Thigh Pain After Total Hip Arthroplasty - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 24
About This Presentation
Title:

Thigh Pain After Total Hip Arthroplasty

Description:

Sepein Chiang, D.O. Garden City Hospital Introduction Disabling hip pain is the primary indication for total hip arthroplasty THA is very successful Occasionally ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:346
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 25
Provided by: sharingdo
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Thigh Pain After Total Hip Arthroplasty


1
Thigh Pain After Total Hip Arthroplasty
  • Sepein Chiang, D.O.
  • Garden City Hospital

2
Introduction
  • Disabling hip pain is the primary indication for
    total hip arthroplasty
  • THA is very successful
  • Occasionally, there is persistent hip/thigh pain
    despite well-fixed and well-positioned components

3
Introduction
  • Pain or point tenderness of the thigh at the
    distal tip of the femoral prosthesis
  • Severity ranges from start-up pain to
    debilitating pain that limits ambulation
  • Most are not limited in their activity and take
    NO pain medications

4
Introduction
  • Usually spontaneously resolves within the first 1
    to 2 years postoperatively
  • Persistent pain often responds to activity
    modification, NSAIDs or analgesics

5
Introduction
  • For some, significant cause for dissatisfaction
  • Severe pain has been reported in 1.4 to 4 of
    THAs
  • Severe pain that does not respond to conservative
    measures may require revision surgery

6
Causes
  • Rule out loose stem, infection, stress fracture
    and spinal/neurologic problems
  • History physical exam
  • Radiographs
  • Bone scans
  • Lab tests- CBC, ESR, CRP, joint aspiration

7
Causes prosthesis factors
  • Mismatch in modulus of elasticity
  • Cobalt chrome vs titanium
  • Stem size
  • Cemented vs cementless
  • Proximal vs extensive porous coating
  • Bony vs fibrous ingrowth
  • Length of follow-up

8
Bony Ingrowth
  • No radiopaque lines
  • No subsidence
  • Mild cortical hypertrophy
  • Mild proximal stress shielding

9
Probable Stable Fibrous Ingrowth
  • Parallel radiopaque lines up to 1 mm without
    progressive migration

10
Unstable Cementless Stem
  • Divergent radiopaque lines
  • Progressive subsidence or migration
  • Bony pedestal

11
Causes technique factors
  • Poor stem sizing with instability and
    micromotion, and radiographic bony pedestal and
    progressive bead shedding
  • Stem malposition with stress transfer

12
Causes patient factors
  • Age
  • Sex
  • Activity level
  • Bone quality

13
Type of Stem Fixation
  • Barrack and Paprosky, The Journal of
    Arthroplasty, August 2000
  • Age, sex, activity level, length of follow-up,
    stem size, bone type (Dorr index) and type of
    femoral stem fixation
  • 2 surgeons at 2 university hospitals
  • 320 patients, 2 4 years post-op (mean 3 years)

14
Barrack and Paprosky
  • Matched pair analysis between proximally coated
    (Replica, DePuy) and fully coated stems (Prodigy,
    DePuy)
  • Matched pair analysis between cemented stems
    (Endurance, DePuy) and fully coated stems

15
Barrack and Paprosky
  • Type of fixation was the only parameter that
    correlated to thigh pain
  • Overall pain in 42 proximally coated, 19 fully
    coated and 16 cemented
  • Matched prox vs fully coated 4220
  • Matched fully coated vs cemented 1816
  • No difference in severity

16
Type of Stem Fixation
  • Engh, JBJS 1997
  • 26 incidence of thigh pain in the proximally
    coated AML
  • 17 with the extensively coated AML

17
Cemented vs Noncemented
  • DLima, Oishi, Petersilge, Colwell and Walker
    CORR 1998
  • 200 consecutive primary THAs
  • Thigh pain in 3 cemented, 40 noncemented
  • In 25 matched pairs, thigh pain in 2 (8)
    cemented, 8 (32) noncemented

18
Bony vs Fibrous Ingrowth
  • Engh, et al
  • British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint
    Surgery, January 1987
  • 307 patients at 2 years follow-up
  • No correlation between thigh pain and age, sex or
    disease process
  • Thigh pain in 11 good bone, 26 poor bone quality

19
Engh, et al
  • 3X lower incidence of thigh pain with bony vs
    fibrous ingrowth
  • Bony ingrowth in 93 of press fit vs 69 with no
    press fit
  • Thigh pain in 9 press fit vs 23 with no press
    fit

20
Stem Instability
  • Campbell, Rorabeck, Bourne, Nott
  • 110 patients, 2 year follow-up
  • PCA (porous coated anatomic, Howmedica)
  • Thigh pain correlated with subsidence greater
    than 2 mm, distal periosteal reaction and
    progressive bead shedding
  • Suggests stem instability with distal stress
    transfer

21
Treatment
  • Activity modification
  • Non-weightbearing 6 weeks
  • NSAIDs
  • Analgesics
  • Cortical strut grafting
  • Revision surgery

22
Cortical Strut Grafting
  • Domb, Hostin, Mont Hungerford
  • Cortical strut grafting of the lateral femur
    without revision of the femoral component
  • Struts spanned the distal tip 3 inches proximally
    and distally

23
Cortical Strut Grafting
  • 6 of 7 gained relief with 5 excellent and 1 good
    HSS score
  • Increases the rigidity of the host bone to
    decrease the modulus mismatch of the prosthesis
    and host bone
  • Denervation of the bone
  • Originally described by Hedley and Firestone in
    11 of 12 patients

24
Conclusions
  • Thigh pain following THAs can range from mild
    start-up pain to debilitating pain requiring
    revision surgery
  • Severe thigh pain is relatively uncommon, 1.4 to
    4
  • Instability, micromotion and modulus mismatch
    most common causes
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com