Title: Partnership for Effective Research for Veterans Health VA
1Partnership for Effective Research for Veterans
HealthVAs Model Clinical Trial-Cooperative
Research and Development Agreement (CT CRADA)
- Our Panel
- Amy Centanni, Director, Technology Transfer
Program (TTP), VHA - Barbara West, Executive Director, National
Association of Veterans Research and Education
Foundations (NAVREF) - Paul Hutter, Assistant General Counsel, Office of
General Counsel (OGC)
2Partnership for Effective Research for Veterans
HealthVAs Model Clinical Trial-Cooperative
Research and Development Agreement
- Partnership (VHA, Nonprofit Research
- Corporations, Office of General Counsel)
- April 2005
- November 2005
- February 2006
3Partnership for Effective Research for Veterans
HealthVAs Model Clinical Trial-Cooperative
Research and Development Agreement
- CT-CRADA - the first product of this strong
partnership - Our Agenda
- The CRADA itself Amy Centanni
- The CT-CRADA Guidelines Amy Centanni
4Partnership for Effective Research for Veterans
HealthVAs Model Clinical Trial-Cooperative
Research and Development Agreement
- The Cooperative Technology Administration
Agreement Amendments/Guidelines Paul Hutter - The Implementation Plan Paul Hutter
- Suggested Talking Points/Conclusion Paul Hutter
- Questions throughout and at the conclusion
5CRADA BASICS
What is a Cooperative Research and Development
Agreement (CRADA)? A CRADA is a legal
agreement between VA and one or more non-Federal
parties. Title 15 USC 3710a
6CRADA BASICS
Protection of background inventions, trade
secrets and confidential information Access to
VA research resources including personnel,
services and property
7CRADA BASICS
Establishment of intellectual property ownership
and licensing options in advance of an
invention Leveraging federal expertise to
develop products with commercialization
potential Enforceable
8When to use the CT CRADA
- When the collaborator
- Holder of the investigational new drug (IND)
-
- Designs the protocol and
-
- Funds the project
9Who negotiates the CT CRADA?
- VAMC / PI (principal investigator)
- NPC (nonprofit corporation)
- RC (regional counsel) as needed
10Looking at the actual agreement
11Article 2 Definitions
- Affiliate vs. Affiliated University
- (University Partners)
- Background Invention vs. CRADA subject Invention
- Clinical Investigator PI
- Collaborator Sponsor
12Article 2 Definitions
- CRADA Data
- Dual Appointment Personnel
- Protocol and Statement of Work
13Article 2 Definitions
- Raw Data
- VA Employee(s)
- without compensation (WOCs)
- intergovernmental personnel agreement
(IPAs)
14Article 5. Inventions and Intellectual Property
- 5.1 Ownership of CRADA Subject Inventions VA
RETAINS OWNERSHIP - 5.2 Reporting VA and Collaborator invention
disclosure obligations.
15Article 6. Licensing
- 6.2 Collaborators License Option to CRADA
Subject Inventions - VA will grant to Collaborator a nonexclusive
royalty free license. - NERF available only for CT CRADAs
16Article 6. Licensing
- Rationale for the NERF
- Protects collaborators rights to use background
intellectual property - Grants collaborator license to use new
intellectual property - Does not affect ownership under language of the
CT-CRADA
17Article 6. Licensing
- 6.3 VA also grants the Collaborator an option
to elect an exclusive or partially exclusive
commercialization license on any CRADA Subject
Invention - License will comply with Federal requirements
18Article 7. Ownership and Rights of Access to Data
and Publication
- 7.1 Ownership of Data and Records
- 7.2 Right of Access to CRADA Data and CRADA
Materials - 7.4 Presentations and Publications
19Article 8. Confidentiality
- 8.1 Confidential Information
- 8.2 Protection of Confidential Information
- 8.3 Disclosure of Confidential Information
- 8.4 Duration of Confidentiality Obligation
20Article 12. Liability
- 12.1 Collaborators Indemnification and
Liability - 12.2 VAs Indemnity and Liability
21Whats negotiable?
- Refer to CT-CRADA Guidelines
- Use RCs to guide determination as to whether
negotiated changes are substantive - Substantive changes must be cleared by TTP
-
22What if there are substantive changes to the
model CT CRADA?
- RC will forward those clauses to TTP for review
and approval with a cc to the NPC.
23Steps after RC Review
- PI signs acknowledgement
- All parties sign CRADA
- Collaborator
- NPC
- Medical Center Director (last to sign)
-
- Disseminate originals to all parties and provide
a copy to PI and RC. -
24How are Foreign Partners/Sponsors handled under
CT CRADAs?
- CRADAs involving foreign partners have
additional requirements. - Prior to entering such negotiations please call
TTP office to discuss these additional
requirements.
25Other Resources
- CT CRADA Registry
- Registration is mandatory
- (AO or NPC)
- Consists of an Excel spreadsheet listing all past
and current CT CRADAs updated weekly - Complete as much as possible as soon as
negotiations are initiated
26Other Resources
- Future of the Registry online
- submission of CT CRADAs
- Body of the CRADA and Appendix C will be
available to VHA and RCs under password
protection.
27Where to go for help?
- Technology Transfer Website
- www.research.va.gov/
- programs/tech_transfer/
- Technology Transfer Program
- Regional Counsels
- NPC Executive Directors
28Questions
- I would like to confirm my understanding that
the review by the Regional Counsel and the TTP,
if necessary, will be completed in the 30 day
time frame?
29Questions
- Currently our clinical trial agreements
reference the protocol and usually consider it
one of the appendices but the actual protocol
remains with the clinical trial investigator. - What is VA thinking about the Statement of Work
(SOW)?
30CTAA Amendment Guidelines
- CTAAs
- Clearly identify the relationship between VA and
University Partners - Establish joint ownership of potential
intellectual property between VA and Universities - Allowed universities to take the lead with
respect to developing, marketing and promoting
intellectual property
31CTAA Amendment Guidelines
- Amending the CTAAs
- Still establish relationship between VA and
University Partners - CRADA terms require VA to take the lead regarding
intellectual property development
32CTAA Amendment Guidelines
-
- VA looks to amend existing CTAAs to ensure VA
takes the lead for CRADAs - No change in ownership of potential intellectual
property - VA and University Partners retain undivided
interests in the intellectual property
33CTAA Amendment GuidelinesNegotiating the
Amendments
- Field partners (VHA, NPCs, OGC) should take the
lead - Negotiations are best initiated locally with TTP
as backup - VAMC negotiators notify TTP when negotiations
begin with a particular University Partner - Dont wait time is of the essence
34CTAA Amendment GuidelinesNegotiating the
Amendments
- Negotiation a suggested approach
- Determine what is important to the University
- Begin negotiation with the position that VA will
take the lead (patenting, marketing, licensing
and commercialization) in all research subject to
CRADAs (Clinical Trials and otherwise)
35CTAA Amendment GuidelinesNegotiating the
Amendments
- Recall the language from Santa Monica
- Where the VA enters into a CRADA under the
FTTA, then VA undertakes to file such patent
applications and/or market and license the
Subject Invention as it deems appropriate.
36CTAA Amendment GuidelinesNegotiating the
Amendments
- In that event, what otherwise would have been
UNIVERSITYs financial and other rights and
obligations to VA under this Agreement, with
respect to such a Subject Invention, thereafter
shall become VAs rights and obligations to
UNIVERSITY. - Amendments must be signed by the original
signatories or their successors.
37CTAA Amendment GuidelinesNegotiating the
Amendments
- Should the UNIVERSITY fail to agree to the above
clause, then propose the following alternative
clause - Where the VA enters into a phase II, III or IV
clinical trial CRADA, then VA undertakes to file
such patent applications and/or market and
license the Subject Invention as it deems
appropriate.
38CTAA Amendment GuidelinesNegotiating the
Amendments
- In that event, what otherwise would have been
UNIVERSITYs financial and other rights and
obligations to VA under this Agreement, with
respect to such a Subject Invention, thereafter
shall become VAs rights and obligations to
UNIVERSITY.
39CTAA Amendment GuidelinesNegotiating the
Amendments
- The Options in Order of Preference
- 1)University allows VA to take the lead for all
CRADAs - 2)University agrees to VA taking the lead on
phase II-IV Clinical Trials - 3)University agrees to VA taking the lead in
Phase III and IV clinical trials - 4)University reviews on a case by case basis
40Implementation PlanVAs Model Clinical
Trial-Cooperative Research and Development
Agreement
- How do we implement the CT CRADA?
- Implementation Date March 15, 2006 - with the
following guidance and exceptions - All existing executed CRAs are grandfathered
- A CRA may be used for any studies for which
negotiations were initiated before March 15, 2006
41Implementation PlanVAs Model Clinical
Trial-Cooperative Research and Development
Agreement
- If PI/Co-PI are not Dual Appointment Personnel
(DAP), CT CRADA used for all clinical trials
where negotiations start on or after March 15,
2006
42Implementation PlanVAs Model Clinical
Trial-Cooperative Research and Development
Agreement
New clinical trials - PI is a DAP - negotiations
are initiated after March 15, 2006, CT CRADA used
as soon as A or B is satisfied A. Where there
is a CTAA The CTAA allows - or has been amended
to allow - VA to take the lead on intellectual
property developed under a CT CRADA.
43Implementation PlanVAs Model Clinical
Trial-Cooperative Research and Development
Agreement
B. Where there is no CTAA or where the CTAA has
not been amended A process has been worked out
between VA and the university for a case-by-case
review of CT CRADAs allowing VA to take the lead
in any intellectual property developed. A or B
above must be in place no later than June 1,
2006. If not, TTP may provide the site with a
waiver to continue to use CRAs past June 1,
44Talking PointsIntroducing the Model CT-CRADAs to
Stakeholders
- Advantages of CRADAs
- Protect background inventions, trade secrets and
confidential information - Offer access to VA research resources including
personnel, services and property - Establish intellectual property ownership and
licensing options in advance of an invention
45CT CRADA
- Present CRADAs positively
- Track interactions
- Complete a short evaluation
46Questions
- If we dont have a CTAA, should we remove that
paragraph from the CT-CRADA?
47Questions
- I was advised by one of the OGC Corporation
Panel Attorneys not to sign the clinical trial
agreement until the protocol had received IRB
approval some NPCs do like me and wait until the
IRB has approved the protocol whereas other NPCs
have had a practice of signing as soon as a final
draft has been negotiated and approved regardless
of the status of the IRB approval. - Is there any guidance as to the timing of
signing the CT CRADAs?
48Questions
- Are we going to have to insist on the VAMC
Director being the last signatory with the
sponsors?
49Questions
- Article 3.1 Please explain the reasoning behind
the last sentence in this paragraph? - 3.1 Any Collaborator employee(s) who will work
at VA facilities shall be required to have a
Without Compensation Appointment.
50Questions
- 3.6 Human Subject Protection. We should be
allowed to delete this paragraph if no human
subjects are involved?
51Questions
- Appendix B. How detailed do we need to be about
VA contributions? - Would the lab space, admin support, IRB review,
etc. need to be listed? -
- What about the NPC contributions?
52Take Away Points!
- Familiarize yourself with the CT CRADA and CT
CRADA Guidelines - Review the CRADA web site
- Resolve the DAP University/CTAA issues
53Take Away Points!
- Start using the CT CRADA in accordance with the
implementation plan - VA Research Office or NPC must register CRADAs
when negotiations are initiated - Request VISN training and watch for additional
training opportunities
54Questions
- Contact or Email
- Donald.Charapich_at_va.gov
- 202-273-8610