The relative contributions of radiative forcing and internal climate variability to the late 20th Century drying of the Mediterranean region - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

The relative contributions of radiative forcing and internal climate variability to the late 20th Century drying of the Mediterranean region

Description:

Colin Kelley, Mingfang Ting, Richard Seager, Yochanan Kushnir Department of Ocean and Climate Physics Columbia University, New York NY Questions Did external ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:112
Avg rating:3.0/5.0

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: The relative contributions of radiative forcing and internal climate variability to the late 20th Century drying of the Mediterranean region


1
The relative contributions of radiative forcing
and internal climate variability to the late 20th
Century drying of the Mediterranean region
Colin Kelley, Mingfang Ting, Richard Seager,
Yochanan Kushnir Department of Ocean and Climate
Physics Columbia University, New York NY
2
Strong drying of the Mediterranean region
occurred from the 1960s to the 1990s (extended
winter Nov-Apr)
3
NAO
During the same period the NAO trended strongly
positive
4
(No Transcript)
5
The NAO and Mediterranean drying are highly
correlated (0.7 over the century), with the NAO
explaining nearly half of the extended winter
precipitation variance.
6
Questions
  • Did external radiative forcing in the form of
    global warming play an important role in the
    strong positive NAO trend, as suggested by
    Shindell et al. (1999), Feldstein (2002) and
    Osborn (2004), and by extension the drying of the
    Mediterranean region?
  • Or were the strong trends predominantly a result
    of low frequency natural variability on decadal
    to interdecadal timescales (Schneider et al.
    2003 Thompson 2003)?
  • How well can the models produce multidecadal
    trends of realistic magnitude?
  • Can we through use of S/N maximization EOF use
    the models to obtain a best estimate of the
    model-derived signal and use it to attribute and
    quantify the externally forced portion of the NAO
    and Mediterranean drying trends?
  • How does this attribution project onto the 21st
    century?

7
Mechanisms of Mediterranean drying
  • The mechanisms that influence Mediterranean
    rainfall variability include both dynamical and
    thermodynamical processes.
  • The region is located in the subtropical dry
    zone, characterized by the poleward flank of the
    Hadley Cell and moisture divergence by the mean
    flow.
  • The primary mechanisms whereby anthropogenic
    warming could cause drying include
  • 1) increases in specific humidity leading to
    intensified water vapor transports that, in
    regions of existing mean flow moisture
    divergence, such as the subtropics in general and
    the Mediterranean in particular (Held and Soden
    2006 Seager et al. 2007, 2010) will cause
    further drying,
  • 2) the poleward expansion of the Hadley Cell
    (Lu et al. 2007) and
  • 3) the northward migration of the northern
    hemisphere storm track (Yin 2005 Lu et al. 2007,
    Wu et al. 2010).
  • The dominant influence on Mediterranean rainfall
    variability however, particularly during winter
    when the vast majority of precipitation occurs,
    is the NAO (Hurrell et al. 2003).

8
(No Transcript)
9
(No Transcript)
10
From Feldstein 2002
Observed NAO trend 1965-95 1.56 hPa
Observed trend in AO Index 1967-97 5.7
Using 64 runs from 19 coupled models, we show
that the observed NAO trend from 1965-95 is
within the span of model simulated NAO trends,
but that models trends of similar magnitude to
the strong observed trend are rare.
Using a Markov model, Feldstein shows that an
atmospheric model decoupled from the
hydrosphere/cryosphere is almost incapable of
producing trends of magnitude similar to the
observed trend from 1967-97
11
Osborn 2004
  • Using seven coupled climate models Osborn
    concludes that
  • the NAO increase from the 1960s to the 1990s is
    not compatible with either the internally
    generated variability nor the response to
    increasing greenhouse gas forcing simulated by
    these models.
  • The model simulations imply greenhouse gas
    forcing contributed to the observed NAO index
    increase from the 1960s to the 1990s, unless the
    climate models are deficient in their simulation
    of inter-decadal NAO variability or their
    simulation of the response to greenhouse gas
    forcing.
  • It is possible, therefore, that the observed
    record can be explained as a combination of
    internally generated variability and a small
    greenhouse-gas-induced positive trend.
  • This is supported by the more recent (strong)
    downturn in the NAO index after the mid-1990s,
    which might be a reversal of an internally
    generated variation.

12
Comparison of observed and modeled low frequency
(decadal or longer) NAO variability, using six
commonly used coupled models at left and all 19
models at right.
13
Methodology
  • We use signal-to-noise maximization EOF on an
    ensemble of runs from 19 models to obtain a best
    estimate of the externally forced signal (for NA
    SLP and Mediterranean precipitation) that the
    models have in common.
  • After we calculate the forced signal (PC1 of S/N
    EOF) we regress the original data fields of SLP
    and precipitation onto it for the entire 20th
    century, obtaining spatial patterns of the forced
    regression coefficients (a).
  • We obtain the magnitude of the externally forced
    SLP or precipitation at each gridpoint and time
    (x,y,t) (reconstruct the field) by multiplying
    the regression coefficients by the 20th century
    signal (PC1), and then subtract the reconstructed
    externally forced field from the total field to
    get the residual.
  • a(x,y) is the regression coefficient
  • SLP(x,y,t) is the total observed SLP
  • SLP(x,y,t) is the externally forced SLP
  • SLPresid(x,y,t) is the residual SLP

14
(No Transcript)
15
(No Transcript)
16
(No Transcript)
17
(No Transcript)
18
(No Transcript)
19
(No Transcript)
20
(No Transcript)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com