Family Violence - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 25
About This Presentation
Title:

Family Violence

Description:

Family Violence Article by: Patrick Tolan, Debrorah Gorman-Smith, and David Henry Presented by: Megan Bartoszewski Degree to which the term family violence ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:720
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 26
Provided by: MeganBart
Category:
Tags: family | violence

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Family Violence


1
Family Violence
  • Article by Patrick Tolan, Debrorah
    Gorman-Smith, and David Henry
  • Presented by Megan Bartoszewski

2
Purpose and Take-Home Message
  • Review of Family Violence (FV) Literature
  • Current knowledge related to controversies in FV
  • Integrative steps to advance knowledge of FV
  • Appreciation of FV as a complex problem
  • Challenging set of scientific and practical
    issues
  • Need to be managed to reduce public health threat
  • Integration of research across forms of FV
  • Approach theory and practice through an
    ecological perspective
  • What is meant by an ecological perspective?

3
Problems with current approach to FV research and
policy
  • Focus on separate forms vs. an overall
    understanding of violence in families
  • Preoccupation with controversies
  • Conceptualization
  • Definition
  • Measurement
  • Negative Implications Segregated understanding
    and policy direction for types of FV
  • Impedes advancement of scientific study
    ?integration of knowledge and policy about FV
  • Studies are not able to address alternative
    explanations
  • Advocacy efforts are oversimplified or ignore
    other forms of FV or complex issues in affecting
    change in violence rates
  • Example provided by article

4
Why should we focus on FV?
  • Family Violence is the most prevalent form of
    violence in the US.
  • 7 of you said TRUE
  • In younger populations, violence between
    acquaintances or strangers is more common than
    Family Violence.
  • 6 of you said FALSE
  • In older populations, violence between
    acquaintances or strangers is more common than
    Family Violence.
  • 5 of you said FALSE

5
Why should we focus on FV?
  • Most prevalent form of violence in the US
  • Consequences of FV
  • Physical injuries and deaths
  • Psychological impact
  • Detrimental functioning/Decreased productivity
    major health and social problem
  • Great costs to health care, criminal justice
  • Presupposes a relationship between those
    involved.
  • Presents a paradox
  • Harm by those who are supposed to Care
  • Antithetical to value of the family
  • Relationships exist prior to, during, and after
    violent incidents or periods
  • Violence among family members has a legal meaning
    that is different from other forms of violence

6
Valuable, but what is FV?
  • Controversy about defining FV and its forms
  • Behaviors included in the definition of FV
    contribute to differences in
  • Rates
  • Meanings
  • Implications drawn
  • Disputed Elements
  • Political ramifications of terminology
  • The value of studying violence apart
    from presumption of effects or
    implications
  • The extent to which violent acts are seen as part
    of a broader set of problematic behaviors and
    relationship characteristics
  • Presented Challenge
  • Attempt to forge conceptual consensus about how
    to define forms of FV
  • Simultaneously trying to relate these areas of
    study

7
Controversies in Defining FV
  • Central Controversy
  • Should FV be synonymous with abuse or substantial
    mistreatment of family members?
  • Should the definition encompass all acts of
    violence, or only serious or ongoing patterns of
    violence?
  • Controversy 2
  • What if FV is equated to abuse, including
    nonviolent abuse.
  • Pro This type of abuse is more relevant in
    forming policy.
  • Con Serious violence only makes up a small
    portion of the measure of
  • violence.
  • Controversy 3
  • How to incorporate gender inequities and
    dependency differences related to power within
    family relationships.
  • Suggested Relationship perspective
  • Controversy 4
  • Extent to which common or socially sanctioned
    violent behavior in family relationships should
    be considered problematic.
  • Inconsistent results regarding negative effects
    of corporal punishment
  • Possible undercutting of credibility of findings

8
So again, What is FV??
  • Currently Some reviews attempt to signify why
    one view should prevail and/or suggest
    operational definitions that promote one
    connotation
  • Suggested Relating these components and views
    in order to understand the ecology of family
    violence
  • Leaning towards
  • Considering threatening verbal behavior and
    intimidation
  • Violence in family relationships may have
    different meanings because of dependency among
    family members
  • Multiple influences on family violence
    individual, relationship, context

9
Prevalence-Domestic Violence
  • Community and representative samples report
    higher rates of violent domestic or partner acts
    for men versus women.
  • 6 of you said TRUE
  • Women initiate violent acts against their partner
    at higher rates than do men.
  • 7 of you said FALSE 
  • Negative effects on individuals are greater when
    they are only the victim (and not also the
    perpetrator) of violent acts in their
    relationship with their partner.
  • 4 of you said FALSE 
  • Within young couples, males have shown higher
    aggression than females.
  • 6 of you said TRUE
  • Within older couples, males have shown higher
    aggression than females.
  • 6 of you said TRUE

10
Prevalence of Domestic Violence
  • Gender Differences
  • National Family Violence Survey and assault
    results
  • Young couples (14-22) higher aggression in
    females
  • Older couples (23-49) higher aggression in men
    (Archer 2002)
  • Directionality of Violence Between Partners
  • Violence between partners is often BIDIRECTIONAL
  • Arrest Practices
  • Question Why are men arrested at a higher rate?
  • Actual seriousness
  • Differential relation of behavior to
  • reporting violence to police
  • Police reaction depending
  • on the gender of the victim
  • Example
  • Results reported for 2003-Still true today?
  • Up to Date Information

11
Prevalence-Child Abuse
  • Children under the age of 3 suffer the highest
    rates of child abuse.
  • 7 of you said FALSE
  • Unmarried partners of parents are responsible for
    a larger proportion of child deaths due to child
    abuse or neglect than are the childrens own
    parents.
  • 5 of you said FALSE 

12
Child Abuse What is it?
  • Child abuse or maltreatment constitutes all
    forms of physical and/or emotional ill-treatment,
    sexual abuse, or neglect or negligent treatment
    or commercial or other exploitation, resulting in
    actual or potential harm to the childs health,
    survival, development or dignity in the context
    of a relationship of responsibility, trust or
    power (World Health Organization 2002).
  • Problems with definition or obtaining rates?

13
Child Abuse Prevalence
  • National Clearinghouse on Child Abuse and Neglect
    Information (2004)
  • 906,000 children victims of abuse or neglect 12.4
    per 1000
  • Children under the age of 3 had the highest rates
    of victimization
  • Girls slightly more than boys
  • Differed by ethnic group
  • 1500 Children died as the result of abuse or
    neglect
  • 80 parents,
  • 6 other relatives
  • 4 unmarried partners of parents
  • 79 were younger than 4 years
  • Community surveys suggest much higher rates of
    all forms of child abuse and maltreatment

14
Prevalence-Elder Abuse
  • The most common characteristics of a victim of
    elder abuse includes being between the ages of
    70 and 80, being female, and being African
    American.
  • 5 of you said TRUE

15
Elder Abuse Prevalence
  • Intro to Elder Abuse
  • Abuse divided into categories
  • Physical abuse
  • Psychological or emotional abuse
  • Financial or material abuse
  • Sexual abuse
  • Neglect
  • Findings
  • 4-6 of the population WHO 2002
  • Characteristics of Victims of Elder Abuse
  • Over 80 years of age
  • Females
  • 80 white

16
Risk Factors of Family Violence A Focus on
Poverty as a Stressor
  • Those living in poverty display
    disproportionately higher rates of Domestic
    Violence.
  • 4 of you said TRUE
  •  Domestic Violence increases the likelihood of
    violence toward children.
  • 7 of you said TRUE
  • A parent with low self-esteem and/or mental
    health problems is more likely to commit acts of
    Child Abuse.
  • 6 of you said TRUE
  • Physical Child Abuse is related to marital status
    and parental education.
  • 4 of you said TRUE
  • Those who commit Elder Abuse tend to show a
    history of aggression or violence, current
    substance abuse, or have a mental illness.
  • 6 of you said TRUE
  • The characteristics of children who suffer from
    Child Abuse include being male, being a younger
    versus older child, and having medical
    complications or disabilities.
  • 4 of you said FALSE

17
Poverty as a Risk Factor
  • Discussed in DV and CB sections
  • Introduced in DV
  • Occurs across all socioeconomic levels
  • BUT those living in poverty are
    disproportionately affectedWhy?
  • Suggestions
  • Greater stress
  • Hopelessness
  • Financial constraints
  • Reiterated in CB
  • Interpret poverty effects as reflecting STRESS
    and RESOURCE ISSUES
  • Example-Factors treated as a mediators or
    moderators of poverty CB relationship?

18
Mediators of Poverty and CA
  • A1Crime level A2Concentrated Poverty
  • B1Family Factors B2interactions with
    individual and neighborhood factors
  • CRisk of Child Abuse
  • A1?C and A2?C
  • A1?B1 and B2 A2?B1 and B2
  • A1B1B2?C A2B1B2?C
  • B1 and B2 all the sig/predict child abuse
  • A1 and A2 no longer significant/do not predict
    child abuse

19
Poverty as a Risk Factor
  • Similar to Social Selection or Social Causation?
  • May reflect limited resources and support
  • Children of the Recession
  • Recession and Dating Violence
  • Family Violence Prevention Fund
  • Liz Claiborne Inc. Study of the Relationship
    between Recession and Dating Violence

20
Poverty and StressRisk Factors of Elder Abuse
  • Elder Abuse
  • Not the dependence of the elder on the caregiver
    that matter
  • But rather is the dependence of the caregiver on
    the elder financially
  • Stress and Elder Abuse Example

21
Promising Interventions
  • The presence of one form of family violence is a
    risk factor for the presence of another form.
  • 7 of you said TRUE
  • Most interventions of Family Violence consider
    multiple forms of the phenomenon.
  • 6 of you said TRUE
  • Many interventions take into consideration that
    perpetrators of Family Violence were often
    victims once themselves.
  • 6 of you said TRUE
  • Dating Violence is often a precursor to Family
    Violence.
  • 6 of you said TRUE

22
Interventions-DV
  • Shelters for Victims
  • Mandatory Prosecution of Perpetrators
  • Treatment of Perpetrators
  • Reducing Dating Violence
  • The Youth Relationship Project
  • The Safe Dates Program

23
Interventions-CA
  • Court-mandated treatment for offender
  • Parenting Practices and Family Interventions
  • Potential positive effects on mediators of of
    child abuse
  • Home Visitation for At-Risk Mothers
  • Critical Aspects of Effective Child Abuse
    Interventions
  • Proactive programs
  • Home visitation
  • Multi-component
  • Reactive Programs
  • Parent-training interventions
  • Multi-component

24
Interventions-EA
  • Ways to Reduce Elder Abuse
  • Reduce stress
  • Providing respite to the caregiver
  • Reduce depression
  • Economic hardship

25
Conclusion
  • Recap
  • Forms of FV share many risk
  • factors/effective interventions
  • Relation of policy advocacy to
  • research has been limited
  • Personal responsibility vs.
  • Multiple determinates
  • Broader consideration Assist families with
    one type of violence to help affect and even
    prevent another form
  • Ecological Model as challenging but a (better?)
    alternative to the research and policies of FV
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com