How To Build a Successful Mentoring Program Using the The Elements of Effective Practice TM Mentor/National Mentoring Partnership, 2005 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 28
About This Presentation
Title:

How To Build a Successful Mentoring Program Using the The Elements of Effective Practice TM Mentor/National Mentoring Partnership, 2005

Description:

How To Build a Successful Mentoring Program Using the The Elements of Effective Practice TM Mentor/National Mentoring Partnership, 2005 Irma Orozco, APR – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:1598
Avg rating:3.0/5.0

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: How To Build a Successful Mentoring Program Using the The Elements of Effective Practice TM Mentor/National Mentoring Partnership, 2005


1
How To Build a Successful Mentoring ProgramUsing
the The Elements of Effective Practice
TMMentor/National Mentoring Partnership, 2005
  • Irma Orozco, APR
  • CPS Energy Mentoring Matters Program Coordinator
  • Oct. 22, 2009
  • San Antonio, Texas

2
Mentoring
  • Mentoring is a structured and trusting
    relationship that brings young people together
    with caring individuals who offer guidance,
    support and encouragement aimed at developing the
    competence and character of the mentee.
  • Source The Elements of Effective PracticeTM

3
Mentoring Research
  • Better School Attendance
  • Better Chance of Going on to Higher Education
  • Better Attitude toward School
  • Less Drug and Alcohol Use
  • Improved Social Attitudes and Relationships
  • More Trusting Relationship and Better
    Communication with Parents
  • Source Mentoring A Promising Strategy for Youth
    Development (Child Trends, 2002)

4
Mentoring Needs Assessment
  • Local Government
  • United Way
  • Communities In Schools
  • Big Brothers Big Sisters
  • U.S. Census Bureau Local Statistics
  • Environmental Scanning

5
EEP Design Parameter 1Mentee Selection
  • Mentoring Need
  • Age (8 -18)
  • Gender
  • Common Characteristics (Disabled, At-risk, Income
    Level, Particular Faith)

6
EEP Design Parameter 2Mentor Recruitment
7
EEP Design Parameter 3 Type of Mentoring Program
  • 1 to 1 Mentoring
  • Group Mentoring (1 to 4 ratio)
  • Team Mentoring (1 to 4 ratio)
  • Peer Mentoring
  • E-Mentoring

8
EEP Design Parameter 4Mentoring Program Structure
  • Stand-alone Program?
  • Part of an Existing Organization?
  • Factors
  • Start-Up Cost
  • Duplication of Services
  • Legal Liability
  • Infrastructure (Personnel, Financial and
    Technology Systems)
  • Funding

9
EEP Design Parameter 5Nature of Mentoring
Relationship
  • Character, Social Leadership Development
  • School-to-Career
  • Career Exploration
  • Job/Life Skills
  • Postsecondary Education/Internships
  • Academic Success

10
EEP Design Parameter 6Stakeholder Outcomes
  • Mentees (School Retention Better Grades
    Enhanced Social Skills Heightened Career
    Awareness Higher Graduation Rates and College
    Entrance)
  • Mentors (Job Satisfaction, Leadership and People
    Skills, Civic Pride)
  • Sponsoring Organizations (Assistance with
    Mission)
  • Businesses (Recognition, Corporate Citizenship
    Ranking)

11
EEP Design Parameter 7 Mentoring Time
  • During School
  • After School
  • During Mentors Work Hours
  • Any Time (Monday Sunday)

12
EEP Design Parameter 8Mentor/Mentee Relationship
  • Quality Factors
  • Frequency
  • Duration
  • Close Relationships
  • EEP Standard
  • (4 Hours a Month for a Year)

13
EEP Design Parameter 9Mentoring Program Locations
  • Faith Based
  • School Based
  • Workplace Based
  •  Juvenile Corrections Facility
  • Community Based
  • Agency Based
  • Online

14
EEP Design Parameter 10Stakeholders and Promotion
  • Stakeholders
  • Advisory Group
  • Management Team
  • Mentors
  • Mentees
  • Partners (Agencies, Schools, Businesses, Chambers
    of Commerce)
  • Parents/Caregivers
  • (Media)
  • (General Public)
  • Marketing Plan (Quarterly or Yearly)

15
EEP Design Parameter 11Evaluation
  • Process Evaluation
  • Mentor/Mentee Relationship Quality
  • Outcome Evaluation
  • Stakeholders
  • Mentees
  • Mentors
  • School
  • Sponsoring Agency
  • Metrics
  • Format
  • Data Management
  • Program Refinement

16
EEP Design Parameter 12Case Management Protocol
  • Regular Contact
  • Avoid Conflict
  • Improve Relationships
  • Accomplish Goals

17
Other Program Considerations
  • Program Management
  • Written Policies and Procedures
  • Staff Training Development
  • Financial Plan (Budget, Risk Management, Internal
    Controls, Funding)
  • Timeline

18
(No Transcript)
19
Bexar County San Antonio Needs Assessment
  • 40 Dropout Rate
  • 158,000 At-Risk Students
  • 20 Poverty Rate
  • 88th in Educational Attainment of 100 Cities

20
Top Ten Critical Community Issues
  • Business Growth
  • Economic Development
  • Education Literacy
  • Environmental Issues
  • Children Youth
  • Job Training
  • Job Creation
  • Healthcare
  • Elder Care
  • Unemployment/Low Wages Income
  • Source The Neighbor of Choice Report, 2005

21
Mission (Why Your Program Exists)
  • The CPS Energy Connecting The Dots Job
    Shadowing Program connects at-risk high school
    students with professional employees to explore
    career opportunities, widen the students
    horizons and encourage high school graduation and
    higher education.

22
CTD Program EEP Parameters
  • 38 At-Risk Students (14-18)
  • 41 Employee Mentors
  • 1 to 1 Mentoring
  • Partnership (CIS-SA)
  • Career Focus
  • Outcomes (Heightened Career Awareness, College
    Readiness, High School Graduation, College
    Enrollment)
  • Lunch Time
  • 4-Year Commitment, 2½ hours per month
  • Office and School Based
  • Stakeholders (Mentees, Mentors, CIS-SA, Schools,
    CPS Energy)

23
2009-10 CTD Student Goal (Broad-based Statements
That Follow Your Mission)
  • To assist 10 Kennedy freshmen, 10 South San
    High School sophomores and 18 Edison High School
    sophomores, juniors and seniors in getting
    focused about future careers and pursuing higher
    education.

24
CTD Student Objectives (Specific Targets to
Achieve a Goal)
  • By May 2010, mentees will have improved college
    or higher education readiness knowledge and
    skills.
  • By May 2010, 9th through 11th grade mentees will
    have chosen or updated their careers and will
    have developed two documents for their college
    portfolio.
  • By May 2010, 12th grade students will have
    applied for higher education institutions and
    financial aid.

25
CTD Process Evaluation
  • CIS-SA Bi-weekly Mentee Monitoring (2007 -
    Present)
  • CPS Energy Mentor Feedback Session (2007 -
    Present)
  • CPS Energy Monthly Mentor Monitoring (2009-10)
  • Meeting Frequency
  • Content
  • Quality of Relationship
  • Support Training Needed
  • Follow Up
  • Participant Feedback (Interviews with CIS Case
    Managers, Business Liaison, School
    Administrators) (2009 -2010)

26
Monitored Student Indicators
  • School Enrollment
  • Promotion
  • Grades
  • TAKS Tests
  • Attendance

27
CTD Outcome Evaluation
  • Online Pre and Post Tests (2007 - Present)
  • Students (Heightened Career Awareness College
    Readiness)
  • Mentor (Improved Job Satisfaction)
  • CIS Board and Staff Schools (Enhanced CPS
    Energy Corporate Citizenship Ranking)

28
  • Questions?
  • Contact
  • Irma Orozco
  • 353-2490
  • iorozco_at_cpsenergy.com
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com