Development of Models for Emergency Preparedness: Personal Protective Equipment, Decontamination, Isolation/Quarantine, and Laboratory Capacity - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Development of Models for Emergency Preparedness: Personal Protective Equipment, Decontamination, Isolation/Quarantine, and Laboratory Capacity

Description:

Development of Models for Emergency Preparedness: Personal Protective Equipment, Decontamination, Isolation/Quarantine, and Laboratory Capacity – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:179
Avg rating:3.0/5.0

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Development of Models for Emergency Preparedness: Personal Protective Equipment, Decontamination, Isolation/Quarantine, and Laboratory Capacity


1
Development of Models for Emergency
PreparednessPersonal Protective Equipment,
Decontamination, Isolation/Quarantine, and
Laboratory Capacity
  • Bettina M. Stopford R.N.
  • Director
  • Public Health and Medical Emergency Preparedness
  • Homeland Security Support Operations
  • Science Applications International Corporation
  • McLean, VA

2
Project Overview Goals
  • AHRQ Bioterrorism Initiative
  • To examine current evidence-based best practices
    and present them in an operationally pertinent
    format for the end user.
  • Review research and obtain key stakeholder input
    4 topic areas
  • To assess, identify, measure, and prepare
    guidelines and models for evidence-based,
    best-demonstrated practices
  • Identify research gaps, shortfalls and future
    needs
  • Identify health care-focused enhancements to the
    existing automated exercise and assessment
    program scenarios, (AEAS).

3
Methodology
  • Open-source literature research
  • Government/industry regulation reviews
  • Subject matter expert interviews
  • Stakeholder review of draft document and models
  • Stakeholder conference

4
Stakeholders
  • Broad spectrum of Federal, State, local,
    academic, civilian, military, regulatory,
    operations, and clinical subject matter experts
  • JCAHO, OSHA, NIOSH, DHS ODP, HHS, CDC, SBCCOM,
    ATSDR, ENA, ACEP, AHA, ANA, APIC, ABSA, ASHE,
    ASTM, IACP, IAFC, IAEMT, DoD, APHL, NDMS, ASHRM,
    HRSA, USAMRIID, Risk Management, Law,
    Universities, public health, medical, nursing,
    bioethics, laboratory and hazardous materials
    professionals, among others

5
Goals of Model Development
  • Create operational planning user tool
  • Evidence-based, best-demonstrated practices
  • Results
  • Four sets of guidelines/models developed
  • One electronic, interactive model for review

6
Guideline Questions for Model
  • Adaptability Is the best practice suitable for
    use in any region?
  • Throughput How many victims of a WMD attack
    will the best practice aid?
  • Cost How much will it cost regions to implement
    the best practice?
  • Operational Impact What are the operational
    considerations of implementing best practice?
  • Training What level of training does this best
    practice require?

7
Guideline Questions for Model
  • Resources Does the practice build on existing
    practices/infrastructure? Are there available
    resources to implement the practices?
  • Morbidity and Mortality What impact will this
    practice have on saving lives?
  • Evidence-based Practice vs. Theory Is there a
    body of professional research supporting this
    practice or is it theoretical?
  • Regulatory Compliance Does the practice comply
    with existing regulations or does it require a
    regulatory change?

8
Personal Protective Equipment (PPE)
  • Distinguish between a contaminated patient event
    vs. an infectious patient event
  • PPE choice for an infectious patient/agent is
    determined by infection control guidelines
  • PPE choice for a contaminated patient is guided
    by new OSHA standards
  • PPE should be selected based on the results of a
    community-based hazards vulnerability analysis
    (HVA) that should reveal credible threats, as
    well a role (such as EMS vs. facility based)

9
Isolation/Quarantine
  • Best practices model for plan development
    includes the following components
  • Hazards Vulnerability Analysis
  • Review of existing community action plans
  • Gap analysis
  • Establish isolation barriers
  • Designated isolation/quarantine facilities

10
Isolation/QuarantineBest practices model for
plan development includes the following
components
  • Ease in fiscal restraints
  • Technology use
  • Legal and regulatory authority
  • Surge capacity
  • Mobile medical units
  • Training and education
  • Active, early surveillance
  • Reporting incentives
  • Increased Epi capacity
  • Rapid ID, isolation, notification

11
Laboratory Capacity
  • Laboratories will play a critical role in the
    response to any BT event
  • Ensuring a practiced, streamlined system is
    paramount to achieve maximum laboratory surge
    capacity
  • Timeliness, accuracy and security of lab
    diagnostics will have a direct impact on
    containment, mitigation and clinical treatment
  • Laboratory surge capacity issues must be
    addressed at local, State and national levels
  • Three elements of containment determine BioSafety
    (BSL) level
  • Laboratory practices and techniques, safety
    equipment, and facility design

12
Decontamination
  • A spiral development approach is required to
    build a community or regions capacity
  • Decontamination should be fully integrated into
    Planning Organization Equipment Training and
    Exercises (POETE)
  • Decontamination best practices were quantified in
    an interactive emergency planning

13
RESEARCH
PRACTICE
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com