Aristotle - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Aristotle

Description:

Welcome to Aristotle! Western thought s first structural & textual critic of the Fine Arts! Aristotle s Aesthetics (382-322 BC): All men by nature to desire to ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:916
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 48
Provided by: Shoc
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Aristotle


1
Aristotles Aesthetics (382-322 BC)
  • Welcome to Aristotle!
  • Western thoughts
  • first structural
  • textual critic of
  • the Fine Arts!

2
Aristotles Aesthetics (382-322 BC)All men by
nature to desire to know.the human race lives
also by art and reasonings Metaphysics 11.
  • Aristotle produced the first
  • extended study of an art form.
  • The Poetics is the primary
  • resource for Aristotles view
  • of art.
  • Poetics is a reply to Platos
  • condemnation of Poetry.

3
Introduction
  • In terms of literary analysis, in the
  • Poetics, Aristotle moves back
  • Forth between criticism and theory.
  • He wrote Poetics in our after 334.
  • We only have Book I Book II on
  • comedy is lost.

4
Introduction
  • The Poetics can be somewhat perplexing.
    Therefore, it is helpful to keeping in mind the
    following guiding questions
  • What is poetry?
  • What kind of poetry is tragedy?
  • What are tragedys essential elements?

5
Discourse Outline of Aristotles Poetics
Unifying theme is Mimesis Imitation is
representation
  • I. Introduction (Poetics 1-5)
  • A. General Notion of Artistic imitation (1)
  • B. Different Species of Artistic Imitation (2-3)
  • C. The Development of Poetry (4-5)
  • II. Tragedy (Poetics 6-22)
  • A. Definition and description (6)
  • B. Discussion of Plot (7-18)
  • C. Discussion on thought (19)
  • D. Discussion on diction (20-22)
  • III. Epic (Poetics 23-24)
  • A. Discussion of Merits of Tragedy Epic
    (26).

6
Introduction
  • If you recall, Plato wanted to ban poetry for the
    following reasons
  • No knowledge undergirds poetry for poets are
    ignorant (Apology 22b-c on 543a)
  • Poetry relies on inspiration (Ion 534b-e
    Phaedrus, 245a) rather than reason
  • Poetry propagates falsehoods (Republic 337-391)

7
Introduction
  • Poetry arouses irrational passions that displaces
    reason it is intoxicating with its seductive
    charms of rhythm, meter, and harmony (Book 10)
  • Poetry imitates appearance and not reality
    it is a lower-level metaphysic (mimesis) (Book
    10)
  • Poetry imitates the souls worst impulses from
    its better ones (Republic 605)
  • Poetry should be banned if it cannot be justified
    by reason (Republic 2-4 10)

8
Pertinent Statement 1449b24-28
  • The fundamental aspects of Aristotles argument
    appears in his definition of tragedy
  • A tragedy, then, is the imitation of an action
    that is serious and also, as having magnitude,
    complete in itself in language with pleasurable
    accessories, each kind brought in separately in
    the parts of the work in a dramatic, not in a
    narrative form with incidences arousing pity and
    fear, wherewith to accomplish its catharsis of
    such emotions. Here, by language with
    pleasurable accessories I mean that with rhythm
    and harmony and by the kinds separately I mean
    that some portions are worked out with verse
    only, and others in turn with song. Poetics,
    1449b24-28.

9
Important Words to Consider from 1449b24-28I am
indebted to Nickolas Pappas article, Aristotle
in The Routledge Companion to Aesthetics, 15-26
for this discussion.
  • We will now proceed to consider some of the more
    weighty words of that statement which will be
    used to present the thesis of this book
  • Catharsis
  • Mimesis
  • Action
  • Seriousness.
  • Lets proceed to consider all four words!

10
First Word is Catharsis
  • This word occurs twice in what we have of the
    Poetics.
  • No definition is given of the word.
  • Closing place for stating a purpose or goal is at
    the end of a sentence that is where catharsis
    is located in 1449b24-28
  • wherewith to accomplish its catharsis of such
    emotions.

11
Catharsis
  • Three possible definitions with the first two
    being psychological and the last being literary
  • Catharsis refers to the purging the emotions
  • Catharsis refers to the clarification or
    calibration of the emotions
  • Catharsis refers to the incidents in the drama
    (coherent and significant plot structures in the
    goal of tragedy).

12
Catharsis Three interpretations
  • Word also occurs in Politics VIII where mentions
    the catharsis that music and poetry deliver.
  • Interpreters of Catharsis have extensively
    debated this word.
  • Before Aristotles use catharsis was used in a
    number of ways including the following
  • Medical catharsis was a purgation (e.g, laxative
    or enema cleaning out the digestive system)
  • Clean up or clarification.

13
Catharsis Release of emotion
  • Since 19th Century Aristotelian catharsis tended
    to receive a medical reading. Nickolas Pappas
    elaborates on this interpretation
  • Tragedy flushes out unruly and undesirable
    passions by letting them flow freely until we
    return to an unemotional state. The terror
    aroused by a well-made tragedy lets us release
    the thousand little terrors we normally swallow
    back down (pg. 17).

14
Catharsis Release of emotion
  • A.E. Taylor states it this way
  • Aristotle has a theory which is directly aimed
    against this overstrained Puritanism referring
    to Platos suppression of fine arts. He holds
    that the very exciting and sensational art which
    would be very bad as a daily food may be very
    useful as an occasional medicine for the soul.
    He would retain even the most sensational forms
    of music on the account for what he calls their
    purgative value. In the same spirit he asserts
    that the function of tragedy, with its
    sensational representations of the calamities of
    its heroes, is by the vehicle of fear and pity
    to purge our minds of those and similar
    emotions. The explanation of the theory is to be
    sought in the literal sense of the medical term
    purgative (Taylor, Aristotle, 109).

15
Catharsis release of emotion
  • This idea of release of emotion has been the
    traditional interpretation. Consider the
    following translation
  • Some persons fall into a religious frenzy, and
    we see them restored as a result of the sacred
    melodies-when they used the melodies that excite
    the soul to mystic frenzy-as though they had
    found healing medical treatment and purgation
    katharsis. Those who are influenced by pity or
    fear, and every emotional nature, must have a
    like experience, and others in so far as each is
    susceptible to such emotions, and all are in a
    manner purged and their souls lightened and
    delighted. The melodies which purge the passion
    likewise give an innocent pleasure to mankind.
    Politics, Book VIII, 1342.6-15.

16
Catharsis 3 Reasons Against Release of
emotion
  • First, we know from Aristotles ethics that he
    does not call for the celebration or the
    suppression of emotions he argues for the
    regular and well ordered expressions (pg.
    18). In the Nicomachean Ethics (Book II 1103b18)
  • Aristotle states

17
Catharsis Reasons Against Release of emotion
  • This, then, is the case with the excellences
    also by doing the acts that we do in our
    transactions with other men we become just or
    just, and by doing the acts that we do in the
    presence of danger, and being habituated to feel
    fear or confidence, we become brave or cowardly.
    The same is true of appetites and feelings of
    anger some men become temperate and
    good-tempered, others self-indulgent and
    irascible, by behaving in one way or the other in
    the appropriate circumstances. Thus, in one
    word, states arise out of like activities. This
    is why the activities we exhibit must be a
    certain kind it is because the states correspond
    to the differences between these. It makes no
    small difference, then, whether we form habits of
    one kind or of another from our very youth it
    makes a very great difference, or rather all the
    difference.

18
Catharsis 3 reasons against Release of Emotion
  • Second, music and poetry educates our emotions
    because songs contain images of anger, courage
    and other traits (Politics, Book VIII,
    1340a-1921. Consider the following excerpt
  • Since then music is a pleasure, and excellence
    consists in rejoicing and loving and hating
    rightly, there is clearly nothing which we are so
    much concerned to acquire and to cultivate as the
    power of forming right judgments, and of taking
    delight in good dispositions and noble actions.
    Rhythm and melody supply imitations of anger and
    gentleness, and also of courage and temperance,
    and of all the qualities contrary to these, and
    of the other qualities of character, which hardly
    fall short of the actual affections, as we know
    from our own experience, for in listening to such
    strains our souls undergo a change. Politics,
    Book VIII, 1340a14-22.

19
Catharsis Another Interpretation
  • Aristotle later states
  • Enough has been said to show that music has a
    power of forming the character, and should
    therefore be introduced into the education of the
    young. The study is suited to the stage of
    youth, for young persons will not, if they can
    help, endure anything which is not sweetened by
    pleasure, and music has a natural sweetness.
    There seems to be in us a sort of affinity to
    musical modes and rhythms, which makes some
    philosophers say that a soul is a harmony,
    others, that is possesses harmony.
  • Politics, Book VIII, 1340b 11-19.

20
Catharsis is clarification of emotions
  • And third, delight over the whole experience
    trains the soul to enjoy the sight of real-world
    virtue. Politics, Book VIII 1340a22-27.
  • Therefore, on this view Pappas notes that
    catharsis is a clarification of emotion. This is
    the view held by L. Golden, R. Janko, and M.C.
    Nussbaum.
  • Pappas states

21
Catharsis is clarification of emotions
  • Training emotions has nothing to do with
    releasing them. Training presupposes that the
    emotions are here to stay, and need to be
    calibrated to fit the real-world situations that
    call them forthBy rousing powerful emotions with
    a simpler train of events than life provides,
    tragedy teaches how fear and pity feel and where
    they are appropriate. That understanding forms
    part of the groundwork for ethical behavior,
    since Aristotle connect ethical behavior to
    well-trained emotions. Thus the clarification
    view helps harmonize Aristotles aesthetic with
    his ethics (pg. 18).

22
Catharsis is clarification of emotions
  • Nevertheless, this view has a glaring
    difficulty. While this view offers contextual
    support to Aristotles argument against Platos
    view of art, music, and poetry, in Politics Book
    VIII, 1342a7-15, Aristotle refers to catharsis as
    a relief, something that makes the soul settle
    down (pg. 18).

23
Catharsis is incidents in the drama.
  • According to Pappas, others still (e.g., Gerald
    Else) contend that catharsis does not mean
    purging of emotions or clarification of
    emotions. Rather, than being a psychological
    word, this word is a literary, narratological
    term since coherent and significant plot
    structure is the goal of tragedy (pg. 19).
  • This is a minority view.
  • It has the advantage of looking in the Poetics
    for an argument about what literature knows and
    how it says it.

24
Catharsis is incidents in the drama.
  • According to Beardsley, Professor Else, on the
    other hand, translates the passage as follows
    carrying to completion, through a course of
    events in involving pity and fear, the
    purification of those painful or fatal acts which
    have that quality. The purgation, in his
    reading, is a purification, and it is not
    something that takes place in the spectator at
    all, but something that takes place in the play.
    It is carried out by the plot itself, in virtue
    of the fact that the plot consists of events of a
    certain sort (Professor Else takes pathematon as
    tragic events, because pathos in later chapters
    means this) (pg. 65).

25
Second Word Mimesis Image-Making.
  • 1. Mimesis is natural to people from childhood
    (Poetics 1448b6) as opposed to Plato who saw
    image-making as a lower-level metaphysical
    perversion. Plato thought of mimesis two fold
    as (a) impersonating and the (b) mock up or
    production of a likeness of something.
  • 2. Mimesis is a natural propensity and pleasant
    because it is a way of learning (Poetics 1448b13
    cf. 1448b8) as opposed to Plato who wants
    knowledge to come in the form of universal
    statements, the highest sort of learning.

26
Second Word Mimesis Image-Making.
  • 3. Humans love to learn (Metaphysics I.1) and
    mimesis brings determination and simplification
    to learning as opposed to Plato who finds it to
    be denigrating to a virtuous education.
    Aristotle saw mimesis can involve representation,
    it is not mimicry nor counterfeiting.
  • 4. Aristotle argues that mimesis takes action as
    its object thus, tragedy communicates
    authentically philosophical knowledge as opposed
    to Plato who argued that mimesis is passive since
    it either involves putting on the mask (drama)
    and impersonating or the production of a likeness
    of something (poetry).

27
Second Word Mimesis Image-Making of Reality.
  • 5. Aristotle takes mimesis as imitating nature
    because of its orderly and purposeful forms fine
    arts take on these are productive purposes which
    are rational, consciously perceive by the mind of
    its maker (Metaphysics 7.7) as opposed to Plato
    who thought it displaced or even corrupted reason
    by arousing the non-rational part of the soul.
  • 6. Only the mimetic arts have as their specific
    purpose to produce representations or fictional
    depictions of the world or reality. This is
    contrary to Plato because he saw mimesis as being
    an imitation of appearance, not reality.

28
Second Word Mimesis Image-Making of Reality.
  • Regarding the relationship between reality and
    the artwork, it is important to observe the
    following quote from Poetics 9
  • Poetry is more philosophical and more serious
    than history, for it deals with universals, while
    history speaks of particulars.
  • In other words, poetry is offering larger
    conceptions which structure human experience and
    understanding, bringing unity, wholeness, or
    completeness.

29
Third Word Action.
  • 1. Thus, mimesis is active mimesis communicates
    knowledge, it is not passive, inherently weak,
    corrupt, or based in ignorance.
  • 2. Just as some consider photography as not being
    art because it is passive (Plato Republic 596d),
    Aristotle considers mimesis to be an active
    process of selective presentation because of
    being a composer of plots, a drawer of lines, etc.

30
Third Word Action.
  • 3. Tragedy in poetry represents events and not
    passions just as painting is more a matter of
    line than of color (Poetics, 1450b2-3)
  • 4. A good plot clearly represents an action it
    restricts itself to a unified action, even if
    that involves differing characters and their
    development. In fact a tragedy imitates a
    complete action a beginning, middle and an end
    (Poetics, 1450b26). The unity of ploy s derived
    from the fact that it is a single action.

31
Third Word Action.
  • 5. The unity consists in the right connections
    among the parts of a plot. Each even follows the
    other either by necessity or probably (Poetics
    1451a13, 38 1452a20).
  • 6. Tragedy that represents action contains a
    general truth.
  • 7. Composing, plot making, play writing, are
    constructions this is something musicians, story
    tellers, poets, and story tellers do. Hence a
    plot is an object that gets constructed.

32
Third Word Action.
  • Potential misreading of Plato
  • A. Some have argued that Platos analogy of a
    mirror meant to capture not passive automatism,
    but superficiality.
  • B. Plato may think that the perversity is
    misusing their talents to produce so little that
    is virtuous.
  • C. Plato may have been concerned that
    characterization, not plot, was the problem of
    mimesis to duplicate an appearance is the issue
    when you are strive for the universal form.

33
Third Word Action.
  • - Even if this is the case, the Poetics assert
    that plot supremacy over character establishes a
    defense of the arts. The causal principle makes
    the story plausible and contains the tragedys
    general statement. Therefore, tragedy
    communicated knowledge.

34
Fourth Word Seriousness
  • The tragic character be good, serious, superior
    people (Poetics 1448a2 1454a17). These
    characters dignity and standing ensure the
    importance of what they undertake and undergo
    (pg. 22).
  • Aristotle did not want tragedy to present
    meaningless suffering tragic effect is
    disgusting, Poetics 1452b36) where as
    appearance of purpose or order is fine (Poetics
    1452a6-10) (pg. 22-23).

35
Fourth Word Seriousness
  • Associates bad consequences to a characters
    hamartia (Poetics 1453a10) which simply means a
    mistake, error of judgment, foolishness, or
    self-deception in classical Greek. (pg. 23). It
    is not used as a defect of character but an
    action the misfortune of heroes depends on what
    they do.
  • Tragic plots have strong causal connects whereby
    it instructs the audience on morality mimesis
    imparts knowledge (pg. 23).
  • Luck is also involved things may not turn out
    the way one necessarily hopes this is the plight
    of the tragic hero does.
  • Therefore, for Aristotle, there is value in the
    seriousness of tragedy (pg. 23).

36
Aristotles View of Beauty
  • Aristotle uses beauty (kalos) 19 times in
    Poetics as compliment for tragic plots, language,
    and character.
  • Only once does Aristotle make beauty a defining
    criterion for tragedies, when he says they must
    be neither too long to surpass what the memory
    can hold, not too short to count as serious
    (Poetics 1451a4-15) (pg. 24).
  • Beauty is defined in terms of size or proportion
    (Metaphysics 1078a31-b5)
  • Beauty is a real property of things (Metaphysics
    1072b32-35). Aristotle writes

37
Aristotles View of Beauty
  • Beauty is defined in terms of size or proportion
    (Metaphysics 1078a31-b5). Consider Aristotles
    comment in Poetics 1450b35
  • either a living creature of any structure made
    of parts, must have not only an orderly
    arrangement of these parts but a size which is
    not accidental-for beauty lies in size and
    arrangement

38
Aristotles View of Beauty
  • Beauty is a real property of things (Metaphysics
    1072b32-35). Aristotle writes
  • Those who suppose, as the Pythagoreans and
    Speusippus do, that supreme beauty and goodness
    are not present in the beginning, because the
    beginnings both of plants and of animals are
    causes, but beauty and completeness are in the
    effects of these, are wrong in their opinion.
    For the seed comes from other individuals which
    are prior and complete, and the first thing is
    not seed but the complete being, e.g., we must
    say that before the seed there is a man,-not the
    man produced from the seed, but another from whom
    the seed is produced.

39
Aristotles View of Beauty
  • Moreover, in Parts of Animals, 645a23-25,
    Aristotle relates beauty to design
  • Absence of haphazard and conduciveness of
    everything to an end are to be found in natures
    works in the highest degree, and the end for
    which those work are put together and produced is
    a form of the beautiful.
  • So, while Aristotles view of beauty may be
    vague, it is clear that he believed beauty to be
    objective beauty is derived from the nature of
    the beautiful object it is related to size and
    proportion it is related to design.

40
Final Thoughts on Aristotles Aesthetics
  • While Aristotle doesnt provide offer a robust
    account of philosophical aesthetics whereby he
    deals with the problems of defending aesthetic
    judgments, we are able to conclude the following
  • Aesthetics involves objective reality it is
    cognitively perceived and can be imitated.
  • Aesthetics is pedagogically valuable and serious.
  • Beauty is a real property He is an empiricist
    who believed all knowledge begins in the senses.

41
Final Thoughts on Aristotles Aesthetics
  • Aesthetics involves aesthetic experiences he
    doesnt deny its impact on people. In fact, we
    take pleasure in imitation because it is a
    special case of learning. In fact, the unity of
    plot, etc. may be seen as an aesthetic predicate.
  • Mimesis or imitation involves a special kind of
    representation it is a matter of representing
    an object. It can be the art of imitating visual
    appearances by means of color and drawing or the
    art of imitating human actions by means of dance
    and song.

42
Final Thoughts on Aristotles Aesthetics
  • Mimesis in poetry, in order to have its impact,
    must involve a real understanding of human
    nature for without this knowledge you cant have
    a very good play (Beardsley, 63). Therefore,
    psychological laws must be true one for dramatic
    development
  • Aristotle is a structural and textual critic
    because he analyzes aspects of structure, chiefly
    concerned with plot. If catharsis is seen as a
    structural concept rather than a psychological
    one, then this description of Aristotle is
    appropriate. One can also say he is textual
    critic because he is concerned with analysis at
    the verbal level Rhetoric.

43
Final Thoughts on Aristotles Aesthetics
  • Beardsley makes two comments that are most
    interesting to consider. First
  • What Plato feared most as a bad example for
    Athenian youth was the suggestion that good men
    are unhappy and that bad men prosper.
    Aristotles reply might be understood in this
    way there is no need to have a moral censorship
    of plays, but only an aesthetic one. For the
    play about the good man who becomes unhappy or
    the bad man who becomes happy will simply not be
    a very good tragedy other things being equal,
    morality and justice will coincide with aesthetic
    excellence (Aesthetics, pg. 67).

44
Final Thoughts on Aristotles Aesthetics
  • And secondly, Monroe Beardsley observes
  • When Aristotle inquires into the nature of
    somethingHe asks what is the nature of the
    poetic art? And the answer is both normative and
    descriptive. For it involves a set of categories
    that play a fundament role in all of his
    thinking the four causes, or four types of
    explanation (see Physics II, vii). These are not
    mentioned in the Poetics itself, but it is
    interesting that in the Metaphysics (V ? , ii)
    when he distinguishes the four causes, his
    example of the material cause is the bronze of
    the statue the formal cause is the pattern,
    or formula of the essence the efficient cause
    is the productive agent (e.g., the sculptor and
    his activity) the final cause is the end,
    i.e., that for the sake of which a thing is
    (trans. Ross) (pp. 55-56).

45
Final Thoughts on Aristotles Aesthetics
Four causes for the statue of Athena
2 intrinsic causes Material
Cause Bronze out of which it was
made. Formal Cause Pattern, form,
essence of which it was made.
2 External causes Efficient Cause
Artist by which it was made Final Cause
The purpose that for which it was made.
46
Postscript
  • A.E. Taylor makes an interesting claim about the
    Poetics
  • Poetics was meant to be a collection of rules
    by obeying which the craftsman might make sure of
    turning out a successful play. So far as
    Aristotle has a Philosophy of Fine Art at all, it
    forms part of his more general theory of
    education and must be looked for in the general
    discussion of the aims of education in his
    Politics. Aristotle, 20-21.

47
Bibliography
  • Aristotle, The Complete Works of Aristotle, rev.
    Oxford Translation, edited by Jonathan Barnes, 2
    Vols. (Princeton Princeton University Press,
    1984).
  • Monroe Beardsley, Aesthetics From Classical
    Greek to the Present A Short History
    (Tuscaloosa The University of Alabama Press,
    1966).
  • A Companion to Aesthetics (Malden, M.A.
    Blackwell, 1992, 1995).
  • Routledge Companion to Aesthetics, edited by
    Berys Gaut and Dominic McIver Lopes (London
    Routledge, 2001).
  • A.E. Taylor, Aristotle, 3rd edition (Toronto,
    Ontario General Publishing 1955).
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com