ISO 22000:2005....What Transition Can it Make in your Food Production Facility? - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 33
About This Presentation
Title:

ISO 22000:2005....What Transition Can it Make in your Food Production Facility?

Description:

ISO 22000:2005....WHAT TRANSITION CAN IT MAKE IN YOUR FOOD PRODUCTION FACILITY? AN EXPERIENCE IN BRIEF. 6th Dubai International Food Safety Conference – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:299
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 34
Provided by: free79
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: ISO 22000:2005....What Transition Can it Make in your Food Production Facility?


1
  • ISO 220002005....What Transition Can it Make in
    your Food Production Facility?
  • An Experience In Brief.

2
  • Presented by
  • Huda Musa El Sayed
  • Wheata Ind. Co. Ltd.
  • ( (Araak Group
  • Sudan

3
Food Industry in Sudan
  • Food industry in Sudan has remarkably flourished
    and diversified in the past decade.
  • Up until 2010 the food manufacturing industry
    sector constitutes 55 of the manufacturing
    industry in Sudan.

4
Regulatory and Statutory BodiesFood Safety
Responsibility
  • The following authorities are responsible
  • SSMO (Sudanese Standards and Metrology Org.).
  • Ministry of Health.

5
Food Safety Awareness
  • 1st International Food Safety Conference in Sudan
    took place on March 2010 held by SSMO with
    collaboration of FAO.

6
Food Industry Food Safety Responsibility and
Efforts
  • HACCP system implemented by many food production
    companies (HACCP recommended but not mandatory).
  • One company has an ISO 220002005 certified
    (FSMS), implementation started in a no. of
    companies.
  • Food safety forums held by the food industry.

7
Importance of an Integrated Food Chain Approach
to Control Food Safety Hazards
  • Food safety failures in both developed and
    developing countries have intensified interest
    everywhere in systematic prevention at every link
    in the food supply chain.
  • Food safety is a joint responsibility of all the
    actors in the food chain and requires their
    combined efforts.


Weak links Minimize food safety
Strong links enhance food safety
8
ISO 220002005 Standard
  • Food safety management systems Requirements for
    any organization in the food chain.
  • Harmonizes the requirements for systematically
    managing safety in food supply chains and offers
    a unique solution for good practice on a
    worldwide basis.
  • A meaningful system backed by international
    consensus.
  • Has the potential to turn the difficult task of
    meeting multiple or even contradictory
    requirements from various different safety and
    quality guidelines into one system.
  • Shares common management principles with ISO
    9001.

9
ISO 220002005 Specifies the Following Key
Elements to Ensure Food Safety



10
Wheat Milling Factory- At a Glance
  • Established at 2001.
  • Milling capacity 1750 metric tons of wheat per
    day.
  • Plays a dynamic role in the achievement of food
    security in Sudan.
  • ISO220002005 certified FSMS.

11
Benefits of Implementing ISO 220002005
  • Benefits can vary depending on the org., its
    type, its situation and management system in
    place before adopting the ISO 220002005 standard
    requirements.

12
Perceptible Benefits
  • Meeting and complementing statutory and
    regulatory requirements.

13
Benefits of Implementing the ISO
220002005Perceptible Benefits Well
established communication channels
  • Organized and targeted communication concerning
    food safety with
  • Internally with employees that have an impact on
    food safety.
  • Externally with
  • - Regulatory and statutory bodies.
  • Suppliers of raw materials .
  • Service providers.
  • Inspection companies.
  • Customers.

14
A Scientific Drive for Food Safety
  • Incessant exploitation of sound scientific
    principles.
  • Food safety hazards identified and controlled
    according to scientific basis.
  • Linking all food production aspects in a
    comprehensive scientific way.
  • Utilization of guidelines and standards published
    by the Codex and other international standards.
  • Ability to identify the food safety risks
    associated with our activity, to foresee them and
    to effectively contain any emergency that may
    occur.

15
Dynamic Control of Food Safety Hazards.
  • All food safety hazards of relevancy to the
    process and the product are carefully IDENTIFIED
    and consequently
  • CONTROLLED.

16
Team work
  • Efficient relationship based on openness all
    working towards the same goal
  • FOOD SAFETY

17
In House Training
  • A structured program for training of food
    handlers.
  • Personnel hygiene practices (principles) became
    habits for all employees and workers that have an
    impact on food safety.

18
Documents illustratingWhat? How ? When? and Who?
  • For know how and to guarantee the sustain-ability
    of food safety procedures and consequently the
    FSMS.
  • To monitor and measure effectiveness of the FSMS.

19
Specificity
  • All the work and plans are organized under
    specific internationally used scientific titles
    and terminology.

20
Wheat Products Contaminants Analysis
  • Although not verified in wheat products before
    implementing the ISO 220002005 standard
    mycotoxins (DON, Ochratoxin A) heavy metals (lead
    and cadmium) and pesticide residues which are
    potential contaminants were always not detected
    at low detection levels.
  • Microorganisms (Bacillus cereus and Clostridium
    perfingens) levels were far below the levels
    permitted by local regulations.

21
Customer Complaints
  • No complaints regarding food safety of wheat
    products were received after implementing the ISO
    220002005.

22
Food Safety a Culture in the Organization
  • Food safety became an ultimate goal.
  • Employees conscientious about food safety.
  • Deeper knowledge of all the production process
    (from A to Z).
  • Better exchange of knowledge between staff .
  • At the employees level more awareness to
    regulatory and statutory requirements.
  • Understanding of food safety responsibilities.

23
Perceptible Benefits
  • Reading back on the importance of different
    technologies.
  • Improved over all performance.
  • Better planning.
  • Control focused on what is necessary and
    conserving resources.
  • Enhancement of the traceability systems.

24
Self Confidence and Contentment
  • Confident about wheat products safety.
  • Feeling that the right thing is done.
  • Credibility of the companys image.

25
Opportunities for Improvement.Continues
  • Inputs for improving the adequacy of the food
    safety management system are but not only
  • Verification and auditing.
  • Validation.
  • Management review.
  • Communication.

26
Infrastructure and Technology A Fundamental
Support
  • The infrastructure allowed the production in
    satisfactory sanitary conditions.
  • Sites, buildings, product flows and the factory
    layout are logically arranged.
  • Technology installed was satisfactory to produce
    safe food.

27
Top management commitmentAn Essential Support
  • Top management must wholeheartedly understand the
    food safety concept.
  • Top management has a major role in the
    successful implementation through its commitment
    to provide necessary resources.

28
Obstacles Faced During Start of Implementation
  • Lack of knowledge about food safety
  • Food safety not distinguished from other quality
    aspects.
  • Preliminary knowledge of HACCP system and also
    unfamiliarity.

29
Benefit for You as a Supplier
  • Your customer want to have confidence that your
    organization is well run, that you are managing
    the food safety hazards associated with your
    products and that you are taking onboard any
    regulatory requirements.
  • ISO 220002005 can provide the confidence your
    customers need in order to do business with you
    because you identify and control food safety
    hazards in the right way.

30
ISO Standards can be Used in Line with IS0
220002005 Standard
  • ISO/TS 220042005, Food safety management systems
    Guidance on the application of ISO 220002005.
  • ISO 220052007, Traceability in the feed and food
    chain General principles and guidance for
    system design and development.

31
  • Food Safety a Non negotiable Human Right Remains
    the Responsibility of all the Operators Along the
    Food Chain
  • Are You Doing Your Part?

32
  • Your Commitment to Food Safety is a
  • Moral Commitment

33
Thanks for Listening
Wheata Ind. Co. Ltd.(Araak Group), Sudan.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com