The Supreme Court of the United States - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 63
About This Presentation
Title:

The Supreme Court of the United States

Description:

The Supreme Court of the United States John Roberts Mr. Chief Justice, and may it please the court Antonin Scalia Clarence Thomas Samuel Alito Anthony ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:228
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 64
Provided by: nccs1
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: The Supreme Court of the United States


1
(No Transcript)
2
The Supreme Court of the United States
3
John Roberts
  • Mr. Chief Justice,
  • and may it please the court

4
Antonin Scalia
5
Clarence Thomas
6
Samuel Alito
7
Anthony Kennedy
8
Ruth Bader Ginsburg
9
Stephen Breyer
10
Sonya Sotomayor
11
Elena Kagan
12
(No Transcript)
13
SCOTUS
14
(No Transcript)
15
neither force nor will but only judgment.
-Alexander Hamilton
Fed. No. 78
16
(No Transcript)
17
The Roberts SCOTUS
  • Judges from states on East Coast or West Coast
  • No Protestants
  • Three Women
  • No Former Elected Officials
  • Little Practical Experience
  • 4 of 5 NYC Boroughs Represented

18
Judicial RestraintversusJudicial Activism
19
Judicial Restraint
  • The view that the Supreme Court (and other lesser
    courts) should not read the judges' own
    philosophies or policy preferences into the
    constitution and laws and should whenever
    reasonably possible construe the law so as to
    avoid second guessing the policy decisions made
    by other governmental institutions such as
    Congress, the President and state governments
    within their constitutional spheres of authority.
    On such a view, judges have no popular mandate to
    act as policy makers and should defer to the
    decisions of the elected "political" branches of
    the Federal government and of the states in
    matters of policy making so long as these
    policymakers stay within the limits of their
    powers as defined by the US Constitution and the
    constitutions of the several states.

20
ConservativeJudicial RestraintStrict
InterpretationOriginalism
Antonin Scalia
21
There are four justices who have sat beside me
who believe that the death penalty is now
unconstitutional...and they believe it to be
unconstitutional because they think it ought to
be" - Antonin Scalia
22
ConservativeJudicial Restraint
John Roberts Antonin Scalia Clarence
Thomas Samuel Alito
23
Once the justices depart, as most of them have,
from the original understanding of the principles
of the Constitution, they lack any guidance other
than their own attempts at moral philosophy Yet
when it rules in the name of the Constitution,
whether it rules truly or not, the Court is the
most powerful branch of government in domestic
policy. -Robert Bork, 2005
24
LiberalJudicial Activism Loose or Broad
InterpretationActivist
Earl Warren
25
Judicial Activism
  • The view that the Supreme Court justices (and
    even other lower-ranking judges as well) can and
    should creatively (re)interpret the texts of the
    Constitution and the laws in order to serve the
    judges' own considered estimates of the vital
    needs of contemporary society when the elected
    "political" branches of the Federal government
    and/or the various state governments seem to them
    to be failing to meet these needs. On such a
    view, judges should not hesitate to go beyond
    their traditional role as interpreters of the
    Constitution and laws given to them by others in
    order to assume a role as independent policy
    makers or independent "trustees" on behalf of
    society.

26
We must never forget that it isa Constitution
intended to endure for ages to come, and,
consequently, to be adapted to the various crises
of human affairs.- John Marshall, 1819
27
LiberalJudicial Activism
Stephen Breyer Ruth Bader Ginsburg Sonia
Sotomayor Elena Kagan
28
"The words of the Constitution. are so
unrestricted by their intrinsic meaning or by
their history or by tradition or by prior
decisions that they leave the individual Justice
free, if indeed they do not compel him, to gather
meaning not from reading the Constitution but
from reading life." -Justice Felix Frankfurter,
1949
29
Laws are dead letters without courts to expound
and define their true meaning and operation.
-Alexander Hamilton
Fed. No. 78
30
ConservativeSwing Vote
Anthony Kennedy
31
(No Transcript)
32
Dual Court System
The Structure of the Courts
33
Federal Court System
and
50 State Court Systems
34
(No Transcript)
35
(No Transcript)
36
How do cases get to the
80 Decisions
Original Jurisdiction
80 of cases accepted come from federal system
lt1 of cases accepted are original jurisdiction
U.S. Supreme Court?
State Supreme Court highest state court
U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals 12 circuits
Federal Circuit
Intermediate Appeals Court
U.S. District Court 94 districts Federal Trials
Trial Courts municipal or county Local Trials
FEDERAL 1 million cases/yr
STATES 30 million cases/yr
37
(No Transcript)
38
(No Transcript)
39
SCOTUS
40
(No Transcript)
41
Federal Level
U.S. Supreme Court Circuit Courts of Appeal
Federal District
42
SCOTUS Docket
  • Federal Question Cases
  • Constitution
  • Federal Laws
  • Treaties
  • Diversity Cases

43
OHIO State Courts
Ohio Supreme Court
Supreme Court
District Court of Appeals
Appellate Courts
Court of Common Pleas
Municipal Court
Trial Courts
44
State Level
State Supreme Court State Courts of Appeal
Common Pleas
Municipal
45
Dual Court System
State Supreme Court State Courts of Appeal
SCOTUS
Appellate
Common Pleas
Municipal
Federal District
46
Dual Sovereignty Doctrine
Rodney King 1992 State Court Ruling Federal
Court Ruling
47
(No Transcript)
48
Getting to Court
49
(No Transcript)
50
Standing
  • Actual controversy
  • Real adversaries
  • Actual harm

51
The Supreme Court in Action
52
10th Justice
The Supreme Courts Docket
The Solicitor General
53
The Judges in Conference
Bi-Weekly
Conference Protocol
Stare Decisis
Rule of 4
54
(No Transcript)
55
The Supreme Court in Action
Writ of Certiorari
In Forma Pauperis
Rule of Four
56
Lowering Court Costs
  • In Forma Pauperis
  • Interest Group pays
  • Fee Shifting

57
Amicus Curiae Briefs
58
Oral Arguments Made in Open Court
Quorum
Recusal
Oyez, Oyez, Oyez
Protocol
Law Clerks
59
(No Transcript)
60
(No Transcript)
61
Opinion Writing
Per Curiam
Concurring Opinion
Opinion of the Court
Dissenting Opinion
Slip Opinion
62
(No Transcript)
63
(No Transcript)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com