Title: Minimizing Energy Consumption with Probabilistic Distance Models in Wireless Sensor Networks
1Minimizing Energy Consumption with Probabilistic
Distance Models in Wireless Sensor Networks
- Yanyan Zhuang, Jianping Pan, Lin Cai
- University of Victoria, Canada
2Background Related Work
- Clustering Schemes
- Cluster Head (CH) cluster nodes
- two-tier hierarchical structure simple node
coordination - Multi-hop avoid long-range transmissions
3Background Related Work (cont.)?
- Grid-Based Clustering
- Partition equal-sized squares
- Facilitate data dissemination sensors can
transmit data without route setup in advance
Manhattan Walk
Diagonal-First Routing
4Background Related Work (cont.)?
- Variable-size Clustering
- traffic volume highly skewed ? bottleneck
- consume their energy much faster than other
nodes ? earlier breakdown of the network - Existing Work
- time synchronization/frequent message exchanges
- linear network, or quasi-two-dimensional
5Distance Distribution Model
- Wireless Transmitter
- data transmission rate
- a constant related to the environment
- path loss exponent 2,6
-
6Distance Distribution Model
- Energy consumption ? node distance ? average
distance (?) ? Average Distance Model -
- Grid structure geometric property ?
probabilistic distance distribution ? Distance
Distribution Model
7Coordinate Distributions
- Two nodes in same grid (AB) U0,1
- Two nodes in diagonal grids (PQ)?
- X1, Y1 U0,1 and X2, Y2 U-1,0
- Two nodes in parallel grids (RS)?
- X1, Y1, Y2 U0,1 and X2 U-1,0
8Distance Distributions
- Node distance
- Goal
- Four step derivation
- Difference --gt Square --gt Sum --gt Square Root
9Distance Distributions
- Node distance
- Goal
- Four step derivation
- Difference --gt Square --gt Sum --gt Square Root
10- (1) Difference distribution
-
- Example P
and Q
11- (2) Square distribution
- Example P and Q
12- (3) Sum distribution
- (4) Square-root distribution
13 14PDF within a Unit Grid Polyfit
15PDF between Parallel/Diagonal Grids
16Probabilistic Energy Optimization
- Simulation Setup Friis Free Space Two-Ray
Ground - cross-over distance
- system loss factor
- rx/tx antenna height
- wavelength of the carrier signal
17Distance Verification
- CDF vs. Simulation
One-hop Energy Consumption
18Total Energy Consumption Distance Distribution
vs. Average Model
19Improvement Variable Size Griding
- P and Q
- X1, Y1 U0,1-q
- X2, Y2 U-q(1-q),0
- R
- X1 U-q,0, Y1 U0,1-q
- S
- X2 -q, -q(1-q), Y2 U-q(1-q),0
20Distance Verification
- CDF vs. Simulation
One-hop Energy Consumption -
-
-
- CDF with q0.4 and 0.7
One-Hop Energy Consumption with q0.5
21Per-Grid/Total Energy Consumption vs. Size Ratio
22Conclusions
- Energy consumption model based on distance
distributions - Nonuniform grid-based clustering both data
traffic and energy consumption balanced - The importance of grid-based clustering and the
optimal grid size ratio that can balance the
overall energy consumption
23 24Coordinate Distributions
- Two nodes in same grid (AB) U0,1
- Two nodes in diagonal grids (PQ)?
- X1, Y1 U0,1 and X2, Y2 U-1,0
- Two nodes in parallel grids (RS)?
- X1, Y1, Y2 U0,1 and X2 U-1,0
25 26Improvement Variable Size Griding
- PQ X1, X2 U0,1-q and Y1, Y2 U-q(1-q),0
- R X1 U-q,0, Y1 U0,1-q
- S X2 -q, -q(1-q), Y2 U-q(1-q),0
27- Wireless Channel Model
- the data transmission rate
- a constant related to the environment
- path loss exponent 2,6
- distance distribution function (poly
fit appx)?