FDA PAT Sub-Committee of Advisory Committee for Pharmaceutical Sciences June 12-13, 2002; Gaithersburg, MD Regulatory Challenges: Post-Approval PAT Applications - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 10
About This Presentation
Title:

FDA PAT Sub-Committee of Advisory Committee for Pharmaceutical Sciences June 12-13, 2002; Gaithersburg, MD Regulatory Challenges: Post-Approval PAT Applications

Description:

FDA PAT Sub-Committee of Advisory Committee for Pharmaceutical Sciences June 12-13, 2002; Gaithersburg, MD Regulatory Challenges: Post-Approval PAT Applications – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:183
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 11
Provided by: nm21
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: FDA PAT Sub-Committee of Advisory Committee for Pharmaceutical Sciences June 12-13, 2002; Gaithersburg, MD Regulatory Challenges: Post-Approval PAT Applications


1
FDA PAT Sub-Committee of Advisory Committee for
Pharmaceutical Sciences June 12-13, 2002
Gaithersburg, MD Regulatory Challenges
Post-Approval PAT Applications
  • Dhiren N. Shah, Ph.D.
  • Director, DRA-CMC
  • Aventis Pharmaceuticals

2
Outline
  • Need for post-approval (PA) PAT Applications
  • Challenges in PA-PAT Applications
  • PA- PAT Applications to
  • APIs
  • Drug Products
  • Guidance Development Consideration
  • CMC Review
  • Type and amount of CMC information required
  • Regulatory submission type
  • Compliance Audit
  • Summary Conclusions

3
Need for PA-PAT Applications
  • Improve quality of existing products
  • Improve analytical testing
  • Increase manufacturing efficiency
  • Reduce/eliminate OOSs, avoid potential recalls,
    enhance compliance
  • Potential long-term cost-savings

4
Challenges in PA-PAT Applications
  • Two kinds of post-approval situations
  • Products without PAT applications in the original
    submission
  • Identify process critical control parameters
    (PCCP)
  • Replacement or adjustments of in-process
    controls and possibly final specifications
  • Correlation between PAT-based controls and
    approved conventional controls
  • Review and compliance processes
  • OOSs How to handle?
  • Difficult to apply for this type of product

5
Challenges in PA-PAT Applications
  • Two kinds of post-approval situations
  • Products with PAT-based controls in the original
    submission
  • Changes to approved PAT-based controls
  • Addition of new PAT-based controls
  • Deletion of a specification to eliminate
    non-value-added controls
  • Review and Compliance processes
  • OOSs How to handle?
  • Much easier to further apply PAT

6
PA-PAT Applications to APIs
  • No change to DS synthetic pathway
  • In-process controls such as
  • Impurity levels
  • Residual solvents (including moisture)
  • Completion of reaction
  • Isolation/purification
  • Initiation and completion of crystallization
  • Correlation between the conventional IPCs and
    PAT-based IPCs
  • Final API specifications?
  • Parametric release?

7
PA-PAT Applications to DPs
  • No changes to drug product
  • Drug product type dependent SODF (IR and MR),
    Sterile, Semi-solids, etc.
  • Raw materials controls ID, assay, uniformity,
    physical properties
  • In-process controls such as
  • Granulation end-point
  • Moisture content in granulation
  • Blend uniformity (direct compression and blending
    of running powders to wet granulation)
  • Content uniformity
  • Viscosity measurements
  • Co-relation between conventional IPCs and
    PAT-based IPCs
  • Parametric release?

8
Guidance Development for PA-PAT-based
ControlsCMC Review
  • Equivalence to conventional controls
  • Enhanced assurance that the product will meet
    SIPPQ How to show?
  • Scientific basis for PAT controls
  • Type/amount of CMC information requirement
  • Number/scale of batches requirements
  • Statistical support
  • Stability requirements?
  • Post-approval commitments?
  • Regulatory submission route
  • AR, CBE-0, CBE-30, PAS?

9
Guidance Development for PA-PAT-based
ControlsCompliance Audit
  • PA PAT-based changes to controls
  • Evaluate adequacy
  • Validation (IQ, OQ, PQ)
  • Any link with Part 11?
  • Investigator training
  • OOSs?

10
Summary Conclusions
  • PA-PAT Applications
  • Easier for original applications with PAT
  • Difficult for original applications with
    conventional controls
  • Proof of equivalence/enhancements
  • Validation
  • How to deal with OOSs?
  • Role of Compliance
  • Incentive for the Industry Cost/Benefit
  • Training of Industry as well as FDA staff
  • Welcome FDAs this important initiative
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com