History VS Shakespeare - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

History VS Shakespeare

Description:

History VS Shakespeare Introduction Richard III has been immortalised by Shakespeare s play, which depicts him as an evil, ambitious character. – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:20
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 12
Provided by: 3021
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: History VS Shakespeare


1
HistoryVSShakespeare
2
Introduction
  • Richard III has been immortalised by
    Shakespeares play, which depicts him as an evil,
    ambitious character.
  • However, the REAL Richard only partially
    resembles the scheming lump of deformity
    portrayed by Shakespeare.

3
Supposed Crimes
  • In Richard III one of Richards earliest crimes
    was his murder of Edward of Lancaster and his
    father, King Henry at the battle of Tewkesbury.
  • for I did kill King Henry...
  • twas I that stabbd young Edward
  • (Act 1 Sc 2)

4
Actual Crimes
  • Though Richard did have a leading part in the
    battle of Tewkesbury, there is no reference to
    Richard as the murderer of Edward. Instead, it is
    widely believed that he died in battle.
  • King Henry was captured in the battle at
    Tewkesbury and kept prisoner in the Tower of
    London, where he was executed, by order of King
    Edward of York.

5
Supposed Crimes
  • In the play, one of Richards earliest crimes was
    to kill his brother Clarence by sending two
    assassins to drown him in a barrel of wine.
  • Clarence hath not another day to live
  • Act 1 Scene 2

6
Actual Crimes
  • There is no contemporary evidence to suggest that
    Richard was actively involved in Clarences
    death.
  • Historians write that Clarence had been in a
    dispute with Edward IV for some time and this led
    to Clarences execution for treason.

7
Supposed Crime
  • Shakespeares Richard woos the recently widowed
    Anne Neville over the corpse of her dead father
    in law, Richard being responsible for both crimes
    Annes widowhood and Henrys death.
  • Richard wins Anne over marries her. The marriage
    does not last and Richard has her poisoned.
  • Ill have her but I will not keep her long
    (Act 1 Sc 2)
  • He then proceeds to bolster his claim to the
    throne by attempting to marry his niece,
    Elizabeth of York.

8
Actual Crime
  • In fact, Richard and Anne married and even had a
    child. There was no evidence to suggest that they
    were not happy together. When their only child
    died, both parents were grief stricken and said
    to be bordering on madness.
  • It is believed that this loss was a contributing
    factor to her natural death.

9
Supposed Crimes
  • Richard imprisoned the two young princes in the
    Tower of London and had them executed.
  • He did this to legitimise his claim to the
    throne.

10
Actual Crimes
  • It was never proven that Richard had killed the
    two princes.
  • Two bodies were found later, near the tower but
    they were never successfully linked to Richard.

11
Similarities
  • Richard III did become the Duke of Gloucester in
    1461.
  • He did have a leading part in the battle at
    Tewkesbury.
  • In 1471, Richard III married Anne Neville
  • Richard III did bastardise Edwards children in
    1483.
  • Richard was crowned King in 1485 (though he would
    only be King for a month.)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com