U.S. Coast Guard International Port Security (IPS) Program - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

U.S. Coast Guard International Port Security (IPS) Program

Description:

U.S. Coast Guard International Port Security (IPS) Program LCDR Ray Negr n USCG Atlantic Area III Western Hemp. Port Security Conference Punta Cana, Dominican Republic – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:375
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 34
Provided by: D7I
Learn more at: http://www.oas.org
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: U.S. Coast Guard International Port Security (IPS) Program


1
U.S. Coast Guard International Port Security
(IPS) Program
LCDR Ray Negrón USCG Atlantic Area
III Western Hemp. Port Security Conference Punta
Cana, Dominican Republic
  • April 10, 2008

2
Overview
  • USCG IPS Intro/Review
  • Country Visit Status
  • Reciprocal Visits
  • Best Practices
  • Areas of Concern
  • Long Term Direction

3
USCG International Port Security Program Overview
  • The IPS Programs focus is to
  • Engage in bilateral and multilateral security
    discussions with trading nations
  • Share and align maritime security practices
  • Exchange best practices

4
USCG International Port Security Program Overview
  • Preliminary information exchange with maritime
    trading partners
  • Port facility visits
  • In country visit and information exchange
  • Ongoing dialogue
  • Reciprocal visits

5
IPS Program Personnel
Alameda
Tokyo
Singapore
6
Status Report
  • Country Visits to Date136 Visits Completed
  • (out of 145)
  • 10 Have Not Substantially Implemented the ISPS
    Code (2 More Have Not Reported to IMO)
  • - Second Round of Visits has Commenced

7
Reciprocal Visits
Hosted 27 reciprocal visits to the U.S.
  • European Commission (Italy, Netherlands, U.K.,
    Belgium, France)
  • Russia
  • Norway
  • Korea
  • Canada
  • Nigeria
  • Brazil
  • China
  • Guatemala
  • Honduras
  • Nicaragua
  • Ghana
  • European Commission (Ireland, UK, Bulgaria,
    Portugal
  • Dominican Republic
  • South Africa
  • Gabon
  • Mexico
  • Uruguay
  • European Commission (Greece, Belgium, Spain,
    France, U.K., Sweden)
  • Saudi Arabia
  • Argentina
  • Columbia
  • Trinidad and Tobago
  • Togo
  • Bahrain
  • Norway
  • Albania -
  • (Israel April 2008)
  • (Suriname May 2008)

8
Locations of Reciprocal Visits
  • CG Headquarters
  • Atlantic Area Command
  • New York, NY
  • Philadelphia, PA
  • Baltimore, MD
  • Norfolk, VA
  • Charleston, SC
  • Savannah, GA
  • Jacksonville, FL
  • San Francisco, CA
  • Miami, FL
  • Tampa, FL
  • Mobile, AL
  • New Orleans, LA
  • Port Arthur, TX
  • Corpus Christi, TX
  • Houston, TX
  • Galveston, TX
  • Los Angeles, CA
  • Seattle, WA

9
Reciprocal Visit Previous Topics of Interest
  • Container, bulk liquid, cruise, coal facilities
  • National Vessel Movement Center
  • El Paso Intelligence Center (EPIC)
  • Joint Harbor Operations Center (Norfolk, VA)
  • CBP Border Crossing
  • Vessel Traffic Centers

10
Reciprocal Visit Potential Topics of Interest
  • Security Committees
  • Security Exercises
  • Inland River Ports
  • Ice Operations
  • Outer Continental Shelf
  • Cooperative Agreements
  • St. Lawrence Seaway

11
Reciprocal Visits Lessons Learned
  • Delegation
  • 4 to 6 working level DA reps
  • Security Policy Automation Network (SPAN)
  • Delegate information required 30 days prior to
    arrival
  • Name
  • Date of birth
  • Country of origin/nationality
  • Rank/title
  • Agency/organization
  • Position
  • Passport number
  • A short biography of senior members
  • How to request a reciprocal visit
  • U.S. Embassy
  • International Port Security Liaison Officer
    (IPSLO)

12
Best Practices
  • Alfapass Belgium
  • Industry led
  • Worker access to various facilities
  • Internet based
  • Electronic and biometric technologies
  • Control tower - Romania
  • Observe entire facility
  • Monitor personnel and vehicles
  • Climate controlled
  • CCTV

13
Best Practices
  • Security Zones - Jamaica
  • Waterside access is common weakness
  • Political implications
  • Cooperative effort
  • Potentially costly
  • Railroad gate guard tower India
  • Locked gate
  • Guards on ground and tower
  • Moderate cost
  • Not fool proof

14
Best Practices
  • Pipe barrier Saudi Arabia
  • Supplements perimeter fence
  • Recycled material
  • Virtually impenetrable
  • Concertina wire at bottom of fence Indonesia
  • Discourages access over or under
  • Additional deterrent

15
Best Practices
  • Anti-vehicle barriers - Korea
  • Low cost (scrap materials)
  • Easy to deploy
  • Little/no training
  • Carbon dioxide (CO2) detector Dominican
    Republic
  • Uncomplicated
  • Low cost (lt300 U.S.)
  • Minimal training

16
Best Practices
  • Color-coded flags Ecuador
  • Easily understood
  • Country-wide
  • Cost Effective
  • Color-coded uniforms Philippines
  • Required for all contractors
  • Color coded per restricted area
  • Easily seen from a distance

17
Best Practices
  • Signs in Multiple Languages Malaysia
  • Three languages
  • Posted at gates
  • Port security advisory committee South Africa
  • All port stakeholders
  • Emphasis on port security
  • Informed response

18
Best Practices
  • Police presence Thailand
  • Cooperative agreement
  • Officer and motorcycle
  • 24/7 presence
  • Canine unit Guatemala
  • Cargo and personnel screening
  • Effective
  • Minimal cost

19
Best Practices
  • 24-hour guards Algeria
  • Stationed at transfer pier
  • Must have authorized access
  • Additional guards during transfer
  • Monthly DA inspections Costa Rica
  • Announced
  • Observes security measures and procedures
  • Follow-up

20
Best Practices
  • Security training - Uruguay
  • All personnel
  • Minimum 2 hours Admin
  • Contracted truck drivers
  • Response cards - Peru
  • Details security duties
  • All security levels
  • Laminated
  • Worn around neck

21
Best Practices
  • Whistle - Thailand
  • Security incident codes
  • Effective at medium distances
  • Very low cost
  • No maintenance
  • Continuous Improvements -
  • Argentina
  • 3 tiered system for facility improvements
  • Follow-up coincides with Annual Endorsement on
    ISSC (Perimeters, barriers, fencing, Access
    Control, IDS)
  • 66 of facilities at third stage

22
Best Practices
  • Homeport Website
  • http//homeport.uscg.mil

23
Areas of Concern
  • Governance and oversight
  • No enacting legislation
  • Communication of security levels
  • Use of last ports of call information for Port
    State Control purposes

24
Areas of Concern
  • Capacity to meet Security Level 2
  • Sustainability
  • Lack of resources
  • Communications
  • U.S. approach
  • - Targeted measures

25
Areas of Concern
  • Poor access control
  • Fences
  • Gates
  • Guards
  • City encroachment

26
Areas of Concern
  • Waterside Security
  • Standoff area
  • Availability of boats
  • Crew Training
  • Maintenance
  • Waterway congestion

27
Areas of Concern
  • Drills and exercises
  • Execution
  • Feedback loop
  • DA oversight
  • DA connectivity with port facilities
  • Lost in translation

28
Success Story Dominican Republic
29
Success Story Dominican Republic
30
Long Term Direction
  • Increase focus on capacity building
  • Assistance with security shortfalls
  • Lack of sufficient resources
  • Develop relationships
  • Requires assistance of developed countries
  • Organization of American States (OAS)
  • Asian-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC)
  • Transport Canada
  • USCG drill exercise training

31
Long Term Direction
  • The ISPS Code is a minimum security standard

32
Long Term Direction
A systems approach to maritime governance must
be global in scope and must be built upon a
foundation of international cooperation. U.S.
Coast Guard Strategy for Maritime Safety,
Security, and Stewardship
33
Questions? Raymond.Negron_at_uscg.mil 757-753
-6728
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com