint on sustainable development is the
    state of technology and social organization in
    society

10
Snapshot 3 Millenium Development Goals
  • Protecting our common environment
  • Peace, security and disarmament
  • Development and poverty eradication
  • Human rights, democracy and good governance
  • Protecting the vulnerable
  • Meeting special needs of Africa
  • Strengthening the United Nations

11
Key values driving MDGs
  • Respect for nature
  • Freedom
  • Equality
  • Solidarity
  • Tolerance
  • Shared responsibility

12
New ethics of conservation and stewardship
  • Implementing Kyoto Protocol
  • Protection of all types of forests
  • Implementation of the Convention on Biological
    Diversity, combat desertification
  • Sustainable water use
  • Reduce number and effects of natural and manmade
    disasters
  • Free access to info on human genome

13
Normative basis of practical environmental ethics
  • Ethics entails distinctions
  • Right vs wrong
  • Good vs bad
  • What deserves respect vs what not

14
Right vs wrong
  • Duties of nations, corporations, professionals
    and individuals
  • To fight climate change
  • To reduce greenhouse emissions
  • To pursue sustainable development
  • To eradicate poverty
  • To ensure justice and equity
  • To improve the lives of people

15
Good vs bad
  • What we embrace as the good life
  • Dignity and justice for all
  • Peace and prosperity
  • Freedom from terror, diseases and manmade
    disasters
  • Prerequisites for such a life
  • Access to clean water
  • Access to information
  • Technology transfer between nations

16
What deserves respect what not
  • What we can identify with as human beings accept
    as source of our being
  • Caring for life
  • Our own lives
  • The lives of other humans
  • The lives of non-humans
  • The vulnerable and the poor
  • The victims of our own unwise decisions
  • Thinking and cautionary approach

17
Quality of our justifications
  • Kyoto Protocol
  • Preventing harm to people living now and in the
    future
  • Johannesburg Summit on Sust. Dev.
  • Justice, human dignity, social development,
    caring about future generations
  • Millennium Development Goals
  • Cooperation to achieve freedom, equality,
    solidarity to improve the lives of people

18
Three positions in environmental ethics
  • Human centered
  • Anthropocentric
  • Nature centered
  • Ecocentric
  • Radical positions
  • Root causes of environmental problems
  • Transformative agenda

19
The anthropocentric position
  • Conserve nature for the sake of humans
  • Enlightened self-interest
  • Nature is valued instrumentally
  • Nature is a means to human ends
  • Nature is nothing but a resource
  • Consumptive use of nature?
  • Non-consumptive use of nature?

20
3 snapshots anthropocentric
  • Kyoto Protocol, WSSD, MDGs
  • Overcome harm to humans
  • Promote human interests
  • Enlightened self-interest
  • We care for nature for the sake of humankind
  • Best place to start to engage governments,
    multinational corporations
  • What is good for nature is good for humans

21
Is this good enough?
  • Ecocentrists argue
  • Instrumental values are not strong enough to
    protect nature from humans
  • In trade-offs humans will always win
  • We need a stronger position
  • That change our attitude towards nature
  • That can stop us when we want to go too far

22
Intrinsic value
  • Whole or parts of nature has intrinsic value
  • Value in and of itself
  • Regardless of value to humans
  • Entities with intrinsic value should be
  • Treated with respect
  • Cannot do with them what we want
  • Moral duty to protect that intrinsic valueif
    not to promote it

23
3 snapshots and intrinsic value
  • Kyoto Protocol, WSSD and MDGs
  • Move us away from a cynical and ruthless
    exploitation of nature
  • Take a few necessary first steps
  • But only ensure a weak protection of nature, and
    weak sustainability
  • We have to move on and find stronger measures to
    protect and promote intrinsic value

24
Radical environmental ethics
  • Try to understand root causes of our
    environmental problems and overcome them by
    transforming society
  • Root causes are found in
  • Structure of worlds economy
  • Distribution of political and economic power
    between and within countries

25
Radical questioning
  • Focus on social and cognitive structures
    informing organization of the world
  • Political economy of decision-making
  • Dominant conceptions of self and self-realization
  • Narrow egotistical self of consumer society
  • A logic of dualistic, hierarchical thinking that
    justify exploitation of nature, women and darker
    races

26
The value of radical questioning
  • Is total transformation not going too far?
  • Is the momentum of global consumerism not too
    strong?
  • But
  • Are we happy with the images of self and
    self-realization that we see all around us?
  • Do we recognize ourselves in the mirrors held up
    to us by our cities, our shopping malls, our TV
    ads, our glossy magazines and fashion?

27
Radical questioning starts
  • When we start to feel uncomfortable with living
    in the world we see around us
  • When we do not recognize ourselves in it seeing
    no future for our children in it
  • Wondering whether what we do is meaningful or not
  • When we realize that we are faced today with a
    crisis of character and culture

28
So, why this deep interpretation
  • To underline that our environmental predicament
    is more than
  • A crisis of survival
  • A crisis of justice and human dignity
  • To underline that our environmental problems
    challenge us to ask serious questions about who
    we are and how we realize ourselves in this world
    on this earth

29
  • To underline that the Kyoto Protocol, Sustainable
    development and the MDGs are but first, initial
    steps that need to be followed up by stronger
    measures of protection, and that we have to take
    a harder look at ourselves and how we produce and
    consume in order to realize ourselves in this
    world

30
  • To underline that if we think that we have done
    enough by putting in place measures like the
    Kyoto Protocol, sustainable development and noble
    development goals, and not also question the
    root causes of global climate change,
    unsustainable development, and increasing poverty
    and human indignity in the world, we seriously
    fool ourselves

31
Conclusion 1
  • To address environmental issues without humans
    benefiting from it would be futile
  • Measures like the Kyoto Protocol, sustainable
    development, MDGs should
  • Never increase world poverty
  • Never entrench current patterns of injustice and
    inequity in the world

32
Conclusion 2
  • We need more than instrumental values to protect
    nature
  • Acknowledging intrinsic value, the value of
    entities for their own sake, regardless of their
    use value to us, is an effort to change our
    attitude towards nature by thinking about it
    differently

33
Conclusion 3
  • The state of the world today, of which the
    environmental crisis is but one symptom,
    confronts us with
  • A crisis of identity, of character and culture
  • Radical questions about who we are, what we
    define as meaningful, and how we realize
    ourselves in this world have to be asked

34
A last unconcluding word
  • Human interests, intrinsic value and radical
    questioning are all necessary to look at our
    environmental crisis
  • Each make a valid contribution to our
    understanding of our environmental crisis, what
    it means, and how to start thinking about
    overcoming it
  • We need all three we cannot ignore any

35
  • This is what I would like you to take to heart
    today
  • Speaking from my heart
  • And what I believe is at the heart of
    environmental ethics today, as a theoretical
    enterprise, as well as in the format of practical
    international action
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com