Title: The relative contributions of radiative forcing and internal climate variability to the late 20th Century drying of the Mediterranean region
1The relative contributions of radiative forcing
and internal climate variability to the late 20th
Century drying of the Mediterranean region
Colin Kelley, Mingfang Ting, Richard Seager,
Yochanan Kushnir Department of Ocean and Climate
Physics Columbia University, New York NY
2Strong drying of the Mediterranean region
occurred from the 1960s to the 1990s (extended
winter Nov-Apr)
3NAO
During the same period the NAO trended strongly
positive
4(No Transcript)
5The NAO and Mediterranean drying are highly
correlated (0.7 over the century), with the NAO
explaining nearly half of the extended winter
precipitation variance.
6Questions
- Did external radiative forcing in the form of
global warming play an important role in the
strong positive NAO trend, as suggested by
Shindell et al. (1999), Feldstein (2002) and
Osborn (2004), and by extension the drying of the
Mediterranean region? - Or were the strong trends predominantly a result
of low frequency natural variability on decadal
to interdecadal timescales (Schneider et al.
2003 Thompson 2003)? - How well can the models produce multidecadal
trends of realistic magnitude? - Can we through use of S/N maximization EOF use
the models to obtain a best estimate of the
model-derived signal and use it to attribute and
quantify the externally forced portion of the NAO
and Mediterranean drying trends? - How does this attribution project onto the 21st
century?
7Mechanisms of Mediterranean drying
- The mechanisms that influence Mediterranean
rainfall variability include both dynamical and
thermodynamical processes. - The region is located in the subtropical dry
zone, characterized by the poleward flank of the
Hadley Cell and moisture divergence by the mean
flow. - The primary mechanisms whereby anthropogenic
warming could cause drying include - 1) increases in specific humidity leading to
intensified water vapor transports that, in
regions of existing mean flow moisture
divergence, such as the subtropics in general and
the Mediterranean in particular (Held and Soden
2006 Seager et al. 2007, 2010) will cause
further drying, - 2) the poleward expansion of the Hadley Cell
(Lu et al. 2007) and - 3) the northward migration of the northern
hemisphere storm track (Yin 2005 Lu et al. 2007,
Wu et al. 2010). - The dominant influence on Mediterranean rainfall
variability however, particularly during winter
when the vast majority of precipitation occurs,
is the NAO (Hurrell et al. 2003).
8(No Transcript)
9(No Transcript)
10From Feldstein 2002
Observed NAO trend 1965-95 1.56 hPa
Observed trend in AO Index 1967-97 5.7
Using 64 runs from 19 coupled models, we show
that the observed NAO trend from 1965-95 is
within the span of model simulated NAO trends,
but that models trends of similar magnitude to
the strong observed trend are rare.
Using a Markov model, Feldstein shows that an
atmospheric model decoupled from the
hydrosphere/cryosphere is almost incapable of
producing trends of magnitude similar to the
observed trend from 1967-97
11Osborn 2004
- Using seven coupled climate models Osborn
concludes that - the NAO increase from the 1960s to the 1990s is
not compatible with either the internally
generated variability nor the response to
increasing greenhouse gas forcing simulated by
these models. - The model simulations imply greenhouse gas
forcing contributed to the observed NAO index
increase from the 1960s to the 1990s, unless the
climate models are deficient in their simulation
of inter-decadal NAO variability or their
simulation of the response to greenhouse gas
forcing. - It is possible, therefore, that the observed
record can be explained as a combination of
internally generated variability and a small
greenhouse-gas-induced positive trend. - This is supported by the more recent (strong)
downturn in the NAO index after the mid-1990s,
which might be a reversal of an internally
generated variation.
12Comparison of observed and modeled low frequency
(decadal or longer) NAO variability, using six
commonly used coupled models at left and all 19
models at right.
13Methodology
- We use signal-to-noise maximization EOF on an
ensemble of runs from 19 models to obtain a best
estimate of the externally forced signal (for NA
SLP and Mediterranean precipitation) that the
models have in common. - After we calculate the forced signal (PC1 of S/N
EOF) we regress the original data fields of SLP
and precipitation onto it for the entire 20th
century, obtaining spatial patterns of the forced
regression coefficients (a). - We obtain the magnitude of the externally forced
SLP or precipitation at each gridpoint and time
(x,y,t) (reconstruct the field) by multiplying
the regression coefficients by the 20th century
signal (PC1), and then subtract the reconstructed
externally forced field from the total field to
get the residual. - a(x,y) is the regression coefficient
- SLP(x,y,t) is the total observed SLP
- SLP(x,y,t) is the externally forced SLP
- SLPresid(x,y,t) is the residual SLP
14(No Transcript)
15(No Transcript)
16(No Transcript)
17(No Transcript)
18(No Transcript)
19(No Transcript)
20(No Transcript)