Yield losses in agriculture - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 30
About This Presentation
Title:

Yield losses in agriculture

Description:

Yield losses in agriculture Abiotic stresses - drought, wind, frost, flood Pests - insects, nematodes, etc Weeds - compete with crop Disease - fungi, bacteria ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:132
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 31
Provided by: DianaH52
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Yield losses in agriculture


1
Yield losses in agriculture
  • Abiotic stresses - drought, wind, frost, flood
  • Pests - insects, nematodes, etc
  • Weeds - compete with crop
  • Disease - fungi, bacteria, oomycetes, viruses,
    post-harvest losses

2
Disease Control Market
  • Large
  • Current global fungicide sales 7billion
  • Disease resistance traits present or sought in
    all crops
  • Growing
  • Asian soybean rust
  • Increased consumption of fruits and vegetables in
    developing world
  • Unsolved problems
  • Bacterial diseases
  • Soilborne diseases

3
Crop Disease
  • Disease problems are increased with high
    intensity agricultural practices
  • Monocultures provide buffet for successful
    pathogen
  • Narrow genetics base
  • Pressure on evolutionary arms race
  • Tremendous specificity in plant-pathogen
    interaction

4
Traditional disease control measures
  • Chemicals broad spectrum, but
  • Expensive
  • Hard to distribute
  • Safety concerns
  • Evolution of pathogen resistance, sometimes
    quickly

5
Traditional disease control measures
  • Genetics narrow spectrum
  • Limited number of genes in intercrossing species
  • Desirable traits often linked to bad traits,
    making breeding difficult and slow
  • Evolution of pathogen resistance, sometimes
    quickly

6
Value shift from chemical to seed trait
US Agricultural Industry Revenue
2003 8.4 Billion
2008 E 9.1 Billion
1996 7.6 Billion
0.1
1.3
2.6
2.7
3.6
4.5
3.0
3.5
3.8
Biotech Traits
Germplasm
Crop Chemicals
Sources 1996-2003 Doane Agrotek and Seed
Studies Monsanto estimates
7
Difficulties with genetic approaches to disease
problems
  • No single killer app like Bt toxin or
    glyphosate to control diseases
  • Disease control market is widely spread across
    many small crops
  • Regulatory costs considered too high to support
    development in nearly all non-hybrid or minor
    crops

8
Industry Consequences
  • Primarily academic institutions pursuing disease
    resistance
  • Significant value only given after
    proof-of-concept in the crop
  • Dramatic downturn in early stage venture
    investing 2001 present
  • Despite major advances in the lab
  • No real innovation in crop disease resistance

9
Two Blades Mission
  • To support the development and deployment of
    durable disease resistance in agricultural crops

10
How we work
  • Control key intellectual property
  • Out-license to seed companies in developed
    countries for profit
  • Give free access to IP rights and products to
    Least Developed Countries
  • Use profits to fund additional research programs

11
Two Blades Foundation
  • Incorporated 20 April, 2004
  • Conferred 501(c)3 tax exempt status in December,
    2004
  • Personnel
  • Roger Freedman - Chairman, CEO
  • Eric Ward - President
  • Diana Horvath - COO
  • Michael Pauly - Technical Development

12
Two Blades Foundation
  • Scientific Advisory Board
  • Prof. Jeff Dangl, Univ. North Carolina
  • Prof. Jeff Ellis, CSIRO
  • Prof. Paul Schulze-Lefert, Max-Planck, Köln
  • Prof. Brian Staskawicz, UC Berkeley

13
Two Blades Activities
  • Identify areas where novel technology
    developments may support significant unmet
    agricultural needs
  • Drive technology development through grants to
    investigators and use of contract research
    organizations
  • Provide overall project management support

14
Two Blades Activities
  • Develop and manage IP portfolios by in-licensing
    and new filings
  • Initiate commercial programs for crop improvement
  • Partner with seed companies for commercial
    deployment

15
Bacterial Spot Disease
  • Most serious disease problem in fresh market
    tomato industry in the Southeastern USA
  • unsatisfactory chemical control
  • losses on the order of 20-30
  • Disease has persisted as number 1 problem for 30
    years
  • Significant disease problem in peppers, a closely
    related plant effectors enhance bacterial growth

16
BS2 Resistance gene
  • Bs2-based resistance had strong likelihood of
    being transferable to tomato
  • Closely related Solanaceous plants
  • Bs2-based resistance recognizes a bacterial
    effector that is important for pathogen virulence
  • Bacterial fitness decreased in the absence of
    effector

17
Pepper
Tomato
Bs2 ()
Bs2 (-)
Bs2 ()
Bs2 (-)
  • Confers resistance to the bacterial spot
    pathogen, Xanthomonas campestris pv vesicatoria
    in pepper
  • Also confers resistance when transferred into
    tomato

18
Field Test
  • VF36
  • VF36 Bs2

19
Bs2 Commercial Strategy
  • Avoid use of genetic elements except from tomato
    and pepper for
  • Minimum regulatory concerns
  • Greatest public acceptance
  • Make prototype in attractive agricultural variety
    to be near market- ready for
  • Greatest control over responsible deployment
  • Fastest uptake by seed companies

20
Plant Strategic Defense Initiative (PSDI)
  • Explore the hypothesis that durable non-host
    resistance can be found and/or engineered by
    stacking R genes

21
PSDI premise
  • Plant resistance (R) genes recognize components
    of pathogens (effectors), and trigger
    hypersensitive reaction (HR)
  • Pathogens are typically restricted to certain
    host species
  • Within a species, differences in resistance are
    attributable to specific R gene/effector
    interactions
  • Do non-host species simply have many R genes that
    recognize pathogen effectors?

22
A Pyramid of R genes?
23
A genomic approach
  • New approach is driven by
  • availability of whole genome sequences
  • dramatic decrease in sequencing cost
  • ability to mobilize individual effectors
  • Identify all candidate effectors from a pathogen
  • Test in high-throughput fashion against all R
    genes from a crop

24
Potential hurdles
  • R gene has to work across species
  • Model system may have to be developed (e.g. for
    banana)
  • Identifying all effectors from some pathogens
    will be difficult
  • But
  • If validated, approach will be applicable to any
    crop/pathogen system

25
PSDI target selection
  • Technical feasibility
  • Potential impact on food security in developing
    countries
  • Potential market in developed countries ( for
    more research)
  • Try to maximize overlap

26
PSDI Potential targets
  • Wheat stem rust
  • strain Ug99

Photo by Cereal Disease Lab, USDA
27
Wheat Stem Rust Ug99
  • Already pandemic in E. Africa present in Iran
    headed for Pakistan and India
  • Understand effector complement of Puccinia
    graminis
  • Seek non-host resistance by transfer of NBLRR
    genes from wild wheat relatives, rice, or
    Brachypodium distachyon

28
PSDI Other potential targets
  • Asian soybean rust
  • (Phakopsora pachirhizi)
  • 700MM fungicide replacement value
  • endemic throughout southern Asia

http//www.uky.edu/Ag/Agronomy/CropEcoPhys/kumudin
i/projects.htm
29
PSDI Other potential targets
http//www.apsnet.org/education/feature/banana/
  • Black sigatoka in banana (Mycosphaerella
    fijiensis)
  • gt200MM fungicide replacement value endemic in
    sub-Saharan Africa

30
PSDI Other potential targets
  • Xanthomonas bacterial wilt of banana and enset

www.bspp.org.uk/ndr/july2005/2005-29.asp
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com