Title: Essays are graded on a NINE point scale, just like AP essays
1Essays are graded on a NINE point scale, just
like AP essays
- 9 100
- 8 97
- 7 93
- 6 86
- 5 80
- 4 77
- 3 72
- 2 70
- 1 65
- NS below 60
- Right now, if you are in the 5/6 range, I think
you are okay and can learn what you need to
learn to succeed in the class and on the AP exam.
2Issues that need to be fixed
- Proper nouns need capital letters English,
America - A lot is TWO words.
- There and their are NOT interchangeable.
- s and s are not interchangeable
- Themself is not a word
- SentEnce, not sentAnce
- Spell the authors name correctly, and punctuate
appropriately - Learn where to divide words at the end of a line,
or better yet, if you dont have room, go to the
next line. - Refer to Elements of Style for more rules you
should know. This book is a REFERENCE book.
3More issues Refer to Elements of Style if you
are confused
- Parallel structure errors (Ex. Immigrants who
come to America are looking for a better life,
sanctuary, or simply because they have nowhere
else to go.) - Sentence fragments/run-ons
- Subject/verb agreement errors
- Pronoun/antecedent agreement errors (Ex. If an
immigrant lives here long enough, they need to
learn English.)
4Other things that will help you
- Dont be wordy. (Ex. due to the fact that,
utilize, etc.) - Handwriting really does matter, even though its
not supposed to . - Details are important.
- Summary is unnecessary.
- Spelling matters.
- Watch the immature expressions (Ex. beat her
over the head with, all up in his face) and
cliches (beat around the bush)
5Rogerian Argument
- Dont hate on your audience.
6Rogerian Argument
- Rogerian is one of THREE models of argument.
(The others are Classical and Toulmin, we will
cover them later) - Ideas come from Carl Rogers, a psychologist. Your
reading packet is written by him.
7A few quotes
- Real communication occurs when we listen with
understanding Carl Rogers - The first duty of a wise advocate is to convince
his opponents that he understands their
arguments, and sympathizes with their just
feelings. Samuel Taylor Coleridge (English
Romantic Poet) - You can catch more flies with honey than you can
with vinegar -??
8You dont pick fights with your audience!
- The Rogerian model acknowledges the
audiences point of - view or opinions before presenting the
authors different or - opposing viewpoint .
- A Rogerian argument supports the central
argument with tact - without outright attacking the audiences
preconceived notions. - But seriously, the CONCEPTS are more important
than the LABELS. Dont get overwhelmed. - THIS IS NOT THE ONE AND ONLY RIGHT WAY TO WRITE
PERSUASIVELY!!!!!!!!! There are many right ways
to write! - Sometimes it works well and is appropriate,
sometimes its not. As a writer, you have to make
the call.
9Argument v. Persuasion
- Definitions tend to be academic
- Some say argument is purely logical, and
persuasion contains emotional appeals. - ARGUMENT discover a truth or conviction
- PERSUASION seeks to change a point of view or
ACT on a conviction
10Rogerian Argument
- Seeks to establish trust and find COMMON GROUND.
- Assume that audience /or opposition is made up
of REASONABLE people. This is, unfortunately, not
always true. Therefore, Rogerian argument is not
always the best approach. - Seeks to UNDERSTAND the point of view of those
with whom they disagree - To start a DIALOGUE or DISCOURSE
- BOTH/AND instead of EITHER/OR
- WIN/WIN instead of WIN/LOSE
11Courtroom Example When you would NOT use
Rogerian techniques
Prosecution and defense argue with EACH OTHER -
but the AUDIENCE is really the Judge and jury.
In this case, there is no need to be nice or
concede ANY points to the opposition. Your goal
is to WIN!!
12Same thing with DEBATES
The OPPONENT is not the AUDIENCE, so you
might not see many Rogerian techniques when you
watch debates! The goal is to WIN or Dominate!
13Aristotelian (Classical) argument
- Seeks to REFUTE the opposition because they are
WRONG! - Audience/opponent is WRONG, and must be
disproved or overwhelmed by evidence. - Again, dont worry about labels. Know concepts.
14Things that happen in a Rogerian Argument
- Speaker/writer shows (sympathetic) understanding
to the opposition. - Speaker/writer demonstrates that those who
disagree with them are still reasonable,
intelligent people of good will (not fools and
idiots). - Speaker/writer is non-confrontational, even
friendly (not my way or the highway).
15Probably the most useful (but difficult) with
controversial issues
- Brainstorm some controversial issues
- Death penalty
- Gay marriage
- Abortion
- Gun control
- The difficulty is that when people become
polarized about issues, they dont like to admit
that the other side may have some good points.
16To Review
- State the problem or issue.
- Give the opposing position. Grant some validity
to parts of it. Recognize circumstances where it
could be acceptable. - State YOUR position, support it, and tell why the
opposition will be IMPROVED by embracing your
views. Why will the world be a better place for
this?
17How to use Rogerian Argument
- While I am NOT a fan of rigidly structured
essays, here is an example of what a Rogerian
argument might look like - Intro
- Summary of Opposing Views
- Statement of Understanding
- Statement of Your position
- Statement of Contexts
- Statement of Benefits
- Important parts/pose a solution here is where
you concede something to the opposing side and
acknowledge that others who think differently
from you are also intelligent, reasonable people.