Title: Moria One Use-Plus SBK vs. 60 kHz IntraLase FS SBK
1Moria One Use-Plus SBK vs.60 kHz IntraLase FS
SBK
sadly, no financial interests
2Alternate Title
- Do I really need to throw away my microkeratome
and buy a femtosecond laser to provide
state-of-the-art SBK thin flap LASIK?
3ONE Use-Plus SBK Sub Bowmans Keratomileusis
The Moria option for SBK
4Reported advantages of SBK compared to
conventional LASIK
- Less weakening of corneal biomechanics, less risk
of ectasia, better stability - Faster visual recovery
- Better quality of vision
- Fewer higher order aberrations
- Better contrast sensitivity
- Fewer complications, less glare, fewer halos
- Less incidence of postoperative dry eye
- Reduced loss of corneal sensitivity
- Ability to treat more patients, and higher levels
of myopia - Can treat thinner corneas
- Reduced enhancement rate
5The rationale of SBK
Anterior third of the stroma is the strongest
region of cornea
By John Marshall, PhD, UK
6The rationale of SBK
Less disruption in the anterior third of the
stroma causes less weakening of the cornea
By John Marshall, PhD, UK
7The Moria option for SBK or Sub-Bowmans
Keratomileusis
ONE Use-Plus SBK
8Demographics
- Fifty myopic eyes of 25 consecutive patients
- Eleven females, 14 males
- MRSE mean -3.57 /- 2.17 D (-1.13 to -10.00)
- Refractive cylinder mean 0.53 /- 0.56 D (zero
to 3.00)
9Measurement Parameters
- BSCVA
- MR and CR
- Visx Wavescan HOA
- Orbscan II
- US Pach
- Flap thickness (US pachymetry subtraction method)
- Flap diameter
- Hinge length (in degrees)
- Suction time
- Pupil Tracking success
- Iris Registration success
- Flap status
- Stromal bed smoothness
- Epithelium status
10Measurement Parameters
- UCVA
- Flap status
- Epithelium status
- UCVA
- BSCVA
- Visx Wavescan HOA
- Visante OCT flap profile
- Flap status
- Epithelium status
11Materials and Methods
- One surgeon (RJD) using the Moria One Use-Plus
SBK automated microkeratome to produce a 100
micron flap - VISX S4 Smooth Scan Active Trak excimer laser
with 39 custom ablations and 11 conventional
ablations - Follow-up period of one month on all eyes
12Results
- Flap Thickness 103 /- 9 µ (83 to 123)
- Vertical Flap Diameter 9.3 /- 0.3 mm
- Hinge Length 63 /- 18
- Pupil Tracking success 100
- Iris Registration success 81
- No epithelial defects or slides
- Very smooth and dry beds
- No flap striae, microstriae, slipped flaps, free
caps, buttonholes, DLK, epithelial ingrowth, etc.
13Why such epithelial kindness?
- Disposable smooth heads without imperfections and
irregularities from autoclaving, handling, and
reusing - Consistent translation speed relative to old
manual LSK-One microkeratome
14Accuracy and predictability equivalent to
Femto-SBK
1. Duffey RJ. One Use-Plus SBK Clinical studies.
Presented at Morias speaker forum during the
annual meeting of American Society of Cataract
and Refractive Surgery April 5, 2008 Chicago,
IL, USA. 2. Kerizian G. Will laser microkeratomes
replace conventional ones? Paper presented at the
ISRS/AAO meeting during the annual meeting of
ESCRS in September 2006, London, UK.
15Results
- 20/15 38
- 20/20 52
- 20/25 10
- 20/15 50
- 20/20 40
- 20/25 8
- 20/30 2
- MRSE -0.09 /- 0.29 D
16Visual recoverywith One Use-Plus SBK
UCVA at Day 1 postop
N50 eyes
17Why Increased UCVA on Day 1?
- Thin flaps (this has been my experience with
thin flaps for over 5 years, although UCVA has
been improved even further with the One Use-Plus
SBK) - ? Stretched edges with whales tail ?
18Faster visual recoverywith One Use-Plus SBK
UCVA at Day 1 postop
One Use-Plus SBK (Dr Duffey) N50 eyes Intralase
60kHz (Dr Durrie) N50 eyes
19Visual recovery withOne Use-Plus SBK
UCVA at Month 1 postop
N50 eyes
20Faster visual recoverywith One Use-Plus SBK
UCVA at Month 1 postop
One Use-Plus SBK (Dr Duffey) N50 eyes Intralase
60kHz (Dr Durrie) N48 eyes
21Change in HOA (rms) Results at 1 Month
- Total HOA 0.10µ increase
- Coma 0.04µ increase
- SA 0.08µ increase
22Change in HOA between preop and 1 month postop
with One Use-Plus SBK and FS 60kHz
Blue- One Use-Plus n50 Yellow- IntraLase
FS n11
23Change in High Order Aberrations between preop
and 1 month postop
?No clinically significant difference between
customized SBK treatment using IntraLase 60kHz
One Use-Plus SBK both better than PRK data.
24Visante OCT (2.01) Flap Profile Results at 1
Month
- Planar and near planar flap profiles that match
photos from published IntraLase studies (Stahl,
Durrie, et al.) and compare equally between One
Use-Plus SBK and IntraLase FS 60 kHz SBK in this
study. - As with all OCT profiles (even with the latest
2.01 software), it is impossible to consistently
identify the interface and accurately place the
cursor on it at the 1 month postop visit, thus
decreasing the reliability of central,
paracentral, and peripheral flap thickness
measurementsboth in the OUP and FS laser cut
flaps. - Very subjective endpoints for flap thickness
measurements with the present state of OCT
technology
25AAO 2007 Predictability of flap thicknesswith
-1 disposable ring of One Use-Plus
- James Lewis, MD (OCT Visante)
- Zeiss OCT Visante
- 100 /- 9,6 (83-125)
- N 84 eyes
26High resolution corneal scans512 A-scans per
line0.25 sec per line. Four lines total at 45,
90, 135, and 180 degreesall in 1 sec.
27Color One Use-Plus SBK disposable -1 ringflap
with a planar profile at 1 mo.
28Color One Use-Plus SBK disposable -1 ringflap
with a planar profile digitized
29Grayscale One Use-Plus SBK disposable ringflap
with a planar profile and taper edge
30Color Femtosecond SBK at 1 monthflap with a
planar profile and edge scar
31Color Femtosecond SBK digitizedflap with planar
profile and edge scar
32Grayscale Femtosecond SBK flap with digitized
planar profile and edge scar
33Totally masked placement of cursors on OU-P flap
at 1 month postopnot reproducible!!
34Totally masked placement of cursors on FS flap at
1 month postopnot reproducible!!
35OCT of Flap Interfaces
- At present with the best technology available,
this is a qualitative test only that helps assess
the planar nature of flaps. - It is not sensitive enough nor high resolution
enough to be able to reproducibly assess flap
thickness quantitatively in all meridia or even
along one complete meridian.
36Top Moria OU-P -at 1 month- Bottom FS
60kH
This is the best we can doa qualitative
comparison of the planar nature of both the
One Use-Plus and femtosecond laser flaps.
37Why Planar Flaps?
- ? Meniscus shapes are nullified as the
microkeratome flaps become thinner ? - or meniscus shape flaps from longitudinal
translational mechanical microkeratomes were a
myth to begin with
38Moria manual LSK-One 180 micron flap after
H-LASIK with slow translationits planar!
39Moria One Use-Plus SBK vs.60 kHz IntraLase FS
SBK
- SEM Smoothness Study of the Stromal Beds
40Materials and Methods
- Four cadaveric eyes (2 paired sets) unsuitable
for corneal transplantation - Less than 5 days post mortem
41Methods
- One eye from each pair, thus 2 eyes total
- 100 micron flap, 9 mm diam., 60 hinge, 7 mm/sec
automat. translation, 15,000 oscill/min. - Flap lift and amputate
- Cornea removed and placed in gluteraldehyde
- SEM prep, scans at 20x, 40x, 80x, and 100x
- One eye from each pair, thus 2 eyes total
- 100 micron flap, 9 mm diam., 55 hinge angle,
raster pattern energy of 1.0 µj, pulse separation
8x8 µm, side energy cut 1.0 µj at 70, pocket
enabled - Flap lift and amputate
- Cornea removed and
- SEM prep, scans at 20x
42Method of Smoothness Scoring
- 10 masked (to technology) observers rated each
stromal bed photograph for smoothness on a scale
from zero to four (zero was polished glass
smooth) - Photos were evaluated sequentially by
magnification all 20x photos first, followed by
all 40x, followed by all 80x, followed by all
160x photographs - 3 representative photos (chosen by SEM
technician) of each of the 4 different
magnifications were evaluated for each of the 2
technologies making a total of 12 Moria and 12
femtosecond laser bed photographs that were
scored - A cumulative mean score was tabulated for each of
the two technologies by combining the 20x, 40x,
80x, and 160x data scores lumped together
43SEM 20x
OU-P
IntraLase FS
44SEM 40x
UO-P
IntraLase FS
45SEM 80x
UO-P
IntraLase FS
46Representative Scoring Scale at 160x 0
glass1234
1
2
3
4
47Edges
IntraLase FS 20x
OU-P 80x
48Scored Results (Mean)
49Scanning Electron Microscopy Moria One
Use-Plus vs. IntraLase FS 160x
OU-P
FS 60kH
50Why the difference?
- The raster pattern of the femtosecond laser
produces a velcro like interface that has to be
peeled open with increased force to break the
remaining adhesions between the pixel pattern
bursts of laser energy.
51Moria One Use-Plus SBK vs.60 kHz IntraLase FS
SBK
52Patients and Methods
- Ten consecutive eyes with myopia underwent SBK
(thin flap LASIK) with IntraLase FS (60kHz) flaps
and - Ten matched consecutive eyes with myopia
underwent SBK (thin flap LASIK) with the Moria
One Use-Plus SBK microkeratome - All eyes operated by same surgeon (RJD) with the
same excimer laser (VISX Star S4)
53Scoring Method and Intervals
- Pain was assessed for each eye by type (FB,
burning, sharp, pressure), pattern (continuous,
intermittent), duration (in hours), intensity (on
a scale of 0 to 10), and use of pain medications
- A Making of flap in OR
- B First 1-5 hours after surgery
- C First night after surgery
- D First full postoperative day following
surgery
54 Pain Survey
During Flap in OR OD OS First 1-5 hours after surgery OD OS First Night of Surgery OD OS Next Day OD OS
Pain Yes/No
Type FB, burning, sharp, pressure, other
Pattern continuous, intermittent, other
Duration number of hours (one, two, three, etc.)
Amount on a number scale of 0 (none) to 10 (max)
Difficulty sleeping Yes/No
Pain Meds Yes/ No yes
Type Tylenol, Motrin, Aleve, prescription, other xanax
55Results
- A 0.6
- B 0.8
- C 0
- D 0
- Cumulative Overall 1.4
- Mean Score 0.35
- A 1.4
- B 4.8
- C 0
- D 0
- Cumulative Overall 6.2
- Mean Score 1.55
56Greater patient comfortwith One Use-Plus SBK
than with Femto-SBK
The pain occured at a much lower frequency and
intensity with One Use-Plus SBK in the first 1 to
5 hours after surgery than with Intralase
SBK Richard J. Duffey, MD (Mobile, AL, USA)
57Why the difference in the 1 to 5 hours post
surgery interval?
- CO2 diffusion through corneal tissue from the OBL
in the stromal bed, flap, and pocket? - Possibly a similar mechanism of pain produced in
a SCUBA diver from too rapid decompression and N2
bubbles diffusing through tissues
58Miscellaneous Observations
59One Use-Plus SBK
- None of the intraoperative reported complications
of Femto-SBK - Laser eye tracking difficulties/Iris
Registration difficulties - Suction loss
- Strong adhsions, requiring manual cut-downs or
recuts - Interface gas bubble escape (opaque bubble layer
or OBL) into flap, bed and pocket - Vertical gas breakthrough subepithelial or
anterior chamber gas bubble
60One Use-Plus SBK
- None of the postoperative reported complications
of Femto-SBK - Photophobia due to light hypersensitivity or TLS
Syndrome - Energy-related Diffuse Lamellar Keratitis (DLK)
- Occasional interface haze requiring retreatment
- Difficulty in lifting the flap atraumatically
for retreatments - Post-operative pain 1-5 hours after surgery
associated with gas diffusion thru corneal tissue
61My Final Report Card
Moria OUP/SBK 90 vs. 60 kHz Intralase
flap thickness
flap profile
flap diameter
flap centering
flap hinge/location
flap edge
no flap striae/microstriae
bed smoothness
epithelial preservation
fit on small orbits
suction time
iris registration
pupil tracking
UCVA day 1
UCVA month 1
minimal pain post-op
minimal ingrowth risk
low DLK risk
no TLSS
no OBL or pocket
loss suction immediate recut
corneal biomechanics
time considerations
space considerations
cost-capital investment
no free cap risk
no button hole or vertical gas breakthrough risk
really exciting to drive
Final Score 22 19
62Video of surgery
63GMC Yukon XL or Jaguar XJ220?
Practical Reliable Durable and for me Better
especially with lots of college educations
to pay for.
64Thank You